Sp5, while you are a great member of the forum, at this point you are suffering heavily from cognitive dissonance. I notice a lot of people do when it comes to the Talmuds.
Before I get started with the point by point rebuttal, we can see the hamsterization (the process of maintaining an illusion to avoid cognitive dissonance) very clearly when Sp5 says below, "Jews
only make up 15% of the Doctor population".
![[Image: icon_lol.gif]](https://rooshvforum.network/images/smilies/new/icon_lol.gif)
Bro, Jews are around 2% of the population.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Jews
Quote:Quote:
In 2012, the American Jewish population was estimated at between 5.5 and 8 million, depending on the definition of the term. This constitutes between 1.7% and 2.6% of the total U.S. population.
![[Image: lol.gif]](https://rooshvforum.network/images/smilies/new/lol.gif)
You have such bad cognitive dissonance that when you see a
a disproportionate representation of 7 fold you write it off as no big deal. Come on man, snap out of it!
The same Talmudic racism is
present at most of the top universities:
Quote:Quote:
In fact, Harvard reported that 45.0 percent of its undergraduates in 2011 were white Americans, but since Jews were 25 percent of the student body, the enrollment of non-Jewish whites might have been as low as 20 percent, though the true figure was probably somewhat higher.51 The Jewish levels for Yale and Columbia were also around 25 percent, while white Gentiles were 22 percent at the former and just 15 percent at the latter. The remainder of the Ivy League followed this same general pattern.
This overrepresentation of Jews is really quite extraordinary, since the group currently constitutes just 2.1 percent of the general population and about 1.8 percent of college-age Americans.52 Thus, although Asian-American high school graduates each year outnumber their Jewish classmates nearly three-to-one, American Jews are far more numerous at Harvard and throughout the Ivy League. Both groups are highly urbanized, generally affluent, and geographically concentrated within a few states, so the “diversity” factors considered above would hardly seem to apply; yet Jews seem to fare much better at the admissions office.
25% of Harvard is Jewish, which is a
13.5 disproportional increase. Imagine if Whites had the same domination over the schools as the Talmuds did? You wouldn't hear the end of the kvetching.
If Whites had a 13.5 disproportional representation at universities, every university in America would be White as snow.
Affirmative action laws are created to end "systemic racism," and yet all we see right now are Talmudic Jews raping the system for their own ends. At this point the brainwashed usually counter, "But Jews aren't a race!" except that Jews are considered a race under all hate-crime laws. And Jewishness can be identified easily with DNA testing.
More Talmudic racism dominating schools:
https://archive.is/fT0rh
Quote:Quote:
Brandeis University: 1,750 Jewish students, 48%
Barnard College: 1,000 Jewish students, 40%
University of Hartford: 1,500 Jewish students, 32%
Muhlenberg College: 750 Jewish students, 31%
Goucher College: 450 Jewish students, 31%
George Washington University: 3,000 Jewish students, 29%
Oberlin College: 850 Jewish students, 29%
CUNY, Brooklyn College: 4,000 Jewish students, 29%
Yale University: 1,500 Jewish students, 28%
New York University: 6,000 Jewish students, 27%
Columbia University: 2,400 Jewish students, 27%
Tulane University: 2,250 Jewish students, 27%
Emory University: 2,100 Jewish students, 27%
Sarah Lawrence College: 350 Jewish students, 27%
Binghamton University: 3,500 Jewish students, 27%
University at Albany: 3,500 Jewish students, 27%
University of Pennsylvania: 2,500 Jewish students, 26%
Queens College: 4,000 Jewish students, 26%
Harvard University: 1,675 Jewish students, 25%
Haverford College: 300 Jewish students, 25%
Tufts University: 1,250 Jewish students, 24%
Long Island University, Brooklyn Campus: 1,200 Jewish students, 24%
Hampshire College: 325 Jewish students, 24%
American University: 1,600 Jewish students, 23%
Wesleyan University: 680 Jewish students, 23%
University of Maryland: 5,800 Jewish students, 22%
