Posts: 3,017
Threads: 0
Joined: Jul 2010
[FAQ] Attractiveness Scale (1-10)
08-17-2011, 06:50 PM
Quote: (08-17-2011 06:34 PM)oldnemesis Wrote:
Quote: (08-16-2011 08:35 PM)Dash Global Wrote:
I lost count how many times you mentioned your preference for rating women.....
We are already at a crossroads of disagreements there lol as like I already mentioned ones personal preference alone has no bearing on generally accepted universal beauty.
The whole point of this discussion was to prove that there is no such thing as "accepted universal beauty", and that you wrongly believe that the same things which are important for you are as important to anyone else.
Quote:Quote:
You might like flat chested women, but most men will laugh at that notion and just write you off.
You have some bad tendency to project your thoughts at everyone else, and you're doing it again. How many men you have talked to out of ~3B Earth population? Get off your high horse, if you think something is good it is nothing but your personal opinion. Everything else is just your speculations.
Like I already pointed out and broke down the GENERAL ACCEPTED UNIVERSAL TRAITS of beauty. Nothing anyone can say will make me think otherwise. Everyone knows a fat bitch is ugly. I dont give a shit if some dumbass guy claims they are hot. Im gonna write him off point blank.
Now I didnt say EVERYONE ADHERES and LIKES these universal traits. Because clearly there are people that like the opposite of what most men generally find attractive.
The only real debate here is how far we can quantify and rate these attributes in women. Like Athlone said we can all agree to a certain point but after that its subjective. I think we can break it down further. He does not. But using that same logic you can say everything is subjective making nothing quantifiable.
This is a forum. We all have thoughts and opinions. We debate or discuss them. If someone doesnt agree with me Im not gonna lose any sleep over it. We are all different and will have varying opinions. Nothing new.
I will agree to this much though, different cultures have different universal traits of beauty. You go to africa and some cultures find women with huge gapping perciengs attractive, or go to parts of India I believe and they like the insanely stretched neck. The ones I outlined are for US and western cultures.
Posts: 4,116
Threads: 0
Joined: Aug 2011
Reputation:
176
[FAQ] Attractiveness Scale (1-10)
08-17-2011, 06:56 PM
I gotta wonder if guys who argue over this stuff don't have Asperger's or some other social disorder.
Aesthetics are in large part subjective. I like thicker girls and darker girls. It'd take a really hot white chick for me to view as a 7. You can use your Asperger standards on facial symmetry and hip to waist ratio. I just don't care much for white girls.
LOL at even caring if some dork will "write me off" because of my unique preferences. OMG!
Most guys who fight over ratings are just worried about OTHER MEN. They want to be able to brag that they banged an "8" or whatever. I'm far more interested in banging chicks than impressing other dude's with the quality of my bangs.
Posts: 3,017
Threads: 0
Joined: Jul 2010
[FAQ] Attractiveness Scale (1-10)
08-17-2011, 07:00 PM
MikeCF
Thickness is a trait of attractiveness to many men. I mean unless your talking about fat thickness lol
Im not outraged or anything. I dont expect everyone to view things as I do. I said my piece like the other posters said theres.
Sometimes you just gotta agree to disagree. Nothing more nothing less.....
Posts: 3,017
Threads: 0
Joined: Jul 2010
[FAQ] Attractiveness Scale (1-10)
08-17-2011, 07:07 PM
Quote: (08-17-2011 07:03 PM)MikeCF Wrote:
Quote: (08-17-2011 07:00 PM)Dash Global Wrote:
MikeCF
Thickness is a trait of attractiveness to many men. I mean unless your talking about fat thickness lol
See, that's the issue. I like BBW Brazilians. I also enjoy petite little yoga girls.
How does one rate them using the same scale?
You can't, which is why this stuff is amusing fodder but certainly nothing to bug out over.
the same way someone can rate kim kardashian and a runway model the same number. Two completely diff type women...
Posts: 111
Threads: 0
Joined: Mar 2010
Reputation:
2
[FAQ] Attractiveness Scale (1-10)
08-18-2011, 01:21 AM
The attractiveness scale is a path towards misery. It's mostly only intellectual masturbation -- whether a female 10 is top 1%, .001%, or 0%. A hot chick is a hot chick. Most men aren't fucking them, be glad if you are. The chances of you consistently bagging near flawless girls are slim, so you'll pigeonhole the hot girls you are fucking as 7s or 8s and feel inadequate.
Hot is hot, pussy is pussy.
Posts: 3,017
Threads: 0
Joined: Jul 2010
[FAQ] Attractiveness Scale (1-10)
08-18-2011, 10:39 PM
Quote: (08-18-2011 05:56 PM)oldnemesis Wrote:
Quote: (08-17-2011 06:50 PM)Dash Global Wrote:
Like I already pointed out and broke down the GENERAL ACCEPTED UNIVERSAL TRAITS of beauty. Nothing anyone can say will make me think otherwise.
