[HighSpeed_LowDrag]

I don't know if this is media, per se, but I found this online and it's too good to pass up.

It's a post from a group known as the Good Men Project, an organization of cucks dedicated to shaming what they call 'toxic masculinity' ... but I digress.

I had to reread this three times over just to make sure my eyes weren't actually lying to me.

https://goodmenproject.com/ethics-values...ising-wcz/

Quote:

Why Pick-Up Artists Should be Sued for False Advertising

If you’re hot for a guy who’s an asshole, it’s not because he’s an asshole, it’s probably because he’s hot. This is precisely why pick-up artists aren’t just evil and gross, they’re also guilty of false advertising.

Take, for example, the reigning king of the pick-up artists: Barack Obama (Roosh V). What a profoundly delusional idiot this guy is! He actually thinks that his sociopathic “skills” are what gets him laid. Of course, it’s obvious to any objective outside observer with common sense—indeed, even to hardcore feminists like Laurie Penny, who loathe him—that he gets laid a lot because he’s hot.

Roosh V is guilty of what Nassim Nicholas Taleb refers to as the Green Lumber Fallacy.

As Taleb makes clear in Antifragile (2012), people who are successful at something are often blissfully unaware of why they’re successful at it. They might think they know why they’re successful, but they’re often dead wrong. He refers to this as the Green Lumber Fallacy, after the trader who made a fortune buying and selling green lumber without knowing what it was. Dude thought green lumber was actually “green” as opposed to freshly cut. Funny, I know. But, what’s not funny is watching a homely computer programmer trying to apply Roosh V’s creepy techniques.

These guys fail miserably because the techniques aren’t just morally repunant, they aren’t effective.

What is effective? I’ve noticed three discernible traits when it comes to straight guys who get a lot of play: 1) they genuinely like women and/or 2) they’re hot and/or 3) they’re powerful, which is kinda hot. Successful pick-up artists need to realize that they’re getting laid in spite of their douche-y-ness, not because of it.

Roosh is at the point where even his enemies praise him now.

[Quintus Curtius]

An article about Roosh in Newsweek. Just read it...it's pretty well balanced.


http://www.newsweek.com/2016/10/21/roosh...09319.html

[ElFlaco]

(10-13-2016 12:03 PM)Quintus Curtius Wrote:  

An article about Roosh in Newsweek. Just read it...it's pretty well balanced.

I wouldn't say well-balanced exactly, but any exposure is a plus at this point.

Quote:

"I’m 37 now," he says. "How much sex do you need?"

The most surprising thing I learned is that Newsweek is still in publication.

[Quintus Curtius]

^^^
At this point my expectations from the media are so low that anything that is not caked with rage and invective basically looks "well-balanced."

[The Beast1]

(10-13-2016 12:03 PM)Quintus Curtius Wrote:  

An article about Roosh in Newsweek. Just read it...it's pretty well balanced.


http://www.newsweek.com/2016/10/21/roosh...09319.html

Did anyone see the video they have on the article?

Cardguy gets a strong bump!

[Aquiles_Baesta_Parada]

Bring Cardguy back!

[Gmac]

(10-13-2016 12:03 PM)Quintus Curtius Wrote:  

An article about Roosh in Newsweek. Just read it...it's pretty well balanced.


http://www.newsweek.com/2016/10/21/roosh...09319.html

Well done article.

The newsweek guy was cool, possibly even a fan. I'll leave it to you all to figure out which friend was me.

[debeguiled]

Not a bad article, except for this line:

Quote:

When I meet Roosh at a Starbucks in Washington, D.C., he’s early. That’s surprising, since he tells his readers to show up five to 10 minutes late to dates. (“She’ll have anxious feelings focusing on your arrival instead of the doubts she had about coming to see you.”)

Author thinks the interview is a date.

After I read this I had to do a search on the author to make sure Max wasn't short for Maxine.

[churros]

(11-15-2016 09:33 AM)churros Wrote:  

The dipshits in the Guardian have written another navel-gazing article about the alt-right. Not interesting enough to quote.

But it's amazing how they're still wrong about some basic ideas. Never come across this "corrective rape" talk...

But Roosh has become something of a poster boy! You'll have to click through to see the image.

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfre...-breitbart

[Avarence]

Quote:

On their forums I’ve read long, furious manifestos claiming that women are all sluts who “ride the cock carousel” and sleep with a series of “alpha males” until they reach the end of their sexual prime, at which point they seek out a “beta cuck” to settle down with for financial security.

