rooshvforum.network is a fully functional forum: you can search, register, post new threads etc...
Old accounts are inaccessible: register a new one, or recover it when possible. x


The Trump China Policy Thread

The Trump China Policy Thread

Full Transcript of VP Pence's speech on China

Quote:Quote:

THE VICE PRESIDENT: Thank you, Ken, for that kind introduction. To the Members of the Board of Trustees, to Dr. Michael Pillsbury, to our distinguished guests, and to all of you who, true to your mission in this place, “think about the future in unconventional ways” –- it is an honor to be back at the Hudson Institute.

For more than a half a century, this Institute has dedicated itself to “advancing global security, prosperity, and freedom.” And while Hudson’s hometowns have changed over the years, one thing has been constant: You have always advanced that vital truth, that American leadership lights the way.

And today, speaking of leadership, allow me to begin by bringing greetings from a great champion of American leadership at home and abroad –- I bring greetings from the 45th President of the United States of America, President Donald Trump. (Applause.)

From early in this administration, President Trump has made our relationship with China and President Xi a priority. On April 6th of last year, President Trump welcomed President Xi to Mar-a-Lago. On November 8th of last year, President Trump traveled to Beijing, where China’s leader welcomed him warmly.

Over the course of the past two years, our President has forged a strong personal relationship with the President of the People’s Republic of China, and they’ve worked closely on issues of common interest, most importantly the denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula.

But I come before you today because the American people deserve to know that, as we speak, Beijing is employing a whole-of-government approach, using political, economic, and military tools, as well as propaganda, to advance its influence and benefit its interests in the United States.

China is also applying this power in more proactive ways than ever before, to exert influence and interfere in the domestic policy and politics of this country.

Under President Trump’s leadership, the United States has taken decisive action to respond to China with American action, applying the principles and the policies long advocated in these halls.

In our National Security Strategy that the President Trump released last December, he described a new era of “great power competition.” Foreign nations have begun to, as we wrote, “reassert their influence regionally and globally,” and they are “contesting [America’s] geopolitical advantages and trying [in essence] to change the international order in their favor.”

In this strategy, President Trump made clear that the United States of America has adopted a new approach to China. We seek a relationship grounded in fairness, reciprocity, and respect for sovereignty, and we have taken strong and swift action to achieve that goal.

As the President said last year on his visit to China, in his words, “we have an opportunity to strengthen the relationship between our two countries and improve the lives of our citizens.” Our vision of the future is built on the best parts of our past, when America and China reached out to one another in a spirit of openness and friendship.

When our young nation went searching in the wake of the Revolutionary War for new markets for our exports, the Chinese people welcomed American traders laden with ginseng and fur.

When China suffered through indignities and exploitations during her so-called “Century of Humiliation,” America refused to join in, and advocated the “Open Door” policy, so that we could have freer trade with China, and preserve their sovereignty.

When American missionaries brought the good news to China’s shores, they were moved by the rich culture of an ancient and vibrant people. And not only did they spread their faith, but those same missionaries founded some of China’s first and finest universities.

When the Second World War arose, we stood together as allies in the fight against imperialism. And in that war’s aftermath, America ensured that China became a charter member of the United Nations, and a great shaper of the post-war world.

But soon after it took power in 1949, the Chinese Communist Party began to pursue authoritarian expansionism. It is remarkable to think that only five years after our nations had fought together, we fought each other in the mountains and valleys of the Korean Peninsula. My own father saw combat on that frontier of freedom.

But not even the brutal Korean War could diminish our mutual desire to restore the ties that for so long had bound our peoples together. China’s estrangement from the United States ended in 1972, and, soon after, we re-established diplomatic relations and began to open our economies to one another, and American universities began training a new generation of Chinese engineers, business leaders, scholars, and officials.

After the fall of the Soviet Union, we assumed that a free China was inevitable. Heady with optimism at the turn of the 21st Century, America agreed to give Beijing open access to our economy, and we brought China into the World Trade Organization.

Previous administrations made this choice in the hope that freedom in China would expand in all of its forms -– not just economically, but politically, with a newfound respect for classical liberal principles, private property, personal liberty, religious freedom — the entire family of human rights. But that hope has gone unfulfilled.

The dream of freedom remains distant for the Chinese people. And while Beijing still pays lip service to “reform and opening,” Deng Xiaoping’s famous policy now rings hollow.

Over the past 17 years, China’s GDP has grown nine-fold; it’s become the second-largest economy in the world. Much of this success was driven by American investment in China. And the Chinese Communist Party has also used an arsenal of policies inconsistent with free and fair trade, including tariffs, quotas, currency manipulation, forced technology transfer, intellectual property theft, and industrial subsidies that are handed out like candy to foreign investment. These policies have built Beijing’s manufacturing base, at the expense of its competitors -– especially the United States of America.

China’s actions have contributed to a trade deficit with the United States that last year ran to $375 billion –- nearly half of our global trade deficit. As President Trump said just this week, in his words, “We rebuilt China” over the last 25 years.

Now, through the “Made in China 2025” plan, the Communist Party has set its sights on controlling 90 percent of the world’s most advanced industries, including robotics, biotechnology, and artificial intelligence. To win the commanding heights of the 21st century economy, Beijing has directed its bureaucrats and businesses to obtain American intellectual property –- the foundation of our economic leadership -– by any means necessary.

Beijing now requires many American businesses to hand over their trade secrets as the cost of doing business in China. It also coordinates and sponsors the acquisition of American firms to gain ownership of their creations. Worst of all, Chinese security agencies have masterminded the wholesale theft of American technology –- including cutting-edge military blueprints. And using that stolen technology, the Chinese Communist Party is turning plowshares into swords on a massive scale.

China now spends as much on its military as the rest of Asia combined, and Beijing has prioritized capabilities to erode America’s military advantages on land, at sea, in the air, and in space. China wants nothing less than to push the United States of America from the Western Pacific and attempt to prevent us from coming to the aid of our allies. But they will fail.

Beijing is also using its power like never before. Chinese ships routinely patrol around the Senkaku Islands, which are administered by Japan. And while China’s leader stood in the Rose Garden at the White House in 2015 and said that his country had, and I quote, “no intention to militarize” the South China Sea, today, Beijing has deployed advanced anti-ship and anti-air missiles atop an archipelago of military bases constructed on artificial islands.

China’s aggression was on display this week, when a Chinese naval vessel came within 45 yards of the USS Decatur as it conducted freedom-of-navigation operations in the South China Sea, forcing our ship to quickly maneuver to avoid collision. Despite such reckless harassment, the United States Navy will continue to fly, sail, and operate wherever international law allows and our national interests demand. We will not be intimidated and we will not stand down. (Applause.)

America had hoped that economic liberalization would bring China into a greater partnership with us and with the world. Instead, China has chosen economic aggression, which has in turn emboldened its growing military.

Nor, as we had hoped, has Beijing moved toward greater freedom for its own people. For a time, Beijing inched toward greater liberty and respect for human rights. But in recent years, China has taken a sharp U-turn toward control and oppression of its own people.

Today, China has built an unparalleled surveillance state, and it’s growing more expansive and intrusive – often with the help of U.S. technology. What they call the “Great Firewall of China” likewise grows higher, drastically restricting the free flow of information to the Chinese people.

And by 2020, China’s rulers aim to implement an Orwellian system premised on controlling virtually every facet of human life — the so-called “Social Credit Score.” In the words of that program’s official blueprint, it will “allow the trustworthy to roam everywhere under heaven, while making it hard for the discredited to take a single step.”

And when it comes to religious freedom, a new wave of persecution is crashing down on Chinese Christians, Buddhists, and Muslims.

