rooshvforum.network is a fully functional forum: you can search, register, post new threads etc...
Old accounts are inaccessible: register a new one, or recover it when possible. x


Maximizing Tinder Matches Based on ELO Score and Swiping
#26

Maximizing Tinder Matches Based on ELO Score and Swiping

Have you guys tried tind3r (Chrome extension) for location spoofing?
Reply
#27

Maximizing Tinder Matches Based on ELO Score and Swiping

Anyone know the ramifications of deleting, then recreating your account? I have had three different accounts. They start off real strong, then die off when I start to hit around 2000 matches. I would guess Tinder can keep a record of this when they connect to your Facebook account. I am getting ready to delete my current one, then start a new one with new pics, soon.
Reply
#28

Maximizing Tinder Matches Based on ELO Score and Swiping

When you location spoof (i.e. SEA) to boost your ELO score, do you actively swipe or just let it sit?
Reply
#29

Maximizing Tinder Matches Based on ELO Score and Swiping

Does this work on Bumble as well?

Cattle 5000 Rustlings #RustleHouseRecords #5000Posts
Houston (Montrose), Texas

"May get ugly at times. But we get by. Real Niggas never die." - cdr

Follow the Rustler on Twitter | Telegram: CattleRustler

Game is the difference between a broke average looking dude in a 2nd tier city turning bad bitch feminists into maids and fucktoys and a well to do lawyer with 50x the dough taking 3 dates to bang broads in philly.
Reply
#30

Maximizing Tinder Matches Based on ELO Score and Swiping

Quote: (06-04-2017 04:50 PM)Player_1337 Wrote:  

When you location spoof (i.e. SEA) to boost your ELO score, do you actively swipe or just let it sit?

Personally I let it sit for 24 hours and then collect the matches in one go.

I suspect that matching is better than just getting liked but not swiping back, because it makes you look like a more active user. But it's just my own guess, I may be wrong.

Also girls tend to open guys often in those countries. Although nobody really knows how the ELO score works, getting first messages by girls can't hurt.

I don't spend too much time doing it though. Also I don't respond to any message. Autolikers can come in handy for this situations.


See this old thread for the kind of results I'm talking about:

thread-60838...pid1497044

If 500 matches in a day doesn't improve your ELO score, I don't know what will.

Quote: (06-04-2017 08:20 PM)Cattle Rustler Wrote:  

Does this work on Bumble as well?
I have no idea about how the Bumble algorithm works. It would be very interesting to know actually, I have often wondered myself.
Reply
#31

Maximizing Tinder Matches Based on ELO Score and Swiping

Quote: (06-04-2017 03:15 PM)whiteknightrises Wrote:  

Perhaps this could help your "score":

Quote:Quote:

Good to know: When you first show up in a new location, whether you're actually there or passporting, your profile gets a visibility boost similar to the noob boost for new accounts. It also lasts about two days. This is meant to help tourists along, so they don't have to wait too long to be noticed, as otherwise they might already be home again by the time the matches start rolling in. A nice bonus (if the people like you where you're passporting) is the fact that this influences your score. So if you find a place on earth where you're just the local's type, you can improve your score by passporting there and keeping that setting for a few days

https://www.reddit.com/r/Tinder/comments...faq_guide/

So maybe reset your profile (look at the above link for info), set your location to SEA, then set it back to wherever you're from

Though your score could just go down over time in your home location if you aren't that attractive (get better pics)

Not sure if swiping in Thailand fucked up my shit cuz I only see ugly bitches now

(I basically match everyone there)

New Post:
Men’s Style Guide: For Guys Who Want to Get Laid

You aren't getting laid because you still believe in "game".

Here's how I went from being a 21-year-old, videogame-addicted, Asian virgin to banging too many girls to count (no PUA bs):

https://whiteknightrises.com/start-here

BTC: 1A5WUGDNGnsxGJ62CXadV6T2oapKfFu4T3
ETH: 0x9019d135dD1FFA06f0CC53C5942cBce806a943dd

(If I miss your reply PM me)
Reply
#32

Maximizing Tinder Matches Based on ELO Score and Swiping

When you guys change cities to check out the talent, how often do you leave your profile on that city?

I usually leave it in one place for 2 days before changing to another city (checking out where to travel) but I'm thinking that might be too fast.

