Quote: (07-08-2017 06:01 AM)Malidon Wrote:
[1] "...they could possibly develop abstract thinking and become humane."
[2] "So how can a rational man cope with a reality where he is condemned to fucking human-looking mammals..."
[1] The classical Greeks thought similar to you about women in the sense that women did not appear or behave or think like men at all. The Greeks were really good at showing the extreme differences where it
almost appears that women not human. But that view would not be doing a service to the Greek playwrights if one argued that women are not human. They are human because we can reproduce with them and belong to the species
H. sapiens.
It is largely due to how women perceive the world. Take a log for example, although it could be anything. It has a true weight say 100 lbs. We all have an idea on how heavy it is that's why whenever we go to pick it up we know what strength we need. The weight might be 100 lbs. for both sexes but is heavier to a woman. So then you have the difference in how the sexes perceive the world since men are more then capable of moving nature while women cannot in the way a man can because everything is too hard and exhausting to move, build, defend etc. for a woman.
Due to child bearing women have a different general purpose in life. Their hips and breasts don't enable them to run faster. Their bone structure enables them to bare children in the womb instead. So again they cannot do things a well as a man in things that men are naturally prone to.
Because of these physical constraints compared to men, women think differently. One being that since they cannot efficiently move nature they cannot create things the way a man can nor are they capable of abstract thought in the way a man being that their perception of what is real (100 lbs.) is limited which leads to limited creativity opportunities including strong machines and the like to do the job for them since making a machine requires a lot of muscle. That is why they cannot see things the way we see them.
That is why women cannot think like a man. Instead they either get someone else to do things for them or they study something as best they can which is why they are prone to attention to detail. Since they are weaker, both in creativity and in strength, that is why they desire the strongest and smartest men but more importantly the strongest leadership and the best (Alpha-males or some king of Alpha concept).
Personally, this also leads me to believe that a woman does not have free-will the same as a man since it appears that their only real practical adaptation to the environment is based on causation and reaction and not original ideas to solve problems as well all women seem to do is follow the strongest around.
Obviously women do make some kind of personal choices like choosing an alpha-male "provider" rather then marrying daddy government which is in many cases is more profitable but bad for society following strength is clearly what a woman prioritizes. And being a follower is something a woman clearly cannot escape.
[2] Women are attractive and they only get more attractive the more womanly they are. It's not a good idea to not care about how "intelligent" they are about economics or other man stuff. In fact in my mind that tells me they probably are not good at being mother since they spend all their time at a desk trying to mimic a man.
I suggest you go talk to actual women and not western chicks. Also read more Red pill stuff like Rational Male and The Way of Men.