As we know, one of the aims of Cultural Marxism and its proponents is to destroy the traditional family. They do this through a number of ways, including the normalization of female infidelity and homosexuality. Before this, however, one of the first things that happened was making it okay to have sex outside of marriage or concubinage. It became normal to have a girlfriend for a while before marrying her. Then multiple girlfriends and then one-night-stands/FWBs. Now it's rare if your partner didn't do both hetero and homosexual experimentation before you get together for a relationship.
Now, in a nihilistic and hedonist twist, even the more permanent terms of "girlfriend" and, god forbid "wife" are nigh taboo in this community (with the latter inviting scorn in the vein of "lol AWALT") and replaced by the unceremonious "long term relationship" or LTR. What is this nonsense? It's like me restyling my wife a "legally ordained opposite-gender companion." As I see it, widespread use of the term swallows up perhaps the fundamental of social structures into a sterilized generalization similar to the leftist "civil union"; it reflects a lack of willingness on the part of otherwise sensible men to act in defense of civilization and the concurrent view of women as disposable or communal resources (as in in the Marxist tradition). Is it not clear that this plays into the hands of those who conspire to destroy men and society?
Rant over.
Now, in a nihilistic and hedonist twist, even the more permanent terms of "girlfriend" and, god forbid "wife" are nigh taboo in this community (with the latter inviting scorn in the vein of "lol AWALT") and replaced by the unceremonious "long term relationship" or LTR. What is this nonsense? It's like me restyling my wife a "legally ordained opposite-gender companion." As I see it, widespread use of the term swallows up perhaps the fundamental of social structures into a sterilized generalization similar to the leftist "civil union"; it reflects a lack of willingness on the part of otherwise sensible men to act in defense of civilization and the concurrent view of women as disposable or communal resources (as in in the Marxist tradition). Is it not clear that this plays into the hands of those who conspire to destroy men and society?
Rant over.