Boston University: 3,500 Jewish students, 21%
Cornell University: 3,000 Jewish students, 21%
Vassar College: 500 Jewish students, 21%
Washington University: 1,500 Jewish students, 20%
Hofstra University: 1,350 Jewish students, 20%
Skidmore College: 500 Jewish students, 19%
Rutgers University: 6,400 Jewish students, 19%
University of Miami: 2,000 Jewish students, 18%
University of Vermont: 2,000 Jewish students, 18%
Syracuse University: 2,500 Jewish students, 17%
Lehigh University: 800 Jewish students, 17%
Clark University: 400 Jewish students, 17%
Kenyon College: 275 Jewish students, 17%
Bryn Mawr College: 200 Jewish students, 17%
Union College: 350 Jewish students, 16%
University of Michigan: 4,500 Jewish students, 16%
SUNY College at Oswego: 1,050 Jewish students, 16%
Northwestern University: 1,400 Jewish students, 15%
Vanderbilt University: 1,050 Jewish students, 15%
Brown University: 1,000 Jewish students, 15%
University of Rochester: 900 Jewish students, 15%
Franklin & Marshall College: 370 Jewish students, 15%
Middlebury College: 350 Jewish students, 15%
University of Florida: 5,000 Jewish students, 15%
University of Chicago: 800 Jewish students, 14%
McMaster University: 3,500 Jewish students, 14%
University of California, Santa Barbara: 2,750 Jewish students, 14%
Queensborough Community College: 2,000 Jewish students, 14%
Trinity College: 300 Jewish students, 13%
Amherst College: 225 Jewish students, 13%
University of Wisconsin: 4,200 Jewish students, 13%
So it's pretty obvious you're suffering from cognitive dissonance, but I don't blame you at all - the brainwashing has started before we were born.
Now let's do some point by point replies:
Quote:Quote:
Quote: (11-25-2016 01:38 AM)Sp5 Wrote:
Example of a fact: Jews are disproportionately represented amongst science Nobel Prize winners, by the numbers.
Example of a feeling: "They (Jews) are racist." That is a mirror image of the worst sort of SJW-foolery.
Quote: (11-25-2016 05:42 PM)Samseau Wrote:
Not even close to what I've written.
"They are racists" is a direct quote of you. Right out of SJW playbook.
The easiest way to see the Talmudic racism has poisoned Nobel Prize awards is by noticing the extreme decline in the quality of its recipients over the years. Obama was given the "Peace Prize" as soon as he walked into office, and yet more wars ended up happening with him than with Bush.
Thus while I do not have the time to look through every award of late, I am very confident many of the awards handed out from Talmud to Talmud was just the usual racism.
Quote:Quote:
Quote: (11-24-2016 04:29 AM)Sp5 Wrote:
So if I understand you correctly, "Talmudic Jews" are Jews who have not "accepted Christ." In other words, what most people call "Jews," apart from the small number of Jewish Christian converts, e.g. "Jews for Jesus."
Quote: (11-25-2016 05:42 PM)Samseau Wrote:
Small number? Try a HUGE number, one that no one even has an accurate count of. I estimate Jewish converts were at least 50% of the surviving Jews of the Roman empire (given at how fast it spread), and this could be easily confirmed with DNA tests of many clergy of Eastern Churches as well as within the population of the Middle Eastern area. Similar to how we can still see neanderthal DNA, although a tremendous amount of eastern Christians have Jewish DNA in them.
Unfortunately is no real research on this, but I am 100% confident if the DNA tests were performed on wide enough level everything I say would be confirmed true. I would bet every dollar I own.
Unfortunately, there are far less Christians with Jewish DNA left today after ISIS have genocided god knows how many hundreds of thousands in Syria.
First, the descendants of Jews who converted in the 1st Century have such an attenuated connection to both the original Jewish DNA and the Jewish tradition that they could never be considered Jews, "non-Talmudic," or not. You and I might both be such descendants, as could almost anyone with European origins. Would we be Jews?
It doesn't matter if we qualify as "Jews" or not (racial purity is nonsense), what does matter is showing that a very large number of Jews, historically, converted to Christianity which can be detected through DNA tests.
