[Going strong]

(11-16-2016 06:26 PM)Irenicus Wrote:  

(11-16-2016 01:53 PM)Roosh Wrote:  

It's also worth mentioning that for a time period, many members were calling on me in private to ban Samseau for his political and race opinions. It was a pile on that was persistent, but I met him twice and didn't believe he was trolling. My gut instinct told me he was legit.

Looking back, it's clear to me that he was in the process of publicly putting his world view together, and the product of that was a clear and powerful campaign to get Trump elected. I'm glad I listened to my gut.

Although I do not agree with him a lot of times (and we came from ethnic backgrounds that hate each other), I would be very disappointed if he got a ban. I am glad that you listened to your gut.


And by the way, those guys that called for his ban are not better, at least in my book, than Anita Sarkesian and her degenerate ilk.

When the (covert or open) "attacks" against Samseau peaked, I remember that Samseau publicly thanked a few forum members (and yes, I'm glad to have been one of those ), who had chosen to "Like" his most controversial post (on another thread).

Which reminds me, I would really like to read what Samseau thinks, about what (extremely positive) impact D. Trump's election will certainly have on the catastrophic "millions-of-Migrant" E.U. crisis... Because, personally, I think that this (nothing short of miraculous) election in the US, will enable Europeans to dodge a massive bullet (the organized invasion of the continent). I mean, I think that D. Trump's example and leadership, will spur the Europeans into action, and ultimately force our cuck governments to build protective walls, too.

Anyway, it's normal that Samseau concentrate on the (extremely positive) situation developing in the USA, at the moment, but I'd like to hear his take on the European situation, too, post-Trump election. Samseau, do you share my newfound optimism on the Migrants crisis? Do you think that D. Trump will save not only the US, but also Western Europe?

[nomadbrah]

(11-17-2016 05:08 PM)Going strong Wrote:  

(11-16-2016 06:26 PM)Irenicus Wrote:  

(11-16-2016 01:53 PM)Roosh Wrote:  

It's also worth mentioning that for a time period, many members were calling on me in private to ban Samseau for his political and race opinions. It was a pile on that was persistent, but I met him twice and didn't believe he was trolling. My gut instinct told me he was legit.

Looking back, it's clear to me that he was in the process of publicly putting his world view together, and the product of that was a clear and powerful campaign to get Trump elected. I'm glad I listened to my gut.

Although I do not agree with him a lot of times (and we came from ethnic backgrounds that hate each other), I would be very disappointed if he got a ban. I am glad that you listened to your gut.


And by the way, those guys that called for his ban are not better, at least in my book, than Anita Sarkesian and her degenerate ilk.

When the (covert or open) "attacks" against Samseau peaked, I remember that Samseau publicly thanked a few forum members (and yes, I'm glad to have been one of those ), who had chosen to "Like" his most controversial post (on another thread).

Which reminds me, I would really like to read what Samseau thinks, about what (extremely positive) impact D. Trump's election will certainly have on the catastrophic "millions-of-Migrant" E.U. crisis... Because, personally, I think that this (nothing short of miraculous) election in the US, will enable Europeans to dodge a massive bullet (the organized invasion of the continent). I mean, I think that D. Trump's example and leadership, will spur the Europeans into action, and ultimately force our cuck governments to build protective walls, too.

Anyway, it's normal that Samseau concentrate on the (extremely positive) situation developing in the USA, at the moment, but I'd like to hear his take on the European situation, too, post-Trump election. Samseau, do you share my newfound optimism on the Migrants crisis? Do you think that D. Trump will save not only the US, but also Western Europe?

It's going to be great!

Though the lord works in mysterious ways.

Take Trump's demand that Euro countries pay up the 2%. What this will do is force these countries, particularly the bloated welfare states to make big cuts. Have to be realistic now. Many of these welfare states have very little wriggle room. They will need massive cuts somewhere. If they choose to cut immigrants, great! If they choose to cut social services, great, that will mean the end of socialism in Europe. You can't sell that to the public.

In addition, larger military, more young men in the military, ready for war with the muslims. A change in perception, more red pilled people in the military, more respect for men.

Basically, much of Europe has been the yapping manlet hiding behind his big bully friend. Now Europe has to back up all the provocations with their military might. Probably won't yap as much.

[Going strong]

(11-17-2016 06:55 PM)nomadbrah Wrote:  

It's going to be great!

Though the lord works in mysterious ways.

Take Trump's demand that Euro countries pay up the 2%. What this will do is force these countries, particularly the bloated welfare states to make big cuts. Have to be realistic now. Many of these welfare states have very little wriggle room. They will need massive cuts somewhere. If they choose to cut immigrants, great! If they choose to cut social services, great, that will mean the end of socialism in Europe. You can't sell that to the public.

In addition, larger military, more young men in the military, ready for war with the muslims. A change in perception, more red pilled people in the military, more respect for men.

Basically, much of Europe has been the yapping manlet hiding behind his big bully friend. Now Europe has to back up all the provocations with their military might. Probably won't yap as much.

"In addition, larger military, more young men in the military, ready for war with the islamists":

Except, the islamists are not stupid: they enlist, massively, in the (French, especially, and I guess Belgian?) army themselves!

I mean, in France's islamized suburbs, the number-1 legit job that young islamists want, is joining the army . For example, the infamous Momo Merah terrorist tried to enlist, several times...

There are 2 reasons for that: one, they (the islamists) want to infiltrate the West and prevent a native reaction from the military.

Two: young suburban muggers think (and it is partly wrong, partly true) that this job, being in the army, is an easy lazy job. Money to sit around doing nothing. Which is quite true, given that they (the islamists) are not sent to the combat lines (if you don't believe me, look at the names of fallen French soldiers in Mali, only native names are to be found).

By the way, it's also a problem, though less generalized, in the US Army - if you remember saddening cases of infiltrated terrorists like Major Nidal Hasan (will he be executed, at last?) or sad-pepe "Hasan" Mark Kools. Two cases branded as workplace-violence (or deranged fragging) by the "Liberal" administration...

Anyway, I do hope that Samseau feels optimism now for the massive Migrants crisis, being in Europe or the USA... Because if D. Trump can't fix this global mess, nobody can and will!
But, I'm optimistic: D. Trump's policies and their virtuous effects will resonate all over the world, showing, I hope, a clear path (for all nations) to prosperity and safety.

[Simeon_Strangelight]

Well done Samseau!

Still - I do believe that your assessment of our world is only partial. The swamp goes far deeper and is far wider than Washington.

There is no way in hell that Donald Trump can drain it in the least.

Also I see a lot of romantic glory-days writing in terms of Reagan and Reaganomics. That guy may have had good intentions, but he turned out to be one of the biggest servants of the globalists.


Reagan and Nixon at Bohemian Grove - occult meeting place of the elite.

