Quote: (02-17-2017 07:01 PM)Edmund Ironside Wrote:
Plus, you have to consider that when someone joins the military, that's a nice prolonged period of potential indoctrination ... similar to a university, but with more control. How do you think that would turn out? Don't assume the culture and training in the military wouldn't be manipulated, potentially by a Soros surrogate or similar.
I think we should abolish the standing army and just have a militia. Then all the militiamen could be given the franchise without having to serve a five-year enlistment.
A standing army's purpose is mostly for invasion of other countries, since it consists of professionals hired to participate in unpopular wars if need be. A militia is composed of regular citizens, and is more for defense of the homeland. The founders' original plan was for the Navy, composed of professionals, to defend the coasts from invasion. (The Navy would not be able to, by itself, impose tyranny on the people or invade foreign lands, so it was not as much of a threat to liberty.) But if an enemy did manage to invade, the militia would be there to stop them.
Apparently, in 1812 that didn't work out too well. I think today, though, the U.S. Navy could make short work of an enemy fleet carrying troops to our shores. Plus we no longer have a bunch of Indian tribes hanging around waiting to attack us at the first opportunity.
A militia might not be well-suited to conflicts like the Afghanistan War. But that war would not have been needed if the U.S. had not had a major lapse in homeland security. Arguably, 9/11 also wouldn't have happened if the U.S. hadn't been intervening in the Arab world so much.
The founders' mistrust of standing armies was reflected in the Declaration of Independence, which noted, "He has kept among us, in times of peace, Standing Armies without the Consent of our legislatures" and in Article I, Section 8 of the U.S. Constitution, which states, "The Congress shall have Power . . . To raise and support Armies, but no Appropriation of Money to that Use shall be for a longer Term than two Years". Historically, various state constitutions have also forbidden standing armies, to wit:
1776 North Carolina: That the people have a right to bear arms, for the defence of the State; and, as standing armies, in time of peace, are dangerous to liberty, they ought not to be kept up; and that the military should be kept under strict subordination to, and governed by, the civil power.
1776 Pennsylvania: That the people have a right to bear arms for the defence of themselves and the state; and as standing armies in the time of peace are dangerous to liberty, they ought not to be kept up; and that the military should be kept under strict subordination, to, and governed by, the civil power.
1777 Vermont: That the people have a right to bear arms for the defence of themselves and the State -- and as standing armies in time of peace are dangerous to liberty, they ought not to be kept up; and that the military should be kept under strict subordination to and governed by the civil power.
1780 Massachusetts: The people have a right to keep and to bear arms for the common defence. And as, in time of peace, armies are dangerous to liberty, they ought not to be maintained without the consent of the legislature; and the military power shall always be held in an exact subordination to the civil authority, and be governed by it.
1802 Ohio: That the people have a right to bear arms for the defence of themselves and the State; and as standing armies, in time of peace, are dangerous to liberty, they shall not be kept up, and that the military shall be kept under strict subordination to the civil power.
1859 Kansas: The people have the right to bear arms for their defense and security; but standing armies, in time of peace, are dangerous to liberty, and shall not be tolerated, and the military shall be in strict subordination to the civil power.
1868 South Carolina: The people have a right to keep and bear arms for the common defence. As, in times of peace, armies are dangerous to liberty, they shall not be maintained without the consent of the General Assembly. The military power of the State shall always be held in subordination to the civil authority and be governed by it.
1971 Virginia: That a well regulated militia, composed of the body of the people, trained to arms, is the proper, natural, and safe defense of a free state, therefore, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed; that standing armies, in time of peace, should be avoided as dangerous to liberty; and that in all cases the military should be under strict subordination to, and governed by, the civil power.