[Penta Sahi]

Let us continue the game.

Same options as the previous two threads with one minor change.

Riding high from the SC win, Trump should win Nevada easily, but because it's a stupid caucus there might be some fudging, shenanigans etc. so who knows by how much. I'll say somewhere between 10-15%, closer to 15% though.

Trump 2016!

   

[BortimusPrime]

Thank you, google reverse image search.

[username]

Link to her gallery: http://imgur.com/a/n8Bp8

[Penta Sahi]

(02-22-2016 04:03 AM)BortimusPrime Wrote:  

Thank you, google reverse image search.

Haha

It's some broad named Yael Farache. She has lots of other pics out there, I'm not sure exactly what she does. I think this is her website:

http://acapulco70.com/

Her entire gallery of Trump pics is here though:

https://imgur.com/a/n8Bp8

EDIT: username beat me to it. Everyone enjoy!

[Irenicus]

Tuthmosis Almighty...I would slap these titties all day

On topic - Trump will will with 10% lead - former Jeb! voters might vote for Marcobot or Cruz.

And, by the way, I have a feeling that Carson might drop out tonight.

[big poppa]

(02-22-2016 08:32 AM)Irenicus Wrote:  

Tuthmosis Almighty...I would slap these titties all day

On topic - Trump will will with 10% lead - former Jeb! voters might vote for Marcobot or Cruz.

And, by the way, I have a feeling that Carson might drop out tonight.

The last 5 standing all qualify for the next debate, so I think we'll see Carson and Kasich stick it out until Super Tuesday and then suspend their campaigns, not accounting for a huge turnaround in support.


These caucuses seem retarded to me. We know what happened in Iowa, with Cruz stealing Carson's votes and Rubio experiencing a "late surge". I expect more of the same this time around, however Trump will still hold on.

Trump 35
Rubio 24
Cruz 21
Carson 10
Kasich 10

[Liberty Sea]

I have bad feeling about caucuses. The format is fucking retarded. However unlike Iowa his lead is big enough this time around, so I predict a win around 10-15%.

[Requiem]

I'm under the impression that Caucuses are easy to rig. See Iowa, especially with Hillary. Worries me a bit. Trump has definietly enough support to win it but I'm suspicious whether everything will go rightly.

[Emancipator]

Nevada base of operations for making america great again

[kaotic]

Guys,

There is NO WAY he'll win with double digits.

In fact Rubio called me up this morning, told me that in fact Trump is ending his campaign.

He'll never get the nomination, not matter the 61 delegates and double digit lead.

He'll never be president.

[Emancipator]

Kaotic's right guys, Marco Rubio has been winning.

Source: Fox News

[kaotic]

Let's dispel with this fiction that Donald Trump doesn't know what he's doing. He knows exactly what he's doing

[Irenicus]

Voting is today, yes?

[Penta Sahi]

(02-22-2016 07:43 PM)Irenicus Wrote:  

Voting is today, yes?

It's tomorrow, not sure about times though. And I'm not sure if Nevada caucus is similar in procedure to Iowa so I don't even know if people will be actually "voting" or if they will be doing the hand counts for each country/district.

[n0000]

I predict a YUGE margin. The polls are showing 18-30%. Even though Nevada is a notoriously hard place to poll, the ethos of Las Vegas overlaps with Trump. TRUMP 2016.

[Libertas]

Trump wins in a massive stomp.

Cruz and Rubio will battle for a close second and third.

[Liberty Sea]

http://thehill.com/policy/technology/270...d-pictures

Nevada GOP to report caucus results with smartphones

Quote:

Nevada GOP presidential caucus officials will report the results of Tuesday night’s contests using pictures snapped on their smartphones — a marked contrast to the Microsoft-built app that was used to deliver results in Iowa.

The Wall Street Journal reported that GOP officials are hoping to avoid a repeat of the 2012, when final results in Nevada were not officially reported until days after the caucuses, long after news organizations had called the race for Mitt Romney.

In 2012, press reports noted that the hand counts in some counties were not finished more than a day after the polls closed because of discrepancies. The Las Vegas Sun said at the time that the process was marked by “disorganization, bickering and bumbling at nearly every turn.”

While those setbacks did not cause much turmoil because of Romney’s large margin of victory, the GOP results are expected to be much closer this year.

The Journal also reported that the combination of a competitive contest, an underfunded state party and a decentralized process have officials bracing for some confusion on Tuesday.

There will be 130 caucus locations set up across the state to deal with the 1,700 precincts. According to the party, officials at each caucus location will tally the results and send them off to the county and state headquarters “via telephone and photo confirmation.” The Associated Press also has been tasked with delivering the results from Nevada to the public and flagging any “data issues” with the numbers.
“A smartphone picture of the tally sheet will be sent to the party,” a fact sheet provided by the party reads. “Results will be compiled and reviewed by the party, and shared with AP. As the news organization inserts the results into its election system, it will share any data issues with the party.”

The state party will officially then certify the totals “upon physical receipt” of all tallies.

The set-up in Nevada is a contrast to the Iowa caucuses, which were reported using a Microsoft-built app and backed up by its cloud technology. The app amounted to little more than a password-protected interface into which caucus officials could enter their results. Back ups were designed to flag anomalies and double check inputs.

The tech giant donated its time in Iowa but did not partner with any other state parties this election cycle. Microsoft said its reporting app worked flawlessly in the Hawkeye State, despite concerns about allowing a major corporation to help with the process.

[Penta Sahi]

(02-22-2016 10:37 PM)Liberty Sea Wrote:  

http://thehill.com/policy/technology/270...d-pictures

Nevada GOP to report caucus results with smartphones

Oh boy there's no possibility of voter shenanigans there, none at all!

[Prince of Persia]

(02-22-2016 11:21 PM)Penta Sahi Wrote:  

(02-22-2016 10:37 PM)Liberty Sea Wrote:  

http://thehill.com/policy/technology/270...d-pictures

Nevada GOP to report caucus results with smartphones

Oh boy there's no possibility of voter shenanigans there, none at all!

Hopefully it won't matter too much, as Trump is expected to win by a large margin regardless. Worst case scenario, Rubio and Cruz end up in a virtual tie as they did in SC.

[Liberty Sea]

Oh, I forgot, even if there is no shenanigans and rigging, the winner of the Nevada caucus is Marco Rubio, whatever the vote and delegate counts will end up being.
This is an infallible prediction.
More on tomorrow msm.

[Prince of Persia]

(02-22-2016 11:38 PM)Liberty Sea Wrote:  

Oh, I forgot, even if there is no shenanigans and rigging, the winner of the Nevada caucus is Marco Rubio, whatever the vote and delegate counts will end up being.
This is an infallible prediction.
More on tomorrow msm.

Marcomentum!11!!! He's sURgINg!!!@1!!2!1

[Penta Sahi]

Trump with the YUGE win. Glad I was wrong!

[Liberty Sea]

Oh haha, I've never felt so good about being wrong before.

[Samseau]

Trump's win was so crushing in Nevada, Drudge declared Trump the Republican nominee.

   

Next up: Shillary.

[redpillage]

(02-24-2016 09:18 AM)Samseau Wrote:  

Trump's win was so crushing in Nevada, Drudge declared Trump the Republican nominee.

Next up: Shillary.

Check this out - headline in the Associated Press:

WITH NV WIN, TRUMP HAS TRIFECTA; RUBIO NARROWLY WINS SECOND

Correct me if I'm wrong but there will only be ONE republican candidate. WINNING second means that Rubio was the first loser after Trump.

UP YOURS LEFTIST MEDIA - Trump will be sworn in come January 2017.