016 DNC Convention Thread
07-28-2016, 11:23 PM
Hillary is a terrible public speaker. Nothing about it is memorable.
The speech content, however, was perfectly crafted by some of the finest speech writers in the land. Her campaign is also pulling a Ted Cruz and lying their asses off by pretending Trump's issues are her issues. She ACTUALLY SAID she'll be tough on China! WTF? When did that EVER become an issue for her? She said she won't take away guns, she'll get ISIS, and she'll even be tough on Russia. Her viewpoints clearly were globalist in nature compared to Trump's.
To paraphrase her, she said "We're stronger with the world than without it," which makes absolutely no sense whatsoever. It's as if I can go anywhere in the world and will share their strength or whatever. But it sounds all good and touchy feely, which is what the goal is. The problem with this? Hillary COMPLETELY bombed the key moment of the speech when she delivered, "Love Trump's Hate." It actually sounded like she meant, "We should love Trump's hate," because she didn't stress the right words or syllables. Hilariously bad.
There was a shit ton of coverage of this speech, and I wouldn't be surprised if it got higher ratings than Trump's RNC speech. This is because more networks were hyping up this event as well as give glowing praise the entire time (compare the DNC to how Melania was treated). However, I think Trump's RNC got a lot more internet coverage, because I saw a lot more YouTube channels live streaming the RNC than I did the DNC. There was only 3-4 streams with over 1,000 that I saw, with the top stream getting 250K viewers at it's peak. More than Obama. On the other hand, the amount of channels streaming the RNC were at least 5 pages of RNC live streams.
I don't think this event will change the polls too much, but perhaps the media propaganda machine can work some incredible magic. It's pretty tough to polish this turd. The 2016 DNC was a major failure, pissing off the progressive wing, and delivering non-stop pandering speeches that all sounded exactly the same.
Hillary is not the main opponent for Trump this election. It is 100% the controlled media. They are going to be pumping bullshit into the airwaves everyday, every second, for the remainder of this election. Since most people are low-info voters, the media will do as much as possible not to show too much of the DNC. They will hide the riots, protests, and walkouts. They will portray Hillary as humane and caring. They will show a packed stadium of people acting united. The soundclips they will play back from this event have already been picked by the speech writers a day before Hillary even spoke. This is going to minimize all damage the DNC could have caused Hillary's campaign, with a possible increase in the polls in the weeks to come from the media smear campaign.
However, the one thing that is going to keep Trump in the lead will be the debates. Once people have a chance to size the candidates next to each other, and Trump is allowed to counter Hillary's lies (like he did with Cruz) the low-info voter will be able to put things into perspective and see that Trump really isn't the big scary guy the Dems say he is, but instead is 100x more likable than the shrill old-lady who cannot justify her actions. The debates will be the key component to breaking the media spell.
The speech content, however, was perfectly crafted by some of the finest speech writers in the land. Her campaign is also pulling a Ted Cruz and lying their asses off by pretending Trump's issues are her issues. She ACTUALLY SAID she'll be tough on China! WTF? When did that EVER become an issue for her? She said she won't take away guns, she'll get ISIS, and she'll even be tough on Russia. Her viewpoints clearly were globalist in nature compared to Trump's.
To paraphrase her, she said "We're stronger with the world than without it," which makes absolutely no sense whatsoever. It's as if I can go anywhere in the world and will share their strength or whatever. But it sounds all good and touchy feely, which is what the goal is. The problem with this? Hillary COMPLETELY bombed the key moment of the speech when she delivered, "Love Trump's Hate." It actually sounded like she meant, "We should love Trump's hate," because she didn't stress the right words or syllables. Hilariously bad.
There was a shit ton of coverage of this speech, and I wouldn't be surprised if it got higher ratings than Trump's RNC speech. This is because more networks were hyping up this event as well as give glowing praise the entire time (compare the DNC to how Melania was treated). However, I think Trump's RNC got a lot more internet coverage, because I saw a lot more YouTube channels live streaming the RNC than I did the DNC. There was only 3-4 streams with over 1,000 that I saw, with the top stream getting 250K viewers at it's peak. More than Obama. On the other hand, the amount of channels streaming the RNC were at least 5 pages of RNC live streams.
I don't think this event will change the polls too much, but perhaps the media propaganda machine can work some incredible magic. It's pretty tough to polish this turd. The 2016 DNC was a major failure, pissing off the progressive wing, and delivering non-stop pandering speeches that all sounded exactly the same.
Hillary is not the main opponent for Trump this election. It is 100% the controlled media. They are going to be pumping bullshit into the airwaves everyday, every second, for the remainder of this election. Since most people are low-info voters, the media will do as much as possible not to show too much of the DNC. They will hide the riots, protests, and walkouts. They will portray Hillary as humane and caring. They will show a packed stadium of people acting united. The soundclips they will play back from this event have already been picked by the speech writers a day before Hillary even spoke. This is going to minimize all damage the DNC could have caused Hillary's campaign, with a possible increase in the polls in the weeks to come from the media smear campaign.
However, the one thing that is going to keep Trump in the lead will be the debates. Once people have a chance to size the candidates next to each other, and Trump is allowed to counter Hillary's lies (like he did with Cruz) the low-info voter will be able to put things into perspective and see that Trump really isn't the big scary guy the Dems say he is, but instead is 100x more likable than the shrill old-lady who cannot justify her actions. The debates will be the key component to breaking the media spell.
Contributor at Return of Kings. I got banned from twatter, which is run by little bitches and weaklings. You can follow me on Gab.
Be sure to check out the easiest mining program around, FreedomXMR.