Last month, Beijing shut down one of China’s largest underground churches. Across the country, authorities are tearing down crosses, burning bibles, and imprisoning believers. And Beijing has now reached a deal with the Vatican that gives the avowedly atheist Communist Party a direct role in appointing Catholic bishops. For China’s Christians, these are desperate times.

Beijing is also cracking down on Buddhism. Over the past decade, more than 150 Tibetan Buddhist monks have lit themselves on fire to protest China’s repression of their beliefs and their culture. And in Xinjiang, the Communist Party has imprisoned as many as one million Muslim Uyghurs in government camps where they endure around-the-clock brainwashing. Survivors of the camps have described their experiences as a deliberate attempt by Beijing to strangle Uyghur culture and stamp out the Muslim faith.

As history attests though, a country that oppresses its own people rarely stops there. And Beijing also aims to extend its reach across the wider world. As Hudson’s own Dr. Michael Pillsbury has written, “China has opposed the actions and goals of the U.S. government. Indeed, China is building its own relationships with America’s allies and enemies that contradict any peaceful or productive intentions of Beijing.”

In fact, China uses so-called “debt diplomacy” to expand its influence. Today, that country is offering hundreds of billions of dollars in infrastructure loans to governments from Asia to Africa to Europe and even Latin America. Yet the terms of those loans are opaque at best, and the benefits invariably flow overwhelmingly to Beijing.

Just ask Sri Lanka, which took on massive debt to let Chinese state companies build a port of questionable commercial value. Two years ago, that country could no longer afford its payments, so Beijing pressured Sri Lanka to deliver the new port directly into Chinese hands. It may soon become a forward military base for China’s growing blue-water navy.

Within our own hemisphere, Beijing has extended a lifeline to the corrupt and incompetent Maduro regime in Venezuela that’s been oppressing its own people. They pledged $5 billion in questionable loans to be repaid with oil. China is also that country’s single largest creditor, saddling the Venezuelan people with more than $50 billion in debt, even as their democracy vanishes. Beijing is also impacting some nations’ politics by providing direct support to parties and candidates who promise to accommodate China’s strategic objectives.

And since last year alone, the Chinese Communist Party has convinced three Latin American nations to sever ties with Taipei and recognize Beijing. These actions threaten the stability of the Taiwan Strait, and the United States of America condemns these actions. And while our administration will continue to respect our One China Policy, as reflected in the three joint communiqués and the Taiwan Relations Act, America will always believe that Taiwan’s embrace of democracy shows a better path for all the Chinese people. (Applause.)

Now these are only a few of the ways that China has sought to advance its strategic interests across the world, with growing intensity and sophistication. Yet previous administrations all but ignored China’s actions. And in many cases, they abetted them. But those days are over.

Under President Trump’s leadership, the United States of America has been defending our interests with renewed American strength.

We’ve been making the strongest military in the history of the world stronger still. Earlier this year, President Trump signed into law the largest increase in our national defense since the days of Ronald Reagan -– $716 billion to extend the strength of the American military to every domain.

We’re modernizing our nuclear arsenal. We’re fielding and developing new cutting-edge fighters and bombers. We’re building a new generation of aircraft carriers and warships. We’re investing as never before in our armed forces. And this includes initiating the process to establish the United States Space Force to ensure our continued dominance in space, and we’ve taken action to authorize increased capability in the cyber world to build deterrence against our adversaries.

At President Trump’s direction, we’re also implementing tariffs on $250 billion in Chinese goods, with the highest tariffs specifically targeting the advanced industries that Beijing is trying to capture and control. And as the President has also made clear, we will levy even more tariffs, with the possibility of substantially more than doubling that number, unless a fair and reciprocal deal is made. (Applause.)

These actions — exercises in American strength — have had a major impact. China’s largest stock exchange fell by 25 percent in the first nine months of this year, in large part because our administration has been standing strong against Beijing’s trade practices.

As President Trump has made clear, we don’t want China’s markets to suffer. In fact, we want them to thrive. But the United States wants Beijing to pursue trade policies that are free, fair, and reciprocal. And we will continue to stand and demand that they do. (Applause.)

Sadly, China’s rulers, thus far, have refused to take that path. The American people deserve to know: In response to the strong stand that President Trump has taken, Beijing is pursuing a comprehensive and coordinated campaign to undermine support for the President, our agenda, and our nation’s most cherished ideals.

I want to tell you today what we know about China’s actions here at home — some of which we’ve gleaned from intelligence assessments, some of which are publicly available. But all of which are fact.

As I said before, as we speak, Beijing is employing a whole-of-government approach to advance its influence and benefit its interests. It’s employing this power in more proactive and coercive ways to interfere in the domestic policies of this country and to interfere in the politics of the United States.

The Chinese Communist Party is rewarding or coercing American businesses, movie studios, universities, think tanks, scholars, journalists, and local, state, and federal officials.

And worst of all, China has initiated an unprecedented effort to influence American public opinion, the 2018 elections, and the environment leading into the 2020 presidential elections. To put it bluntly, President Trump’s leadership is working; and China wants a different American President.

There can be no doubt: China is meddling in America’s democracy. As President Trump said just last week, we have, in his words, “found that China has been attempting to interfere in our upcoming [midterm] election[s].”

Our intelligence community says that “China is targeting U.S. state and local governments and officials to exploit any divisions between federal and local levels on policy. It’s using wedge issues, like trade tariffs, to advance Beijing’s political influence.”

In June, Beijing itself circulated a sensitive document, entitled “Propaganda and Censorship Notice.” It laid out its strategy. It stated that China must, in their words, “strike accurately and carefully, splitting apart different domestic groups” in the United States of America.

To that end, Beijing has mobilized covert actors, front groups, and propaganda outlets to shift Americans’ perception of Chinese policy. As a senior career member of our intelligence community told me just this week, what the Russians are doing pales in comparison to what China is doing across this country. And the American people deserve to know it.

Senior Chinese officials have also tried to influence business leaders to encourage them to condemn our trade actions, leveraging their desire to maintain their operations in China. In one recent example, China threatened to deny a business license for a major U.S. corporation if they refused to speak out against our administration’s policies.

And when it comes to influencing the midterms, you need only look at Beijing’s tariffs in response to ours. The tariffs imposed by China to date specifically targeted industries and states that would play an important role in the 2018 election. By one estimate, more than 80 percent of U.S. counties targeted by China voted for President Trump and I in 2016; now China wants to turn these voters against our administration.

And China is also directly appealing to the American voters. Last week, the Chinese government paid to have a multipage supplement inserted into the Des Moines Register –- the paper of record of the home state of our Ambassador to China, and a pivotal state in 2018 and 2020. The supplement, designed to look like the news articles, cast our trade policies as reckless and harmful to Iowans.

Fortunately, Americans aren’t buying it. For example, American farmers are standing with this President and are seeing real results from the strong stands that he’s taken, including this week’s U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement, where we’ve substantially opened North American markets to U.S. products. The USMCA is a great win for American farmers and American manufacturers. (Applause.)

But China’s actions aren’t focused solely on influencing our policies and politics. Beijing is also taking steps to exploit its economic leverage, and the allure of their large marketplace, to advance its influence over American businesses.

Beijing now requires American joint ventures that operate in China to establish what they call “party organizations” within their company, giving the Communist Party a voice –- and perhaps a veto -– in hiring and investment decisions.

Chinese authorities have also threatened U.S. companies that depict Taiwan as a distinct geographic entity, or that stray from Chinese policy on Tibet. Beijing compelled Delta Airlines to publicly apologize for not calling Taiwan a “province of China” on its website. And it pressured Marriott to fire a U.S. employee who merely liked a tweet about Tibet.

And Beijing routinely demands that Hollywood portray China in a strictly positive light. It punishes studios and producers that don’t. Beijing’s censors are quick to edit or outlaw movies that criticize China, even in minor ways. For the movie, “World War Z,” they had to cut the script’s mention of a virus because it originated in China. The movie, “Red Dawn” was digitally edited to make the villains North Korean, not Chinese.

