[semibaron]

"Mankind always searched for answers on the great questions. Where are we coming from? Where are we going to? Why does attractiveness and easiness of women around the world differ?"

The document further below tries to give an answer on the utmost important question with a statistical approach. The document itself is quite technical. But don't worry, explanations how to read are given after each chapter.

As written in the document, only relationships between attractiveness / easiness and a further set of variables is shown. Therefore, if the community is interested in the statistical relationship between "Enjoyability" (how much men enjoy time being spent with women) and other variables, please fill out a map such as the ones for attractiveness and easiness.

Here the link to the document:
https://www.docdroid.net/Fxt3LEJ/women-o...h.pdf.html

Have an interesting read!

[scotian]

(12-15-2016 06:03 AM)semibaron Wrote:  

"Mankind always searched for answers on the great questions. Where are we coming from? Where are we going to? Why does attractiveness and easiness of women around the world differ?"

The document further below tries to give an answer on the utmost important question with a statistical approach. The document itself is quite technical. But don't worry, explanations how to read are given after each chapter.

As written in the document, only relationships between attractiveness / easiness and a further set of variables is shown. Therefore, if the community is interested in the statistical relationship between "Enjoyability" (how much men enjoy time being spent with women) and other variables, please fill out a map such as the ones for attractiveness and easiness.

Here the link to the document:
https://www.docdroid.net/Fxt3LEJ/women-o...h.pdf.html

Have an interesting read!

What's the TLDR on all this number and graph mumbo jumbo?

[eddie_7]

Really interesting datasheet!

[reciproke]

Your data is not understandable to anyone without an academical background in statistics. Real explanations are missing, no abstract, no conclusions and so on. Dividing cultures into historical religious entities is questionable, to say the least. By asking "why" you are implying a causation, but I haven't seen anything that's more of a correlation.

Also, Russia got a "2 easy to bang" in easiness. Just no. In the Excel datasheet it says 4. Makes me wonder how reliable the source data is.

[scotian]

Instead of all these numbers and charts and other book stuff, you should study the data sheets on RVF and compile some graphs from first hand accounts of actual dudes banging girls. You could also check out Swooptheworld, those guys are over in Japan gang banging early 20s sisters, something you probably won't find in a text book haha!

[pancakemouse]

(12-15-2016 11:32 AM)scotian Wrote:  

Instead of all these numbers and charts and other book stuff, you should study the data sheets on RVF and compile some graphs from first hand accounts of actual dudes banging girls. You could also check out Swooptheworld, those guys are over in Japan gang banging early 20s sisters, something you probably won't find in a text book haha!

"Instead of actually using science, you should check out these two or three pieces of anecdotal evidence".

Because that's been known to be reliable.

[Putin Closes]

(12-15-2016 12:15 PM)corsega Wrote:  

(12-15-2016 11:32 AM)scotian Wrote:  

Instead of all these numbers and charts and other book stuff, you should study the data sheets on RVF and compile some graphs from first hand accounts of actual dudes banging girls. You could also check out Swooptheworld, those guys are over in Japan gang banging early 20s sisters, something you probably won't find in a text book haha!

"Instead of actually using science, you should check out these two or three pieces of anecdotal evidence".

Because that's been known to be reliable.

Agreed. Datasheets are good to get a general feel of which places to frequent and venues to target. The rest is a good story but pretty much useless in terms of applicability unless you're aiming to hit the same exact type of niche. (Eskimo Brothers).

[scotian]

(12-15-2016 12:15 PM)corsega Wrote:  

(12-15-2016 11:32 AM)scotian Wrote:  

Instead of all these numbers and charts and other book stuff, you should study the data sheets on RVF and compile some graphs from first hand accounts of actual dudes banging girls. You could also check out Swooptheworld, those guys are over in Japan gang banging early 20s sisters, something you probably won't find in a text book haha!

"Instead of actually using science, you should check out these two or three pieces of anecdotal evidence".

Because that's been known to be reliable.