The globalists can hinder any massive tariff and trade deal reforms, they can even tank the economy by restricting the money supply, so that it seems that Trump is responsible for that.

In Reagan's times they simply expanded debt - both state as well as private and gave the average citizen the first time access to credit cards and large consumer debts. That fueled the economy and it was no miracle - just a drunk Moe who gets a loan and then spends it all. That loan is due now and the middle class is not going to be able to repay it ever.

Sure - we could expand that money supply more and give all the incoming immigrants ample loans that they cannot repay as well - that will keep the ball rolling for 4-8 years, but sooner or later everything will come back with interest.

Samseau - I promised you a crate of finest Scotch if Trump made any significant changes against the globalists. In return I expect a beer if he cannot do much.

Still - the election of Donald Trump is a setback for the globalists just as Brexit is. But setbacks mean little to men who plan for decades and centuries in advance.

My proposal is still set and the same:

We copy the globalists. We expand and fund organizations like the Poznan Institute and other NGOs. We meet in secret. We rise in numbers. We bide our time. Occasionally we support candidates and help in elections, but we still grow in the shadows. Also we publicly reach many men and Red-Pill them.

And then maybe in some time life will give us a chance to make a move in greater numbers and to truly seize and change the direction of a country or system. That time has not even come in the least with president Trump. If Trump executed what is necessary, then he and and his family would be dead or dying of fast-growing cancers in the next years.

A presidential candidate of true change would have to be someone with Superman's power or Lex Luthor's cunning and funding.

I don't want to be the party-pooper here, but you simply don't know what you are up against.

[Samseau]

(11-15-2016 07:19 PM)DonnyGately Wrote:  

Average hourly wage was $25.92 in October, your estimate of $10 is remarkably offbase. Note this figure caps out at $100/hr. So, it won't be doubling anytime soon.

This does not include bonuses, health care, pension, 401[k], vacation days or any other benefit. Obviously this varies massively by industry, but we have that data also.

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics.

I agree on the need for some sort of vast welfare reform.

Read what I wrote more carefully. I said for most of the country. I.e. outside of the cities. If you take away the cities the number is closer to my figure. I think the modal wage captures it.

(11-15-2016 08:08 PM)Roosh Wrote:  

I just read part one. Great analysis, with an interesting narrative thrown in (I didn't know you were campaigning full time).

For a lot of men here, it's hard to connect our ideas to influence in the real world. It's easier for me to see it since men directly contact me and thank me, but for a typical member, I doubt they can realize how their ideas "trade up" to those with larger bullhorns, whether it's me, MikeCF, or others. Samseau pointed to a couple of examples where he suspects an idea landed within Trump's campaign, and while I can't offer concrete evidence this is happening, I do believe we are being read by influential men who can't admit publicly that they follow us.

The best part of this is that we're not trying to influence anyone. It's all organic, just like how a plant effortlessly grows in good soil. We are the soil, and from that life springs forth. We are all here for different reasons but the main one I'd argue is that we simply enjoy it. It's a male-only space that invigorates our minds and is an enjoyable way to pass the time. Who would have thought that contributions would form the leading edge of a peaceful revolution in the United States?

Well, you might not be trying, but everything I write is designed to make an impact on people's minds. I deliberately attack unquestioned premises people hold (i.e. sacred cows) in order to induce cognitive dissonance and begin the mind changing process of planting seeds that mature into new worldviews.

I was actually thinking of writing a book about it. My first idea for the title is,

"How to Perform Mind Surgery

The Essential Tool for Truth Loving People Who Want to Save Their Neighbors"

It would be a work of psychology/philosophy. It's similar to persuasion but changing someone's mind (i.e. mind surgery) is far slower and far more permanent.

(11-16-2016 06:45 AM)Sp5 Wrote:  

1. Don't waste your time trying to prevent UNH resident students from registering in NH. It's not "fraud," never has been, it's the same way in every other state. Dunn v. Blumstein 405 U.S. 330 (1972). The USA is based on complete mobility of people and commerce between the states, way it is.

2. Don't get the ranting about the Jews, even I know it's become a feature (bug) of this forum. Two of Trump's kids are married to Jews. Jared Kushner is reputed to be smart and likely to be a close advisor to Trump. Jews like other ethnic groups in America are represented in all points of view on all subjects.

3. I backed Trump, but I expect things to be marginally better than Hillary, especially in foreign policy, not that he'll bring in paradise.

1. Just change how far in advance people can register to vote. Students are lazy and uninformed, change it to 3 months in advance and it stops at least 50% of them.

2. You're giving a disingenuous read. I'm not ranting against Jews, I'm carefully describing the toxic influence of Talmudic culture upon the Jews and their effect on the rest of America. No different than criticizing Islam or Catholicism.

Culture/Religion != Race

3. When is the last time we had a President with as much business experience and political knowledge as Trump? It's never happened in our grandparent's lifetimes. The changes are gonna be Yuge.

(11-16-2016 07:48 AM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  

Yo, Samseau.

Lightbulb moment regarding welfare for ghetto trash, because I love you (no homo) but demanding birth control is never going to fly.

Everyone has sympathy for a single mom with one, two, max three kids, right?

The moment she has number four, five, six, she gets chucked in the slut bin and people rightfully ask if semen addiction is a treatable disorder.

"Reasonable" middleground. Cap welfare at 3 children.

There's not a lot of votes lost on the sad plight of ultra-loose cumdumpsters doing it tough because they fucked up MORE than three times.

Letting kids starve isn't gonna fly either. The kids shouldn't be the ones who get punished for the woman's irresponsible behavior. But today, children suffer all the consequences of a woman's bad decisions.

Woman doesn't like her pregnancy, she murders her kid ("abortion").
Woman gets a divorce, keeps Dad away from kids.
Women become poor, kids live in poverty.
Women date abusive boyfriends, kids are abused.
Women have way too many children, kids grow up to be fucked in the head.

It's a sick world.

If the government is the substitute husband for these women, then the government must also be the substitute father for the children. This means taking care of both the women and the children from the mother's poor choices, i.e. mandatory birth control.

If this is not fixed our country will lose the demographic battle to the great unwashed welfare children, motivated only by the hatred they received while growing up. It will manifest itself at the ballot box. No one will even remember what the Constitution is, personal rights will become a thing of the past.

(11-17-2016 05:08 PM)Going strong Wrote:  

(11-16-2016 06:26 PM)Irenicus Wrote:  

(11-16-2016 01:53 PM)Roosh Wrote:  

It's also worth mentioning that for a time period, many members were calling on me in private to ban Samseau for his political and race opinions. It was a pile on that was persistent, but I met him twice and didn't believe he was trolling. My gut instinct told me he was legit.

