[Repo]

(02-16-2018 05:52 PM)Roosh Wrote:  

He's cucking out...

This chart shows that roughly double the amount of white people are shot by the police than black people.

However, there are roughly 5 times more white people in the US than black people. Source

Therefore it actually shows that black people are getting shot by the police at a higher rate than white people. I am not sure how the highlighted statement is backed up based on this.

Anyway, as Atlanta Man said its just an edgy joke. I do however think that police should have the right to shoot any man who sings Cardi B in public, regardless of race. Maybe even allow a citizens arrest for this kind of thing. It is disturbing how many grown men are out in public rapping about their red bottoms.

[Roardog]

(02-20-2018 05:47 PM)Atlanta Man Wrote:  

Chris Rock's special was funny as hell, the last 45 minutes were hilarious. It is comedy fellas, do not take it personally. I listen to Owen Benjamin and laugh my ass off , I do not take it personally. If you don't think his jokes about divorce, Tinder, and Crips are funny then I wonder about your sense of humor. Listen to the whole thing, then judge.

Agreed. I thought his latest special was funny as hell. I was pissing myself the whole way through.
I thought it was much better than Bill Burr's latest special.

He definitely looks a lot older but then he is 53, he's not a young guy any more and I'm sure the divorce and things have taken their toll on him.

[Atlanta Man]

(02-20-2018 08:46 PM)Paracelsus Wrote:  

Chris Rock has always come across to me as Diet 1980s Eddie Murphy. You want red pill shoved up your ass with a chili suppository as the chaser, try Raw or Delirious. This is not to say that Eddie didn't get his own beatdown by the establishment, got cucked, and got forced to comply by a combination of shit managers and shit choices in women, but when he's still pulling tail like this in 2012--



--you have to admire the guy for that.

I wish Eddie would stop getting caught with Transsexuals.....

[Simeon_Strangelight]

(02-20-2018 09:22 PM)Repo Wrote:  

Therefore it actually shows that black people are getting shot by the police at a higher rate than white people. I am not sure how the highlighted statement is backed up based on this.

Anyway, as Atlanta Man said its just an edgy joke. I do however think that police should have the right to shoot any man who sings Cardi B in public, regardless of race. Maybe even allow a citizens arrest for this kind of thing. It is disturbing how many grown men are out in public rapping about their red bottoms.

Ay - but that assumes that there the percentage of white teenagers are doing as much crimes that can end with getting shot as black teens. And that is a far far stretch that is not backed by reality. Whites will be underrepresented just as North-Asians will be even more underrepresented in that crime statistic.

I could not defend Chris Rock - I just wish the old shows would be out there without too much politically divisive content.

I would defend Dave Chappelle however - he is still a favorite of mine even if he believes some of the leftist propaganda and went even against Donald Trump. Also it is correct that we don't even know if these are his real thoughts - a man has gotta pay the bills and going pro-Trump (or even neutral on Trump) would have cost him too much.

[AneroidOcean]

(02-20-2018 09:22 PM)Repo Wrote:  

Therefore it actually shows that black people are getting shot by the police at a higher rate than white people. I am not sure how the highlighted statement is backed up based on this.

Did you read the study or dig into it to see why they stated that, or did you just call it wrong based on looking at one graph added to that headline as an image?

It's likely you did the latter. That article is about a small sample study that involves putting mostly white officers in a simulator. If you want to read more about it, here's an additional breakdown as well as the actual text of the study. Here's a large sample study by a Harvard professor that's far more interesting/relevant (as it analyzes actual incidents) and the news article listing some of it's findings below:

Quote:

A study by a Harvard professor released this month found no evidence of racial bias in police shootings even though officers were more likely to interact physically with non-whites than whites.

The paper for the National Bureau of Economic Research, which examined thousands of incidents at 10 large police departments in California, Florida and Texas, concluded that police were no more likely to shoot non-whites than whites after factoring in extenuating circumstances.

“On the most extreme use of force — officer-involved shootings — we find no racial differences in either the raw data or when contextual factors are taken into account,” said Harvard economics professor Roland G. Fryer Jr. in the abstract of the July 2016 paper.

