[Blaster]

(07-05-2017 06:39 PM)AnonymousBosch Wrote:  

Here's a good example of how Gamergate failed to remove these Cunts from the Public Sphere of Influence:

You mean because he has a twitter account that manages a hundred or so likes for posting vapid shit on twitter? Gamergate got him shitcanned from The Escapist. At that point, the problem is not Moviebob the problem is his audience. If it wasn't him, it would be someone else. Hounding him further would just give him victim status for no benefit. Even if you did drive him offline entirely, it wouldn't change anything because he wasn't the problem. If you want to truly defeat a carbon-copy progressive ideologue, you have to erode and peel away their audience, and intimidation is not the best way to do that.

[weambulance]

(07-05-2017 08:23 PM)CleanSlate Wrote:  

Link, please? The one I have doesn't have that last line.

Archived source:

http://archive.is/PEObM

The relevant bits are at about the 60% mark.

[Blaster]

(07-05-2017 08:23 PM)CleanSlate Wrote:  

Link, please? The one I have doesn't have that last line.

http://archive.is/o7izm#selection-1233.0-1233.73

[CleanSlate]

^^ got it, thanks. People are saying, though, that by not publishing (only threatening to do so) -- CNN is taking the "high road" here.

Some cannot be saved.

[SirTimothy]

You think CNN will say this promotes violence?

[MMX2010]

[url=https://twitter.com/NoSlackDelta/status/882638688211128321][/url]

60-item tweetstorm that echoes what Anonymous Bosch has predicted.

"I'm not going to call for violence against journalists, but I'm not going to shed a tear if it happens, because they brought it upon themselves."

[Hypno]

Remind me, was it CNN who gave Hillary the questions during the debate?

[weambulance]

It was Donna Brazile for the CNN debate. Presumably her actions were sanctioned by CNN, then when she got caught they chucked her under the bus.

I expect something like that to happen this time too, but it won't work.

[Hypno]

Probably the most effective thing would be to call ATT and cancel your cell phone, DSL, or Direct TV and blame CNN.

One could also call the FCC and complain about the blackmail threats to the public and fake news; not sure what they would do. They don't have jurisdiction over the merger as far as I am aware, that would be the Department of Justice and the FTC. Trump could always have those agencies give the merger a closer look - not block it per se, but stall it.

[PharaohRa]

I knew that once Donald Trump would be elected, that (((legacy media))) would be in its death throes and by the end of 8 years, it would not exist. However, I did not realize it would happen so soon, so either CNN is that dumb or they are being intentially sabotaged by Donald's "friends". Either way, it could not have happened to a better company!

[Hypno]

(07-05-2017 09:05 PM)weambulance Wrote:  

It was Donna Brazile for the CNN debate. Presumably her actions were sanctioned by CNN, then when she got caught they chucked her under the bus.

I expect something like that to happen this time too, but it won't work.

Brazille, yes, but where did she get the questions from - CNN? Or did the DNC actually let Brazille draft the questions?

[MOVSM]

   

[PharaohRa]

Folks, there is a big lesson to be learned here: don't ever fuck with pol/4chan/8chan, EVER!

[weambulance]

I'm not sure I understand what you're asking. She was working for CNN at the time of the debate in question, but she didn't write the questions, she just passed them along. She became DNC chair after she was fired. The DNC was not supposed to be involved in coming up with the questions.

The only people who know the exact details of the scam are the people who were involved. Maybe she played spy and acted alone; maybe it was a DNC-CNN plot to fix the debate, with full knowledge of both parties. Frankly, given that she ended up DNC chair after she left CNN, and in light of all these recent revelations about CNN, I think it was the latter scenario more than the former.

[Latinopan]

(07-05-2017 06:03 PM)RioNomad Wrote:  

(07-05-2017 05:55 PM)RIslander Wrote:  

Whats to dox? Oh Steve Smith from Northwest Indiana made a meme of a Trump face over a Chuck Norris face roundhouse kicking a CNN head. No one with any sanity, 90%+ of the country, is going to care.

No normal person will care, but that tiny percentage of mentally ill liberals will harass him, his family, his children, his employer, his neighbors, hell, his fucking grandma in her nursing home, non-stop. Look at what they've done to Barron.

Endless phone calls, text messages, emails, death threats, possibly people showing up at his or his families homes, house and car being vandalized, and who knows what else.

Doxxing someone's name and address in this day and age is dangerous. Eventually someone will be murdered due to it, if they haven't already. Look what happened when the media gave out info about where Scalise would be.

