I'm spamming the thread, but anyway. Here's an important thing to understand: just because it's STEM doesn't mean it's results-oriented and therefore a brutally fair place to work.
Google likes to pretend it's an innovative, results-oriented body. It isn't. It is a corporation, and a very large one at that. The moment that a corporation becomes large, the odds of it shifting its focus from results to process escalate to the point of nearly 100%. Beyond a certain point (a very low point, due to the existence of lawyers and the courts willing to entertain them) a corporation simply cannot be fully results-oriented and must become process-oriented, i.e. a bureaucracy. The only difference between your average government bureaucracy and your average corporate bureaucracy is that you can sell your stake in the corporation.
If you want an example of this, consider Apple under Steve Jobs and Apple under the man who stole it from him, John Sculley. Or indeed Apple since Steve Jobs died. Jobs was about as results-oriented as you can get. Didn't give much of a fuck about his employees so long as they produced insanely great products, or at least insanely marketable and desirable products. Apple under anyone else looks like any other large corporation: uninspiring, bureaucratic, more like An Institution than a business.
Google was essentially fated to become a corporate bureaucracy because it had a conscious image of being attentive to its employees' needs and the
experience of working there being fantastic. This is not to be confused with it being a fantastic place to work; quite the opposite, Google's meatgrinder reputation is longstanding, and
the experience disguises something deeply disturbing:
Quote:Quote:
Joe Cannella, former senior account manager: 'Basically, you end up spending the majority of your life eating Google food, with Google coworkers, wearing Google gear, talking in Google acronyms, sending Google emails on Google phones, and you eventually start to lose sight of what it's like to be independent of the big G, and every corner of your life is set up to reinforce the idea that you would be absolutely insane to want to be anywhere else.'
'To which the majority of folks will say 'boo-hoo, poor spoiled Googler'. But that's sort of the point. You are given everything you could ever want, but it costs you the only things that actually matter in the end.'
Size has something to do with it:
Quote:Quote:
Sean Gerrish, Former Software Engineer: 'Google must tread carefully in order to avoid litigation. In general, Google cannot do things like violate copyright laws without immediate, significant effects. This is exacerbated because governments' laws will change to affect Google itself.'
'In contrast, many startups can run circles around Google, not because they are better at execution (although some of them are better at execution), but because they can often get quite far by flouting regulations or civil actions before being discovered.'
But it's also standard corporate incompetence:
Quote:Quote:
'People are promoted into management positions -- not because they actually know how to lead/manage, but because they happen to be smart or because there is no other path to grow into,' said a former technical program manager. 'So there is a layer of intelligent individuals who are horrible managers and leaders.'
And, being a corporate bureaucracy, they hire people who are exactly like themselves:
Quote:Quote:
'They hire the same person over and over again,' said an anonymous commenter. 'Same background, same 10 schools, same worldview, same interests. It's no exaggeration to say that I met 100 triathletes in my three years at Google. Only a handful of them were interesting people.'
And a results-oriented body can be changed by one person. That won't happen at Google:
Quote:Quote:
'I worked at Google for 3 years and it was very difficult to leave but there was one major factor that helped me make the decision -- the impact I could ever have on the business as an individual was minimal. As noted in many answers below, Google is an incredible machine that prints money thanks to AdWords. Unless you are an amazingly talented engineer who gets to create something new, chances are you're simply a guy/girl with an oil can greasing the cogs of that machine.'
Quote:Quote:
'I'd say the relentless daily mediocre thinking of middle management types who are completely focused on metrics to the exclusion of all other factors. They don't want to rock the boat, they don't know how to inspire their workforce, and they rely far too much on the Google name and reputation to do that for them.'
In other words, Google is a corporate bureaucracy, first cousin to your average DMV. It is not interested in real results anymore.
Remissas, discite, vivet.
God save us from people who mean well. -storm