[Quintus Curtius]

(07-02-2016 12:22 AM)Burt Gummer Wrote:  

I wonder how many hours of his life Suits has logged on here.
5000+ posts. A true leader!

There's a reason guys like Mike Cernovich left the forum.

[Suits]

(07-02-2016 12:22 AM)Butt Gummer Wrote:  

I wonder how many hours of his life Suits has logged on here.
5000+ posts. A true leader!

My life is a wreck and I'm a huge failure. I have a liberal arts degree. It took me 8.5 years to finish. I still have $40K of student debt.

I run a business playing with toys with children. Sometimes I get paid just to cook a pizza with a 9 year old.

I've only banged 11 girls so far in 2016. They were all ugly and fat.

My only friends are other losers from here on the forum.

I spend most of my day refreshing the EE section of the forum and checking if I've got any new likes.

[spokepoker]

delete

[Suits]

(07-02-2016 12:22 AM)Butt Gummer Wrote:  

In any case I agree with EVERYTHING here except this one issue.
If questioning it, even only in passing, gets me banned than I was wrong to want to be here.

[Samseau]

(07-02-2016 12:07 AM)Burt Gummer Wrote:  

If I did that Id be banned.
All Ill say is look at crime stats, IQ stats, etc.
You can guess my point...

Too bad you got banned, but we talk about race differences all the time. The thing is, single mother is 10x the predictor of crime than race is. I've looked up the rates and race pales in comparison as a predictive factor.

So really now, I'd say you got banned here because of the passive aggressiveness which took a race discussion into troll territory. It's possible to talk about race without being a race troll.

[Suits]

(07-02-2016 01:23 AM)Samseau Wrote:  

(07-02-2016 12:07 AM)Burt Gummer Wrote:  

If I did that Id be banned.
All Ill say is look at crime stats, IQ stats, etc.
You can guess my point...

Too bad you got banned, but we talk about race differences all the time.

So really now, I'd say you got banned here because of the passive aggressiveness which took a race discussion into troll territory. It's possible to talk about race without being a race troll.

Sure, we talk about race all the time. There isn't a rule against doing so, as long as it relevant to the topic and is done with respect for other forum members.

There is a rule prohibiting race talk by newbies. Also, insulting the entire forum is generally frowned upon too.

Insulting Suits is encouraged and appreciated. That's just good fun.

[Horus]

Suits is a poo-poo pants because he poops his pants.

[Suits]

(07-02-2016 01:38 AM)Horus Wrote:  

Suits is a poo-poo pants because he poops his pants.

Previously banned member detected: gds555

gds555 Ban Date: October 2012

Horus Sign-Up Date: January 2013

[Quintus Curtius]

(07-02-2016 12:22 AM)Burt Gummer Wrote:  

If questioning it, even only in passing, gets me banned than I was wrong to want to be here.

Yes, you were wrong to want to be here.

And your playing the martyr and victim also rings false. You weren't seeking a "discussion about race." What you were seeking was a hate-boner strokefest where you could indulge your views that blacks are inferior.

This is proved by your earlier comment that said "look at IQ stats, crime stats, etc. You get my drift."

Yeah, we got your drift all right. We got it loud and clear.

Get out of the hate cesspool that you're in. It doesn't do you and anybody else any good.



.

[Horus]

(07-02-2016 01:42 AM)Suits Wrote:  

(07-02-2016 01:38 AM)Horus Wrote:  

Suits is a poo-poo pants because he poops his pants.

Previously banned member detected: gds555

gds555 Ban Date: October 2012

Horus Sign-Up Date: January 2013

[Leonard D Neubache]

Well fuck all of you chickenshit hippies.

I'm a racist and I don't give a shit what anyone thinks.



Fucking blue people have refused to get with the program for too long, and we need to hang the fucking lot of them.

[Fortis]

Always enjoyed the self-policing here. Makes me feel warm and fuzzy.