Looking back, it's clear to me that he was in the process of publicly putting his world view together, and the product of that was a clear and powerful campaign to get Trump elected. I'm glad I listened to my gut.

Although I do not agree with him a lot of times (and we came from ethnic backgrounds that hate each other), I would be very disappointed if he got a ban. I am glad that you listened to your gut.


And by the way, those guys that called for his ban are not better, at least in my book, than Anita Sarkesian and her degenerate ilk.

When the (covert or open) "attacks" against Samseau peaked, I remember that Samseau publicly thanked a few forum members (and yes, I'm glad to have been one of those ), who had chosen to "Like" his most controversial post (on another thread).

Which reminds me, I would really like to read what Samseau thinks, about what (extremely positive) impact D. Trump's election will certainly have on the catastrophic "millions-of-Migrant" E.U. crisis... Because, personally, I think that this (nothing short of miraculous) election in the US, will enable Europeans to dodge a massive bullet (the organized invasion of the continent). I mean, I think that D. Trump's example and leadership, will spur the Europeans into action, and ultimately force our cuck governments to build protective walls, too.

Anyway, it's normal that Samseau concentrate on the (extremely positive) situation developing in the USA, at the moment, but I'd like to hear his take on the European situation, too, post-Trump election. Samseau, do you share my newfound optimism on the Migrants crisis? Do you think that D. Trump will save not only the US, but also Western Europe?

My thoughts on Europe's future are posted in the Trump Doctrine section.

[Simeon_Strangelight]

Quote:

Louisiana guy: “I don’t know. It just doesn’t happen. We’re trying to gain more influence in their communities.”

Sam: “Won’t you guys lose your majority at the current population growth rates of Blacks vs Whites?”

LG: “Yeah, I think so.”

Sam: “So I guess you guys need to have more kids.”

LG: “It’s not that simple. White people aren’t interested in having kids anymore.”

Sam: “Are you sure? The economy sucks really bad and they can’t afford it.”

LG: “The studies do not indicate it.”

Sam: “I’m not sure those studies are correct. Also, what about doing something to curb the growth of the welfare population?”

LG: “What do you mean?”

Sam: “Well, I know a lot of Blacks have kids through the baby momma thing. You know, like 5 kids from 4 Dads sorta thing. Maybe women shouldn’t be allowed to do this? Give them mandatory birth control in exchange for welfare after the first kid, and if keeps having more then tie her tubes?”

LG: “Hold on, there’s someone I gotta talk to.”

I liked that little exchange there. Of course it would cut too close to "racism".

Though of course you don't mean racism since some kind of mandatory population control is going to come either way. But if you leave it in the hands of the globalists, then it will be much much worse.

I would also like to stress that I agree with you except with the wild optimism you have for the Trump administration.

Your solutions however are solid.

If the government is the daddy of the single moms and takes care of multiple children and couples via welfare (usually only immigrants doing it sometimes with multiple wives), then the government should give them a choice of either welfare or mandatory end of kids. I am sure that some people will be crazy enough to pop out kids and live in abject poverty, but then they get their kids taken away. Most others will prefer to have ample welfare with one kid than to pop out 3.

But as I said - when you leave population control in the hands of the globalists, then you are in for a surprise as the measures will then certainly hit the most "rebellious alternative" and higher IQ ones first.

But none of it will happen anytime soon, because the globalists are currently using demographics as a weapon and they count on many feral dumb single-mother kids and violent anti-West leaning immigrant children to destroy the current stable Western populations. So any mandatory population control will only come after they have succeeded in destroying those societies.

[Easy_C]

More related to the thread title than content....but here is a stark reminder that we have a long ways to go.

TLDR: It isn't just an RVF meme. Cucking actually is rampant. It's a great bellwether but society is still "gravely disordered".
http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/...23616.html

[Laner]

Thank you Samseau, that was a fantastic read. It took me a couple days, and in the course of reading it, I had a few conversations based on what I had read. Your words seem to reflect many thoughts that I have in my mind, without a way to put them into my world. Your ideas are certainly controversial, but never have people been more open about their thoughts than they are now.

I agree on many levels, and what you are talking about in regards to birth control hit close to home for me. I have been open about the fact that I am mixed race native Indian so half my family battles many of the issues that other poor battle. And thanks to feminism, we cant even bring up the idea that women who make poor life decisions of the same formula time and time again, are no longer able to make those decisions for themselves anymore. Where I am from, we had forced sterilization up into the 1970's. Now its considered a 'big shame' of Alberta history. But it worked. My cousin is raising three of a woman's 7 (known) children as a woman in their community cannot stop making poor decisions. Her last baby she had in a truck stop bathroom and left it on the floor in a bloody mess and tried to continue on as if nothing happened. The poor baby was saved, and is being raised by the state, but no one will acknowledge the fact that this will continue with her until she damages her body too much to be able to have more, or hits menopause.

We know here that as men, too many poor life decisions leads to our own demise. We know this because we see it everywhere. But with women, we never really get to see them too poor. They always have a semblance of affluence, and especially here in Canada have far more disposable income than the average working poor. They are middle class compared to places like Poland or Czech, and all they do here is have babies with random men. If feminists actually wanted to do something to help their fellow women, they would address this. Its slavery to the government.

In regards to revealing yourself to the public, I say do it. I have never hid who I am, and if someone spent a couple minutes they would find out who I am. I don't have the same notoriety as you do on these boards, but that at the same time should give you the confidence to know that we all have your (and each others) backs. If you move in life as you do on these boards, and through experience I have found that the men on here do, then it will only be a matter of time until you gain influence in your community. The thought of this gives me a lot of hope. And its hope that keeps this board running.

I want to see you succeed, and even though we are opposite coasts, I know your success will lead to my success. I will watch you, and I will support you. I have all the desire in the world to be a better man in my community, and I have been trying to figure out ways outside of my knowledge in order to do this. But it takes smart men like you to lead the way. This board is full of men who absolutely can help change the world, and by men like Roosh putting themselves out there in the very beginning, they inspire the change they wish to see.

We predicted the monster vote on here, but it never came. Its due to this hesitation. This monster vote needs to happen now more than ever, and it will grow exponentially when men like you say "its time".

[Phoenix]

(11-16-2016 06:45 AM)Sp5 Wrote:  

2. Don't get the ranting about the Jews, even I know it's become a feature (bug) of this forum. Two of Trump's kids are married to Jews. Jared Kushner is reputed to be smart and likely to be a close advisor to Trump. Jews like other ethnic groups in America are represented in all points of view on all subjects.

I don't think this "never criticize Jews" stuff holds water any more. It's OK here (now, as I'm sure you're aware lol) to criticize Muslims for attitudes pervasive amongst them. But Jews are off limits? Doesn't seem fair.