But beyond business and entertainment, the Chinese Communist Party is also spending billions of dollars on propaganda outlets in the United States and, frankly, around the world.

China Radio International now broadcasts Beijing-friendly programs on over 30 U.S. outlets, many in major American cities. The China Global Television Network reaches more than 75 million Americans, and it gets its marching orders directly from its Communist Party masters. As China’s top leader put it during a visit to the network’s headquarters, and I quote, “The media run by the Party and the government are propaganda fronts and must have the Party as their surname.”

It’s for those reasons and that reality that, last month, the Department of Justice ordered that network to register as a foreign agent.

The Communist Party has also threatened and detained the Chinese family members of American journalists who pry too deep. And it’s blocked the websites of U.S. media organizations and made it harder for our journalists to get visas. This happened after the New York Times published investigative reports about the wealth of some of China’s leaders.

But the media isn’t the only place where the Chinese Communist Party seeks to foster a culture of censorship. The same is true across academia.

I mean, look no further than the Chinese Students and Scholars Association, of which there are more than 150 branches across America’s campuses. These groups help organize social events for some of the more than 430,000 Chinese nationals studying in the United States. They also alert Chinese consulates and embassies when Chinese students, and American schools, stray from the Communist Party line.

At the University of Maryland, a Chinese student recently spoke at her graduation of what she called, and I quote, the “fresh air of free speech” in America. The Communist Party’s official newspaper swiftly chastised her. She became the victim of a firestorm of criticism on China’s tightly-controlled social media, and her family back home was harassed. As for the university itself, its exchange program with China — one of the nation’s most extensive — suddenly turned from a flood to a trickle.

China exerts academic pressure in other ways, as well. Beijing provides generous funding to universities, think tanks, and scholars, with the understanding that they will avoid ideas that the Communist Party finds dangerous or offensive. China experts in particular know that their visas will be delayed or denied if their research contradicts Beijing’s talking points.

And even scholars and groups who avoid Chinese funding are targeted by that country, as the Hudson Institute found out firsthand. After you offered to host a speaker Beijing didn’t like, your website suffered a major cyberattack, originating from Shanghai. The Hudson Institute knows better than most that the Chinese Communist Party is trying to undermine academic freedom and the freedom of speech in America today.

These and other actions, taken as a whole, constitute an intensifying effort to shift American public opinion and policy away from the “America First” leadership of President Donald Trump.

But our message to China’s rulers is this: This President will not back down. (Applause.) The American people will not be swayed. And we will continue to stand strong for our security and our economy, even as we hope for improved relations with Beijing.

Our administration is going to continue to act decisively to protect America’s interests, American jobs, and American security.

As we rebuild our military, we will continue to assert American interests across the Indo-Pacific.

As we respond to China’s trade practices, we will continue to demand an economic relationship with China that is free, fair, and reciprocal. We will demand that Beijing break down its trade barriers, fulfill its obligations, fully open its economy — just as we have opened ours.

We’ll continue to take action against Beijing until the theft of American intellectual property ends once and for all. And we will continue to stand strong until Beijing stops the predatory practice of forced technology transfer. We will protect the private property interests of American enterprise. (Applause.)

And to advance our vision of a free and open Indo-Pacific, we’re building new and stronger bonds with nations that share our values across the region, from India to Samoa. Our relationships will flow from a spirit of respect built on partnership, not domination.

We’re forging new trade deals on a bilateral basis, just as last week President Trump signed an improved trade deal with South Korea. And we will soon begin historic negotiations for a bilateral free-trade deal with Japan. (Applause.)

I’m also pleased to report that we’re streamlining international development and finance programs. We’ll be giving foreign nations a just and transparent alternative to China’s debt-trap diplomacy. In fact, this week, President Trump will sign the BUILD Act into law.

Next month, it will be my privilege to represent the United States in Singapore and Papua New Guinea, at ASEAN and APEC. There, we will unveil new measures and programs to support a free and open Indo-Pacific. And on behalf of the President, I will deliver the message that America’s commitment to the Indo-Pacific has never been stronger. (Applause.)

Closer to home, to protect our interests, we’ve recently strengthened CFIUS — the Committee on Foreign Investment — heightening our scrutiny of Chinese investment in America to protect our national security from Beijing’s predatory actions.

And when it comes to Beijing’s malign influence and interference in American politics and policy, we will continue to expose it, no matter the form it takes. We will work with leaders at every level of society to defend our national interests and most cherished ideals. The American people will play the decisive role — and, in fact, they already are.

As we gather here, a new consensus is rising across America. More business leaders are thinking beyond the next quarter, and thinking twice before diving into the Chinese market if it means turning over their intellectual property or abetting Beijing’s oppression. But more must follow suit. For example, Google should immediately end development of the “Dragonfly” app that will strengthen Communist Party censorship and compromise the privacy of Chinese customers. (Applause.)

It’s also great to see more journalists reporting the truth without fear or favor, digging deep to find where China is interfering in our society, and why. And we hope that American and global news organizations will continue to join this effort on an increasing basis.

More scholars are also speaking out forcefully and defending academic freedom, and more universities and think tanks are mustering the courage to turn away Beijing’s easy money, recognizing that every dollar comes with a corresponding demand. And we’re confident that their ranks will grow.

And across the nation, the American people are growing in vigilance, with a newfound appreciation for our administration’s actions and the President’s leadership to reset America’s economic and strategic relationship with China. Americans stand strong behind a President that’s putting America first.

And under President Trump’s leadership, I can assure you, America will stay the course. China should know that the American people and their elected officials in both parties are resolved.

As our National Security Strategy states: We should remember that “Competition does not always mean hostility,” nor does it have to. The President has made clear, we want a constructive relationship with Beijing where our prosperity and security grow together, not apart. While Beijing has been moving further away from this vision, China’s rulers can still change course and return to the spirit of reform and opening that characterize the beginning of this relationship decades ago. The American people want nothing more; and the Chinese people deserve nothing less.

The great Chinese storyteller Lu Xun often lamented that his country, and he wrote, “has either looked down at foreigners as brutes, or up to them as saints,” but never “as equals.” Today, America is reaching out our hand to China. And we hope that soon, Beijing will reach back with deeds, not words, and with renewed respect for America. But be assured: we will not relent until our relationship with China is grounded in fairness, reciprocity, and respect for our sovereignty. (Applause.)

There is an ancient Chinese proverb that reads, “Men see only the present, but heaven sees the future.” As we go forward, let us pursue a future of peace and prosperity with resolve and faith. Faith in President Trump’s leadership and vision, and the relationship that he has forged with China’s president. Faith in the enduring friendship between the American people and the Chinese people. And Faith that heaven sees the future — and by God’s grace, America and China will meet that future together.

Hardcore stuff.
Reply

The Trump China Policy Thread

Pence is a retard. The only country meddling in "our democracy" is Israel.

Shabbos goy confirmed.
Reply

The Trump China Policy Thread

Trump Holds the Cards in the Trade War...

“China is caught in its own debt trap with no way out except inflation or default”...
“Trump will keep up the pressure; he never backs off and always doubles down. It will be up to Xi to blink and acquiesce in many U.S. demands”...

The Chinese economy is trapped, with few good options...

China’s Economy Is Failing
By Jim Rickards

I’ve written for years that Chinese economic development is partly real and partly smoke and mirrors and that it’s critical for investors to separate one from the other to make any sense out of China and its impact on the world.

My longest piece on this topic was Chapter Four of my second book, The Death of Money(2014), but I’ve written much else besides, including many articles for my newsletters.

Trump is putting tariffs on Chinese goods. China is striking back with its own tariffs, but it turns out that China doesn’t buy enough from the U.S. to match Trump dollar for dollar. China’s alternative is to cheapen its currency.