Quote:Quote:
Second, you "estimate" Jewish conversation to Christianity as 50%. Based on what? Estimating a shift in a population 2000 years ago takes research; even then it is questionable because of the lack of data. I have no opinion on the subject. I prefer to say that these groups (Levantine Arabs, Jews, Assyrians, Chaldeans) are related by DNA and the Semitic language group. I found one study which says the rate of Jewish conversion to Christianity was very low (pdf). http://www.hts.org.za/index.html/HTS/arti...le/430/329
This guy makes no sense, he even talks about how the entire community at Antioch of gentiles and Jews converted to Christ, and yet he concludes the worldwide numbers of Jewish converts never exceeded 1000? Antioch was one of the biggest cities in Turkey back then, this was a very confused and poorly written article.
There's a reason why he says at the start most people do not agree with him. He also completely fails to account for the major loss of Jewish life after the Roman-Jewish wars.
I stand by my own hypothesis, based on my family within the Syrian Orthodox Church. I see a lot of Christians running around in my Church with typically Jewish features (2000 years after the fact!!), I have my own DNA test, and I know the history of the Church spread through it's original Jewish converts at a pretty good speed.
Still I admit I could be wrong, but I think the best estimate overall was a roughly 50/50 split in the surviving Jews and I would be willing to bet a large amount of cash on this. Look at how most populations divide themselves politically, the 50/50 split is a safe assumption.
Quote:Quote:
The Assyrians and Chaldeans were distinct peoples from the Jews in ancient times, long before Christ.
You present no evidence that the people now calling themselves Assyrians and Chaldeans in Syria and Iraq, who are the Christians there, are descendants of Jewish converts. The area in which they live now was at the center of the pre-Christian Assyrian Empire.
You have a feeling that 50% of Jews converted about 2000 years ago, nothing more.
So, you stick to your construct of a huge "Jewish" population which includes anyone with Jewish DNA from the 1st Century, with a much smaller subset of "Talmudic Jews" who are not Christian converts. I will stick to describing the people who are descended from the historical Jews and identify themselves as Jews as "the Jews" and not "Talmuds." That's what most people think of as "the Jews."
No feels, again, facts, based on observable human nature (50/50 political split), the massive genocide of Talmudic Jews by the Romans, and the fact that Antioch was one of Turkey's largest cities at the time which was full of Jews converted to Christianity, not to mention the many thousands in Damascus (which Paul was traveling to see when he saw Christ).
Quote:Quote:
1. If that's all ya got as evidence of Jewish racism, ya ain't got much. An ancient text which also says adulterers should be stoned. OK. What is the reality now and for the last 200 years or so?
So I present to you the basis of the entire Talmudic religion, and you reject it saying it doesn't matter because... of your
feelings? Talk about cognitive dissonance!
You remind me of the guys who say "Not all Muslims are like that, it doesn't matter what their Koran book says about killing infidels," etc.
Quote:Quote:
Where are all the Judaic banks lending to Jews without interest? When was the last time that happened?
Never through banks, it's done in private. Don't be naive. And let me pre-empt your next response: it's not a conspiracy theory. It's a conspiracy fact, written down in their holiest of books well over 2000 years ago.
Quote:Quote:
I see Islamic banks who lend in a kind of equity partnership structure which somehow is not "interest" based on the same Bible passages. I do not see Jews in today's world lending to each other without interest. Buying equity in a project is not lending without interest. Change your name to Saul Goodman and try asking a Jewish banker for an interest-free loan because tribe, see how that goes.
Strawman. Being Jewish involves a lot more than changing your name. But if you come from the right Jewish family, who has attended the Synagogue faithfully your entire life, then doors will be opened you didn't know existed. I've personally spoken with well-connected Jews who have benefited from such arrangements.
But these biases go far beyond banking, and pervade themselves in all areas of life Talmudic Jews concern themselves with.
However, it is true that the Talmudic Jews today adhere far less to their texts than they have in the past, just like Christians, which ironically in many ways makes them worse. The left-wing Jews are probably the biggest haters of America on the planet, and yet follow virtually none of the Talmudic teachings despite being biased for one another. With left-wing Talmuds you get all the racism with none of the upside of being nice to gentiles.