CNN knows all of this. This is how they scared the guy shitless and then decided to go public with it, to scare the rest of the general public so they will think twice about posting ANYTHING negative about the media again. They need to be brought down for this. They are essentially threatening American citizens lives in an indirect way.

Exactly, look at the many cases of of gamers being SWATED, literal SWATS teams at your house with M16 pointed at you and everyone in your house, just because somebody had your address.

[AnonymousBosch]

(07-05-2017 08:06 PM)BortimusPrime Wrote:  

I think you went to a more exciting high school than I did.

Nah... more likely these types of people were there, but far outside the healthy minds sphere of interests and attention other than as a passing, dismissive joke.

The problem is a passing joke - soon forgotten, to a healthy mind, becomes a bitter and dysfunctional mind's foundational experience:

One day, I will make you sorry you mocked me.

I remember running into a woman ahead of me in line at a supermarket in Melbourne a few years back, far from the city we both grew up in. She recognised me, then immediately launched into a tumble of words, saying that she hadn't seen me for 30 years, and going on at great length about her life and her job, (which I guess registered as High Status and Important to her but I wasn't interested in enough to be able to tell you what she did even five minutes later).

Meanwhile, I'd just give polite, short nods of faux-interest in the moments she'd take a breath.

Then she mentioned looking me up on Facebook recently, sending me a friend request, and then being annoyed that I didn't accept it. "This is just like that time in Year 8 when I asked you out, and you said you weren't interested...

...and here came the sourness...

..."Well, just look at me now and what you missed out on."

She snatched her grocery bag and walked out, the bored checkout chick sneering at her departure, most likely thinking "Get over yourself Lady". The rest of the line didn't burst into spontaneous applause. No-one turned bright red after being shamed by a woke eight-year-old. It was just a sad and awkward display that made everyone a little uncomfortable, (except for me, because I love as boring and predictable an experience as checking out groceries that I've done a thousand times before suddenly becoming unpredictable, awkward and dysfunctional).

The kicker was: I had no idea who I was talking to. She obviously knew my name, but... no familiarity, no recall, no nostalgia, no sense memory. Zip. Zilch.

I can remember the name of the first girl I kissed and where and when it happened, (her house, under the balcony of her parent's bedroom, hidden by the pampas grass).

I can remember the name, and the location of the first time I saw up a girl's skirt, back when girls wore dresses and skirts I was lying on the grass next to a mini trampoline, she kept running at it then jumping over me, pulling up her skirt each time. Green underwear. Frilly. A turtle on the front.

I can remember the names of the two girls fighting over me at a sixth grade Christmas party about how was going to 'go with me', and I resolved the issue by saying they both could have me and they agreed. Hell, I even remember telling the story at dinner that night: Mum looking annoyed, Dad being "That's my boy!"

But this woman in the supermarket? Nothing.

I either recently-wrote up a post about finding old school pictures for a thread agreeing with Rudebwoy, and how thin girls used to be on average, thought I'm not entirely-sure I posted it. I was showing these pictures to the girl I was dating at the time and was going to point out "Oh, and this girl attacked me in a supermarket a few years back because apparently I didn't want to go with her."

The thing was, I never told her that story, because, even looking at the class picture of the entire year, I never identified her.

This woman carried some grudge against me for over thirty years, and just had to take her resentment out on me.

As for me? I still have no idea who the fuck she was.

This is the Media. They're taking out their childhood grudges. They've formed their little, toxic 'Massacre at Central High' replacement cool cliques with the other damaged kids where they get to be the bullies. If you want them triggered, let's find out who ate paste or picked their nose, or 'smelled funny' or who begged with the teacher to go to the toilet only for her flow of urine to waterfall over the chair and spread across the floors to the mass squeak of chair legs on wood as everyone around her recoiled in horror.

Who was the kid who cried hysterically in front of the entire class because they were terrified by the Opera Singing Orange on Sesame Street and had to go to the school nurse to calm down? Who was the kid who poohed themselves on the school excursion and refused to slide down the slippery dip at the end of the trail until the teacher bullied them into it, mooshing it everywhere and leaving a trail behind them that no-one wanted to slide down, requiring the emptying of canteens, and no-one wanted to sit near them pathetically-holding their underwear in a brown paper bag on the bus?