[Merenguero]

(07-02-2016 12:29 AM)Suits Wrote:  

(07-02-2016 12:22 AM)Butt Gummer Wrote:  

I wonder how many hours of his life Suits has logged on here.
5000+ posts. A true leader!

My life is a wreck and I'm a huge failure. I have a liberal arts degree. It took me 8.5 years to finish. I still have $40K of student debt.

I run a business playing with toys with children. Sometimes I get paid just to cook a pizza with a 9 year old.

I've only banged 11 girls so far in 2016. They were all ugly and fat.

My only friends are other losers from here on the forum.

I spend most of my day refreshing the EE section of the forum and checking if I've got any new likes.

SpecialEd? If so he's getting sneakier by keeping the antisemitic comments and the comments about other guys' dicks to a minimum.

[MMX2010]

I'm too lazy to find it, but about a month ago Heartiste.wordpress.com posted some divorce stats between interracial couples, and Black man plus White woman had a 95% divorce rate. (White man plus Black woman had around a 20% divorce rate, by far the lowest among all categories.)

I don't have any comment on the statistic itself. I just thought of it when I clicked on Ana Millsap's Facebook page.

[nomadbrah]

(07-02-2016 01:23 AM)Samseau Wrote:  

(07-02-2016 12:07 AM)Burt Gummer Wrote:  

If I did that Id be banned.
All Ill say is look at crime stats, IQ stats, etc.
You can guess my point...

Too bad you got banned, but we talk about race differences all the time. The thing is, single mother is 10x the predictor of crime than race is. I've looked up the rates and race pales in comparison as a predictive factor.

So really now, I'd say you got banned here because of the passive aggressiveness which took a race discussion into troll territory. It's possible to talk about race without being a race troll.

When it comes to violent crime, there is a strong correlation with low IQ, it is very well established, not only in the US, but in studies across decades in European countries too.

It's THE primary predictor of violence.

[Samseau]

(07-02-2016 11:22 AM)nomadbrah Wrote:  

(07-02-2016 01:23 AM)Samseau Wrote:  

(07-02-2016 12:07 AM)Burt Gummer Wrote:  

If I did that Id be banned.
All Ill say is look at crime stats, IQ stats, etc.
You can guess my point...

Too bad you got banned, but we talk about race differences all the time. The thing is, single mother is 10x the predictor of crime than race is. I've looked up the rates and race pales in comparison as a predictive factor.

So really now, I'd say you got banned here because of the passive aggressiveness which took a race discussion into troll territory. It's possible to talk about race without being a race troll.

When it comes to violent crime, there is a strong correlation with low IQ, it is very well established, not only in the US, but in studies across decades in European countries too.

It's THE primary predictor of violence.

Nope, single-motherhood still far, far, far greater.

Get educated bro. http://fisheaters.com/garbagegeneration.html

[MiscBrah]

Fuck! Without Burt how will we fight off the graboids?!?!

[nomadbrah]

(07-02-2016 11:30 AM)Samseau Wrote:  

(07-02-2016 11:22 AM)nomadbrah Wrote:  

(07-02-2016 01:23 AM)Samseau Wrote:  

(07-02-2016 12:07 AM)Burt Gummer Wrote:  

If I did that Id be banned.
All Ill say is look at crime stats, IQ stats, etc.
You can guess my point...

Too bad you got banned, but we talk about race differences all the time. The thing is, single mother is 10x the predictor of crime than race is. I've looked up the rates and race pales in comparison as a predictive factor.

So really now, I'd say you got banned here because of the passive aggressiveness which took a race discussion into troll territory. It's possible to talk about race without being a race troll.

When it comes to violent crime, there is a strong correlation with low IQ, it is very well established, not only in the US, but in studies across decades in European countries too.

It's THE primary predictor of violence.

Nope, single-motherhood still far, far, far greater.