Quote:Quote:
You acknowledge that Jews are marrying outside their tribe in large numbers. OK.
Can you distinguish between campaigning against racism in the public sphere vs. maintaining a degree of racism in the private sphere? It's not hypocrisy.
Against racism in the public sphere: Black people should have full rights to vote, hold office, work, go to school, and use public accommodations equally.
See above. Talmuds dominate tons of institutions.
Quote:Quote:
Racism in the private sphere: I don't want my daughter or son to marry a black person. I prefer to lend money only to people closest to me, who share my traditions, congregation, and networks. I trust them more.
And Talmuds do this too.
Quote:Quote:
Are these hypocritical? No. Whether they are racists in the private sphere more than other white people (highly questionable, I see many Jews in racially mixed marriages), Jews did not just "pretend" to campaign against racism in the public sphere. Jews did contribute and campaign in the 1960s Civil Rights movement disproportionately. This was to achieve public rights for black people.
No, it was to weld dominance over Whites, and then not apply the same diversity laws to themselves.
But yes, Jews are mixing more and more because serious inbreeding has made them sexually repellent to one another.
Quote:Quote:
Quote: (11-25-2016 01:38 AM)Sp5 Wrote:
The USA is founded upon a particularly universalist ideal, which is compounded by a free market economy and a secular legal culture. So ethnic particularism is always struggling against a powerful tide in the USA. For the Jews, this means they are as endangered as a distinct people in the USA as anyone else.
Quote: (11-25-2016 05:42 PM)Samseau Wrote:
But Talmuds are far more resistant because the incentive to stay within the family comes with huge $$$$ bonuses. All of the centuries of lending to non-Talmuds at interest paid off handsomely. And being part of the family means you get access to that cash with fewer strings attached.
Ridiculous. Where was the huge store of cash which American Jews accessed when they arrived in the USA? They mostly arrived without two nickels from Russia and EE. Their main asset was hard work and smarts. The assets of the Jews in Germany and Eastern Europe, such as they had assets, were almost all wiped out in WWII, along with a lot of the Jews.
Again, you fail to distinguish between Talmudic Jews before and after WWII. That event was such a shock to their system it fundamentally changed their culture, in some ways for the worse, and some ways for the better.
While it is true they lost a lot of money to the Nazis, it is not true that they did not have money before this. Moreover, the Talmuds outside of Europe retained their riches.
Quote:Quote:
Take the Kushners as an example. Jared's grandfather Joseph Kushner arrived from Poland after WWII, the assets of the family and much of the family itself had been wiped out. Joseph worked as a construction worker, saved, and used the path of leveraged real estate purchases to build equity.
Whose first buy he most likely got through some Talmudic connections.
Quote:Quote:
That is a well-known path to riches. It takes work, saving, balls and the luck of growing RE prices, that's all.
The luck of the Talmudic Jew! I'm not hating, but let's not be naive here. We see how the religion is constructed, there is every reason to believe he integrated with some Jews in America who were already situated to get started in the real estate world.
Quote:Quote:
Mortimer Zuckerman's parents ran a grocery store. You might not be old enough to remember the large number of single grocery stores, hardware stores, clothing stores, cobblers which were staffed by their Jewish owners. This was classic American Dream stuff. They are still there, but less common as the children and grandchildren have moved on to bigger or more professional things. The founders arrived 100 or 50 years ago with nothing.
No one is saying these people are without merits. They still work hard, but they keep it in the family to amplify their success over everyone else. When Blacks see Whites do it, they call it racism, yet when Whites call it out they get labeled anti-Semites. Curious.
Quote:Quote:
Quote: (11-25-2016 01:38 AM)Sp5 Wrote:
And, of course, Jews have to hire non-Jews, not enough Jews to run their businesses exclusively. Maybe you didn't get hired, but I did, a couple of times.
Quote: (11-25-2016 05:42 PM)Samseau Wrote:
Sure, goyim at the bottom, Talmuds at the top.
