Dude, the coins mentioned in the OP are mostly PoS (Proof-of-Stake) or ICO coins.
This has nothing to do with printing money...
This has nothing to do with printing money...
Quote: (01-06-2018 09:10 AM)Genghis Khan Wrote:
Heck, I don't even mind conceding. Monero will become the de-facto currency of drug and human traffickers, mobsters, and whoever else wants to do illicit stuff.
Whooptifuckingdo. So what? How is that going to stop the decline of the West or whatever else you think is ailing the world.
Quote: (01-06-2018 09:24 AM)semibaron Wrote:
Dude, the coins mentioned in the OP are mostly PoS (Proof-of-Stake) or ICO coins.
This has nothing to do with printing money...
Quote:Quote:
So far, the best argument in favor of Monero I've seen is that it's used by drug dealers. If that's the best you got, long-term Monero won't end up as the next Facebook or Google.
Quote: (01-06-2018 11:47 AM)Samseau Wrote:
These centralized coins may use "proof of stake" but they can still create more coins on the dime whenever needed. There is zero reason to trust any centralized coin.
Quote: (01-07-2018 12:39 AM)SamuelBRoberts Wrote:
Quote: (01-06-2018 11:47 AM)Samseau Wrote:
These centralized coins may use "proof of stake" but they can still create more coins on the dime whenever needed. There is zero reason to trust any centralized coin.
Proof of Stake doesn't mean that someone can arbitrarily increase the number of coins.
This is just wrong.
Quote: (01-07-2018 09:44 AM)Samseau Wrote:
Quote: (01-07-2018 12:39 AM)SamuelBRoberts Wrote:
Quote: (01-06-2018 11:47 AM)Samseau Wrote:
These centralized coins may use "proof of stake" but they can still create more coins on the dime whenever needed. There is zero reason to trust any centralized coin.
Proof of Stake doesn't mean that someone can arbitrarily increase the number of coins.
This is just wrong.
Do you own their code? Is it open source? Then they can do whatever they want. You're wrong.
Quote: (01-07-2018 01:56 PM)SamuelBRoberts Wrote:
Quote: (01-07-2018 09:44 AM)Samseau Wrote:
Quote: (01-07-2018 12:39 AM)SamuelBRoberts Wrote:
Quote: (01-06-2018 11:47 AM)Samseau Wrote:
These centralized coins may use "proof of stake" but they can still create more coins on the dime whenever needed. There is zero reason to trust any centralized coin.
Proof of Stake doesn't mean that someone can arbitrarily increase the number of coins.
This is just wrong.
Do you own their code? Is it open source? Then they can do whatever they want. You're wrong.
Of course it's open source. All this stuff is open source.
Cardano Github: https://github.com/input-output-hk/cardano-crypto
NEM Github: https://github.com/NemProject
Please stop this.
Quote: (01-07-2018 11:34 AM)Adonis Wrote:
Samseau, what's your thoughts on Verge/XVG?
Quote: (01-09-2018 09:04 AM)Samseau Wrote:
Open source is only meaningful if the coin is minable because a coin's code cannot change unless all the miners implement it. With centralized mining, a small oligarchy of miners can decide to print coins and that's that.
Quote: (01-09-2018 05:16 PM)SamuelBRoberts Wrote:
Quote: (01-09-2018 09:04 AM)Samseau Wrote:
Open source is only meaningful if the coin is minable because a coin's code cannot change unless all the miners implement it. With centralized mining, a small oligarchy of miners can decide to print coins and that's that.
Non-mining coins don't have centralized miners... because they're non-mining.
That's what non-mining means. It means there are no miners.
Quote:[url=https://twitter.com/LachlanCraigie/status/948862891033153536][/url]
Quote: (01-09-2018 07:01 PM)pants Wrote:
You bring up one centralized non mineable coin, therefor all non-minable are centralized?