[Isaac Jordan]

Delicioustacos updates us on the outcome of the women's march:

Quote:

The Women’s March worked. Trump was deposed. A pink pussy hat now president. Horny killers from Damascus welcomed at LAX by your girlfriend. Schools teach in Mexican. New Chief Usury Officer of Goldman Sachs is trans. Brianna Wu on the $100. Eye in the pyramid now Lena Dunham’s asshole. All pregnancies terminated; late term abortions turn babies into pugs. Ploughshares beat into social media brand management. All workers sponsored content ambassadors for Huffington Post. Doritos knows Black Lives Matter. New twins in Beyonce’s cunt brought to you by Audi. Lyft pledges allegiance to Sharia. Hadiths mandate polyandrous slavery to blue haired genders that OKCupid knows no word for. Something to do with My Little Pony. All porn now clips of Ruth Bader Ginsburg. Sheryl Sandberg merges with flesh NSA servers like an anglerfish, stares back at you from the place you dare not look. Honey Boo Boo’s Mom Lost 200 Pounds You Won’t Believe How Gorgeous She Is, she says in your inner voice. Like This. Justin Trudeau’s hot soft hand on your back like your gym teacher who drank before noon; his robust yoga pants package crawling and awake. Angela Merkel’s spindly tendons twitch as she palpates your Soylent incubation sac. We won, you guys. Pepsi stands against racism.

[Simeon_Strangelight]

'Latinopan'

This observation is a fit to what has been said before in the manosphere, Western women are just shittesting Western men and see how far they can get, feminism itself is a way for women to test their men, when women in this march were jelling "Alla Akbar", is a way for them to tell Western men they think other men are more powerful masculine and dominant than them.

Women do not have loyalty, they are programed to summit to the stronger force they encounter.

Trump election is perfect because while women were protesting him in this march, it was women who gave him the presidency, therefore women have to admit (subconsciously) they do love the dominant personality of Trump, this march was a shittest to Trump to see if he would somehow bend the knee, even when they do not admit it, those same liberal SJWs love strong frame men who support Trump, women love men that don't take their BS.

Trump won't win the hearts and minds of women simply because he is still an underdog.

Women side with the masses and they side with the leading power. And the leading power is being carried by the media, by the main politicians, by the businesses and by the marxist education compass.

They consider themselves to be rebels, but they are the useful idiots of the establishment. And it is because of the backing of the establishment that they oppose Trump.

If the media in entirety did a 180 and started promoting Donald Trump, then the women would swerve like the cattle they are. If the media started telling the truth about Islam, then they would change their opinions as well.

But - it is as Brzezinski has predicted - mankind will not be able to think without the media telling them what to think. That time has already come.

There is no lack of information, but if the information is not sanctioned by the top then people are not accepting it.

As a side note - women are guilty of this, but men are too. Even here on the forum where men question far more things you have some points repeated only because the top-down seeming "consensus" is made. Every man should check out all sides of the story and find out whether he truly knows everything about topics like the monetary system, interest free money creation, globalist world domination plans, the real plans of Agenda 21 & the UN, the global warming (scam), the vaccine (scam), efficiency of some alternative medical treatments like orthomolecular medicine etc. {Though I have no beef with men who have different opinions on those issues - not everyone has the time and energy to dig deep into those topics. }

All those mainstream talking points are opposed sometimes by Nobel price winners of their respective fields and there are countless sources and even sometimes thousands of studies out there. But all of them get drowned out by the power of the mainstream which comes with limitless cash, respectability, being sanctioned by the top and "peer-reviewed consensus".

Keep in mind - feminism and gender-is-a-construct is the leading consensus about gender-relations now. If you then base your seduction and relationship skills on those "scientific" tips, then you will be indeed a poor pig led to the slaughter of the sexual market.

Think for yourself, question almost anything, be ready to change opinions - pick the most likely one out there and the most logical based on what you know.
But alas - I expect this only from men. I expect women only to run in safety of the herds.

[spokepoker]

[Hoser]

^ Ouch!

In multiple ways

[Chowder Head]

The Women's March was such a success they want to strike for a day. But women take more sick days than men so nobody will even notice a women's strike.

[url=https://twitter.com/womensmarch/status/828635618049720323/photo/1][/url]

[Dusty]

(02-06-2017 05:26 PM)Chowder Head Wrote:  

The Women's March was such a success they want to strike for a day. But women take more sick days than men so nobody will even notice a women's strike.

[url=https://twitter.com/womensmarch/status/828635618049720323/photo/1][/url]

Everyone will be walking around with wrinkled shirts.

[Elster]

(02-06-2017 05:26 PM)Chowder Head Wrote:  

[url=https://twitter.com/womensmarch/status/828635618049720323/photo/1][/url]

A day without a woman:

[Handsome Creepy Eel]

I hope they go on a sex strike soon, just imagine a night out at a club without all those millions of fatties roaming around looking for bottom feeders... it would be like the famous DOBA's 1970s!

[John Michael Kane]

They already are on a sex strike. It is called never shaving body hair, weighing 300 lbs and being a feminist. Naturally repelling men for decades!