The RVF travel section contains more than two or three pieces of anecdotal evidence, I'll take the advice of repped RVF members over that of some nerd compiling stats when making my decision where to go chase pussy. Good luck getting laid with scientific method bud, I look forward to reading your data sheets but am not holding my breath.

[Menace]

Nonsense. Any statistical model that purports to model complex human behavior is inherently flawed. Terms such as "easiness" and "enjoyability" are arguably not even quantifiable, and in any event are likely to have multiple components themselves. There are too many confounding variables not accounted for. All it would take to invalidate this model is for a man to have success in a "hard country" and failure in an "easy country" because it would not fit into this linear regression.

The only "statistic" relevant to girls is that the more you approach/interact the more success you are likely to have, i.e. it's a numbers game. Anything else is just keyboard masturbation.

[scotian]

The RVF data sheets by repped members are probably THE BEST SOURCE OF INFORMATION ON THE INTERNET for young guys who want to chase pussy abroad, I can't believe that guys are suggesting that science papers written by some guy no one knows could be better haha. I've met guys who came to Colombia and other places as a first time pussy chasing trip and they did very well and all they did was follow the advice of members on here, its pretty simple and straight forward actually.

[Akwesi]

This doesn't make any sense to begin with. As far as I can tell, the model presupposes that the attractiveness and easiness of women in each country is ALREADY KNOWN. If we already know where the hot and easy girls are, then why the hell to we need this mental masturbation

[Satoshi]

(12-15-2016 02:42 PM)Akwesi Wrote:  

This doesn't make any sense to begin with. As far as I can tell, the model presupposes that the attractiveness and easiness of women in each country is ALREADY KNOWN. If we already know where the hot and easy girls are, then why the hell to we need this mental masturbation

He have used this two maps. but yeah I don't see much use of this. I don't agree fully with the maps to begin with.
http://www.targetmap.com/viewer.aspx?reportId=19491
http://www.targetmap.com/viewer.aspx?reportId=32066

Maybe OP could explain a bit better how to read this statistics. Is it sorted my religion? I don't think many Finish girls would say that they believe in the protestant church.

[kirdiesel]

(12-15-2016 02:03 PM)scotian Wrote:  

The RVF data sheets by repped members are probably THE BEST SOURCE OF INFORMATION ON THE INTERNET for young guys who want to chase pussy abroad, I can't believe that guys are suggesting that science papers written by some guy no one knows could be better haha. I've met guys who came to Colombia and other places as a first time pussy chasing trip and they did very well and all they did was follow the advice of members on here, its pretty simple and straight forward actually.

Correct... This is why I am huge supporter of IN DEPTH and UNBIASED datasheets.

[LINUX]

I love statistics, here's my take courtesy of paintbrush.



And my method works in all countries.

All deans, please PM me if you want to offer me a scholarship to your university.

[James Bond Next level]

Time to science !

First of all, let me just say that like you, I enjoy using science to try to determine the world and girls. I have my own datasheet with mean time between bang, what % come my bang (night, day, online, etc) and more.

Now regarding your document : it's quite ambitious, but I think you're trying to oversimplify. Some notes :

• Correlation factors are way too low. Hence you cannot make a decent linear regression. It's quite obvious when we see the 1st plot : data scattered everywhere. The only thing we can do is draw general trends. For example, for the 1st plot, you can say that the higher the median age is, the lower the fragile index is (and still you have to be careful)
• Attractiveness. Unless you're the judge of every country, it's too subjective to be taken into account. I argue each night with my wing of the degree of attractiveness of the girls we meet (unless they're extremely hot, in that case we both agree). Some prefer asians, some white, etc. Easiness is even more subjective.
• "A country can only be member of one culture group" what? So for example USA is just roman? no african/latinos/muslim? Besides, Europe was built around christianity. It doesn't mean all our culture are the same...
  

I know I sound a bit harsh. I recognize all the time it took to develop this model, but it need to be refined, add more variables.

[semibaron]

(12-15-2016 03:35 PM)Satoshi Wrote:  

He have used this two maps. but yeah I don't see much use of this. I don't agree fully with the maps to begin with.
http://www.targetmap.com/viewer.aspx?reportId=19491
http://www.targetmap.com/viewer.aspx?reportId=32066

Maybe OP could explain a bit better how to read this statistics. Is it sorted my religion? I don't think many Finish girls would say that they believe in the protestant church.

