[eradicator]

Normally, I would not take any sort of joy in someone losing their job. But seeing as how their jobs were all predatory, good riddance.

[8ball]

If a republican gets elected and defunds the department of education and EPA the HUFFPO and BUZZFEED will have to either declare bankruptcy or fire most of their staff.


They have been riding the left wing train for years through government subsidized "education" programs. Billions dollars worth of feminist propaganda, multicultural federal programs and other left wing agendas. Most of this comes from the department of education where there are thousands of jobs who's purpose is to promote these issues. The media outlets were simply relying on this free marketing. Their articles were being shared by thousands of government workers and tax evasion schemes(NGO's), in the last for years the number of people doubled as more programs were added. Once the source is cut off, you will see the biggest media dive in history. Some outlets will just turn(CNN) others will die(HUFFPO).

[metalfan20]

(03-18-2016 02:13 PM)zigZag Wrote:  

(03-18-2016 02:01 PM)metalfan20 Wrote:  

They had it coming. Let's hope Buzzfeed is next.

I doubt Buzzfeed will have any problems anytime soon. They've hit on a winning formula that seems to keep on delivering.

One can be optimistic. There will come a point where they run out of list topics and silly videos to make.

[Emancipator]

(03-19-2016 03:06 PM)metalfan20 Wrote:  

(03-18-2016 02:13 PM)zigZag Wrote:  

(03-18-2016 02:01 PM)metalfan20 Wrote:  

They had it coming. Let's hope Buzzfeed is next.

I doubt Buzzfeed will have any problems anytime soon. They've hit on a winning formula that seems to keep on delivering.

One can be optimistic. There will come a point where they run out of list topics and silly videos to make.

All it takes is one Facebook algorithm change that would hurt Buzzfeed

All the feel good clickbait sites like Upworthy got hit hard in FB's last change

Thing is Buzzfeed has a big video component that resonates with people causally absorbing media while on mobile.

[germanico]

(03-17-2016 03:19 PM)Roosh Wrote:  

The same people who hated on us and tried to take us out are now out of jobs.

Announce that the mediatic attacks you received made you realize the importance of relying on experienced journalists to write your content instead of moody writers.

You are offering a fully paid internship at RVMedia. 36k a year plus full benefit package with 2 weeks paid vacation and they get to follow you around during your 2016 world tour.

To ensure a fair selection process, they have to write an article for RoK extolling the virtues of neomasculinity. Whoever gets more comments gets the job.

Then, expose them as the cynical mercenary typists they are. Contrast how they are bending themselves over just a few weeks after instigating your execution.

"Watch 20 prostitute typists completely miss the point of objective journalism by writing whatever I told them to for money. #4 will make you lose your faith in human intellect."

[Matsufubu]

Like Roosh said, these are not honest working folk who have been laid off; they are evil, lying gutter trash who would be more than happy to see him and his family (or us) dead at the hands of and SJW lynch mob just so they can sell the story. When they involve your family and expose them to risk they deserve everything they get.

I would split their skulls with my axe if the law allowed.

[Suits]

(03-19-2016 09:05 PM)Matsufubu Wrote:  

I would split their skulls with my axe if the law allowed.

[muscless]

I read somewhere that ONLY 48% of people believe the media today. A simple Google search and you know its all brown shit coming out of their mouths!

[CynicalContrarian]

How ironic.
These people work for a news organization, yet they didn't see the 'writing' on the wall.

There's a second benefit to this, which I haven't noticed anyone comment on.
The flood of social science, humanities, gender politics & 'journalism' graduates,
will have even more difficulty finding work with their demented degrees.

[Cpt. Jack Sparrow]

Parasites who leave their former hosts before they die have higher odds of finding new hosts. Never forget that.

[Aurini]

(03-19-2016 07:25 AM)eradicator Wrote:  

Normally, I would not take any sort of joy in someone losing their job. But seeing as how their jobs were all predatory, good riddance.

I woke up with an insight along these lines, regarding a personal situation which I can't describe in detail, but it applies here as well.

It is good to feel sympathy for others, "For the reckless ones whose bad trip left them cold", as Johnny Cash said, after all - haven't we all made bad decisions or taken foolish risks, whose consequences we lucked out of paying? Who are we to condemn the thief who is caught, when we have all been thieves ourselves?

