[Barron]

I began investigating how modern corporations, government agencies, NGO's and other individuals/organizations use the method of compartmentalization to achieve their desired results while minimizing the risk of accountability to themselves should things come to light. For example:
1. George Soros sends funding and operational directives to his Open Society foundation.
2. Open Society's heads then pass put that plan into action with financial backing to various NGO's and connections with heads of government departments.
3. The NGO's and government department heads then fund organizations on the ground such as ANTIFA, BLM, La Raza, etc., as well as media outlets to cover the planned operation
4. Those organizations then carry out whatever the operation is and the media captures & presents the event to support the current agenda.
5. By the time the operation is carried out, the only people facing potential prison time are the useful ANTIFA/BLM idiots and the funding/accountability for the planning of the operation is impossible to trace due to the compartment layering.


From Wikipedia on information security:

Quote:

In matters concerning information security, whether public or private sector, compartmentalization is the limiting of access to information to persons or other entities who need to know it in order to perform certain tasks.

The concept originated in the handling of classified information in military and intelligence applications, though it dates back to antiquity, and was used to successfully keep the secret of Greek fire.

The basis for compartmentalization is the idea that, if fewer people know the details of a mission or task, the risk or likelihood that such information will be compromised or fall into the hands of the opposition is decreased.

Quote:

An example of compartmentalization was the Manhattan Project. Personnel at Oak Ridge constructed and operated centrifuges to isolate Uranium-235 from naturally occurring uranium, but most did not know what, exactly, they were doing. Those that did know, did not know why they were doing it. Parts of the weapon were separately designed by teams who did not know how the parts interacted.

The bolded part above is of particular interest because now you have people working for you that don't know what it is that they're working on will be used for. A person could be building an electric switch but have no idea if it will be used to turn lights on or off in a home or to activate a bomb, etc. It's extremely effective for preventing information leaks and maintaining plausible deniability for those at the top when carrying out these types of operations.

However it doesn't come without it's flaws.

Due to the structure of security clearances and the trickling down of information from one compartment to another (stages), once orders progress past two or more stages, a point of no return is reached where an operation cannot be aborted without risk of exposing those at the top, this is not an option due to the fact that exposing one potentially exposes all.

For example, the Las Vegas shooting theory about how it was planned months ahead, assuming Hilary would win the election and then use it to pass anti-gun legislation, couldn't be aborted due to the fact that plans had already progressed past so many stages that doing so would expose the executors of the operation at the top. Best to let it play out and then make the most of the aftermath. Both scenarios had already been planned for (a Trump or Clinton presidency), obviously a Clinton presidency was the desired scenario under which the shooting would take place.

So how to combat compartmentalized operations?
One way is to expose an operation that hasn't had the opportunity to progress through so many stages and was carried out in a hurry, like the Seth Rich assassination.
The public is in possession of DNC emails by Podesta & Co. discussing the punishment of a leaker, Seth Rich's own words about how he's being followed and fearing for his life. His assassination was rushed and extremely clumsy due to how quickly the "robbery" narrative was proven wrong. I'd say this operation has only two or three compartmental layers max. And if any of the big players are ever going to go down (Podesta, Hilary, etc.), it will be because of info on this botched assassination coming to light once Trump removes a few more barriers protecting it.

[Troller]

Its the mafia MO. Which led to the creation of RICO

[PharaohRa]

It is also known by other names: plausible deniability and need to know

Its flaw is that once one piece becomes exposed, then the others will be exposed as well due to the Streisand Effect (what you try to hide/conceal forcefully will only make more people curious about it and dig deeper)

Might I add this is how corporations work: Different departments work on different tasks but only those at top know how the tasks tie together. Some bright ones on the lower rungs may understand the inner workings but they either are brought into the circle or they leave for greener pastures.

[Lunostrelki]

In the past, society considered hierarchy to be the natural way, as reflected by the divine right of kings, noblesse oblige, the mandate of heaven, and the like. Monarchy was essentially the patriarchal family writ large.

Modern oligarchy is more like an East Bloc orphanage. The elite we have today is an opaque clique whose existence is dissolved in Kafkaesque politicoeconomic institutions and fronted by various denominations of rootless universalism. People's traditional tribal groupings have been destroyed and now the basic social unit -- the family -- has been undermined by all but a few reactionaries. When everyone is equal and no one belongs to anyone else, they belong to the system. When people do not serve their elders and superiors, they serve the system. Individuals torn away from their roots are like crops harvested from their fields, to be stored in silos and liquefied as currency.

The administration of the system is equally liquid and transient, which is a defining trait of the great Marxist regimes. We may recall that in 1984 George Orwell said that if it was necessary, the Party could recruit a new generation of leaders from the proles. The inner oligarchy itself was constantly undergoing purges but this was the price of keeping the system intact.