[kaotic]

Day without a woman ?

Cute.

So what happens when an HR woman has to fire a woman who went on strike and broke company policies ?

Heh.

[kavi]

Nah, they wont ever do that, because they know most of them are useless, and that men would be much happier without them (most of us can go a day without busting in a hole).

[Renzy]

(02-06-2017 05:26 PM)Chowder Head Wrote:  

The Women's March was such a success they want to strike for a day. But women take more sick days than men so nobody will even notice a women's strike.

[/url]

This seems to be a recurring narcissistic, female fantasy - women all go "on strike" and then us incompetent doofus men realize how unbearably difficult day to day life is without women, whom we all rely on to get the *truly difficult* work done.

Years ago the Lifetime channel ran a series "[url=http://www.imdb.com/title/tt2299804/plotsummary?ref_=tt_ov_pl]The Week the Women Went" that went with this idea in the form of a show:

Quote:

With the women escaping to an isolated site, the town's men are left to handle all responsibilities, ranging from making the kids' breakfast and putting them to bed to maintaining their households and coordinating events, many of which resulted in unforeseen issues forcing them to create a new perspective on life during the seven day experience.

Apparently the reverse scenario, "The Week that Men Went", seems to have never occurred to anyone in Hollywood. Maybe that's because if men suddenly decided to go on strike and leave women to fend for themselves, it would look like a post-apocalyptic dystopia.

Personally, I think it would make for a pretty interesting show: no more police, firefighters, military, EMS, construction, plumbers, auto repair, tow truck drivers, garbage men, ... you get the idea.

Women go on strike, it's inconvenient. Men go on strike, and society will shut down.

[kavi]

^That was in old days when women contributed more to society and actually had children. Not so much these days.

[budoslavic]

(02-06-2017 05:26 PM)Chowder Head Wrote:  

The Women's March was such a success they want to strike for a day. But women take more sick days than men so nobody will even notice a women's strike.

[/url]

Via The Guardian, "[url=https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/feb/06/women-strike-trump-resistance-power]Women of America: we're going on strike. Join us so Trump will see our power"

Quote:

<snipped>
...
The women’s marches of 21 January have shown that in the United States, too, a new feminist movement may be in the making. It is important not to lose momentum.

Let us join together on 8 March to strike, walk out, march and demonstrate. Let us use the occasion of this international day of action to be done with lean-in feminism and to build in its place a feminism for the 99%, a grassroots, anti-capitalist feminism – a feminism in solidarity with working women, their families and their allies throughout the world.
</snipped>

[Chowder Head]

Lean-in feminism? Feminism for the 99%? So this will be good for all of us... ok they convinced me -- I'm all in. No broads at work sounds good to me!

[ivansirko]

^^Will the day without women be on election day?

[Libertas]

A day when America's obesity epidemic will suddenly vanish.

[Enoch]

If women go on strike, who will do critical things like monitor the electric grid, keep the HVAC systems running smoothly, tend to the water treatment plants, etc.

wait,

HAHAHAHAHAH

[Conscious Pirate]

Sounds like the most productive & stress free day EVER. I'd even put in overtime for the privilege.

Just my 2c. Which I can afford to budget into my extra 23% that society pays me for not pulling ridiculous stunts & providing value.

Do it bitches. I dare you.

[Simeon_Strangelight]

'Chowder Head'
The Women's March was such a success they want to strike for a day. But women take more sick days than men so nobody will even notice a women's strike.

[/url]

The blogger Judgybitch had a post on a related topic.

If all women did not show up for work, then it would inconvenience us a bit.

However if men did not show up, then civilization would come a screeching halt with partly disastrous results.

[url=http://judgybitch.com/2013/09/17/what-would-happen-if-no-men-showed-up-for-work-today/]http://judgybitch.com/2013/09/17/what-wo...ork-today/

First up, the entire power grid is down. 100% of power plant operators, distributors, and dispatchers are men. Now, it’s possible that there are a few women working in these occupations, but however many there are, they do not make up even 1% of the total workforce, so statistically, 100% of the workforce is male.

dark

91% of the nation’s electrical engineers are men, and if they don’t show up for work, there is no one to monitor and manage the nation’s electrical supplies. Assuming some automation (designed by men, naturally) kicks in for the day, we had all better pray there are no problems. 97.6% of electrical power line installers and maintenance workers are men.

Lights out, ladies and gentlemen.

Don’t bother turning on your taps, either. Or flushing your toilets. 95.5% of water and liquid waste treatment plant and system operators are men.

Think you might be able to get out of town for the one day the men don’t show up?

Think again.

Planes are out.

95.9% of aircraft pilots and flight engineers are men. If you happen to find a plane with a female pilot, don’t get too excited. 98.4% of aircraft mechanics and service technicians are men. You can, however, be assured of your comfort as you sit on a pilotless aircraft that has no mechanic for pre-flight clearance, because 77.6% of flight attendants are female.



Should you be lucky enough to find a female pilot and a female technician to clear you for take-off, you still have some praying to do. Statistically, 0% of airtraffic controllers and airfield operations specialists are women.

http://www.bls.gov/cps/cpsaat11.htm

Of course, that doesn’t mean there are ZERO ladies working in air traffic control. There just aren’t enough to constitute even 1% of the workforce.