But there is a fine line between the errors of weakness and the errors of intent (venial versus mortal sins). You summed it up perfectly with the word 'predatory'. These were not good-hearted truth seekers who got swept up in a witch hunt, credulously believing the foolish things they wrote; these are men and women who put themselves at odds with the world, demanding that their truth be acknowledged by the reality, and they will resort to any means to do so.

This destruction is precisely what they were demanding. It is one thing to steal food because you're hungry; it's another thing to steal food because you declare that you have a right to another man's property - to steal it, and then throw it to the pigs with a laugh, as St Augustine once did. These people live by lies and foulness, they worship themselves, and they'll go to the same place as the first spirit who decided that he was above creation.

Destruction is the just reward for their action; it's the only reward that makes sense, and ultimately it's the only reward they'll accept. These aren't the consequences they suffer for their immoral behaviour - these are the consequences that they always wanted, and would have eventually achieved, one way or another.

Don't pity them. They got exactly what they were seeking.

[WalkingMan]

(03-18-2016 05:23 PM)EuphoricWizard Wrote:  

Don't forget Gawker is about to go down. They screwed themselves over bad. They couldn't turn down the snark and smug for 1 second in the trial and looked like complete sociopaths.

They ARE sociopaths.

After the trial I couldn't help but look this up:

http://mic.com/articles/44423/10-profess....xjPfKJsqC

[Roosh]

7 day ban for Matsufubu. We don't suggest violence here.

[Bosco888888]

(03-20-2016 01:15 PM)Roosh Wrote:  

7 day ban for Matsufubu. We don't suggest violence here.

Seems a bit harsh no? He said "if the law allowed". He's not suggesting violence at all from what I can see.

Your forum though. Your rules.

EDIT: meh, I take that back. I guess saying something like that isn't too smart.

[Surreyman]

(03-20-2016 03:53 PM)Bosco888888 Wrote:  

(03-20-2016 01:15 PM)Roosh Wrote:  

7 day ban for Matsufubu. We don't suggest violence here.

Seems a bit harsh no? He said "if the law allowed". He's not suggesting violence at all from what I can see.

Your forum though. Your rules.

EDIT: meh, I take that back. I guess saying something like that isn't too smart.

I think you should consider the spirit of the rules, rather than interpreting them in a precise legalistic way.

This forum has a lot of enemies, and is under a lot of scrutiny. It's a shame, but we need these rules.

[Requiem]

It's a 7-day ban. I think he'll be ok.

[samsamsam]

I am just going to leave these here for Bosco. I am not sure why you would publicly comment/judge the opinion of the founder of this forum and someone who has helped many men. Troll maybe?

[Bosco888888]

Jesus calm down lads I took back my original questioning. I can see that it was probably not the smartest thing to post if he didn't want a ban.

It was an honest question although I should've known it would look quite trollish coming from a 2 post account. My bad.

By the way - I may not have many posts but I've been around these parts waaaaayy longer than most of you. Pre-RVF. I'm talking DCB old-school Roosh. I've literally read every Roosh post on his blog for about a decade. Pretty sure I haven't missed any. Top that motherfuckers!

But yeah, I stand corrected. He probably deserved the 7-day.

I'll return to the shadows. Carry on!

[samsamsam]

Just having some fun. If you have been around like you said you have been you know how we like to mess around.

[Roosh]

7 day ban for Bosco888888.

[The Beast1]

(03-18-2016 06:24 PM)EuphoricWizard Wrote:  

(03-18-2016 05:32 PM)Aristotle Wrote:  

(03-18-2016 05:23 PM)EuphoricWizard Wrote:  

Don't forget Gawker is about to go down. They screwed themselves over bad. They couldn't turn down the snark and smug for 1 second in the trial and looked like complete sociopaths. They actually said it's ok to publish celebrity sex tapes as long as the person is over 4 years old.

These are the other subsidiary properties
Gawker.com
Deadspin
Gizmodo
Jalopnik
Jezebel
Kotaku
Lifehacker

I hope that, like Twinkies, Lifehacker and Gizmodo survive somehow. I actually occasionally read both those sites, and they post quite a bit of useful information with minimal fluff.