Who was the girl who danced like Kate Bush after being struck-violently about the head, and sang a corny television theme song a cappella in front of the entire school at the end of year talent show, that was so mortifying to watch that everyone was simultaneously-embarrassed for her and embarrassed to be watching her, but it only took one person to start laughing, and, well, then everyone laughed. Even the parents. The Principal came out, all faux serious, saying "Well, at least she tried, but then lost it. Fuck, even I'm still squirming in my seat remembering. (I once dated a girl who was in Kindergarten when I was in Year 6, and she was . I told her that story. The blood drained from her face. "Oh no, I remember that, and I was only tiny. That was the single most embarrassing thing I've ever seen in my life, and I once saw my mother-in-law throw the Christmas Turkey at my ex-husband's head").

I guarantee there are School Legends about every Cunt in the Media. They're dysfunctional by nature. Show me the child at seven...

People just need to dig.

[Suits]

(07-05-2017 06:09 PM)AnonymousBosch Wrote:  

Now, I remember some damn embarrassing shit from High School. The girl with the moustache who never got picked during Dancing, so would end up dancing with the broom. The girl who pissed herself during P.E. The retarded girl who walked up in front of the class and asked the teacher to please fuck her, like she was asking for a pencil. The girl who was caught in the upstairs toilets with her fingers in another girls cunt. The kid who rubbed one out during class, thinking no-one could notice.

That was me!

[AnonymousBosch]

(07-05-2017 08:23 PM)Blaster Wrote:  

You mean because he has a twitter account that manages a hundred or so likes for posting vapid shit on twitter? Gamergate got him shitcanned from The Escapist. At that point, the problem is not Moviebob the problem is his audience. If it wasn't him, it would be someone else. Hounding him further would just give him victim status for no benefit. Even if you did drive him offline entirely, it wouldn't change anything because he wasn't the problem. If you want to truly defeat a carbon-copy progressive ideologue, you have to erode and peel away their audience, and intimidation is not the best way to do that.

No, if the war is on and we want this shit to end, fully and finally, you use their very same tactics against them to cause fear and demoralisation amongst their ranks. No target is too insignificant, too small. Look at the punching down Gawker would do over one insignificant person's random thoughtcrime tweet and the massive power differential involved.

The fat cunt earns $3400 on Patreon a month. You want his audience to be too publicly-scared to support him. Understand The Climate Fear we're been living under: it isn't in arguments over his reach or lack of it, but the fact that you can't predict who will be targeted, when they will be targeted, and why they will be targeted.

They went for small and petty targets, and they knew exactly what they were doing. They didn't care about hurting families.

So, fuck them. They need to know anyone who spouts this toxic, communist shit can then be socially-terrorised and destroyed exactly according to their own standards they want to destroy others with.

This is a natural, predictable reaction for what started in 2007, and really started to evidence itself in mass culture in 2011, got out of control around 2014-15, and, given that things have only gotten more heated due to Trump, we have to adapt, because we are no longer in a polite age. This is the natural, predictable escalation.

We're entering the Final Pushback against Socialism in America. Every Socialist wants you dead or replaced. It's impossible to deny this any longer. Fight every target, or go extinct.

[Suits]

(07-05-2017 03:45 PM)nomadbrah Wrote:  

(07-05-2017 03:24 PM)budoslavic Wrote:  

This is a fake cuckmeme using nazi imagery.

Anon would never make such a meme. It was communists, not nazis who did this kind of thing.

So, let me get this straight.

The communists are the bad guys and the Nazis were the good guys?

The Nazi's didn't use propaganda? The Nazi's didn't limit free speech? The Nazi's didn't imprison and kill people for saying the wrong thing?

[Paracelsus]

Quote:

I can remember the name, and the location of the first time I saw up a girl's skirt, back when girls wore dresses and skirts I was lying on the grass next to a mini trampoline, she kept running at it then jumping over me, pulling up her skirt each time. Green underwear. Frilly. A turtle on the front.

I still remember the colour and pattern of at least four of my female classmates' swimsuits back at the high school swimming carnival. Being at least notionally a competitive event and being at a Catholic school, nobody got to wear a bikini, but it didn't really matter to a 17 year old. I also sucked hard at sports, but for some reason you couldn't stay at school the whole day, so I'd go along and sit in the (poured-concrete) stands for what was an intermittently boring and arousing day at the races.

The most memorable was the new girl who'd come into the school that same year, possibly New Zealander, I didn't know her well enough. Light brown skin. Dark eyes. She wore a one-piece glossy black swimsuit. She had the sort of youthful overdevelopment in the chest area that made every other girl in the school hate her -- and every guy in the school thank God for the fact she was a fit and fast swimmer and therefore guaranteed to be in scenarios where she could be seen soaking wet, on her back and breathing hard. I kid you not, when she got out of the pool at the end of a race with water pouring off her it was like a fucking fertility goddess rising from the waters to grace our dusty little corner of Australia.