China’s economy is slowing and the trade war doesn’t help. Whether it’s the trade war, the currency war or the war of words, China’s weakness is under a spotlight. Trump has correctly spotted China’s weaknesses and is using them as leverage to get better trade deals and less theft of intellectual property.

The mainstream media narrative about the U.S.-China trade war implies that Trump is on a highly damaging ego trip and China holds all the cards. The exact opposite is true.

Trump has ample financial warfare weapons including tariffs, penalties, bans on direct investment, improved cyber-security, forced divestiture and freezing of assets.

Meanwhile, China has almost no room to impose tariffs. China’s vulnerabilities run deeper than that.

There’s no denying China’s remarkable economic progress over the past thirty years. Hundreds of millions have escaped poverty and found useful employment in manufacturing or services in the major cities.

Infrastructure gains have been historic, including some of the best trains in the world, state-of-the-art transportation hubs, cutting-edge telecommunications systems, and a rapidly improving military.

Yet, that’s only half the story.

The other half is pure waste, fraud, and theft. About 45% of Chinese GDP is in the category of “investment.” A developed economy GDP such as the U.S. is about 70% consumption and 20% investment.

There’s nothing wrong with 45% investment in a fast-growing developing economy assuming the investment is highly productive and intelligently allocated.

That’s not the case in China. At least half of the investment there is pure waste. It takes the form of “ghost cities” that are fully-built with skyscrapers, apartments, hotels, clubs, and transportation networks – and are completely empty.

This is not just western propaganda; I’ve seen the ghost cities first hand and walked around the empty offices and hotels.

Chinese officials try to defend the ghost cities by claiming they are built for the future. That’s nonsense. Modern construction is impressive, but it’s also high maintenance. Those shiny new buildings require occupants, rents and continual maintenance to remain shiny and functional. The ghost cities will be obsolete long before they are ever occupied.

Other examples of investment waste include over-the-top white elephant public structures such as train stations with marble facades, 128 escalators (mostly empty), 100-foot ceilings, digital advertising, and few passengers. The list can be extended to include airports, canals, highways, and ports, some of which are needed and many of which are pure waste.

Communist party leaders endorse these wasteful projects because they have positive effects in terms of job creation, steel fabrication, glass installation, and construction. However, those effects are purely temporary until the project is completed. The costs are paid with borrowed money that can never be repaid.

China might report 6.8% growth in GDP, but when the waste is stripped out the actual growth is closer to 4.5%. Meanwhile, China’s debts grow faster than the economy and its debt-to-GDP ratio is even worse than the U.S.

All of this would be sustainable if China had an unlimited ability to roll over and expand its debt and ample reserves to deal with a banking or liquidity crisis. It doesn’t. China’s financial fragility was revealed during the 2014-2016 partial collapse of its capital account.

China had about $4 trillion in its capital account in early 2014. That amount had fallen to about $3 trillion by late 2016. Much of that collapse was due to capital flight for fear of Chinese devaluation, (which did occur in August 2015 and again in December 2015).

China’s $3 trillion of remaining reserves are not as impressive as it sounds. $1 trillion of that amount is invested in illiquid assets (hedge funds, private equity funds, direct investments, etc.)

This is real wealth, but it’s not available on short notice to defend the currency or prop up banks.

Another $1 trillion of Chinese reserves are needed as a precautionary fund to bail-out the Chinese banking system. Many observers are relaxed about the insolvency of Chinese banks because they are confident about China’s ability to rescue them.

They may be right about that, but it’s not free. China needs to keep $1 trillion of dry powder to save the banks, so that money’s off the table.

That leaves about $1 trillion of liquid reserves to defend the Chinese currency if so desired. At the height of the Chinese capital outflows in 2016, China was losing $80 billion per month of hard currency to defend the yuan.

At that tempo, China would have burned through $1 trillion in one year and become insolvent. China did the only feasible thing, which was to close the capital account; (interest rate hikes and further devaluation would have caused other more serious problems).

This distress might have been temporary if China had managed to maintain good trading relations with the U.S. But that proved another chimera. The trade war, which has broken out between the U.S. and China has damaged Chinese exports and raised costs on Chinese imports at exactly the time China was counting on a larger trade surplus to help it finance its mountain of debt.

Now trade is under threat and China is stuck with debt it can’t repay or rollover easily. This marks the end of China’s Cinderella growth story and the beginning of a period of economic slowdown and potential social unrest.

The coming Chinese crack-up is not just theoretical. The hard data supports the thesis. Here’s a real-time data summary from the Director of Floor Operations at the New York Stock Exchange, Steven “Sarge” Guilfoyle:

The greater threat to financial markets will come, in my opinion from the slowing of global growth, at least partially due to the current state of international trade. This thought process is lent some credence by last night’s rather disastrous across-the-board macroeconomic numbers released by China’s National Bureau of Statistics. … For the Month of July, in China – Fixed Asset Investment. Growth slowed to the slowest pace since this data was first recorded back in 1992, printing in decline for a fifth consecutive month. Industrial Production.

Missed expectations for a third consecutive month, while printing at a growth rate equaling the nation’s slowest since February of 2016. Retail Sales. Finally showing a dent in the armor, missed expectation while slowing from the prior month.

Unemployment. This item has only been recorded since January. Headline unemployment “popped” up to 5.1% from June’s 4.8%. Oil Production. The NBS reported that Chinese oil production fell 2.6% in July and now stands from a daily perspective at the lowest level since June of 2011.

China will not report Q3 GDP until October 15. The National Bureau of Statistics reported annualized growth of 6.7% for the second quarter. Depending on the veracity of the data, one must start to wonder if China can indeed hang on to growth of 6.5% going forward.

This unpleasant picture Sarge paints is based on official Chinese data. Yet, China has a long history of overstating its data and painting the tape. The reality in China is always worse than the official data reveals.

This slowdown comes just months after Chinese dictator Xi Jinping was offered a dictator-for-life role by the removal of term limits and was placed on the same pedestal as Mao Zedong by the creation of “Xi Jinping Thought” as a formal branch of Chinese Communist ideology.

The Book of Proverbs says, “Pride goeth before destruction, and a haughty spirit before a fall.”

Xi Jinping now finds himself in precisely this position. His political ascension inflated his pride just as he now faces the reality of a falling economy and possible destruction of any consensus around his power and the lack of accountability.

Trump continues to tighten the screws with more tariffs, more penalties, and a near complete shutdown of China’s ability to invest in U.S. markets.

Only Trump and Xi can salvage the situation with negotiation and reasonable compromise on trade and intellectual property. But, Trump won’t blink first; that’s up to Xi.

Since the Clintons, the USA is the only country that conspired against its own manufacturers to allow China to dump $500 Billion a year of their cheap junk in the USA causing the elimination of 70,000+ US-based manufacturers. Is post-Brexit UK going to buy a lot of China junk sure but not $500 Billion worth. With the arrogant Chinese implanting back door spy chips in their motherboards it has already set off alarm bells among major hardware buyers in the USA and elsewhere - Google Bloomberg for the sordid details - which is not the most pro-Trump organization. Trump wants the Intellectual Property theft to stop and this will be another nail in their crooked Red Freaking Communist Chinese commerce coffin.
Reply

The Trump China Policy Thread

China's problem lies not with Xi Jinping, but the Party-state. The whole system is set up to encourage inefficiency and corruption. Out of political necessity, the CCP controls all the industries worth controlling lest the private sector become too powerful and people start demanding democratic rights. The Chinese missed the boat to transition to something like the Japanese system, where one party (The LDP) is in de facto control, since now the CCP elite is synonymous with wealth and corrupt vested interests.