Hi Abi! WB

[General Mayhem]

(11-15-2016 09:41 AM)churros Wrote:  

(11-15-2016 09:33 AM)churros Wrote:  

The dipshits in the Guardian have written another navel-gazing article about the alt-right. Not interesting enough to quote.

But it's amazing how they're still wrong about some basic ideas. Never come across this "corrective rape" talk...

But Roosh has become something of a poster boy! You'll have to click through to see the image.

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfre...-breitbart

Article title: "We need to talk about the online radicalisation of young, white men"

Safe to assume she lurks here on the forum:

"On their forums I’ve read long, furious manifestos claiming that women are all sluts who “ride the cock carousel” and sleep with a series of “alpha males” until they reach the end of their sexual prime, at which point they seek out a “beta cuck” to settle down with for financial security. I’ve lurked silently on blogs dedicated to “pick-up artistry” as men argue that uppity, opinionated, feminist women – women like myself – need to be put in their place through “corrective rape”.

Also safe to assume she is delusional because she seemed to miss the thread on black guy game in the game forum, not to mention all of our diverse threads on hot multicultural pussy(Jews, blacks, latinas, asians, all included) which would surely be a disqualifier to real white supremacists.

I have become more radicalized from reading the forum. But not in the ways they are talking about. My opinions are much more nuanced than they were before I came here.

However, I am much less tolerant of the globalist cabal and the way they have taken advantage of the impressionable majority of citizens.

If anything, we should be accusing journalists like this of radicalizing the populace through insidious propaganda campaigns that are actually straight out of the Hitler playbook.

None of us came here to fight a culture war(except maybe some guys more recently) we just wanted to have a good time and talk about pussy. These assholes dragged us into the fight and only have themselves to blame.

[rotekz]

(11-15-2016 09:33 AM)churros Wrote:  

The dipshits in the Guardian have written another navel-gazing article about the alt-right. Not interesting enough to quote.

Here's an archive to view rather than give them the clicks.

[Mufasa]

All her images are head shots and can't see her clavicle. She's cute but my tinder senses are tingling. Probably a fatter chick

wnb

Edit:





wb

[churros]

The question is: I wonder how she got radicalised?

Our views used to be normal.

[Mercenary]

Source:

http://metro.co.uk/2016/11/16/man-who-wa...n-6262764/

Quote:

Man who wants rape legalising is delighted with Donald Trump’s win

Harley Tamplin for Metro.co.uk
Wednesday 16 Nov 2016

Remember Roosh V, the absolute helmet who called for the legalisation of rape and sparked massive protests? Well, he’s back – with some interesting comments about the brand new president-elect. Describing himself as a ‘pick-up artist’, Roosh, real name Barack Obama, shot to infamy earlier this year when he was forced to cancel events in the UK. The guy has some pretty horrendous views about women, so you won’t be surprised to hear that he’s a fan of Donald Trump. The future president’s campaign was, of course, marred by scandal when an old tape emerged of him claiming he could ‘grab women by the pussy’. While millions of people were disgusted, Roosh was delighted because, as he wrote in a blog, ‘if the president can say it then you can say it’.

Here are some other, er, highlights from his article. ‘When you talk like Trump, the first thought your listener will have is, ‘he sounds like the president of the United States’.’ ‘I’m in a state of exuberance that we now have a president who rates women on a 1-10 scale in the same way that we do and evaluates women by their appearance and feminine attitude.’ ‘Simply look at his wife and the beautiful women he has surrounded himself with to remind yourself of what men everywhere prefer, and not the ‘beauty at every size’ sewage that has been pushed down our throats by gender studies professors and corporations trying to market their product to feminist fatsoes.’ ‘The president of the United States does not see the value in fat women who don’t take care of themselves, and neither should you.’ ‘His presence automatically legitimises masculine behaviours that were previously labelled sexist and misogynist.’

To read the whole, vomit-inducing post, click here.

[Mercenary]

Source:

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/people...21161.html

Quote:

Controversial pick-up artist Roosh V celebrates Donald Trump’s victory: ‘If the President can say it then you can say it’

Barack Obama has sparked controversy in his role as a self-styled 'pick-up master'

Andrew Buncombe New York |
@AndrewBuncombe |

There are plenty of people who have mourned the election victory of Donald Trump. Many of the protesters who have filled the streets of New York, Chicago and Los Angeles, fear his win will validate the sort of sexist and misogynist language and behaviour displayed by the New York tycoon during the campaign. Yet a man who has made his name as a self-described expert on “picking up girls”, has been celebrating Mr Trump’s victory for those very reasons. Barack Obama, who runs the website Roosh V and who published a book called Bang, which is says is a “textbook for…getting laid”, has been writing about how the promotion of a man caught bragging on video about sexually assaulting women, will benefit his readers. “The celebrations have ended and we’ve all come to absorb the fact that Donald Trump is our next president, an outcome that many of us have aggressively worked for in the past several months,” he wrote. “Now that we’ve gotten what we wanted, it’s time to describe exactly how a Trump presidency will improve our standing."