Cattle 5000 Rustlings #RustleHouseRecords #5000Posts
Houston (Montrose), Texas

"May get ugly at times. But we get by. Real Niggas never die." - cdr

Follow the Rustler on Twitter | Telegram: CattleRustler

Game is the difference between a broke average looking dude in a 2nd tier city turning bad bitch feminists into maids and fucktoys and a well to do lawyer with 50x the dough taking 3 dates to bang broads in philly.
Reply
#33

Maximizing Tinder Matches Based on ELO Score and Swiping

What do you guys think of using someone else's pics (e.g., a male model's or those from an ideal Tinder profile) for the first two days after resetting and making a new account in order to start off with a high ELO score? Are there any downsides to this strategy?
Reply
#34

Maximizing Tinder Matches Based on ELO Score and Swiping

Quote: (09-05-2017 08:12 PM)Palpatine Wrote:  

What do you guys think of using someone else's pics (e.g., a male model's or those from an ideal Tinder profile) for the first two days after resetting and making a new account in order to start off with a high ELO score? Are there any downsides to this strategy?

I've tried that, it doesn't seem to affect much.

As soon as you switch back to your photos your ELO will be almost instantly lowered as girls start swiping left on you.
Reply
#35

Maximizing Tinder Matches Based on ELO Score and Swiping

Honestly, it's just better to use tinder regularly. Playing to a high ELO really doesn't do much. It's based on a variety of factors, including the girls that swipe right on you, and their ELO rating. So if a high ELO girl swipes right on you then yours goes up and hers goes down a little. If a low ELO girl swipes left on you, yours goes down a little. So it depends on who swipes left or right on you and their ELO rating as well.

So on a scale of 0-1000 if you start at 500, yours will go up if girls at 700 are constantly swiping right on you so that your ELO matches up more with the 700's because that is your 'league'. At that point, people in your ELO range are shown to you more often, and it also diversify's it. Especially new accounts are shown off more often so that the initial ELO score can be determined. If anyone needs further explanation, feel free to ask.

On why certain strategies don't work such as only swipe right to sure matches:
Basically, if a bunch of girls with a 300 ELO liked you and the 700 girls all swiped left then you're going to be in the 300 ELO range because those are the matches you're getting and the right swipes you're getting. If you're just sitting there waiting and are exposed to a lot of girls, you're still getting left swiped plenty even if you only swipe right on sure bets. It will still determine your ELO accordingly. Because of this, I don't think it is wise to use that strategy. However, making a new account or resetting your account is always good temporarily because your profile is shown off to a lot more people of all ELO ranges so that yours can be determined.

Why jumping locations helps temporarily
If you jump to a location where you are more liked such as SE Asia, your ELO will go higher if the higher rated ELO girls there are swiping right on you. So for example, if you're a 600 rating and the 800 girls in SEA are swiping right on your because you're exotic, then your ELO will go around to the 800 level. However, when you go back home you will be shown to the 800 girls who weren't as attracted to you in the first place, and you will be swiped left into your natural 600 zone. By lucky chances / encounters / filling a niche, you could possibly match yourself a couple higher rated ELO 800's before you get normalized down to your natural range by the left swipes.

Additionally, there are more factors to it such as the girls you swipe left or right on. If you're not liking all the higher rated ELO girls and only liking the lower level ones, then your ELO goes down as well because that is the range of girls you like. For example, if you like fatties. Or if you're only liking the 900's and they like you back then you'll probably jump more to that range, unless you're getting swiped left a lot. So it just depends on many factors.

As far as boost, superlikes, new profiles, etc.:
-New profiles: I believe new profiles are shown off more to determine initial ELO ratings for profiles. When you like someone its a regular like.
-Boost: You're shown to all of the ELO ranges first and it puts you in the front of the stack for your 30 mins. I think when you like someone on boost you go ahead of the normal like stack.
-Superlikes: It puts you before all of the regular likes I think, and sends a notification that they've been superliked. I need to figure out if you're still behind the people who like you while boosted or in front of them as well.
Reply
#36

Maximizing Tinder Matches Based on ELO Score and Swiping

True Balla

All your assumptions and things you've ascertained I believe are correct. However, this is a forum about game. We don't believe in "ranking" based on looks where men are concerned. A guy with 700 elo can be lame ass and a guy with 400 can be a cool motherfucker worthy of pussy and glory for the simple fact Tinder is based on looks. The system Tinder set in place is fallable and open to exploitation.

So say you do the newbie boost trick or the SEA grind up trick. It will give you acess to higher valued women, and access is imperative. Access allows you to take your shot and have a chance at women you would not if you were in a 300-500 ELO bracket.

Women are not strictly visual creatures and certainly less so than men. Tindr assumes they are, just as men are. So any chance to convey your quality or talk your way into a woman's pants is a chance worth taking.

So no, do not use tindr normally, exploit the system and shoot for the stars until your teeth are cut and you know what you're doing. If you see the way women rate men (absurd as it is) solely based on looks you would find 90% of us rated as 5/6s. While the models and the very handsome would be 8-9s. It's completely absurd what women do when left to their own judgements and devices until us men impose our will on them and it evens the playing field.

ELO is for chess matchmaking not for romantic/sex/dating match making. Exploit the inefficiencies in that system and reap the rewards. Don't submit Tindr's or women's rules built on a faulty premise. Especially when there are absolutely no repercussions for doing so.