The only thing Xi Jinping —who was largely an outsider to the corrupt monied factions when he was given the position of CCP general secretary in 2012 as the result of a political compromise — can do to even stay in power is to constantly be on the the offensive against those who would seek to depose him and his allies from the Politburo. This is the reason he's been promoting Xi Jinping Thought, declaring himself core leader, removing term limits, and so on.

The fact that Meng Hongwei, the Chinese chief of Interpol, was recalled to China and arrested with such speed (despite the embarrassing effects this has on China's image) is the latest obvious example showing that Xi still has powerful enemies who are trying to unseat him or edge him out of power. Meng was the deputy director of the Public Security Bureau and one of the henchmen to Zhou Yongkang, who in turn happens to be the single most powerful official purged by Xi Jinping.

It would be a disaster for US-China relations if Xi lost power right now. The years between 2002 and 2012, when Hu Jintao was supposedly in office, saw him being effectively puppeted by members of his own Politburo, who each carved out their own political-economic fiefs in the Chinese state. Not that America's policies on China were stellar back then, but even if we did have sound leadership at that point, it would be a huge pain dealing with a CCP united on no issues except perpetuating corruption.

This is why, despite having the harshest policy on China in decades, Trump still tries to deal with Xi Jinping directly. He understands best of any US president in a long time how badly a leader can be hamstringed by his own government. Trump's approach is working with North Korea and it will probably work with China.
Reply

The Trump China Policy Thread




Reply

The Trump China Policy Thread

Quote: (10-15-2018 12:43 PM)Lunostrelki Wrote:  

China's problem lies not with Xi Jinping, but the Party-state. The whole system is set up to encourage inefficiency and corruption. Out of political necessity, the CCP controls all the industries worth controlling lest the private sector become too powerful and people start demanding democratic rights. The Chinese missed the boat to transition to something like the Japanese system, where one party (The LDP) is in de facto control, since now the CCP elite is synonymous with wealth and corrupt vested interests.

The only thing Xi Jinping —who was largely an outsider to the corrupt monied factions when he was given the position of CCP general secretary in 2012 as the result of a political compromise — can do to even stay in power is to constantly be on the the offensive against those who would seek to depose him and his allies from the Politburo. This is the reason he's been promoting Xi Jinping Thought, declaring himself core leader, removing term limits, and so on.

The fact that Meng Hongwei, the Chinese chief of Interpol, was recalled to China and arrested with such speed (despite the embarrassing effects this has on China's image) is the latest obvious example showing that Xi still has powerful enemies who are trying to unseat him or edge him out of power. Meng was the deputy director of the Public Security Bureau and one of the henchmen to Zhou Yongkang, who in turn happens to be the single most powerful official purged by Xi Jinping.

It would be a disaster for US-China relations if Xi lost power right now. The years between 2002 and 2012, when Hu Jintao was supposedly in office, saw him being effectively puppeted by members of his own Politburo, who each carved out their own political-economic fiefs in the Chinese state. Not that America's policies on China were stellar back then, but even if we did have sound leadership at that point, it would be a huge pain dealing with a CCP united on no issues except perpetuating corruption.

This is why, despite having the harshest policy on China in decades, Trump still tries to deal with Xi Jinping directly. He understands best of any US president in a long time how badly a leader can be hamstringed by his own government. Trump's approach is working with North Korea and it will probably work with China.

Damn this was a badass post. I don't know if the others can fully appreciate your level of knowledge on China, but you are absolutely keyed in to some degree.

I think China is going to take a hit diplomatically somehow for capturing/killing the Interpol chief the way they did. Having him resign in such a creepy way is fucked up. People are so upset about the Saudi journalist but look at what China just did. Arguably 10 times more fucked up, but hardly a peep about it in the press, especially in the USA. Maybe they will get away with it like they did many times before on lesser people. Some of the silence on the issue could be that the guy was yet another double agent. All those people like that business woman from Houston arrested on espionage charges in China, all had their cover blown by the biggest CIA gaff in 20 years by another agent getting caught and rolling on them all.

Trump has his work cut out. Slowing down China but has to have some kind of good relationship with Xi. It's pretty much Mission Impossible when you look at all the factors working against both him and Xi.

Dating Guide for Mainland China Datasheet
TravelerKai's Martial Arts Datasheet
1 John 4:20 - If anyone says, I love God, and hates (detests, abominates) his brother [in Christ], he is a liar; for he who does not love his brother, whom he has seen, cannot love God, Whom he has not seen.
Reply

The Trump China Policy Thread

Does anyone here watch China Uncensored? Pretty good show.






Don't debate me.
Reply

The Trump China Policy Thread

Since President Trump's bullying hasn't worked so far to bend the Chinese regime, an old friend of China comes to save the day for the Trump Administration. Yes, you got it, Heinz Alfred Kissinger, aka 'Henry Kissinger', comes to the rescue! Old Henry will work his charm and decades long contacts so President Trump can save face before his blue collar clientele.
As the Bible says: 'What has happened before will happen again. What has been done before will be done again. There is nothing new in the whole world'.
And there's evidence to prove it:










With God's help, I'll conquer this terrible affliction.

By way of deception, thou shalt game women.

Diaboli virtus in lumbar est -The Devil's virtue is in his loins.
Reply

The Trump China Policy Thread

Very interesting talk by Eric Li on the Chinese political system, which presents a different perspective and a well-taken analysis of the Chinese system vs western political systems. He makes the case that the Chinese system is more of a meritocracy than the typical western democracy. I'd be interested on Deepdiver's opinion on this...






This video was actually recommended by a pretty smart chinese friend of mine, his interpretation of the current system is a kind of new Chinese dynasty that's not unlike most from the 3,000 year history of that nation.

“Nothing is more useful than to look upon the world as it really is.”
Reply

The Trump China Policy Thread

Sputnik moment for the US? China lands space probe on dark side of the moon, the first country to do so.

Quote:Quote:

China’s space programme scored a major victory on Thursday morning when the Chang’e 4 lunar spacecraft landed on the far side of the moon, territory that has never before been explored.

The probe completed the world’s first ever soft-landing on the uncharted far side at 10.26am Hong Kong time, and almost immediately transmitted a “close range” image of the mysterious land back to Earth.

The photograph showed Chang’e was sitting in a relatively flat area with a small crater just metres away. The mountain range of the Von Karman crater could be seen in the distance.

The China National Space Administration (CNSA) said the mission had “lifted the mysterious veil” from the far side of the moon, which is permanently blocked from view from Earth, and “opened a new chapter in human lunar exploration”.
Reply

The Trump China Policy Thread

It will be very interesting to compare the actual pictures of the moon surface taken by this probe versus the ones from the Apollo programs...

[Image: Stanley-Kubrick.jpg]

“Nothing is more useful than to look upon the world as it really is.”
Reply

The Trump China Policy Thread

I was hoping they would send it to the Apollo landing sites to search for flags and sheeit.
Reply

The Trump China Policy Thread

One thing that the CCP kept from the days of ancient Confucian China was a reverence for education (subsequent to Mao's cultural revolution whereby all the intellectuals and professors were killed, starved, imprisoned, tortured, reeducated etc - why the modern CCP now sends over 400,000+ full tuition paid students to study and "transfer knowledge" from leading private and state public universities in the USA and EU - since the old Maoist CCP killed off so many of their UNI profs) and the CCP kept the Confucian meritocracy exam system to prove who would be the most worthy to invest in advanced education for ministerial positions...

The Ancient Chinese Wisdom dictates there are 4 levels of intelligence:

Lowest: Those you have to teach and train constantly for basic proficiency...

Lower: Those you train several times and become proficient.

Higher: Those you train once and are quickly proficient.

Highest: Those who observe - need no training and exhibit the highest proficiency i.e. the genius warrior-athlete-scholars.

Many wealthy Chinese families pay for exam prep courses and even bribe Chinese professors for better marks towards better GPAs.