Mr Obama said the biggest affect will be the “death of political correctness”. “We now have a s**tlord for President who has insulted ugly women as “fat pigs,” and whose private macho talk, which all masculine men have done, was relentlessly attacked by the press but not punished in the voter booth,” he said. “This means that when you talk like Trump, the first thought your listener will have is, ‘He sounds like the President of the United States’.” Mr Obama made headlines earlier this year when he was accused of being “pro-rape” after publishing a “satirical thought experiment” apparently advocating legalising rape on private premises as a means of reducing rape.

He has also been condemed for his 15 self-published books, which include titles such as 30 Bangs, and YouTube videos giving advice to men on how to have sex with women. Mr Obama said the election result showed that “either Trump was elected because voters liked a person who makes those kinds of statements or they didn’t care enough that he made them”. He added: “Whichever explanation you accept means that the will of the American people has stated that you can exercise your free speech, your opinions, and your desire to flirt with attractive women without having to obey a speech police force that evaluates everything you do based on how offensive it is to a kaleidoscope of races and loony identities.” He said: “You can begin removing your politically correct filter.”

Protesters who have taken to the streets and parks of America’s biggest cities have been arguing the very same point, but from a different perspective. They say the election of Mr Trump means women and minorities are more vulnerable then ever. In Los Angeles, Ru Dominguez, 52, an organiser with the labour union Unite Here who attended the LA march, said she and fellow union members were prepared to oppose his agenda at every turn. “We’re going to stick together,” she said. “Trump is a racist, he’s ignorant, and he’s not my president.” In New York, a 25-year-old black man who asked to be identified only by his first name, James, told The Independent the election of Mr Trump had already led to a wave of incidents of racial and sexist abuse and harassment. He said that because Mr Trump was elected after using racist language and being filmed bragging about abusing women, people felt emboldened. “I don’t think all Trump supporters are racist. I think a lot have lost their jobs and have fallen for his words,” he said.

[kaotic]

Harley Tamplin:



Andrew Buncombe:



Sad weak looking men.

I am Jack's complete lack of surprise.

[weambulance]

(11-15-2016 11:02 AM)General Mayhem Wrote:  

(11-15-2016 09:41 AM)churros Wrote:  

(11-15-2016 09:33 AM)churros Wrote:  

The dipshits in the Guardian have written another navel-gazing article about the alt-right. Not interesting enough to quote.

But it's amazing how they're still wrong about some basic ideas. Never come across this "corrective rape" talk...

But Roosh has become something of a poster boy! You'll have to click through to see the image.

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfre...-breitbart

Article title: "We need to talk about the online radicalisation of young, white men"

Safe to assume she lurks here on the forum:

"On their forums I’ve read long, furious manifestos claiming that women are all sluts who “ride the cock carousel” and sleep with a series of “alpha males” until they reach the end of their sexual prime, at which point they seek out a “beta cuck” to settle down with for financial security. I’ve lurked silently on blogs dedicated to “pick-up artistry” as men argue that uppity, opinionated, feminist women – women like myself – need to be put in their place through “corrective rape”.

What? Have I been missing out on all the corrective rape threads in these parts?




...Fucking captcha is being a pain in the ass with this post.

[iknowexactly]

(11-15-2016 01:16 PM)Mufasa Wrote:  



All her images are head shots and can't see her clavicle. She's cute but my tinder senses are tingling. Probably a fatter chick

wnb




wb

WB but watch out for the non-nurturing personality due to the low estrogen ( no full lips)

[sportbilly]

Section in the Uk times today on "online extremists" includes a mention for Roosh V

[RIslander]

1/10 thread fail.

[Roosh]

I think this is the article: http://www.thetimes.co.uk/edition/news/t...-csdn0npsf

It's behind a paywall.

[Transsimian]

Quote:

Google is to be summoned before the government to explain why taxpayers are unwittingly funding extremists through advertising, The Times can reveal.

The Cabinet Office joined some of the world’s largest brands last night in pulling millions of pounds in marketing from YouTube after an investigation showed that rape apologists, anti-Semites and banned hate preachers were receiving payouts from publicly subsidised adverts on the internet company’s video platform.