Leftism is anti-social degeneration. And Jews are massively disproportionately leftist -- this is simply a fact, and even our pre-loved Jewish cuck Shapiro admits "as is typical, 90%+ of my extended family is leftist". Why that is and how we should respond to it should not be off the discussion table.

[Going strong]

(11-18-2016 11:35 AM)Samseau Wrote:  

(...)
My thoughts on Europe's future are posted in the Trump Doctrine section.

Yes indeed, in this paragraph: "Peace and stability will return to Europe as the war in the Middle East ends. The migrant flow will slow down significantly. Without ISIS, Libya should fall under the rule of another strongman type figure like Gaddafi, and that will hold back the horde. The existing migrants in Europe will find themselves without reinforcements and terrorist attacks will eventually stop. Trump will bring diplomatic pressure to make sure European nations actually throw the criminal migrants in jail or deport them."

I agree with you on D. Trump taking out ISIS, hard and fast: come January, hellfire missiles will rain on their leaders! Good riddance!

ISIS' January (or say, February) surprise, courtesy of mister Trump:


But it does not automatically mean that "Libya (will) fall under the rule of another strongman-type figure like Al Gaddafi", unfortunately. So, I wonder if D. Trump would intervene to stabilize Libya (and stem the undocumented Sub-Saharans' flow), and consequently, save Europe...
But, it probably belongs to another thread and another time: D. Trump will first Make America Great Again, and then, hopefully he'll help Western European nations out of their current nightmare (for nuclear safety reasons alone, it would be, and is, necessary, even from an American point of view). But, sure, first things first...

[Simeon_Strangelight]

(11-18-2016 01:17 PM)Phoenix Wrote:  

(11-16-2016 06:45 AM)Sp5 Wrote:  

2. Don't get the ranting about the Jews, even I know it's become a feature (bug) of this forum. Two of Trump's kids are married to Jews. Jared Kushner is reputed to be smart and likely to be a close advisor to Trump. Jews like other ethnic groups in America are represented in all points of view on all subjects.

I don't think this "never criticize Jews" stuff holds water any more. It's OK here (now, as I'm sure you're aware lol) to criticize Muslims for attitudes pervasive amongst them. But Jews are off limits? Doesn't seem fair.

Leftism is anti-social degeneration. And Jews are massively disproportionately leftist -- this is simply a fact, and even our pre-loved Jewish cuck Shapiro admits "as is typical, 90%+ of my extended family is leftist". Why that is and how we should respond to it should not be off the discussion table.

Breitbart is almost entire staffed by Jewish or half-Jewish writers.

What has been often criticized by them were the progressive far-left radical Jews. But there is no united front even there.

Every ideology or weakness of a group should be able to be criticized. Christian countries have an incredible amount of introspection and guilt-finding within themselves.

But until others do it too, then they will be abused by anyone else, since too much "mea culpa" will always make you out as an oppressor.

[heavy]

(11-15-2016 08:08 PM)Roosh Wrote:  

...Samseau pointed to a couple of examples where he suspects an idea landed within Trump's campaign, and while I can't offer concrete evidence this is happening, I do believe we are being read by influential men who can't admit publicly that they follow us.
...

[Duke Castile]

Over the years my opinion of Sam has gone up and down and back again.

But he may be a genius.

[RedPillUK]

(11-18-2016 05:49 PM)Fisto Wrote:  

Over the years my opinion of Sam has gone up and down and back again.

But he may be a genius.

Two solid negs right there.

Fisto's gaming you, bro.

[Sp5]

(11-18-2016 04:36 AM)Going strong Wrote:  

(11-17-2016 06:55 PM)nomadbrah Wrote:  

It's going to be great!

Though the lord works in mysterious ways.

Take Trump's demand that Euro countries pay up the 2%. What this will do is force these countries, particularly the bloated welfare states to make big cuts. Have to be realistic now. Many of these welfare states have very little wriggle room. They will need massive cuts somewhere. If they choose to cut immigrants, great! If they choose to cut social services, great, that will mean the end of socialism in Europe. You can't sell that to the public.

In addition, larger military, more young men in the military, ready for war with the muslims. A change in perception, more red pilled people in the military, more respect for men.

Basically, much of Europe has been the yapping manlet hiding behind his big bully friend. Now Europe has to back up all the provocations with their military might. Probably won't yap as much.

"In addition, larger military, more young men in the military, ready for war with the islamists":

Except, the islamists are not stupid: they enlist, massively, in the (French, especially, and I guess Belgian?) army themselves!

I mean, in France's islamized suburbs, the number-1 legit job that young islamists want, is joining the army . For example, the infamous Momo Merah terrorist tried to enlist, several times...

There are 2 reasons for that: one, they (the islamists) want to infiltrate the West and prevent a native reaction from the military.

Two: young suburban muggers think (and it is partly wrong, partly true) that this job, being in the army, is an easy lazy job. Money to sit around doing nothing. Which is quite true, given that they (the islamists) are not sent to the combat lines (if you don't believe me, look at the names of fallen French soldiers in Mali, only native names are to be found).

By the way, it's also a problem, though less generalized, in the US Army - if you remember saddening cases of infiltrated terrorists like Major Nidal Hasan (will he be executed, at last?) or sad-pepe "Hasan" Mark Kools. Two cases branded as workplace-violence (or deranged fragging) by the "Liberal" administration...

Some of the victims of terrorist attacks in France were French Muslim soldiers and police. I remember three Muslim paratroopers killed by an Islamist in Toulouse who also attacked a Jewish school. There was also a Muslim police officer killed at the Charlie Hebdo attacks.

I was in Iraq as a civilian government employee involved in counterinsurgency support. We had large staffs of Iraqi Muslims who we trusted with our lives and who risked their lives themselves (some died). There were also US Muslim military and civilian contractors, with security clearances. A US Muslim Defense Intelligence Agency officer, Muslim army officers and enlisted. Civilian interpreters and subject matter experts like engineers who were Muslim. Muslim State Department people.

Who is fighting right now to take Mosul? 95% Muslims at least.

There were also three Jewish US army colonels/light colonels, a few company grade Jews, some State Department and contractors, and a CIA officer I recall being in Iraq, but that's another subject, so -

(11-18-2016 01:17 PM)Phoenix Wrote:  

(11-16-2016 06:45 AM)Sp5 Wrote:  

2. Don't get the ranting about the Jews, even I know it's become a feature (bug) of this forum. Two of Trump's kids are married to Jews. Jared Kushner is reputed to be smart and likely to be a close advisor to Trump. Jews like other ethnic groups in America are represented in all points of view on all subjects.

I don't think this "never criticize Jews" stuff holds water any more. It's OK here (now, as I'm sure you're aware lol) to criticize Muslims for attitudes pervasive amongst them. But Jews are off limits? Doesn't seem fair.