That pretty much goes for everything and unlike Tindr there are things that have very real and impactful penalties for not adhering to the status quo and when you are ready to fight them or accept them you can know you are a real man forging your own destiny

How do you think Napoleon would have faired on Tindr? Putin, Mussolini, Benjerman Franklin? They aren't especially handsome, not renowned to be especially good with women. But does it matter when instead of accepting the rules you play by and enforce your own.
Reply
#37

Maximizing Tinder Matches Based on ELO Score and Swiping

Quote: (09-06-2017 02:30 AM)Eugenics Wrote:  

True Balla

All your assumptions and things you've ascertained I believe are correct. However, this is a forum about game. We don't believe in "ranking" based on looks where men are concerned. A guy with 700 elo can be lame ass and a guy with 400 can be a cool motherfucker worthy of pussy and glory for the simple fact Tinder is based on looks. The system Tinder set in place is fallable and open to exploitation.

So say you do the newbie boost trick or the SEA grind up trick. It will give you acess to higher valued women, and access is imperative. Access allows you to take your shot and have a chance at women you would not if you were in a 300-500 ELO bracket.

Women are not strictly visual creatures and certainly less so than men. Tindr assumes they are, just as men are. So any chance to convey your quality or talk your way into a woman's pants is a chance worth taking.

So no, do not use tindr normally, exploit the system and shoot for the stars until your teeth are cut and you know what you're doing. If you see the way women rate men (absurd as it is) solely based on looks you would find 90% of us rated as 5/6s. While the models and the very handsome would be 8-9s. It's completely absurd what women do when left to their own judgements and devices until us men impose our will on them and it evens the playing field.

ELO is for chess matchmaking not for romantic/sex/dating match making. Exploit the inefficiencies in that system and reap the rewards. Don't submit Tindr's or women's rules built on a faulty premise. Especially when there are absolutely no repercussions for doing so.

That pretty much goes for everything and unlike Tindr there are things that have very real and impactful penalties for not adhering to the status quo and when you are ready to fight them or accept them you can know you are a real man forging your own destiny

How do you think Napoleon would have faired on Tindr? Putin, Mussolini, Benjerman Franklin? They aren't especially handsome, not renowned to be especially good with women. But does it matter when instead of accepting the rules you play by and enforce your own.

Don't get me wrong, I agree with you. The things is even if your ELO is 500, your profile is still shown to the 800's etc. For example, if my ELO rating is 500, I am still shown plenty of models and ugly chicks when I swipe, not just all average looking girls.
Now apart from that the biggest factor is: The 800 rated girls are shown other 800's first. But, really that's irrelevant because the guys who have liked them already, are moved to the front of the stack. So as long as you've liked the girl already, you're ahead of her regular search which consists of the 800's. Girls at even the 600+ mark are shown nothing but constant matches, or people who have already liked them. At that level of looks, they rarely ever get past the people that haven't already liked them.
Reply
#38

Maximizing Tinder Matches Based on ELO Score and Swiping

So being higher Elo puts you higher in the stack which potentially gives you access to those higher quality girls.

Can't tell you how many times I've restarted my Tindr to get a newbie boost and am suddenly matching with 7-8s for the first few days opposed to using Tindr normally and matching with a few dumpy 5s and 6s a day for weeks on end.
Reply
#39

Maximizing Tinder Matches Based on ELO Score and Swiping

Pure gold by True Balla. +1 from me homie.

Cattle 5000 Rustlings #RustleHouseRecords #5000Posts
Houston (Montrose), Texas

"May get ugly at times. But we get by. Real Niggas never die." - cdr

Follow the Rustler on Twitter | Telegram: CattleRustler

Game is the difference between a broke average looking dude in a 2nd tier city turning bad bitch feminists into maids and fucktoys and a well to do lawyer with 50x the dough taking 3 dates to bang broads in philly.
Reply
#40

Maximizing Tinder Matches Based on ELO Score and Swiping

Quote: (09-07-2017 09:08 AM)Eugenics Wrote:  

So being higher Elo puts you higher in the stack which potentially gives you access to those higher quality girls.

Can't tell you how many times I've restarted my Tindr to get a newbie boost and am suddenly matching with 7-8s for the first few days opposed to using Tindr normally and matching with a few dumpy 5s and 6s a day for weeks on end.
Yep, like I said there are so many different aspects. I would recommend resetting as well whenever you hit a slump. Always works for me.

And I get that jumping location to boost your ELO helps, but as the original post said, it's temporary.

Quote: (09-07-2017 09:29 AM)Cattle Rustler Wrote:  

Pure gold by True Balla. +1 from me homie.
Thanks man! First one [Image: smile.gif] lol
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)