Get educated bro. http://fisheaters.com/garbagegeneration.html

I will read your link now, in the meantime here is some food for thought for the opposite argument.

http://www.utdallas.edu/news/2012/5/1-17...-wide.html

Quote:

A prison inmate’s IQ, as well as the average IQ of a prison unit, can play a role in predicting violent prison misconduct, according to a recently published UT Dallas study.

Full study: https://lesacreduprintemps19.files.wordp...olence.pdf

http://law.jrank.org/pages/1363/Intellig...ation.html

Quote:

The central question of IQ-crime studies is whether individuals with less intelligence, on average, commit more crime than those with more intelligence. That is, are IQ and crime negatively correlated? The best answer, drawn from previous research, is a qualified "yes." Delinquents and criminals average IQ scores 8 to 10 points lower than noncriminals, which is about one-half a standard deviation. IQ and criminal behavior are negatively correlated at about r = -.20 (Hirschi and Hindelang; Wilson and Herrnstein). Here are five well-known studies that illustrate the correlation between IQ and crime.

http://www.societyhealthvulnerability.ne...4834/22691

Quote:

In fact, a meta-analysis of research examining the influence of cognitive and affective empathy to offending behaviour found that the relationship between low empathy and offending disappeared after controlling for intelligence and social economic status (Jolliffe & Farrington, 2004). This is not to disregard the concept of empathy, but rather, the ability to understand another person's emotions may be a primary function of intelligence, which ultimately also has links with offending (Jolliffe & Farrington, 2004). More broadly, research that has aimed to examine the origins of offending behaviour (particularly juvenile delinquency) continues to identify low IQ as a predictor of criminal behaviour (Diaz et al., 1994).

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15612862

Quote:

The accuracy of the prediction of criminal violence may be improved by combining psychopathy with other variables that have been found to predict violence. Research has suggested that assessing intelligence (i.e., IQ) as well as psychopathy improves the accuracy of violence prediction. In the present study, the authors tested this hypothesis by using a contemporary measure of psychopathy, the Psychopathy Checklist--Revised (R. D. Hare, 2003), in a sample of 326 European American and 348 African American male offenders. The postdictive power of psychopathy was evident for both ethnic groups and robust across most changes in the operationalization of violence and the analysis conducted, whereas the postdictive power of IQ was not. No Psychopathy x IQ interactions were identified. Implications of these results for violence prediction are discussed.

https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the...-criminals

Quote:

We may infer this from the fact that behavior that would be classified as criminal if engaged in by humans, like murder, rape, assault, and theft, are quite common among other species. The criminologist Lee Ellis documented many instances of these “criminal behavior” among different species with photographs in 1998. The primatologist Frans de Waal and his colleagues have documented brutal murders, assaults, and other interpersonal violence among chimpanzees, bonobos, and capuchin monkeys.

It therefore makes sense from the perspective of the Hypothesis that men with low intelligence may be more likely to resort to evolutionarily familiar means of competition for resources (theft rather than full-time employment) and mating opportunities (rape rather than computer dating), and not to comprehend fully the consequences of criminal behavior imposed by evolutionarily novel entities of law enforcement.

[AboveAverageJoe]

Talk about never turn your back? Shoot, I never even square up my feet when I am near other unknown male elements nearby. Always plant your feet, with your dominant hand and foot back and your head on a swivel. In Hawaii that is known as the old false crack! No Aloha for you, brah!

[Irenicus]

Quote:

You got to love how the supposed "mother" said how she "didn't know why he did it" and how "he's not a bad kid at all, he's as sweet as can be."

Statements like this really make my blood boil.



Many kids from single mothers are truly dysfunctional in some way, and their mothers tend to ignore the problems those kids (especially males), experience. Now, when the single mothers are faced with the truth when their kid commits a mass shooting or something, their hamster starts spinning at Warp 5. They always blame someone else - government, evil CIS men, yadda yadda. Never themselves.



That pattern is present in like 60% cases of mass shootings. And nobody has the courage (apart from the manosphere) to tell the truth, and to offer practical solutions.