The latter two levels are the ones the CCP sends to the west full tuition and expenses paid as knowledge transfer and intellectual property espionage agents.

And of course, Xi fancies himself a modern high tech Chinese Emporer for life - enshrining his words and thought as Mao did with his little red book...

Ancient Chinese Proverb: When the Wind Blows the Grass must bend ... meaning when Chairman Emperor Xi speaks thinks or farts the masses must follow and obey.
Reply

The Trump China Policy Thread

The process of China-U.S. trade negotiations is kind of confusing if you aren't following the news much, or if you only look at how the MSM and fake intellectuals portray things. It's easy to believe that China is just holding out until Trump leaves office and won't actually make a deal.

But if you take a closer look, it becomes clear that there are some game analogues at work, and that Trump is probably close to reaching a deal with Xi.

The USA and China have a geopolitical relationship.

The USA is the stronger party, having a bigger economy, much more innovation, and more political stability. It fulfills the masculine or "yang" role in the relationship, having provided the money and tech for much of China's economic success in the last 40 years (granted, the labor is Chinese). Being stronger, America has the means to fight and win a trade war.

China is weaker, lacks innovation, and has a dark, unstable political system in both the sense that they are a repressive communist state and that their political workings are very opaque. It thus takes the feminine, or "yin" position in the Sino-U.S. dynamic, being more resistant to facts and courtesy, obsessed with face, and acting in secret rather than in the open. China's inferior strength means that it can't survive a trade war.

For the last few decades and arguably longer (like back to China's pre-communist days), the USA has been failing in its Yang role. Especially starting around the 1989 Tiananmen massacre, it has been giving tons of money to China while not being clear or adamant about what it actually wants, which is for China to play by the rules and reciprocate US generosity. China of course has been playing its Yin role, but because of a lack of Yang energy to offset it, the Yin nature of the Chinese leadership is encroaching on and disturbing the proper order.

Things are changing now that Trump and Xi are in power, and the trade war is on. Both of these guys are outsiders to their respective political systems (Trump is an independent businessman and Xi is a political ugly duckling for reasons I don't have time to repeat here) and have a mind to make their countries great again.

If you look at the Taiji (yin-yang symbol), there's a dot of yin in the yang half and vice versa, with the two sides flowing into each other.

Therefore:

Trump represents the appearance of a chaotic, yet dynamic Yin force in the mass of American Yang gone stagnant.

Xi, who is concentrating his political authority in the face of corrupt factional oligarchy in the communist leadership, represents a stabilizing Yang element in the mass of Chinese Yin.

now, as regards the trade talks:

Trump (or Washington) has a set of clear demands for the Chinese. Trump himself is unpredictable but the America he is leading is very much determined to rebuild itself.

Xi has said he is willing to work things out and build better relations. But the Chinese government he leads keeps making communist criticisms of the American-led order and flaking on promises.

Now Trump has made some progress with the trade war that has done actual damage to the Chinese economy. To a certain extent, this gives Xi more authority to push through reforms since there is a crisis (but too much damage would see him ousted).

But at the same time, the Chinese government (including Xi) won't officially admit that it is changing, or if it will change. There is too much face at stake. Also, the concentration of power and increasing totalitarianism of the Chinese system is a byproduct of centralizing power under the communist dictatorship, not an end goal. If you look at the mainstream media reports, which are willfully ignorant, you will see endless commentary about how the Communist Party won't budge and how US-China talks won't get anywhere. But this is terribly flawed. For example, see below:

https://www.cnbc.com/2019/01/09/us-trade...build.html
Quote:Quote:

China’s Foreign Ministry said Wednesday that its trade talks with the United States had concluded, and that results would soon be released.

The length of the negotiations, which extended into an unexpected third day, suggests the serious nature of the discussions, the ministry said.
of course. China is weak and needs to make it seem like they have confidence. Otherwise the Politburo would remove Xi from office for the embarrassment.

Ted McKinney, U.S. Under Secretary of Agriculture for Trade and Foreign Agricultural Affairs, addressed the negotiations earlier in the day to reporters at the delegation’s hotel, saying “I think they went just fine.”
“It’s been a good one for us,” he said without elaborating.
This is what Trump says all the time. As long as people are saying stuff like this, it means there is active (if slow) progress eating at Chinese resistance. Remember, America is stronger and plays the Yang, or active role.

China is keen to put an end to its trade dispute with the United States but will not make any “unreasonable concessions” and any agreement must involve compromise on both sides, state newspaper the China Daily said on Wednesday.
"Unreasonable concessions?" China is just putting up last-minute resistance. Statements like this seem daunting, but coupled with China's simultaneous willingness to host talks, it suggest they're opening to making a deal. Trump need only push harder (firmly, without being too desperate, or else it might trigger extreme knee-jerk reactions from the Chinese leadership and then we'd have China start a war over Taiwan, attempt to return to the days of Mao, or something similarly catastrophic).

However, the vast gap in relative strength between America and China, the existence of nuclear deterrent, plus China's lack of ideological strength (nobody really believes in communism, it's just a worn-out tool for political legitimacy), leads me to believe that America can demand a lot before the communists would dare do go crazy.

Basically, if you apply the root principles of game to how Trump is handling China, you'll see that he's doing great and things are likely to turn out well. If Xi pushes through reforms by 2020 (which is very possible given the combination of him concentrating power in his own hands; i.e. no one in the Party can kick him out, plus trade war pressures), then Trump will get due credit and be re-elected with a high percentage of the vote. The Chinese economy will improve as its private sector is allowed to operate normally, which will mean boosts in America as well.

Quote: (01-03-2019 04:43 PM)Deepdiver Wrote:  

And of course, Xi fancies himself a modern high tech Chinese Emporer for life - enshrining his words and thought as Mao did with his little red book...

Ancient Chinese Proverb: When the Wind Blows the Grass must bend ... meaning when Chairman Emperor Xi speaks thinks or farts the masses must follow and obey.
Xi Jinping Thought is ridiculed by most people in China these days, and Xi knows it. He's only put it in the constitution so that he has plausible authority to boss the Communist Party around.
Reply

The Trump China Policy Thread

Quote: (10-09-2018 08:36 AM)TigerMandingo Wrote:  

Pence is a retard. The only country meddling in "our democracy" is Israel.

Shabbos goy confirmed.

https://sanfrancisco.cbslocal.com/2018/0...francisco/

Quote:Quote:

SAN FRANCISCO (KPIX 5) – New details emerged Wednesday about how a Chinese spy managed to stay by Senator Dianne Feinstein’s side for nearly 20 years.

It happened five years ago, but additional information is just surfacing about how the Bay Area senator’s office was infiltrated by a Chinese spy.

The Bay Area is a hotbed for Russian and Chinese espionage. Late last year, the feds shut down the Russian consulate in San Francisco.

You may remember the thick black smoke that billowing from building before Russian diplomats turned it over to authorities, presumably produced by burning documents.

Now, all eyes are on Chinese intelligence in the Bay Area after the website Politico reported last week that a staffer for Senator Feinstein turned out to be a Chinese spy who reported back to the government officials about local politics.

On Wednesday, the San Francisco Chronicle uncovered additional details in a column written by reporters Phil Matier and Andy Ross.

The column revealed that the Chinese spy was Feinstein’s driver who also served as a gofer in her Bay Area office and was a liaison to the Asian-American community.

He even attended Chinese consulate functions for the senator.

Feinstein — who was Chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee at the time — was reportedly mortified when the FBI told her she’d been infiltrated.

Investigators reportedly concluded the driver hadn’t leaked anything of substance and Feinstein forced him to retire.

Former FBI agent and KPIX 5 security analyst Jeff Harp said he was not surprised.