First you say Jews don't hire goys, now you say they hire goys to subjugate them. Looks like butthurt. In a free market economy, the person doing the hiring is known as "the boss." That's the way it is. I wasn't only hired by Jews, I hired a Jew. To him, I was the boss. If you build a business, you can hire, too.
Cool story, bro. What's this got to do with anything again?
Quote:Quote:
Quote:Samseau Wrote:
Going through the influence of the intellectual history of Talmudic Jews is well explained by Keven MacDonald's Culture of Critique but also by Allan Bloom's Closing of the American Mind.
First, you asserted that "Talmuds" had taken over industries "by racism." You have presented no facts to support that argument.
Wrong, the extreme disproportionality at which Jews occupy many institutions and professions would qualify under disparate impact.
Quote:Quote:
I can quote Roosh here:
Quote:Quote:
The proper response to when they call you a racist is “So what?”
but I also don't see the racism or the takeovers.
I'm not the one freaking out over the racism of the Talmuds, you're the one trying to psychoanalyze me as an anti-semite (even though I am a semite). I'm just telling you like it is, and moreover, that this racist group of people are an extreme threat to America via the Democratic party, just like the welfare classes could be (which I wrote about in great detail in the OP).
Quote:Quote:
Real estate is close to a pure market. Supply/demand, location, location, location, market timing are all important. So what if Jews dominate the NYC and LA RE market? That's still a small fraction of total US RE holdings, which are held overwhelmingly by single building owners.
Did you seriously ask me "So what if Talmuds dominate the most expensive markets in the USA?" To ask the question is to answer it here.
Quote:Quote:
You sound like an intersectional SJW activist complaining about "White Privilege," except you say "Talmudic Privilege." Nobody is stopping you from getting a job, saving a down payment, and buying property to rent or flip, then repeating that x X. Joseph Kushner did.
No, unfortunately, life involves 10x as much luck than that. Right now Talmudic Jews, through the Democratic party, have destroyed the American economy, which is why 75% of the population makes less than the mean wage. Talmudic Jews have played a massive role in killing the American dream. I'm sure both of us could have been far richer had we been born into American life when things weren't so broken, but alas all we can do is try and get rid of the problems obstructing us now.
Quote:Quote:
Also, your assertion of medicine being dominated by Jews is flat wrong. There are more Catholic doctors than Jewish ones. This 2005 study, a bit outdated but not likely to be much different now, says only 14% of US physicians are Jewish: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/article...able/tbl1/
See the start of the post. This is hilarious hamsterization here. A 7 fold increase is pure domination. And let's not forget who controls the schools, wouldn't be surprised at all to see a buncha Talmuds.
Quote:Quote:
You cite Kevin MacDonald, and you do the same thing as Kevin MacDonald: you cite the very Jewy Jew Allan Bloom in support of your argument, as he did, along with other Jews.
MacDonald's book is one long defective argument based on cherry-picking (Marcuse was a Jew, Friedan was a Jew, that proves it!).
More cognitive dissonance. If we quote Jewish authors like Allan Bloom, Marcuse, or Friedan, then we are cherry picking, but if we quote non-Jewish authors like Voltaire, Rousseau, Napoleon, Dostoevsky, and Thomas Aquinas, then we just quoting anti-Semites and the word cannot be trusted.
No matter whom is quoted, no matter how much evidence is presented, a person under cognitive dissonance will not shatter their illusions.
Quote:Quote:
If Jew Allan Bloom, supported by Jew Saul Bellow, Jew Michael Medved (also cited by MacDonald), Jew David Horowitz, and other Jews were in the revolt against Marcusean theory in academia, and other Jews like Norman Mailer and Harold Bloom led related pushbacks against feminism and anti-intellectualism, how valid can you or MacDonald be? MacDonald is full of shit, but the gullible and ignorant are susceptible to his cherry-picking, because they don't know the full story of Western intellectual thought in the last 75 years.
Again, I bring the facts, you bring the feelings.
"Facts"
![[Image: laugh5.gif]](https://rooshvforum.network/images/smilies/new/laugh5.gif)
No matter who anyone quotes it's not enough for you bro.