Leftism is anti-social degeneration. And Jews are massively disproportionately leftist -- this is simply a fact, and even our pre-loved Jewish cuck Shapiro admits "as is typical, 90%+ of my extended family is leftist". Why that is and how we should respond to it should not be off the discussion table.

Who is saying "never criticize Jews?" The question is, can I criticize your criticism of Jews? Can I do that here, or is that a forbidden subject?

Statements like "leftism is anti-social degeneration" are useless. What do you mean by "leftism?" Trumpism includes economics traditionally considered "leftist," like Keynesian infrastructure spending. Traditional conservatives consider the kind of promiscuous unmarried life celebrated here as "leftist."

Jews, like any other group which can be defined on ethnic or religious grounds, have a baseline set of characteristics and an additional set of characteristics which are ascribed to them by their admirers or detractors. As you move away from the baseline (descendants of people from the area of X, with DNA haplogroup X, with the historical belief in religion X) , the ascribed characteristics become more open to contention and should not guide your life. e.g. "Irish are drunks."

It's no big deal to observe Jews mostly vote and donate liberal. Other groups do, too. It is a mistake to cherry-pick Jews out of history like Kevin MacDonald does to construct a false and one-sided narrative about Jewish influence on politics and society. It's easy to talk about Marx or the Frankfurt School and the Jews and blame them for everything. It's harder to note that von Mises was a Jew, too. It's harder to discern the influence of things like the free market itself on the rise of feminism and the decline of the family.

A Jewspiracy believer thinks feminism is solely the product of Jews Betty Friedan, Gloria Steinem, etc. Just ignore non-Jews like Simone de Beauvoir, Germaine Greer, etc.who were leaders.

Ignore Jew Cristina Hoff Summers, maybe the most prominent anti-feminist woman.

Also ignore Jew Norman Mailer, who wrote the first harsh criticisms of organized feminism in the 1960s, Jew Philip Roth, whose novels have a very red pill view (Portnoy's Complaint, Sabbath's Theater) and critique of political correctness (The Human Stain), Jew David Mamet, Jew Saul Bellow, Jew Allen Bloom, etc.

It's also hard to acknowledge that some of what the feminists said was true: guys beating the shit out of their wives was excused a lot more in days past.

The world is complicated, with a lot of contending forces. Blaming a group for all ills is not limited to the Jews: I heard the same thing about Chinese in the Philippines, Indians in East Africa, and Lebanese in West Africa

Sp5's theory is that feminism is a natural organic outgrowth of what Rollo Tomassi calls the Feminine Imperative plus the free global market. In short, women are programmed to buy a lot more (often unnecessary) shit, so it made sense for the Market to give them the freedom to have jobs and their own money to spend without patriarchal control, because this would promote consumption, economic growth and add to profits. To see a few intellectuals in the Frankfurt School and the Jooz behind this is silly, a product of insufficient education and life experience and perhaps a legacy of seated family prejudices.

(11-18-2016 11:35 AM)Samseau Wrote:  

1. Just change how far in advance people can register to vote. Students are lazy and uninformed, change it to 3 months in advance and it stops at least 50% of them.

2. You're giving a disingenuous read. I'm not ranting against Jews, I'm carefully describing the toxic influence of Talmudic culture upon the Jews and their effect on the rest of America. No different than criticizing Islam or Catholicism.

Culture/Religion != Race

3. When is the last time we had a President with as much business experience and political knowledge as Trump? It's never happened in our grandparent's lifetimes. The changes are gonna be Yuge.

1. Lengthy residency periods for voter registration are exactly what Dunn v. Blumstein forbids. No state has a 90 day requirement, so good luck with that. http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0781452.html

2. Your distinction about "Talmudic" Jews seems like an evasion, a distinction without a difference. If you blame the Jews, own it, or define more precisely what you mean, citing the Talmud and examples in real life/history.

3. We shall see. Since Trumpism has no party and has to rely on the establishment GOP for support, it may not be much different from a run-of-the-mill GOP administration. I am still concerned about a coup by the Ryan GOP against Trump to impeach Trump and seat Pence as president if Trump remains true to Trumpism as pronounced during the campaign.

[Phoenix]

Yeah I don't buy the Talmud stuff. I'm guessing a text this big can mean whatever the reader wants it to mean, it's probably got a bit of everything:

[Simeon_Strangelight]

(11-19-2016 02:03 AM)Sp5 Wrote:  

[quote] (11-18-2016 04:36 AM)Going strong Wrote:  

It's going to be great!


I mean, in France's islamized suburbs, the number-1 legit job that young islamists want, is joining the army . For example, the infamous Momo Merah terrorist tried to enlist, several times...

There are 2 reasons for that: one, they (the islamists) want to infiltrate the West and prevent a native reaction from the military.

Two: young suburban muggers think (and it is partly wrong, partly true) that this job, being in the army, is an easy lazy job. Money to sit around doing nothing. Which is quite true, given that they (the islamists) are not sent to the combat lines (if you don't believe me, look at the names of fallen French soldiers in Mali, only native names are to be found).

By the way, it's also a problem, though less generalized, in the US Army - if you remember saddening cases of infiltrated terrorists like Major Nidal Hasan (will he be executed, at last?) or sad-pepe "Hasan" Mark Kools. Two cases branded as workplace-violence (or deranged fragging) by the "Liberal" administration...

Some of the victims of terrorist attacks in France were French Muslim soldiers and police. I remember three Muslim paratroopers killed by an Islamist in Toulouse who also attacked a Jewish school. There was also a Muslim police officer killed at the Charlie Hebdo attacks.

I was in Iraq as a civilian government employee involved in counterinsurgency support. We had large staffs of Iraqi Muslims who we trusted with our lives and who risked their lives themselves (some died). There were also US Muslim military and civilian contractors, with security clearances. A US Muslim Defense Intelligence Agency officer, Muslim army officers and enlisted. Civilian interpreters and subject matter experts like engineers who were Muslim. Muslim State Department people.

Who is fighting right now to take Mosul? 95% Muslims at least.

There were also three Jewish US army colonels/light colonels, a few company grade Jews, some State Department and contractors, and a CIA officer I recall being in Iraq, but that's another subject, so -

That is one of those things that many people don't get about Islam and why guys like me or even Tony Robbionson differentiate between Islam and Muslims.

Muslims come in all colors - some ignore the teachings so much, that they will fight most other Muslims when sharia enforcement comes.
Islam however is utter and complete evil and creates many schisms within.

Even the so-called golden periods of Islam had many wars within, kalifs and sultans being murdered, their own family being murdered when they became sultan They had frequent wars among each other as others splintered off.

Muslims killing Muslims has an old tradition.

If you understood Islam better then you would know that Islam will always have those conflicts within. It may stop someway when the entire world has become Muslim and one group rules over all with a super-iron hand. But then we would be living in the Middle Ages again and one group cannot control the world with that level of technology.