That's where your problem is - you fall into a typical fetishist trap thinking of your personal subjective preferences as "GENERAL ACCEPTED UNIVERSAL TRAITS of beauty". Not really different from this thread.
How is that when I personally dont like slender petite long legged women AKA the opposite of my PREFERENCE, but recognize it is an attractive trait.......?
Posts: 1,713
Threads: 0
Joined: Jun 2010
Reputation:
32
[FAQ] Attractiveness Scale (1-10)
08-18-2011, 11:03 PM
Quote: (08-15-2011 01:24 PM)Tuthmosis Wrote:
My scale is a little different, but similar. In brief:
10: Perfection. A goddess floating through the world. Extremely rare. I've seen, in person, maybe two or three of them in the past five to seven years. One was in Israel, the other was at fit-model convention in Los Angeles, I almost got into a car accident trying to see the third one.
9: Extremely hot. Your day-to-day hot girl with nothing obviously wrong with her.
8: Extremely cute to certifiably hot.
7: Cute.
6: Almost Cute.
5: Fuckable. Slightly embarrassing to be seen with, but not humiliating.
4: Almost-to-barely fuckable. You'd hit it in a serious pinch, but it'd be seriously embarrassing to be seen with her in a way that implied you're hitting it.
3: Straight-up unattractive.
2: Fugly.
1: Repulsive/Sub-Human.
0: Cock.
I find this scale the most similar to my own, except that my 5 is probably closer to your 6/7. IMHO a 5 should be the absolute center of the scale, therefore if a 1 is sub-human and a 10 is a "goddess". A "5" should be an "average" chick and you shouldn't even be slightly embarrassed to be seen with her but you can't brag either.
If i'm even slightly embarrassed to be seen with her than she must be below average and therefore not a 5.
"I'm not afraid of dying, I'm afraid of not trying. Everyday hit every wave, like I'm Hawaiian"
Posts: 3,017
Threads: 0
Joined: Jul 2010
[FAQ] Attractiveness Scale (1-10)
08-18-2011, 11:07 PM
^^^
I agree. 5 is average. She doesnt draw any attention to herself. good or bad. so I dont see how she would be embarrassing just to be seen with her. Certainly nothing to brag about.
Posts: 3,017
Threads: 0
Joined: Jul 2010
[FAQ] Attractiveness Scale (1-10)
08-20-2011, 08:12 AM
Quote: (08-19-2011 04:58 PM)oldnemesis Wrote:
Quote: (08-18-2011 10:39 PM)Dash Global Wrote:
How is that when I personally dont like slender petite long legged women AKA the opposite of my PREFERENCE, but recognize it is an attractive trait.......?
This is just one of the attractive traits, which is mandatory for some men, important for others, and not relevant for the rest.
But I appreciate your thoughts, there is a big change from "trait X are mandatory for any 10 to have" (which is false) to "trait X is attractive to some, or even most men" (which is true).
I never said any of these traits are mandatory or relevant for every man. Obviously there is some / a small amount of men that just dont like what most men find attractive. AKA they like skinny girls, flat chested girls, obese hippos, chicks with faces that look like they been ran over by a simi, chicks with no ass, ect. Im talking amout the MANY traits that MOST men will find attractive. Nothing more, nothing less.
Posts: 9
Threads: 0
Joined: Sep 2018
Reputation:
0
[FAQ] Attractiveness Scale (1-10)
09-21-2018, 08:54 AM
On Kingmaker Roosh often asks male callers how they rate themselves, and then advises them to engage women at least one point lower. How is that best evaluated? Does it generally refer just to appearance, or does it account for game or other factors?
Posts: 553
Threads: 0
Joined: Sep 2016
Reputation:
3
[FAQ] Attractiveness Scale (1-10)
09-21-2018, 09:03 AM
I think most of us would struggle to place other males on a 0-10 scale, never mind ourselves. A fairly good indicator is the standard of female you attract. If most 7s find you fairly attractive, most 8s and above consider you below them and most 6s and below sigh for you, it's quite fair to assume you're a 7 yourself.
Posts: 631
Threads: 0
Joined: Aug 2016
[FAQ] Attractiveness Scale (1-10)
09-23-2018, 02:06 AM
Sir, there is an error in your assessment, I reckon.
Girls who are sixes don't sigh for guys who are sevens.
Posts: 553
Threads: 0
Joined: Sep 2016
Reputation:
3
[FAQ] Attractiveness Scale (1-10)
09-23-2018, 04:29 AM
OK, since we're getting technical, what point difference would make a woman sigh for you, according to you?