This comes from a person who was raised by a single mother, by the way, so don't dare (yes, I am looking at you MSM fucks reading this) accuse me of singlemotherphobia or some made up crap coming from your demented mind(s).

[Fortis]

Not to keep bringing up Burt, but I love how he tries to conflate himself with a man of Cernovich's stature.

Sorry, Burt, Cernovich didn't leave this forum because we wouldn't let him hate on blacks. I am a black man who has met Cernovich and I didn't get a whiff of hate off of the guy.

[AboveAverageJoe]

The real problem with single mothers isn't feral spawn like this gleefully-violent, detriment to society.
It is the pancake titties and those damn stretch marks!

[ball dont lie]

(07-02-2016 11:30 AM)Samseau Wrote:  

(07-02-2016 11:22 AM)nomadbrah Wrote:  

(07-02-2016 01:23 AM)Samseau Wrote:  

(07-02-2016 12:07 AM)Burt Gummer Wrote:  

If I did that Id be banned.
All Ill say is look at crime stats, IQ stats, etc.
You can guess my point...

Too bad you got banned, but we talk about race differences all the time. The thing is, single mother is 10x the predictor of crime than race is. I've looked up the rates and race pales in comparison as a predictive factor.

So really now, I'd say you got banned here because of the passive aggressiveness which took a race discussion into troll territory. It's possible to talk about race without being a race troll.

When it comes to violent crime, there is a strong correlation with low IQ, it is very well established, not only in the US, but in studies across decades in European countries too.

It's THE primary predictor of violence.

Nope, single-motherhood still far, far, far greater.

Get educated bro. http://fisheaters.com/garbagegeneration.html

I will also spend some time reading your link.

To add though: There has been a solid link between low IQ, lead poisoning and crime rates. It has been a very steady predictor of crime, especially violent, irrational crime for a long time.


**EDIT***

I read the first few chapters, which are long, and I don't see any statistics. None. Some of his points are well argued but I don't see anything but correlation. Which is not causation. Id go with lead poisoning.

Recently the Flint lead poisoning in the water has caused the state of Michigan to do lead testing in major cities such as Ann Arbor, Grand Rapids, Kalamazoo, Lansing, etc. These cities surprisingly found that in the lowest income housing, shitty, slumlord places that low income live, which includes mostly blacks, the lead levels were actually higher than in Flint. It just hadn't been tested so nobody knew. These areas are where the majority of the violent criminals come from and at least back in the 60s/70s the research showed that low income who hadn't been exposed to lead (gasoline, paint) had much lower levels of violent crime, even though they had broken homes and were also poor.

[Leonard D Neubache]

The sad fact of the matter is it doesn't matter whether it's an IQ thing, a single mother thing, a race thing or any combination of the three.

Red-pill guys want solutions to problems, not endless academic noise. And the vast majority of us agree that regardless of what the root causes of these behaviour types are, a heavy handed court system coupled with extremely negative consequences for single-mother parenting are the solution.

There was a time in every western nation's history when crime and careless pregnancy was policed harshly by one means or another, and during those times blacks were not drastically over-represented in prisons, despite the alleged systemic racism.

Racial IQ variations are a fact. It's no reason to be racist unless you're willing to concede the planet to the Ashkenazi Jews. Lower IQ also equals worse behaviour absent consequences. Whoopdeefuckingdoo.

What makes more sense. "Getting rid" of low IQ people or reinstating consequences?

[Fortis]

^ Obviously we should kill all blacks and stupid people.

Absolutely agreed on dsincentivizing single motherhood.

China does it right in that regard. "No dad? Sorry, your kid can't go to the schools in our area. Better send him back to Hunan to live with grandma and granddad."

What messes me up is how back in the 70s blacks had lower rates of single parenthood than whites and (you guessed it) relatively low crime rates.

Incentivizing two-parent households is the only way to go in my mind.