Secularization of the Islamic world won't happen, though the globalists could pull it off, so it's the opposite what is in store. Being cautious about this immigrant group is frankly just common sense and not racism. Roosh mentioned once in a hypothetical article an airport-radical-Islam-lie-detector test. If you could do that (which can be done by the way, since that religion has a strong emotional response), then we could filter out the ones that are likely to cause trouble. Most immigrants probably would not pass the test - those that do are then either highly spiritual, highly secular or ex-Muslims at heart already. But until we have such tests.... Besides Mike Cernovich's idea of only accepting immigrants with IQs of 110+ is excellent, because it would truly limit the international bottom-fishing.


---------------

As for Talmudic Jewry - at best it fuels the current globalist mindset. And you are absolutely right - many miss the feminist and globalist Jewish opposition just as they miss the non-Jews working for them.

A lot of Jewish prominence can simply be explained by significantly higher IQ, high work ethic in intellectual endeavors and by their own tribal preference - when given a choice when promoting a feminist writer or actor - they choose their own first and other tribes second.

I am certain that if their IQs were around 100 on average, that their numbers would be significantly lower in all strata of intellectual achievement.

Still - Samseau is right that all countries should be wary of foreign influence - and this is foreign influence to the Christian-infused mindset of the West.

By the way - the very same globalists are destroying Israel - the Jewish homeland - as well so we might have to consider that something else is going on here. (They have everything there from feminism to gender-gay-pushing, but only stop at importing millions of immigrants into the country - but Japan balks at that as well successfully.)

[Going strong]

(11-19-2016 02:03 AM)Sp5 Wrote:  

(11-18-2016 04:36 AM)Going strong Wrote:  

(11-17-2016 06:55 PM)nomadbrah Wrote:  

It's going to be great!

Though the lord works in mysterious ways.

Take Trump's demand that Euro countries pay up the 2%. What this will do is force these countries, particularly the bloated welfare states to make big cuts. Have to be realistic now. Many of these welfare states have very little wriggle room. They will need massive cuts somewhere. If they choose to cut immigrants, great! If they choose to cut social services, great, that will mean the end of socialism in Europe. You can't sell that to the public.

In addition, larger military, more young men in the military, ready for war with the muslims. A change in perception, more red pilled people in the military, more respect for men.

Basically, much of Europe has been the yapping manlet hiding behind his big bully friend. Now Europe has to back up all the provocations with their military might. Probably won't yap as much.

"In addition, larger military, more young men in the military, ready for war with the islamists":

Except, the islamists are not stupid: they enlist, massively, in the (French, especially, and I guess Belgian?) army themselves!

I mean, in France's islamized suburbs, the number-1 legit job that young islamists want, is joining the army . For example, the infamous Momo Merah terrorist tried to enlist, several times...

There are 2 reasons for that: one, they (the islamists) want to infiltrate the West and prevent a native reaction from the military.

Two: young suburban muggers think (and it is partly wrong, partly true) that this job, being in the army, is an easy lazy job. Money to sit around doing nothing. Which is quite true, given that they (the islamists) are not sent to the combat lines (if you don't believe me, look at the names of fallen French soldiers in Mali, only native names are to be found).

By the way, it's also a problem, though less generalized, in the US Army - if you remember saddening cases of infiltrated terrorists like Major Nidal Hasan (will he be executed, at last?) or sad-pepe "Hasan" Mark Kools. Two cases branded as workplace-violence (or deranged fragging) by the "Liberal" administration...

Some of the victims of terrorist attacks in France were French Muslim soldiers and police. I remember three Muslim paratroopers killed by an Islamist in Toulouse who also attacked a Jewish school.

I remember three Muslim paratroopers killed by an Islamist in Toulouse who also attacked a Jewish school:

To begin with, these 3 soldiers shot by Merah in Toulouse (actually, in Montauban), outside of their military base (as they were taking money from an ATM), were not all Muslims, and actually the family of the third one (a Caribbean islander, not Muslim) is infuriated that everybody would assume he's Muslim...

And anyway, it actually reinforces my point. They were stationed in Toulouse (Montauban) instead of being deployed abroad in Mali or other dangerous places, because the brass (under strict orders themselves) do not want to have casualties (or worse, prisoners) among the Muslim (or perceived-minorities) soldiers. So, they remain (usually) safely tucked away in France, while native-French soldiers are killed on foreign battlegrounds. Just look at the KIA lists of French soldiers: only natives.

In any case, if you're religious, please say a prayer for the third soldier shot by Merah, because he (Loic is his name) remains completely paralyzed, from the day of the shooting... Let's hope for a surgery or scientific miracle: after all, last week, scientists have made a paralyzed monkey walk again, in "a step toward repairing spinal cord injury with electronics".
https://www.technologyreview.com/s/60281...alk-again/
^Imagine how many paralyzed wounded soldiers all across the world could walk again?

[MMX2010]

(11-18-2016 11:35 AM)Samseau Wrote:  

If the government is the substitute husband for these women, then the government must also be the substitute father for the children.

This is a beautiful one-liner, and I'm stealing it.

It not only triggers the woman's self-esteem and self-worth, but also triggers everyone else's protective instincts for their children.

[Sp5]

↑↑↑
The third Muslim was Master Sergeant Imad ibn Ziaten, who was killed on March 11. The other three soldiers (2 Muslim, one non Muslim) were shot March 15.

France has sustained very few casualties in overseas operations, but I think a couple of French soldiers killed in Afghanistan were Muslim.
.

[Going strong]

(11-19-2016 06:35 AM)Sp5 Wrote:  

↑↑↑
The third Muslim was Master Sergeant Imad ibn Ziaten, who was killed on March 11. The other three soldiers (2 Muslim, one non Muslim) were shot March 15.

France has sustained very few casualties in overseas operations, but I think a couple of French soldiers killed in Afghanistan were Muslim.
.

I was talking about the 3 soldiers shot in Montauban, near Toulouse, one of whom is now paralyzed (and his family is understandably furious that he's being forgotten by MSM and officials).

Anyway, France is losing more than a few soldiers (or operatives) in overseas operations, especially in Mali, RCA (and also during the Somalian failed hostage rescue operation)... and all of them are natives. Anyway, let's pursue in PMs if you want, so as not to derail Samseau's thread here...

[Leonard D Neubache]

(11-19-2016 06:22 AM)MMX2010 Wrote:  

(11-18-2016 11:35 AM)Samseau Wrote:  

If the government is the substitute husband for these women, then the government must also be the substitute father for the children.

This is a beautiful one-liner, and I'm stealing it.

It not only triggers the woman's self-esteem and self-worth, but also triggers everyone else's protective instincts for their children.