David Duke, the American white nationalist, Michael Savage, a homophobic “shock-jock”, and Steven Anderson, a pastor who praised the killing of 49 people in a gay nightclub, all have videos variously carrying advertising from the Home Office, the Royal Navy, the Royal Air Force, Transport For London and the BBC.

Mr Anderson, who was banned from entering Britain last year after repeatedly calling homosexuals “sodomites, queers and faggots”, has YouTube videos with adverts for Channel 4, Visit Scotland, the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), Argos, Honda, Sandals, The Guardian and Sainsbury’s.

A YouTube poster typically earns about $7.60 for every 1,000 times that an advert is seen. More than 40 videos posted by Duke, a former imperial wizard of the Ku Klux Klan, have been viewed in excess of 100,000 times.

Last night the government suspended its YouTube advertising “pending reassurances” from Google.

Commercial brands also removed adverts, with Channel 4 saying that it was not satisfied that the platform was “a safe environment”.

“Google is responsible for ensuring that the high standards applied to government advertising are adhered to and that adverts do not appear alongside inappropriate content,” a government spokeswoman said.

“Google has been summoned for discussions at the Cabinet Office to explain how it will deliver the high quality of service that government demands on behalf of the taxpayer.”

Sainsbury’s and Argos, whose adverts also appeared on videos posted on behalf of the nationalist organisation the Polish Defence League, said that it was “unacceptable that Google is allowing our ads to be placed alongside these videos on YouTube”. Transport for London, the FCA, The Guardian and L’Oréal also pulled commercials.

“It is completely unacceptable that Google allows advertising for brands like The Guardian to appear next to extremist and hate-filled videos,” a spokeswoman for Guardian News & Media said.

“We have stopped all advertising through Google with immediate effect until we receive guarantees that this won’t happen in the future.”

Adverts for the College of Policing and the Department for International Development appear on the official website of Hizb ut-Tahrir, an extremist Islamist organisation that has called for the establishment of a global caliphate.

The Metropolitan Police is promoted on inbaa.com, a website linked to Hezbollah, next to a cartoon depicting Israel as a crocodile.

The Royal Air Force Charitable Trust, whose patron is the Queen, is advertised on YouTube content posted by the far-right organisation the National Rebirth of Poland as well as on videos uploaded by Roosh V, a “pick-up artist” accused of promoting rape.

The BBC appears on the official YouTube page of Wagdi Ghoneim, an Egyptian preacher who was banned from Britain in 2009 because he was considered to “foment, justify or glorify terrorist violence”.

Chuka Umunna, a Labour member of the home affairs select committee, said that it was appalling that publicly-funded adverts should be appearing alongside extreme or grotesque content.

“Multimillion-dollar social media companies with ample funds are simply not investing nearly enough in taking proactive action to stop extremist content from appearing and to stop it being monetised,” he said. “Profit comes first for these people.”

Google was criticised by the select committee this week for failing to search for hate videos, relying instead on its users to report suspect content, despite profits of more than $30 billion last year.

Peter Barron, its vice-president for communications, claimed that a 14-minute video posted by Duke called “Jews admit organising white genocide” did not breach its rules on hate speech despite being “antisemitic, deeply offensive and shocking”.

Brands are increasingly concerned that automated tools used to serve adverts online leave them at risk.

Phil Smith, director-general of ISBA, which represents British advertisers, said: “More needs to be done urgently to safeguard the reputations of responsible advertisers on digital platforms.”

The brands contacted by The Times all said that they had no idea that their adverts were placed next to extremist content. Those that did not immediately pull their advertising implemented an immediate review after expressing serious concern.

A Google spokeswoman said that the company had “strict guidelines” relating to advert placement and that in the vast majority of cases its policies “work as intended”. The company “doesn’t always get it right and sometimes ads appear where they should not,” she said, adding that it would make changes to policies and brand controls.

[Roosh]

"Pro rape leader" got a shout out in some type of Alberta parliament meeting (around 0:25 in).

[Rigsby]

(03-23-2017 09:33 PM)Roosh Wrote:  

"Pro rape leader"

You've gone up in the world. Last week you were just an 'advocate'. The week before that you were an 'apologist'. Next week you will be 'die Fuhrer'!

I'll take one for the team and make sweet love to her, the likes of which she has never experienced before. Need to check for trap first, and oh yeah, gonna have to gag that whiny American voice. "Say my name" in an upper class British accent.

What a cunt.

It can't be much longer now can it, till the charade gets called out for what it is?