Trains, of course, are also out.

100% of locomotive engineers and operators are men, as are 100% of the workers who operate railroad brake, signals and switches. 94.4% of railway yardmasters are men, but if you chance upon a female yardmaster, it won’t help you much. She can’t operate the trains.

You might have better luck with bus drivers, almost half of whom are women.

But the streets are likely to be chaos. And there won’t be anyone on hand to help you navigate that.

police

87.4% of police and sheriff’s patrol officers are men. 96.6% of firefighters are men. 68.8% of Emergency Medical Technicians and Paramedics are men, so if it all goes tits up and you get hurt, there’s a small chance you might make it to a hospital.

I hope you don’t get too badly hurt, though. 65.7% of all surgeons are men.

Maybe you should just work from home? In the dark, mind you. With no running water.

Uh-oh. Looks like that might be a problem, too.

For all computer and mathematical occupations combined, 74.4% of the workforce is male. Computer network architects, who design and implement all our computer based communications systems are 91.9% men. And 94.2% of radio and telecommunications equipment installers and repair technicians are men.

Looks like that plan is fucked.

Hope it doesn’t get too hot, or too cold the day men don’t show up for work. Even if you had power, which you don’t, you would be hard-pressed to get anyone in to take a look at your wonky air-conditioner or furnace.

repair

98.4% of heating, air-conditioning and refrigeration mechanics and installers are men.

Oh well. Guess you’ll have to mosey on down to the local café, which has no power either, but what’s logic and consequence anyways? Be careful when you step over all that accumulating garbage! Remember that most EMTs are men, and they’ve taken the day off. Don’t want to get hurt now.

garbage

Most garbage collectors are men, too. 93.4%, to be exact.

You’ll need to stop at the bank first, for a little cash injection.

Oops. Don’t bother.

atm

The machine hasn’t been filled with money today. 81.5% of security guards and gaming surveillance officers are men. It’s unlikely the banks would be functioning anyways, with no men at work. 72.1% of all securities, commodities and financial services sales agents are men. 72.6% of the nation’s CEOs would be taking the day off, along with 70.9% of all the general and operations managers.

Don’t count on getting a weather report today. Statistically, 0% of the nation’s atmospheric and space scientists are women.

Actually, don’t plan on acquiring pretty much anything today. The workers in the entire production, transportation and material moving occupations are 78.2% men. Not only will no goods be moving on the day men go on strike, they won’t be made, period. 82.4% of all the industrial production managers are men.

miners

Nothing will be built or extracted from the earth in terms of raw materials. 97.5% of that workforce is male.

Nothing will be installed, maintained or repaired. 96.8% of that workforce is male.

If men took a collective day off, we would instantly be without power, without the means to communicate, without protection, without water, without trucks bringing us the food and products we take for granted, because men are the ones who provide all those things.

Where in our culture do we EVER see that acknowledged? If women took the day off, with the sole exception of NURSES, nothing would happen. No one would die. The world would continue to function. The hair salons and primary schools and retail clothing stores would close, and the male management structure would have to find some way to answer their own phones for a day, but essentially, nothing would happen.

You will often hear feminists barking on about male privilege, usually in a well-lit room, comfortably warm, with her iPhone close at hand, buzzing with updates from her latest #mensuck Twitter feed, with zero awareness that every single one of those luxuries is provided by men.

Essentially a day without men would result in women sitting in the dark in their own appartments, having their doors closed (because cops are out and men would stay at home - those places being the only safe ones), reading a magazine or a book. Also the women would have to take a dump in a bucket, because toilets would stop working.

If they don't show up, then we will survive without them. Nurses would be the most inconvenience, but then only emergency aid would be given by the male doctors, few highly qualified male nurses and the majority of male paramedics. We will survive even that.

A male strike is not to be survived by civilization.

[Matsufubu]

Heh, my first thought was that outside of nurses, what difference would it really make? Service slower at Starbucks? Nobody getting reported to HR for bullshit? So fucking what? If nurses and midwives went on strike it would be politically disastrous for their cause. Nobody wants women and children suffering and dying, and I doubt any more than a handful of nurses would simply abandon their patients to make a dumb point they probably don't even agree with.

This is like a child threatening to leave home because they didn't get sweets. Good luck with that, kid.

[Constitution45]

I don't understand, what do they actually have to complain about ?
They are probably the most privileged group to have ever existed since the dawn of time.
You have to love the whole 1930's socialist style red font used in their poster though.

[MOVSM]

What do you mean, "what"? Nothing is ever enough for women. Was it heartiste who gave the answer to the eternal question?
"what do women want?" --more.

[Latinopan]

They did something like this in Texas after some pro-life laws were passed, calling strike, wmen t not have sex with any men in Texas until these laws are removed, sure, it did not go s well.

[JohnKreese]

#daywithoutmen festivities currently taking place in Brasil

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-news/...th-9769037

Quote:

Bloodthirsty mob takes over city's streets leaving trail of death and rape after police go on strike

I pray that March 8th is not like this!!!