The good writers will be hired anywhere. I'd rather see all Gawker properties burned down and hopefully no one tries to buy it. The social justice was creeping in to a lot of those sites. Gizmodo/Lifehacker would publish the usual hitpieces against Gamergate and the women are being oppressed in STEM garbage.

Screw Gizmodo. I got into a massive flame fest with one of their writers way back in 2005 over some reporting on Linux stuff. I don't remember what the argument was but it ended up having a bunch of folks (myself included) riping the author of the article a new one. I stopped reading after that.

I never found anything useful on Lifehacker, but that may be the one gem in the turd basket for the right kind of person.

The real question is: will we see the death of Jezebel if Hulk Hogan takes over the domain names as part of their compensation?

[Gmac]

(03-20-2016 05:22 PM)Bosco888888 Wrote:  

Jesus calm down lads I took back my original questioning. I can see that it was probably not the smartest thing to post if he didn't want a ban.

It was an honest question although I should've known it would look quite trollish coming from a 2 post account. My bad.

By the way - I may not have many posts but I've been around these parts waaaaayy longer than most of you. Pre-RVF. I'm talking DCB old-school Roosh. I've literally read every Roosh post on his blog for about a decade. Pretty sure I haven't missed any. Top that motherfuckers!

But yeah, I stand corrected. He probably deserved the 7-day.

I'll return to the shadows. Carry on!

If you've been around that long you should know not to insult senior members or be a dissident / disrupter.



Back on topic... I have a feeling this is just the tip of the iceberg. We're going to see a lot more media organizations dropping like flies.

Roosh actually called it during his press conference. What was it, "You don't understand, half you will be out of a job within five years time"? Maybe sooner.

...even if he was going for the water just like Rubio.

[username]

Another big SJW media outlet, Vice, is experiencing a massive struggle with their new TV network.

http://www.ibtimes.com/viceland-ratings-...rk-2343335

Quote:

Thus far, though, Viceland doesn’t seem to be bringing anyone to TV. The average daily viewership of the channel over its first three weeks is a massive 77 percent lower than H2’s viewership over the last three weeks of its existence, according to Rentrak data obtained by International Business Times. And if you think the percentage is bad, the raw numbers are worse: H2 averaged a little over 241,000 viewers a day during that time period. Viceland? Just over 55,000. Viceland’s first week averaged around 60,400 viewers a day.

77% lower ratings. 60,000 viewers in a country of over 300 million people.

[Irenicus]

Vice is a perfect example of what happens when SJW's take over.

Back in the day, that channel (or rather, Youtube channel) was awesome...they were talking about many issues that MSM choose to ignore.

But...when a SJW company took over (I think it was Disney)...they went downhill. All the new documentaries are unwatchable, SJW crap became the norm, and so on.

SJW's need to understand that the vast majority of the people, whether in the US, Europe...are still sane...relatively speaking. Their voices, which were ignored for way too long are getting louder each day.

Look at Trump.

Look at LePen.

Look at the success of Sweden Democrats.

Remember Gamergate (laugh as much as you want, but for the SJWs, this was their Staljingrad - the beginning of the end).

Remember the Battles in Montreal and Toronto.



SJW's are a formidable opponent, that is true. But being formidable does not make you invincible. They can take over as much news outlets as they want (such as Vice) and ruin many games that we held dear (Baldur's gate)...but they will never silence us.

Us normal people.

Us masculine men.

Never.

We are the future. By being here...you are a part of it.

And buckle up...there is still plenty to do. And plenty of feeling to be hurt.

[Matsufubu]

The only thing that makes SJWs a threat is their government backing. Without Big Daddy Government endorsing their twisted world view they would return to the shadows they belong in. Twisted, weak, degenerate scum who only attack in packs. I suppose the more rope they are fed the quicker they'll hang themselves. Removing any boundaries regarding gender, sexuality, trans-whatever will inevitably result in collapse as they seek to gain status within increasingly smaller groups specialising in whatever freakish bullshit they think up next. They are the immediate future but their proliferation relies on infecting normal people. Men who understand the world and exist within the framework that nature has laid out for us are the cure.

The world has a fever, and the only prescription...is more RVF.