Quote: (11-24-2016 04:29 AM)Sp5 Wrote:
Quote: (11-25-2016 05:42 PM)Samseau Wrote:
Please explain to me how Democratic policies have been good for America? Multi-culturalism, reliance on sweatshop labor for cheap goods, high taxes, heavy regulations which lead to anemic business growth, a foreign policy that is incoherent at every level... the political influence alone is toxic enough.
Anyone who has bought into either party in the USA is a fool. True, the Democratic Party is a collection of poverty pimps, race hustlers, city machine politicians, greedy government workers, and rabid feminists. They also stand for some good things, like workers' right to organize and bargain collectively, and not shitting on the Commons. There are a few ones who are OK, like Tulsi Gabbard, Jim Webb, and Bernie to some extent.
Even the ones you say are "OK" have voted yes for every toxic Democrat law for as long as they've been in office. The only thing different about the last three is their rhetoric, and even then, Bernie is a Talmud full of anti-White hypocrisy. Why doesn't Bernie ever talk about Talmudic privilege?
![[Image: rolleyes.gif]](https://rooshvforum.network/images/smilies/rolleyes.gif)
Quote:Quote:
Similarly, the Republican Party is a collection of crony corporatists, looters, polluters, Bible-beaters, police-statists, and warmongers. They also stand for some good things, like cultural conservatism and devolution to local governments. There are a few ones who are OK, like Mike Lee, Walter Jones, and Justin Amash.
Trump will succeed only insofar as he rebels against the Establishment.
He's demolishing it as we speak. I gave up on American politics until Trump came along.
That said, while I do not "buy" into either party there is really no denying that the Democratic party is totally toxic, while the Republican party could still be salvaged. Currently there is no option for the Democratic party except to kill it entirely.
Quote:Quote:
Ironically, the most obvious example of Jewish ethnocentrism in American politics was from within the Republican Party: the war on Iraq. This was promoted by the hard-core Israel Firsters in the neoconservative movement within and without the Bush Administration, along with oil and defense contracting interests (e.g. Halliburton). The war achieved Israel's aims of shattering the Iraqi military threat, but was a disaster for the USA.
The same Republican crew (Kristol, Bolton, Ledeen, Gaffney) still wants to bomb Iran. This will remove a regional threat to Israel, but be a disaster for the USA.
Your adherence to the Republican Party is naïve.
Thanks for showing that Talmudic Jews are a toxic political influence, even when they switch parties.
Quote:Quote:
Your logic is faulty. What Roof, a mentally-ill loser, said was likely not an "observation," as you term it. He spent most of his life in central South Carolina, which is not exactly Manhattan when it comes to Jews. He might not have spoken to ten Jews in his entire life. It's more likely his views were shaped by mental illness and the fringes of the internet than personal experience. We don't know.
It doesn't matter what his views were shaped by. The Truth is the Truth and it doesn't matter if a homeless person on the street tells the Truth while the President speaks lies. The person telling the Truth is still telling the Truth.
![[Image: BZ8jxBV.jpg]](http://i.imgur.com/BZ8jxBV.jpg)
Quote:Quote:
What he offered was an opinion without revealed facts, much like your opinions. His opinion is worthless because (1) we don't know what the factual basis of the opinion was, and (2) his judgment has been proven to be abysmal.
The Unabomber was crazy, but he was an intellect, had had a winning streak in his life, and expressed some facts in his manifesto.
If Dylann Roof is all you can quote to support your ideas, you should question your ideas. Would you endorse his views on black people, too?
The point of quoting Roof was to show if a mentally ill crazy murderer can see the Truth, so can anyone else too.
Quote:Quote:
Your knowledge of these diaspora merchant groups is deficient.
1. Overseas Chinese. Chinese have been in SE Asia for hundreds of years. The Spanish gave Binondo in Manila to Chinese traders in 1594. To some extent, they were ghettoized by the Spanish the way Russians and East Europeans kept the Jews in shtetls. There were Chinese rebellions, and Chinese were regularly accused of black-market trading, usury, and general dominance of commerce. The biggest current families, the Sys and the Gokongweis, have patriarchs in their 90s born in China, but the younger generations were born in the Philippines. Chinese businesspeople in the Philippines are not foreigners, but hold Philippine citizenship. Some are able to buy citizenship in Singapore, the USA, or other places, but they are not "foreigners." There is a significant anti-Chinese feeling among the Filipino indigenous, echoing typical anti-Semitic tropes.