“Think about Diane Feinstein and what she had access to,” said Harp. “One, she had access to the Chinese community here in San Francisco; great amount of political influence. Two, correct me if I’m wrong, Dianne Feinstein still has very close ties to the intelligence committees there in Washington, D.C.”

Harp ran counter espionage for the FBI in the Bay Area. He said in addition to traditional political intel and diplomatic secrets, Bay Area spies are often focused on things like R&D, technology and trade secrets.

“They also have an interest in the economy here. How to get political influence here,” said Harp. “What’s being developed in Silicon Valley that has dual-use technology. All of that is tied to the Bay Area.”

And he says, like in many areas, when it comes to counter intelligence and espionage, the Bay Area is a trend setter.

“As the Bay Area goes, so does the nation when it comes to technology,” said Harp. “So why not when it comes to spying?”

Harp pointed out politicians with access to classified information are generally trained on what not to say and when not to say it. But he also noted when you have a driver behind the wheel day in and day out for 20 years, there are more opportunities to slip up.

Feinstein’s office would not comment on the story, saying they do not address personnel matters or investigations, but they added that none of their California offices staffers had ever had security clearance.

The FBI declined to comment on the story.
Reply

The Trump China Policy Thread

Bump. New tariff threats have spooked the markets. His tone is a bit hyperbolic, but figured this is an important topic that deserves attention since it's faded from the news recently.

Here is a recent editorial from Steve Bannon laying out the case against China.

Quote:Quote:

Bannon: We're In An Economic War With China. It's Futile To Compromise

Getting tough with China to bring manufacturing jobs back to the United States was the linchpin of President Trump’s electoral march through the Rust Belt during his 2016 victory. Today, the goal of the radical cadre running China — the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) — is to be the global hegemonic power. The president’s threatened tariffs on Sunday demonstrate the severity of this threat. But as Washington and Beijing wrap up months of negotiations on a trade deal this month, whatever emerges won’t be a trade deal. It will be a temporary truce in a years-long economic and strategic war with China.

These are six “understandings” that highlight why it is futile to compromise with this regime.

The first understanding: The CCP has been waging economic war against industrial democracies ever since China joined the World Trade Organization (WTO) in 2001, and now China has emerged as the greatest economic and national security threat the United States has ever faced.

As a framework for the current trade talks, China must agree to end forced technology transfers; intellectual property theft; cyberintrusions into business networks; currency manipulation; high tariff and nontariff barriers; and unfair subsidies to state-owned enterprises. However, if the CCP agrees to the United States’ demands in an enforceable manner, it would amount to a legal and regulatory dismantling of Chinese state capitalism.

The second understanding: The trade deal under negotiation this month is not a deal between two similar systems seeking closer ties, as its cheerleaders on Wall Street and in the media and academia argue. Rather, this is a fundamental clash between two radically different economic models.

The best U.S. result is a detailed document in which China renounces its predatory, confiscatory and mercantilist practices while providing ample means to monitor and promptly enforce the agreement.

The best CCP result is to get the tariffs lifted by filing reams of paper with false, unenforceable promises that will allow it to run out the clock on the Trump administration and hope for a less antagonistic Democratic alternative.

The third understanding: Chinese state capitalism is highly profitable for its owners — the members of the CCP. Stagnant state-owned enterprises gain a competitive edge through massive government subsidies and the cost savings won by stealing the intellectual property, technology and innovations of foreigners.

If China halted such grand theft, its enterprises would be rapidly outcompeted by the Germans, South Koreans, Japanese and especially the United States.

This fact explains much about internal Chinese politics today. President Xi Jinping faces a palace sharply divided between reformers led by chief trade negotiator Liu He and a swarm of hawks who have profited and gained power from the status quo. Within China itself, it is both gallows humor and even money as to whether Liu He will be celebrated as the next Deng Xiaoping or end up in a Chinese gulag.

The fourth understanding: Trump advisers inside and outside the White House are playing on the president’s well-earned pride in a rising stock market and a fear he might lose the Farm Belt to try to box him into a weak deal. But it is a decidedly false narrative that any failure to reach a deal will lead to a market meltdown and economic implosion.

In fact, there is no better argument for Trump keeping his bold tariffs on China than the latest report that the U.S. economy grew at an annualized rate of 3.2 percent in the first quarter.

Anything less than a great deal will subject the president to relentless criticism from the Charles E. Schumer and Bernie Sanders wings of the Democratic Party. In addition, Sens. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) and Ted Cruz (R-Tex.) might use it to get to the right of Trump on China — potentially setting up a later primary challenge. For these reasons, the president’s best political option is not to surrender, but rather, to double down on the tariffs — they have been highly effective in pressuring the Chinese without harming the U.S. economy.

The fifth understanding: Even the toughest agreement needs effective monitoring, which is difficult even with accommodating partners and perhaps impossible with China. The danger is for the president to sign what appears to be a reasonable deal and find out several years later that the United States was hoodwinked.

The United States failed to adequately monitor China’s entry into the WTO in 2001. Instead of access to a billion Chinese consumers, the United States lost more than 5 million manufacturing jobs since 2000.

The sixth understanding: The world now bears witness to a rapidly militarizing totalitarian state imprisoning millions in work camps; persecuting Uighurs, Christians and Buddhists; and spying on, and enslaving, its own population.

This is history in real time; and the world is a house divided — half slave, half free. Trump and Xi are facing off to tip the scales in one direction or the other. One way leads to the benefits of freedom, democracy and free-market capitalism. The other leads to a totalitarian and mercantilist power run on state capitalism with Chinese characteristics.

The United States’ fight is not with the Chinese people but with the CCP. The Chinese people are the first and continuous victims of this barbarous regime.

The central issues that must be faced are China’s intentions on the world stage and what those ambitions mean for U.S. prosperity. With our country at a crossroads, it is more important than ever that Trump follow his instincts and not soften his stance against the greatest existential threat ever faced by the United States.
Reply

The Trump China Policy Thread

Quote: (10-15-2018 12:43 PM)Lunostrelki Wrote:  

China's problem lies not with Xi Jinping, but the Party-state. The whole system is set up to encourage inefficiency and corruption. Out of political necessity, the CCP controls all the industries worth controlling lest the private sector become too powerful and people start demanding democratic rights. The Chinese missed the boat to transition to something like the Japanese system, where one party (The LDP) is in de facto control, since now the CCP elite is synonymous with wealth and corrupt vested interests.

The only thing Xi Jinping —who was largely an outsider to the corrupt monied factions when he was given the position of CCP general secretary in 2012 as the result of a political compromise — can do to even stay in power is to constantly be on the the offensive against those who would seek to depose him and his allies from the Politburo. This is the reason he's been promoting Xi Jinping Thought, declaring himself core leader, removing term limits, and so on.

The fact that Meng Hongwei, the Chinese chief of Interpol, was recalled to China and arrested with such speed (despite the embarrassing effects this has on China's image) is the latest obvious example showing that Xi still has powerful enemies who are trying to unseat him or edge him out of power. Meng was the deputy director of the Public Security Bureau and one of the henchmen to Zhou Yongkang, who in turn happens to be the single most powerful official purged by Xi Jinping.

It would be a disaster for US-China relations if Xi lost power right now. The years between 2002 and 2012, when Hu Jintao was supposedly in office, saw him being effectively puppeted by members of his own Politburo, who each carved out their own political-economic fiefs in the Chinese state. Not that America's policies on China were stellar back then, but even if we did have sound leadership at that point, it would be a huge pain dealing with a CCP united on no issues except perpetuating corruption.

This is why, despite having the harshest policy on China in decades, Trump still tries to deal with Xi Jinping directly. He understands best of any US president in a long time how badly a leader can be hamstringed by his own government. Trump's approach is working with North Korea and it will probably work with China.