It's sorted by culture based on religions or historical deep cultural boundaries. If a country doesn't fit exactly to one culture group, it wasn't assigned to any. E.g. South Africa has african and protestant (settlers) elements and therefore didn't get assigned to any group.

(12-15-2016 01:06 PM)scotian Wrote:  

The RVF travel section contains more than two or three pieces of anecdotal evidence, I'll take the advice of repped RVF members over that of some nerd compiling stats when making my decision where to go chase pussy. Good luck getting laid with scientific method bud, I look forward to reading your data sheets but am not holding my breath.

The document doesn't intend to give any advice on where to travel. This would be insane.

(12-15-2016 02:42 PM)Akwesi Wrote:  

This doesn't make any sense to begin with. As far as I can tell, the model presupposes that the attractiveness and easiness of women in each country is ALREADY KNOWN. If we already know where the hot and easy girls are, then why the hell to we need this mental masturbation

There are three uses for this mental masturbation:
1. Learn how to read regression analysis. It is being explained.
2. Enjoy the wisdom of which variables contributes to easiness / attractiveness.
3. Predict the future easiness / attractiveness of a certain country in case of changing conditions. Especially the final easiness model does predict the outcome with 57,12% quite good. For example: How would a massive immigration from Syria into Germany affect the general easiness?

[scotian]

This is the only science based advice you need to know about women:

[Putin Closes]

(12-15-2016 02:03 PM)scotian Wrote:  

The RVF data sheets by repped members are probably THE BEST SOURCE OF INFORMATION ON THE INTERNET for young guys who want to chase pussy abroad, I can't believe that guys are suggesting that science papers written by some guy no one knows could be better haha. I've met guys who came to Colombia and other places as a first time pussy chasing trip and they did very well and all they did was follow the advice of members on here, its pretty simple and straight forward actually.

Again its perfect for certain info and not so useful for others. Mix and match what you need. A 40 year old white guy vs a 20 year old black guy will have completely different experiences, but the good places to game and venues to hit will be the same.

[MrRemi]

Interesting approach. However, I would suggest some other independent variables:
- tax rate: Roosh observed a correlation of high taxes with ugly women in Denmark (video). Can you find significance?
- female labor force participation on attractiveness
- female education on easiness

The world bank also releases some interesting datasets that could be worth looking at. For example "Women who believe a wife is justified refusing sex with her husband if she is tired or not in the mood (%)".

A good model could also help politicians to make policy decisions. E.g. how much public healthcare is optimal to maximize female attractiveness? How much to lower tax rates? etc.

[semibaron]

(12-16-2016 04:10 PM)MrRemi Wrote:  

Interesting approach. However, I would suggest some other independent variables:
- tax rate: Roosh observed a correlation of high taxes with ugly women in Denmark (video). Can you find significance?
- female labor force participation on attractiveness
- female education on easiness

The world bank also releases some interesting datasets that could be worth looking at. For example "Women who believe a wife is justified refusing sex with her husband if she is tired or not in the mood (%)".

A good model could also help politicians to make policy decisions. E.g. how much public healthcare is optimal to maximize female attractiveness? How much to lower tax rates? etc.

Female education is in almost all countries the same as for men. Only a handful of countries have a educational gap value below 0.9 (1 = full equality). http://reports.weforum.org/global-gender...-analysis/

Female labour force participation could be interesting, but I'm afraid that it has the same explanatory value than GDP per Capita. Poor people have to work earlier.

The world bank gender data could indeed be interesting.

[John Michael Kane]

While talking about women writ large is somewhat interesting for the scholar, it is no replacement for understanding social dynamics in person. Knowing what women (and men for that matter) respond to when you interact. Learning game is essential, and more so than trying to take abstract data and make sense of it. If you're looking for a LTR woman, you need to know what to look for, and how to game her sucessfully, plus keep her happy. That isn't something you'll find in a pie chart.