First of, apologies if this was posted elsewhere (I couldn't find it)
![[Image: g39b4j49nek01.jpg]](https://s17.postimg.org/f81mq35ov/g39b4j49nek01.jpg)
http://thefederalist.com/2018/03/08/the-...-bad-sign/
Thoughts and Comments?
http://thefederalist.com/2018/03/08/the-...-bad-sign/
Thoughts and Comments?
The Triumph of the beta male
Over what? They look like their test levels are too low to get excited over beating a video game.
Hidey-ho, RVFerinos!
Look at their faces.
![[Image: WGTkqNq.jpg]](https://i.imgur.com/WGTkqNq.jpg)
Look at their eyes.
![[Image: giphy.gif]](https://media0.giphy.com/media/xT9DPAUdcUYlrCGdVe/giphy.gif)
They are not alright.
We know it.
They know it, but they are lying to themselves.
What Triumph?
What are their accomplishments?
Crushing debt? A mortgage for a house their 'girlfriends' can take away from them with the power of the state? Useless degrees? Where is the science? Where is the art?
Where is the soul?
Eating foods they did not grow? Philosofastering over wine and cucumber sandwiches because they understand that they are not possible to do anything else? Do they have children? Do they even want them? What? Two dogs under 10 pounds?
This is no triumph.
This is the tragedy of Soy.
The tragedy of eunuchs who are called 'men'.
Look at their eyes.
They are not alright.
We know it.
They know it, but they are lying to themselves.
What Triumph?
What are their accomplishments?
Crushing debt? A mortgage for a house their 'girlfriends' can take away from them with the power of the state? Useless degrees? Where is the science? Where is the art?
Where is the soul?
Eating foods they did not grow? Philosofastering over wine and cucumber sandwiches because they understand that they are not possible to do anything else? Do they have children? Do they even want them? What? Two dogs under 10 pounds?
This is no triumph.
This is the tragedy of Soy.
The tragedy of eunuchs who are called 'men'.
Romans 8:31 - 'What shall we then say to these things? If God be for us, who can be against us?'
My notes.
Mike Cernovich Compilation 2015 | 2016
The Gold from Bold
The Last men have come.
Friedrich Nietzsche:
Thus Spoke Zarathustra
Quote:Quote:
When Zarathustra had spoken these words, he again looked at the people, and was silent. And to his heart he said:
There they stand; there they laugh: they do not understand me; I am not the mouth for these ears.
Must one first batter their ears, that they may learn to hear with their eyes? Must one clatter like kettledrums and penitential preachers? Or do they only believe the stammerer?
They have something of which they are proud. What do they call it, that which makes them proud? Culture, they call it; it distinguishes them from the goatherds.
They dislike, therefore, to hear of “contempt” of themselves. So I will appeal to their pride.
I will speak to them of the most contemptible thing: that, however, is the Last Man!"
And thus spoke Zarathustra to the people:
It is time for man to fix his goal. It is time for man to plant the seed of his highest hope.
His soil is still rich enough for it. But that soil will one day be poor and exhausted, and no lofty tree will any longer be able to grow there.
Alas! there comes the time when man will no longer launch the arrow of his longing beyond man -- and the string of his bow will have unlearned to whiz!
I tell you: one must still have chaos in oneself, to give birth to a dancing star. I tell you: you have still chaos in yourselves.
Alas! There comes the time when man will no longer give birth to any star. Alas! There comes the time of the most despicable man, who can no longer despise himself.
Lo! I show you the Last Man.
"What is love? What is creation? What is longing? What is a star?" -- so asks the Last Man, and blinks.
The earth has become small, and on it hops the Last Man, who makes everything small. His species is ineradicable as the flea; the Last Man lives longest.
"We have discovered happiness" -- say the Last Men, and they blink.
They have left the regions where it is hard to live; for they need warmth. One still loves one's neighbor and rubs against him; for one needs warmth.
Turning ill and being distrustful, they consider sinful: they walk warily. He is a fool who still stumbles over stones or men!
A little poison now and then: that makes for pleasant dreams. And much poison at the end for a pleasant death.
One still works, for work is a pastime. But one is careful lest the pastime should hurt one.
One no longer becomes poor or rich; both are too burdensome. Who still wants to rule? Who still wants to obey? Both are too burdensome.
No shepherd, and one herd! Everyone wants the same; everyone is the same: he who feels differently goes voluntarily into the madhouse.
"Formerly all the world was insane," -- say the subtlest of them, and they blink.
