Based on the rationale behind the gay marriage movement, there is no reason why this marriage should remain illegal. Arguments about preventing birth defects via consanguinity are moot - there are two females involved and no chance off offspring.
I'm not advocating for this kind of marriage or incest of any persuasion, but there's no logical reason why this marriage should be annulled much less prosecuted with a criminal conviction and a ten year probation sentence. Add to the fact it involves two women and there's got to be some form of misogyny at work here - so where's the outcry from the LGBT crowd?
C'mon, libs - if we're going to go all the way to the bottom, then dammit, bring us to the bottom already!
Quote:Quote:
DUNCAN, Okla. (AP) — An Oklahoma woman who married her biological mother has pleaded guilty to incest. Court records show 26-year-old Misty Spann of Duncan pleaded guilty Tuesday in Stephens County District Court. Under the deal, she was sentenced to 10 years of probation.
Her mother, 44-year-old Patricia Spann, has pleaded not guilty to incest.
Prosecutors say the two married in 2016. Court records show the marriage was annulled last month at the request of Misty Spann on the grounds of fraud and illegality.
Patricia Spann has said she thought the marriage was legal because she had lost custody of her daughter and two sons years ago and isn't listed on their birth certificates.
Prosecutors say Patricia Spann also married one of her sons. That marriage was annulled in 2010.
I'm not advocating for this kind of marriage or incest of any persuasion, but there's no logical reason why this marriage should be annulled much less prosecuted with a criminal conviction and a ten year probation sentence. Add to the fact it involves two women and there's got to be some form of misogyny at work here - so where's the outcry from the LGBT crowd?
C'mon, libs - if we're going to go all the way to the bottom, then dammit, bring us to the bottom already!