[AnonymousBosch]

(07-05-2017 09:58 PM)Suits Wrote:  

So, let me get this straight.

The communists are the bad guys and the Nazis were the good guys?

The Nazi's didn't use propaganda? The Nazi's didn't limit free speech? The Nazi's didn't imprison and kill people for saying the wrong thing?

I know, I know. It doesn't matter for now. Strange bedfellows. Everyone, hold your nose for now, and Punch left.

[Paracelsus]

(07-05-2017 09:58 PM)Suits Wrote:  

So, let me get this straight.

The communists are the bad guys and the Nazis were the good guys?

The Nazi's didn't use propaganda? The Nazi's didn't limit free speech? The Nazi's didn't imprison and kill people for saying the wrong thing?

Put it this way, and with tongue firmly in the right cheek: the Nazis only killed maybe 6 million of their own and foreigners. Stalin alone killed forty million of his own people.

[budoslavic]

Looks like Wikipedia has locked down Andrew Kaczynkski's page according to a popup message that displayed "This page is protected to prevent vandalism".

[Suits]

(07-05-2017 10:18 PM)Paracelsus Wrote:  

(07-05-2017 09:58 PM)Suits Wrote:  

So, let me get this straight.

The communists are the bad guys and the Nazis were the good guys?

The Nazi's didn't use propaganda? The Nazi's didn't limit free speech? The Nazi's didn't imprison and kill people for saying the wrong thing?

Put it this way, and with tongue firmly in the right cheek: the Nazis only killed maybe 6 million of their own and foreigners. Stalin alone killed forty million of his own people.

So, they are both bad. I don't understand what is inaccurate about the meme.

[nomadbrah]

(07-05-2017 09:58 PM)Suits Wrote:  

(07-05-2017 03:45 PM)nomadbrah Wrote:  

(07-05-2017 03:24 PM)budoslavic Wrote:  

This is a fake cuckmeme using nazi imagery.

Anon would never make such a meme. It was communists, not nazis who did this kind of thing.

So, let me get this straight.

The communists are the bad guys and the Nazis were the good guys?

The Nazi's didn't use propaganda? The Nazi's didn't limit free speech? The Nazi's didn't imprison and kill people for saying the wrong thing?

(07-05-2017 10:06 PM)AnonymousBosch Wrote:  

(07-05-2017 09:58 PM)Suits Wrote:  

So, let me get this straight.

The communists are the bad guys and the Nazis were the good guys?

The Nazi's didn't use propaganda? The Nazi's didn't limit free speech? The Nazi's didn't imprison and kill people for saying the wrong thing?

I know, I know. It doesn't matter for now. Strange bedfellows. Everyone, hold your nose for now, and Punch left.

I don't think either of you are as easily manipulated.

It's like with Jack Prosebiec and (((Laura Loomer))) shouting "you're all nazis" to a room full of leftist jews in a theatre.

What's the number one thing holding back healthy traditional nationalism?

Nazi.

That's all you need to say to shut down anyone.

Do we willingly want to continue this idea of nazism as the ultimate evil? Why always the nazis? The communist jew Lazar Kaganovich starved 10 million white ukrainians to death in 1933. That's in addition to up to 1.5 million white Russian monarchists that the Bolcheviks slaughtered in the Russian revolution. Then Stalin purged up to 3 million between 1936-38.

Before Hitler had harmed a single jew, the jewish Bolcheviks had murdered close to 15 million white people.

The great Russian author Alexander Solzhenitsyn:

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2003/j...ssia.books

Quote:

Alexander Solzhenitsyn, who first exposed the horrors of the Stalinist gulag, is now attempting to tackle one of the most sensitive topics of his writing career - the role of the Jews in the Bolshevik revolution and Soviet purges.
In his latest book Solzhenitsyn, 84, deals with one of the last taboos of the communist revolution: that Jews were as much perpetrators of the repression as its victims. Two Hundred Years Together - a reference to the 1772 partial annexation of Poland and Russia which greatly increased the Russian Jewish population - contains three chapters discussing the Jewish role in the revolutionary genocide and secret police purges of Soviet Russia.

Let's discard all that, those 15 million dead whites and demonize our own pasts and label Hitler "the great evil".

Neither the Bolcheviks nor Hitler are to be applaued, but do we want to willingly cuck ourself by elevating Hitler above other evil regimes?