In Malaysia, the Chinese have been there for more than 100 years. The overwhelming majority of Chinese hold Malaysian citizenship. The ruling Malay nationalist party, Barisan, which has the electoral system rigged to favor Malay districts, occasionally stirs up mobs to rampage through the Kuala Lumpur Chinatown in a kind of pogrom or Kristallnacht. The Chinese are stuck in Malaysia unless they can buy another passport, are not "foreigners."
2. The Lebanese have also been in West Africa for more than 100 years. They are born in those countries and hold citizenship in those countries, again unless they can buy another passport or qualify for Lebanese citizenship.
3. The expulsion of "Asians" (Indians) in Uganda by Idi Amin in 1972 followed all of the typical tropes of anti-Semitism in Europe. The Indians came to East and South Africa through the rope lines of British colonialism as railroad laborers and merchants. They built large business communities along the railway line, in Mombasa, Nairobi, and Kampala, and spread outward. By the time of independence in the 1960s, most Indians there had been born in Africa.
Idi Amin's accusations against the "Asians" were that they were hoarding, taking financial advantage of the Africans and controlling the economy. Sound familiar?
Those expelled had to rely on "British Overseas Territories" passports issued by the UK government to allow them to leave.
Today, the position of Indians in Africa is tenuous even if they are born in their countries and hold citizenship, due to African racial nationalism and the same themes of "controlling the economy" and "cheating Africans."
The idea that Talmudic Jews are comparable to these other ethnic groups acting in their self-interest is false because many of these other ethnic groups have lived in other societies with zero problems.
Chinese, Lebanese, and Indians, have all lived peacefully with most other cultures with relatively few problems.
Conversely, Talmudic Jews have a horrible track record and have been thrown out of almost every country on the planet.
![[Image: yFCFxA7.jpg]](http://i.imgur.com/yFCFxA7.jpg)
The above picture was taken off a Jewish website as "proof" of how horribly they've been treated over the centuries.
But do tell me why, how come no other group has been persecuted to the same extent as Mr. Talmud? It couldn't have
anything to do with their 613 Mitzvot telling them to treat Jews above Gentiles, could it...? Naw, that's just anti-semitism!
Quote:Quote:
Another bald statement. Fail. How did they play a big role? Names, roles, etc. Compare and contrast to those Jews who managed to lose millions.
The Subprime Crisis was fundamentally created by the Democrat policy of mandating "affordable housing," so Freddie and Fannie May were created to guarantee loans to the poor. Now the economy is trashed due to reckless lending.
Talmuds have pretty much always voted Democrat:
![[Image: attachment.jpg34795]](https://rooshvforum.network/attachments/attachment.jpg34795)
And for progressive causes:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jewish_vie...S_politics
Quote:Quote:
Jewish Americans were not just involved in nearly every important social movement but in the forefront of promoting such issues as workers rights, civil rights, woman's rights, gay rights, freedom of religion, freedom from religion, peace movements, and various other progressive causes.
Thus to beat the left and stop them from killing America and sending the West into Civil War, we have to beat the Talmuds.
![[Image: threadderail1_zps829e78d7.jpg~c200]](http://rs168.pbsrc.com/albums/u184/group_theory/SDN/threadderail1_zps829e78d7.jpg~c200)
![[Image: Sheikh_Zayed_bin_Sultan_Al_Nahyan_large.jpg]](http://www.uae-embassy.org/sites/default/files/images/Sheikh_Zayed_bin_Sultan_Al_Nahyan_large.jpg)
![[Image: iraqi_man.jpg]](http://www.commdiginews.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/iraqi_man.jpg)
![[Image: WK-AN852_TVREVI_G_20081202163822.jpg]](https://si.wsj.net/public/resources/images/WK-AN852_TVREVI_G_20081202163822.jpg)