Important thing you got wrong there, the general Chinese public don't care that much for democracy rights. They have never seen democracy/multi-party leadership in their heydays, hence they don't feel for it. Hell, if Ancient Greece was a collection of failed states, probably none of us would think democracy works too.

Instead, from my observations, they are much more bent on "achieving their old position", that is becoming the boss in the area as they were back then. Contrary to others, most of the Chinese see Japan as a failed state, which hasn't recovered since they got neutered by the US at their height of their economic power. That's because their focus on national prestige turns them away from following Japan, economically strong but has no hopes of contesting the world. Deep down, they still discreetly gloat at the US for bombing their embassy back in '99, among other things.

I dare to say Xi Jinping is on offensive because he has the advantage. He sent a clear signal to the world in 2016 he has the upper hand in the Chinese board game when he announced the PLA will be laying off 300k personnel, and right after that, he commenced major structural reforms: incorporating the previous 7 army districts into 5 and replacing divisions with brigades. That's it, he got rid of all the officers from the Jiang Zeming faction, and received the capability to cut the PLA by 1/6. Since then, he has been taking down the opposition openly non-stop.

If you are in a precarious position, the last thing you would do is tell the world you are weak. You show that by secretly taking down rivals like Meng Hongwei. Instead he boldly arrests him, disregarding any possible backlash from opposing factions. He doesn't care because they can't do anything about him. He has the army, he has the popular support (for the Made in China 2025 proposal, the Chinese Rejuvenation plan and least importantly, anti-corruption), he also has ignorant Westerners who don't take China seriously and still think China is a shithole that just came back from the Cultural Revolution. What more does he need?

IMHO, China is not going to strike a deal with America in the near future. That would give Xi's enemies much needed time to gather strength, and he would lose face in front of his citizens. There will be olive branches thrown out here and there to distract Trump, as they have been doing, but this time the they are willing to throw money at Trump too as long as this takes America off their heels on Chinese technological advancement, which is what Made in China 2025 is about and pivotal in starting the trade war.

We will most likely not see an agreement coming until at least the 3rd quarter of the year. If there are any Internet nomads out here, I don't think the market is going to crash soon.
Reply

The Trump China Policy Thread

Nah, China's economy is quickly going downhill with the tariffs choking it. They are using some interventionist black magic to keep their stock market and housing bubble from total collapse, and preparing to lock down the countryside Great Leap Forward style in case things get really bad.

The CCP already tried to delay using the "olive branches" you mentioned earlier, thinking that Trump is tired of the trade war and is desperate for a deal. They wanted to backtrack on pretty much all sections of the draft trade deal the two sides have been working on in the last few moths. Instead Trump is basically telling China that they can either accept the deal Washington wants, or eat more tariffs. In fact there's a good chance the tariffs scheduled for tomorrow will stay there until China proves it's serious about not just signing, but also implementing the treaty.

China's grand strategies ("national rejuvenation," "MIC2025," "One Belt One Road") were reliant on its being able to keep leeching profits and tech from the USA. Trump has reduced these projects to nationalistic hot air.

Going through with the trade deal will put Xi in a bad domestic position. But there's not much choice and Xi will have to either soldier through it somehow, or be ousted.
Reply

The Trump China Policy Thread

Its very likely tariffs are going into effect. Trump was doing the paperwork earlier today.

The Chinese took it as weakness when Trump told the FED to lower rates. Going back on the deal was their way of calling Trump's bluff, but Trump wasn't bluffing.

We'll see how things unfold tonight at 12pm. Dinner coming up shortly.
Reply

The Trump China Policy Thread

Quote: (05-09-2019 06:11 PM)Lunostrelki Wrote:  

Nah, China's economy is quickly going downhill with the tariffs choking it. They are using some interventionist black magic to keep their stock market and housing bubble from total collapse, and preparing to lock down the countryside Great Leap Forward style in case things get really bad.

The CCP already tried to delay using the "olive branches" you mentioned earlier, thinking that Trump is tired of the trade war and is desperate for a deal. They wanted to backtrack on pretty much all sections of the draft trade deal the two sides have been working on in the last few moths. Instead Trump is basically telling China that they can either accept the deal Washington wants, or eat more tariffs. In fact there's a good chance the tariffs scheduled for tomorrow will stay there until China proves it's serious about not just signing, but also implementing the treaty.

The US only represents about 23% of the total exports of China, and even there, the tariffs will be absorbed mostly by US importers. Think of the iphone, or sneakers, Chinese manufacturers will simply pass on the tariffs to Apple or Nike.

China's exports to America amounted to
$562.9 billion or 21.5% of its overall imports.

1. Electronic equipment: $155.9 billion
2. Machinery: $119.8 billion
3. Furniture, lighting, signs: $38.1 billion
4. Toys, games: $27.9 billion
5. Plastics: $20.6 billion
6. Vehicles: $18.1 billion
7. Knit or crochet clothing: $15.4 billion
8. Footwear: $14.7 billion
9. Iron or steel products: $14.2 billion
10. Clothing (not knit or crochet): $13.4 billion

Most of these items are hard to replace key items in the supply chain. China has cornered the market on key items like monitors, screens and whole classes of microchips and electronics. Steel products (representing 3% of China's total exports to the US) are more vulnerable, but even with tariffs China will still be competitve vs Korea or Germany.

Overall, a small drop in the US export market, which represents 23% of China's total exports is hardly going to paralyze their economy. China's GDP growth the last two quarters was 6.4%. Their middle class is still growing fast (as is their millionaire class), now much larger than the US'.



Quote:Quote:

China's grand strategies ("national rejuvenation," "MIC2025," "One Belt One Road") were reliant on its being able to keep leeching profits and tech from the USA. Trump has reduced these projects to nationalistic hot air.

That's a bit silly. China is investing $6 trillion in its Belt Road infrastructure initiative, and one of the main goals was precisely to reduce its dependency on the US market. The US on the other hand has spent $6 trillion in mideast wars, with nothing to show for except thousands of casualties and massive debt.

Also, with the US going full retard neocon and putting half the world economy on notice for trading with Iran and Russia, China's prospects for trade with the rest of the world are looking better, even with countries like Germany, which resent having their arm twisted by Uncle Sam for buying cheap Russian gas.

“Nothing is more useful than to look upon the world as it really is.”
Reply

The Trump China Policy Thread

Quote:Quote:

Other unnamed sources reports have it that Chinese Vice Premier Lie He told Lighthizer & Mnuchin there is nothing more he can do and that it's up to President Trump and President Xi now to work this out.
Reply

The Trump China Policy Thread

Quote: (05-09-2019 06:11 PM)Lunostrelki Wrote:  

They are using some interventionist black magic to keep their stock market and housing bubble from total collapse, and preparing to lock down the countryside Great Leap Forward style in case things get really bad.

https://www.cnbc.com/2019/01/04/china-cu...lows-.html

China cuts banks' reserve ratios by 1% as economy slows
The cut in banks' reserve requirement ratios is the first in 2019 and the fifth in a year by the People's Bank of China.
The Chinese economy faces its weakest growth since the global financial crisis and mounting pressure from U.S. tariffs.
Reply

The Trump China Policy Thread

"Weakest growth" being what, six and a half percent?

God if we got that for even a quarter, Trump would be talking it to the skies.
Reply

The Trump China Policy Thread

To put things in context, weakest growth = 6.5%.

As well, China's bank reserve ratios went from 14.5%to 13.5%. For reference, the eurozone banks' reserve ratio is 1.0%, the US' is 10%.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reserve_re...d_reserves

“Nothing is more useful than to look upon the world as it really is.”
Reply

The Trump China Policy Thread

Just some things China has been through in its history:

- massive social upheavals
- civil wars
- devastating earthquakes
- brutal dynasty rivalries
- starvation
- communism

Pretty sure they can handle some bogus-ass tariffs. The Chinese are hardened motherfuckers.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)