Mr. Fryer, who is black, told The New York Times that the finding of no racial discrimination in police shootings was “the most surprising result of my career.”

At the same time, the study found blacks and Hispanics were more than 50 percent more likely to experience physical interactions with police, including touching, pushing, handcuffing, drawing a weapon, and using a baton or pepper spray.

The 63-page study, “An Empirical Analysis of Racial Differences in Police Use of Force,” appears to support research conducted at Washington State University showing that officers in simulation tests were actually less likely to shoot at blacks than whites.

The paper also challenges the contention by the new wave of civil-rights groups such as Black Lives Matter that racist police are singling out blacks for shootings.

The findings are nothing if not timely, coming after protests spurred by two deadly incidents earlier this month involving black men shot and killed by police in Louisiana and Minnesota.

Their deaths, which are under review, spurred a sniper attack on police Thursday in Dallas during a Black Lives Matter march that left five officers dead and seven injured.

The 25-year-old gunman, Micah Xavier Johnson, told negotiators he wanted to take out white people, especially officers. He was killed after Dallas police detonated a remote-control robot in his vicinity after he refused for hours to exit a college building.

Mr. Fryer’s study found that police are 50 percent more likely to engage in physical interactions with blacks and Hispanics, including touching, pushing and drawing weapons.

“Adding controls that account for important context and civilian behavior reduces, but cannot fully explain, these disparities,” the paper said.

The study examined data collected in six Texas cities, three Florida counties and Los Angeles County, as well as New York City’s Stop, Question and Frisk program.

Mr. Fryer said that the “importance of our results for racial inequality is unclear.”

“It is plausible that racial differences in lower level uses of force are simply a distraction and movements such as Black Lives Matter should seek solutions within their own communities rather than changing the behaviors of police and other external forces,” he said in the study’s conclusion.

“Much more troubling, due to their frequency and potential impact on minority belief formation, is the possibility that racial differences in police use of nonlethal force have spillovers on myriad dimensions of racial inequality,” Mr. Fryer said.

[Repo]

(02-21-2018 03:13 PM)AneroidOcean Wrote:  

(02-20-2018 09:22 PM)Repo Wrote:  

Therefore it actually shows that black people are getting shot by the police at a higher rate than white people. I am not sure how the highlighted statement is backed up based on this.

Did you read the study or dig into it to see why they stated that, or did you just call it wrong based on looking at one graph added to that headline as an image?

It's likely you did the latter. That article is about a small sample study that involves putting mostly white officers in a simulator. If you want to read more about it, here's an additional breakdown as well as the actual text of the study. Here's a large sample study by a Harvard professor that's far more interesting/relevant (as it analyzes actual incidents) and the news article listing some of it's findings below:

Quote:

A study by a Harvard professor released this month found no evidence of racial bias in police shootings even though officers were more likely to interact physically with non-whites than whites.

The paper for the National Bureau of Economic Research, which examined thousands of incidents at 10 large police departments in California, Florida and Texas, concluded that police were no more likely to shoot non-whites than whites after factoring in extenuating circumstances.

“On the most extreme use of force — officer-involved shootings — we find no racial differences in either the raw data or when contextual factors are taken into account,” said Harvard economics professor Roland G. Fryer Jr. in the abstract of the July 2016 paper.

Mr. Fryer, who is black, told The New York Times that the finding of no racial discrimination in police shootings was “the most surprising result of my career.”

At the same time, the study found blacks and Hispanics were more than 50 percent more likely to experience physical interactions with police, including touching, pushing, handcuffing, drawing a weapon, and using a baton or pepper spray.

The 63-page study, “An Empirical Analysis of Racial Differences in Police Use of Force,” appears to support research conducted at Washington State University showing that officers in simulation tests were actually less likely to shoot at blacks than whites.

The paper also challenges the contention by the new wave of civil-rights groups such as Black Lives Matter that racist police are singling out blacks for shootings.

The findings are nothing if not timely, coming after protests spurred by two deadly incidents earlier this month involving black men shot and killed by police in Louisiana and Minnesota.