I personally think that welfare in the form of cash should not exist.

They should have shitty but nutritious food delivered to their door. Canned beans. Canned tomatoes. Pasta. Canned fruit, etc.They should be provided basic and spartan accommodations. No more federal assistance competing to inflate the rental markets. They should have single phase electricity, as much as they can draw, free, with the option of getting a job and paying for the other two phases. Give them a non-smart phone that can make an sms for free once every half hour. Give them the shitty basics that keep them alive. I'm beyond tolerating seeing deadbeats smoking and drinking all day.

That way you fulfil your obligation to "the starving chillens" and you give the welfare set the maximum motivation to find work.

With diminishing returns on national debt it may simply be a matter of time before this becomes a brutal necessity and a gladly accepted compromise from a public that is barely keeping their own head above water and has no sympathy for layabouts.

[Samseau]

(11-19-2016 02:03 AM)Sp5 Wrote:  

(11-18-2016 11:35 AM)Samseau Wrote:  

1. Just change how far in advance people can register to vote. Students are lazy and uninformed, change it to 3 months in advance and it stops at least 50% of them.

2. You're giving a disingenuous read. I'm not ranting against Jews, I'm carefully describing the toxic influence of Talmudic culture upon the Jews and their effect on the rest of America. No different than criticizing Islam or Catholicism.

Culture/Religion != Race

3. When is the last time we had a President with as much business experience and political knowledge as Trump? It's never happened in our grandparent's lifetimes. The changes are gonna be Yuge.

1. Lengthy residency periods for voter registration are exactly what Dunn v. Blumstein forbids. No state has a 90 day requirement, so good luck with that. http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0781452.html

So make it 30 days voter registration. No need to fuss over details when the general principles I'm talking about couldn't be easier to understand.

Quote:

2. Your distinction about "Talmudic" Jews seems like an evasion, a distinction without a difference. If you blame the Jews, own it, or define more precisely what you mean, citing the Talmud and examples in real life/history.

You're historically ignorant but that's okay, most people are on this issue. Very, very, very few people understand the toxic history of Talmudism, the book written by the surviving Jews of the Roman-Jewish wars who rejected Jesus. This is easily a major thread topic in of itself, which I will write about someday.

I forgot to mention this in the OP. The History of the Jews: Christianity and Talmudism is a separate thread I will create someday.

We Orthodox still know about this history. The executive summary, which can easily be researched yourself on the internet/wikipedia, is that after the destruction of Jerusalem, and the genocide of most of the world's Jewry, the surviving Jews split into two factions.

Those who accepted Christ, and those who rejected him. The ones who accepted Christ and his teachings to love thy Neighbor and went on to become symbiotes to their host cultures, and created Western Civilization as we know it. The ones who rejected Christ only loved their fellow Jew, and went on to become racist parasites to their host cultures who have destroyed many civilizations in their quest for world racial supremacy.

A good tree produces good fruit, a poisoned tree produces no fruit.

Zionism is but one of many logical outgrowths of the Talmudic worldview of Jewish supremacism. As was Communism, Feminism, and post-modernism (all major subjects that would take forever to explain here but rest assured I will in the History of Jews thread) are outgrowths of various Talmudic thoughts.

Pharisaic thought could not reconcile the fact that the Old Testament original covenant promised them worldwide domination with Christ's claim of being the Messiah telling them to Love thy Neighbor instead. For the Pharisees envisioned raw power and control, but the Messiah told them they would rule over others with Love instead. The cognitive dissonance was so great they instead murdered Christ, who also prophesized that not only would Jerusalem be burned to the ground for their sins, but that Jewish families would become divided as a result of Christ himself. Everything Christ said came to pass.

The resulting cognitive dissonance of Christ's teachings against the apparent promises of Jewish supremacy did indeed cause a permanent split within the Jewish world. Those who accepted Christ stopped calling themselves Jews and saw the title as irrelevant, wrote the Bible, called themselves Christians. Those who hated Christ continued to call themselves Jews, focused on racial purity (only marrying women of Jewish descent), and wrote the Talmud.

Because of the extreme amount of mental gymnastics necessary for Jews to reconcile the fact of Christ not being the Messiah with the fact of Christ correctly prophesying all events that came to pass, virtually all of the Talmud is a work of gibberish and contradictions that cannot be understood logically but instead thematically. Reading the Talmud is like reading the work of madmen who are feverishly trying to rationalize why Jesus was not the messiah and instead why the real messiah is yet to come, and that the real reason for the destruction of Jerusalem was not because they killed the messiah but because they didn't follow precepts 1-10,425 of Mosaic law perfectly enough. The Talmud is nothing more than a Jew running on the Hamster wheel.

Instead, just like with other irrational subject matter such as women explaining their preferences for men, it is best to pay no attention to what they say and instead follow what they do. Which is to say, the Talmudic Jews continued their beliefs in Jewish supremacism, and they prove it to themselves by amassing wealth beyond the other races, getting away with crimes against their neighbors, conspiring against their neighbors, and God would supposedly never care. The Talmud enshrines many things as holy which were are sins within the Old Testament; as such the cognitive dissonance hallucinations of the Talmud became complete.

In order to maintain the illusion Christ was not the messiah, they had to actively become sinners against many of the original teachings of the Old Testament; this hypocrisy was not lost on the early Christian Jews of the time. The ensuing rift between the Christians and Talmudic Jews became permanent in the third century, most accurately chronicled by John Chrysostom, one of the Church's fathers, in his homily Against the Jews. This is so much biting wisdom and criticism of the Talmuds in this homily that the Talmuds continue to slander and defame this homily at any chance they get; even the wikipedia page on it is slanted as all hell.

For now I will end this discussion with a quote from Chrysostom:

Quote:

(2) Since there are some who think of the synagogue as a holy place, I must say a few words to them. Why do you reverence that place? Must you not despise it, hold it in abomination, run away from it? They answer that the Law and the books of the prophets are kept there. What is this? Will any place where these books are be a holy place? By no means! This is the reason above all others why I hate the synagogue and abhor it. They have the prophets but not believe them; they read the sacred writings but reject their witness-and this is a mark of men guilty of the greatest outrage.

(3) Tell me this. If you were to see a venerable man, illustrious and renowned, dragged off into a tavern or den of robbers; if you were to see him outraged, beaten, and subjected there to the worst violence, would you have held that tavern or den in high esteem because that great and esteemed man had been inside it while undergoing that violent treatment? I think not. Rather, for this very reason you would have hated and abhorred the place.

[..]

What else do you wish me to tell you? Shall I tell you of their plundering, their covetousness, their abandonment of the poor, their thefts, their cheating in trade? the whole day long will not be enough to give you an account of these things. But do their festivals have something solemn and great about them? They have shown that these, too, are impure. Listen to the prophets; rather, listen to God and with how strong a statement he turns his back on them: "I have found your festivals hateful, I have thrust them away from myself".