They are clever and know all that has happened: so there is no end to their derision. People still quarrel, but are soon reconciled -- otherwise it upsets their stomachs.
They have their little pleasures for the day, and their little pleasures for the night, but they have a regard for health.
"We have discovered happiness," -- say the Last Men, and they blink.
And here ended the first discourse of Zarathustra, which is also called "The Prologue," for at this point the shouting and mirth of the multitude interrupted him. "Give us this Last Man, O Zarathustra," -- they called out -- "make us into these Last Men! Then will we make you a gift of the Overman!" And all the people exulted and smacked their lips. Zarathustra, however, turned sad, and said to his heart:
They do not understand me: I am not the mouth for these ears.
Perhaps I have lived too long in the mountains; I have hearkened too much to the brooks and trees: now I speak to them as to the goatherds.
My soul is calm and clear, like the mountains in the morning. But they think I am cold, and a mocker with terrible jests.
Now they look at me and laugh: and while they laugh they hate me too. There is ice in their laughter.
Friedrich Nietzsche:
Thus Spoke Zarathustra
(1) You are being deceived.
(2) If you are seeing it, the ad is for you.
(3) The Federalist is just as big a part of the problem as The Hollywood Reporter, because it takes a fucking TV show with less than one million viewers -- that is, less than 0.5% of the US population at best -- and implies that the show has its finger on the pulse of US society and this is how people in the real world behave. In a word, it accepts the fantasy reality the show puts out as truth. And doing so, convinces people that shit is as the Reporter portrays it, and makes it worse.
This is what we call the Streisand Effect, and it is apparent the big Fed has been so beaten to the punch on male issues by Tucker Carlson that it's reduced to seeking your hate in order to get you as readers.
Make no mistake: the Big Fed wants the Western status quo to continue as much as any of the staff writers on the Hollywood Reporter.
Go back to the Fed article, bad as it is to sell pageviews to these fuckwits. Is there a single piece of factual information that you did not know before? Did anyone not know that men kill themselves more than women, are imprisoned more than women? Anyone? Did any of you not already see the four youtube videos she linked to? What was the purpose of them telling you these things?
While you're thinking that one over, here's something more significant: the article has been written by someone with a cunt. This, too, is reinforcement of the status quo. You're meant to see the fact a woman wrote it and silently rage at the fact if a man wrote it the article couldn't be taken seriously. The fact a woman wrote it is meant to make you grind your frustration and hate harder: "even women themselves see how unjust feminism is!"
And that has a purpose: to make you do nothing. By engaging with the frustration and rage, you reinforce the idiot stereotype that most of the gender war has been pushing, including #MeToo: that men are not much worthy of their women.
She sneers that the soyboys on the cover aren't true feminists. Surely the better point would be to challenge feminism's precepts, not yell at a bunch of actors in an ad that they don't sufficiently follow feminism? Does the Federalist have so little a reach and so limited a journalistic budget it can't do substantial investigations on the societal imbalances against men?
(The answers to all of these questions are yes. And the Federalist's demographic wouldn't actually give much of a shit if they did a long article on, say, post-combat trauma, or male homelessness.)
Understand the distinction, I am not saying that if the four clonetroopers on the front of the Reporter were real people that they could deadlift their own bodyweight and thereby be able to pull women. I am saying that you are getting mad at a fucking advertisement from a publication that explicitly advertises fantasy.
I am saying, in short, that you are buying into the default position the System wants, which is this:
A man is not enough in himself. He must be worthy of a woman, be approved by a woman, to be a fully-formed man.
That is, he must possess the brand of Attractive To Women™. If a man accepts this definition of a man, he hands his identity over to a woman, and he truly is lost, because no woman can ever tell a man what his identity should be.
Again, understand the distinction: if game is about anything, it's about allowing you to hook women when you want, its very status as a game is a powerful way to keep its mastery from being integral to your concept of manhood, any more than your mastery of chess determines whether you are a man or not.
The woman is just about flicking her clit over an essay that Winston Churchill wrote in 1925 about how all the great men are gone. Again, it's part of the branding, part of the despair they want you in so you'll keep buying the Federalist and not changing anything about yourself or your world: shit was much, much better in the past. Be like Winston Churchill and women will fuck you, that last third of the article whispers. What, so, betray Poland to Russia, send thousands of Australians and New Zealanders to their deaths in failed assaults on the Dardanelles, make deals with Stalin, uphold the British Navy as founded on rum, sodomy, and the lash? Sure. Why not. Because pretending to be someone you're not is a healthy thing and not part of the epidemic of narcissism in the West.