Their deaths, which are under review, spurred a sniper attack on police Thursday in Dallas during a Black Lives Matter march that left five officers dead and seven injured.

The 25-year-old gunman, Micah Xavier Johnson, told negotiators he wanted to take out white people, especially officers. He was killed after Dallas police detonated a remote-control robot in his vicinity after he refused for hours to exit a college building.

Mr. Fryer’s study found that police are 50 percent more likely to engage in physical interactions with blacks and Hispanics, including touching, pushing and drawing weapons.

“Adding controls that account for important context and civilian behavior reduces, but cannot fully explain, these disparities,” the paper said.

The study examined data collected in six Texas cities, three Florida counties and Los Angeles County, as well as New York City’s Stop, Question and Frisk program.

Mr. Fryer said that the “importance of our results for racial inequality is unclear.”

“It is plausible that racial differences in lower level uses of force are simply a distraction and movements such as Black Lives Matter should seek solutions within their own communities rather than changing the behaviors of police and other external forces,” he said in the study’s conclusion.

“Much more troubling, due to their frequency and potential impact on minority belief formation, is the possibility that racial differences in police use of nonlethal force have spillovers on myriad dimensions of racial inequality,” Mr. Fryer said.

Yes I read the image because that was what was posted. I have not yet read the second study you posted, but the qualifications and limiting factors identified in the first study explain why the highlighted statement is clickbait at best. But that is to be expected with modern "journalism".

[TooFineAPoint]

Watching the newest special right now.

I am the lily-whitest bourgeois right-wing guy, and I have always enjoyed Rock. I don't see the cop joke as anything more than a jester's attempt to bring levity to the undercurrent in modern America. It was funny, and it didn't come off as nefarious or malicious at all.

I might be biased because he was a great sense of joy as a scruffy film school student, doing burger runs at midnight and listening to his bits on Charlie Brown and withholding tax in the late 90s.

[Roardog]

(02-25-2018 01:38 AM)TooFineAPoint Wrote:  

Watching the newest special right now.

I am the lily-whitest bourgeois right-wing guy, and I have always enjoyed Rock. I don't see the cop joke as anything more than a jester's attempt to bring levity to the undercurrent in modern America. It was funny, and it didn't come off as nefarious or malicious at all.

I might be biased because he was a great sense of joy as a scruffy film school student, doing burger runs at midnight and listening to his bits on Charlie Brown and withholding tax in the late 90s.

Make sure you watch Dave Chapelle's specials as well, absolutely hilarious, especially his last one. Love his IDGAF attitude.

[Kish]

(02-26-2018 11:37 PM)Roardog Wrote:  

(02-25-2018 01:38 AM)TooFineAPoint Wrote:  

Watching the newest special right now.

I am the lily-whitest bourgeois right-wing guy, and I have always enjoyed Rock. I don't see the cop joke as anything more than a jester's attempt to bring levity to the undercurrent in modern America. It was funny, and it didn't come off as nefarious or malicious at all.

I might be biased because he was a great sense of joy as a scruffy film school student, doing burger runs at midnight and listening to his bits on Charlie Brown and withholding tax in the late 90s.

Make sure you watch Dave Chapelle's specials as well, absolutely hilarious, especially his last one. Love his IDGAF attitude.

IMHO Chris Rocks special on Netflix was better than Chappelle's. I liked both.

[SLSlayer]

Chappelle is a natural comedian.

Rock is scripted.

[Thot Leader]

Rock was my alltime favorite comedian, and I guess he still is, but I couldn't make it through his latest special. Uninspired, phoned-in, pandering to black and SJW audiences. He wasn't always like that. He used to deal with race and politics in an even-handed way, pointing out historical and structural racism while also calling out black people for their own poor decisions. Now it's just "white people are terrible, Trump is terrible, America sucks, it's basically impossible to get ahead if you're black", repackaged over and over into predictable jokes. I guess the divorce was hard on him and he needs to get paid. Pity.

[Simeon_Strangelight]

Someone noted that most comedy specials have become SJW lectures that berate you constantly and piss on the country that made them multi-millionaires. That is why men like Seinfeld have announced years ago that SJWs will kill comedy.