When Chrysostom spoke of Jews he meant the Talmuds; he of course knew that Christ himself was a Jew as were a great many of the original converts, but the Talmud was still a work in it's infancy and completely unknown to him. He did not see Jewishness as a racial entity but a cultural one, this was common as all converts to Christianity, including Jewish ones, became Christians and lost their old identity.

"there is not here Jew or Greek, there is not here servant nor freeman, there is not here male and female, for all ye are one in Christ Jesus;" - Galatians 3:28.

Of course, with today's DNA technology it is easy to identify one's racial origins and separate it from one's culture, but back then it was impossible and as such people did not even think about it. You were a Jew or you were a Christian. Today I use the word Talmud over Jew because it is far more meaningful than mere racial identification; additionally, anti-semites have poisoned discourse to the point that anything racial Jewish is toxic, including Christianity. Therefore in order to deal with the racist Talmudic Jew and the racist anti-Semite, the distinction between Jew and Talmudic Jew must be made.

And that is why your claim of Talmudic Jew being a distinction without a difference is false and historically ignorant, but there is so much more to talk about on this and it deserves it's own thread in the Deep forum.

Quote:

3. We shall see. Since Trumpism has no party and has to rely on the establishment GOP for support, it may not be much different from a run-of-the-mill GOP administration.

False. It's not relying on GOP establishment at all. Trump is literally building a new party as we speak. Steve Bannon, for instance, grew up as a lifelong Democrat as did Lt. General Flynn.

Quote:

I am still concerned about a coup by the Ryan GOP against Trump to impeach Trump and seat Pence as president if Trump remains true to Trumpism as pronounced during the campaign.

I wonder about that snake as well. I cannot believe he was unanimously elected by the House; that is certainly not a good sign.

[Phil619sd]

Samseau I recall you mentioning in the past that at present influential Jews are at crossroads; basically Talmudic Jews with a supremacist world-domination agenda vs more benevolent Jews fed up with Talmudic Jews consequences for them (think the raise of anti-semitism in the western world due to the emergence of brutal islamic terrorism)

You are vastly more knowlegable in this field than me, so please help me understand something.

Correct me if I am wrong but the Talmudic Jews are in general those who wanted Hillary to win; those who want to undermine Europe and the USA via immigration and the destitution of their rights, those with a depopulation and divide and conquer agenda so they can solidify their grip over the cattle, prominent members of those we call the elite. If this holds true, then can we say most Talmudic Jews resideo in USA? Or at least their influence, as most Jews in the USA voted for Hillary and are leftist.

Now it has been said that Trump is pro-Israel, but this may not necessarily be bad as the Israel Jews may be the ones that oppose the Talmudic jews? Right now Israel is content as Trump promised to move the embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem, so it seems to me that Israel Is ok with Trumps presidency.

Another thing is that Soros is anti-Israel and sponsored Hillary, coincidence?

Now this must mean that the evil American Talmudic Jews are losing agains the "good" Jews at Israel, is this correct? Or this is not so white and black and there are different proportions of Talmudic Jews and "good" Jews in both America/Western World and Israel and it is just a dog-eats-dog world?

Edit:Some typos, I may still have some as im typing from my phone

[Samseau]

(11-21-2016 06:28 PM)Phil619sd Wrote:  

Samseau I recall you mentioning in the past that at present influential Jews are at crossroads; basically Talmudic Jews with a supremacist world-domination agenda vs more benevolent Jews fed up with Talmudic Jews consequences for them (think the raise of anti-semitism in the western world due to the emergence of brutal islamic terrorism)

As with many people, the internet is giving Truth and light to those kept in the darkness for so long. Many Jews are leaving the way of the Talmud and are coming home to Christ, in record numbers compared to past ages. Before it was much easier for Rabbis to hide opposing viewpoints from most descendents of Talmuds. Not so much with the internet anymore.

When you see 50% of British Talmuds (i.e. the ones who call themselves Jews) vote against the EU you can be damn sure they are questioning what their Rabbis tell them, which is a good thing. To the extent they become sympathetic or convert to Christ is the degree by which they stop becoming enemies of Western Civ, for then they accept their Neighbors instead of seeking domination over them instead.

Quote:

Correct me if I am wrong but the Talmudic Jews are in general those who wanted Hillary to win; those who want to undermine Europe and the USA via immigration and the destitution of their rights, those with a depopulation and divide and conquer agenda so they can solidify their grip over the cattle, prominent members of those we call the elite. If this holds true, then can we say most Talmudic Jews resideo in USA? Or at least their influence, as most Jews in the USA voted for Hillary and are leftist.

Judging from voting records, it certainly seems that way. The Talmuds in places like NYC and Hollywood are especially a virulent breed.

The good news is that the birthrates of these Talmuds are low and the older ones are dying out quickly.

Quote:

Now it has been said that Trump is pro-Israel, but this may not necessarily be bad as the Israel Jews may be the ones that oppose the Talmudic jews? Right now Israel is content as Trump promised to move the embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem, so it seems to me that Israel Is ok with Trumps presidency.

Israeli Jews are overwhelmingly Talmud. They don't like Christ and you can read many stories about Christians being mistreated in Israel.

Trump is pro-Israel, and yet in spite of his goodwill towards the Talmuds watch how they will shit on him and continue to hate him. It is typical Talmudic racist hypocrisy, only possible with people who will not accept anyone as a Neighbor except for one of their own (i.e. their fellow Jew).

Quote:

Another thing is that Soros is anti-Israel and sponsored Hillary, coincidence?

It's not a coincidence and men like Soros, who are both anti-West and anti-Zionism offer a much more complex view of the subject. There are many factions within the Talmudic world, and Soros just seems to be part of the most Satanic, not wanting a homeland for the Jews yet continuing Talmudic schemes to destroy others for profit.

A major flaw with Supremacist religions and ideologies, such as Talmudism, Islam, or White Supremacism, is that after the other "unpure" are cast out, the purity tests continue on one another to determine who is the best Jew, Muslim, or White. So Supremacist ideologies, rather than establish peace and harmony, end up causing more wars within itself.

Hence Talmudic Jews are constantly fighting each other, as are Muslims, as are White Nationalist groups. Even Christianity has suffered tremendously over "Who is most Christian," something Christ himself would have thought utterly sinful, hypocritical, and ridiculous.

Quote:

Now this must mean that the evil American Talmudic Jews are losing agains the "good" Jews at Israel, is this correct? Or this is not so white and black and there are different proportions of Talmudic Jews and "good" Jews in both America/Western World and Israel and it is just a dog-eats-dog world?

Your latter supposition is correct. It's not so black and white and the factions are complex as hell.