You are in the middle of a classic good cop, bad cop con, with the Fed the former and the Reporter the latter. While you keep reading them, you accept the program, you let the Matrix tell you who you are, and worse still, you let the Matrix tell you how to want.
(2) If you are seeing it, the ad is for you.
(3) The Federalist is just as big a part of the problem as The Hollywood Reporter, because it takes a fucking TV show with less than one million viewers -- that is, less than 0.5% of the US population at best -- and implies that the show has its finger on the pulse of US society and this is how people in the real world behave. In a word, it accepts the fantasy reality the show puts out as truth. And doing so, convinces people that shit is as the Reporter portrays it, and makes it worse.
This is what we call the Streisand Effect, and it is apparent the big Fed has been so beaten to the punch on male issues by Tucker Carlson that it's reduced to seeking your hate in order to get you as readers.
Make no mistake: the Big Fed wants the Western status quo to continue as much as any of the staff writers on the Hollywood Reporter.
Go back to the Fed article, bad as it is to sell pageviews to these fuckwits. Is there a single piece of factual information that you did not know before? Did anyone not know that men kill themselves more than women, are imprisoned more than women? Anyone? Did any of you not already see the four youtube videos she linked to? What was the purpose of them telling you these things?
While you're thinking that one over, here's something more significant: the article has been written by someone with a cunt. This, too, is reinforcement of the status quo. You're meant to see the fact a woman wrote it and silently rage at the fact if a man wrote it the article couldn't be taken seriously. The fact a woman wrote it is meant to make you grind your frustration and hate harder: "even women themselves see how unjust feminism is!"
And that has a purpose: to make you do nothing. By engaging with the frustration and rage, you reinforce the idiot stereotype that most of the gender war has been pushing, including #MeToo: that men are not much worthy of their women.
She sneers that the soyboys on the cover aren't true feminists. Surely the better point would be to challenge feminism's precepts, not yell at a bunch of actors in an ad that they don't sufficiently follow feminism? Does the Federalist have so little a reach and so limited a journalistic budget it can't do substantial investigations on the societal imbalances against men?
(The answers to all of these questions are yes. And the Federalist's demographic wouldn't actually give much of a shit if they did a long article on, say, post-combat trauma, or male homelessness.)
Understand the distinction, I am not saying that if the four clonetroopers on the front of the Reporter were real people that they could deadlift their own bodyweight and thereby be able to pull women. I am saying that you are getting mad at a fucking advertisement from a publication that explicitly advertises fantasy.
I am saying, in short, that you are buying into the default position the System wants, which is this:
A man is not enough in himself. He must be worthy of a woman, be approved by a woman, to be a fully-formed man.
That is, he must possess the brand of Attractive To Women™. If a man accepts this definition of a man, he hands his identity over to a woman, and he truly is lost, because no woman can ever tell a man what his identity should be.
Again, understand the distinction: if game is about anything, it's about allowing you to hook women when you want, its very status as a game is a powerful way to keep its mastery from being integral to your concept of manhood, any more than your mastery of chess determines whether you are a man or not.
The woman is just about flicking her clit over an essay that Winston Churchill wrote in 1925 about how all the great men are gone. Again, it's part of the branding, part of the despair they want you in so you'll keep buying the Federalist and not changing anything about yourself or your world: shit was much, much better in the past. Be like Winston Churchill and women will fuck you, that last third of the article whispers. What, so, betray Poland to Russia, send thousands of Australians and New Zealanders to their deaths in failed assaults on the Dardanelles, make deals with Stalin, uphold the British Navy as founded on rum, sodomy, and the lash? Sure. Why not. Because pretending to be someone you're not is a healthy thing and not part of the epidemic of narcissism in the West.
You are in the middle of a classic good cop, bad cop con, with the Fed the former and the Reporter the latter. While you keep reading them, you accept the program, you let the Matrix tell you who you are, and worse still, you let the Matrix tell you how to want.
Remissas, discite, vivet.
God save us from people who mean well. -storm
You don't need to be a Beta to be a Silicon Self-made millionaire.
That does not increase your raw attractiveness towards women.
That does not increase your raw attractiveness towards women.
What...the...fuck... :
Guy may as well castrate himself now...
Quote:[url=https://twitter.com/Blacklabellogic/status/982386503174193152][/url]
Guy may as well castrate himself now...
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)