Posts: 1,307
Threads: 0
Joined: Apr 2012
Reputation:
21
Must-not read books
04-19-2017, 05:25 AM
I most regret reading novels which were supposed to be nonfiction but which I only learned later only loosely based on real events.
For example: the jungle, all quiet on the western front, the grapes of wrath, crime and punishment.
To be fair almost all of these sorts of things were required reading in English class and I had little choice in the matter.
If you're going to try, go all the way. There is no other feeling like that. You will be alone with the gods, and the nights will flame with fire. You will ride life straight to perfect laughter. It's the only good fight there is.
Disable "Click here to Continue"
My Testosterone Adventure: Part I |
Part II |
Part III |
Part IV |
Part V
Quote:Quote:
if it happened to you it’s your fault, I got no sympathy and I don’t believe your version of events.
Posts: 305
Threads: 0
Joined: Mar 2017
Reputation:
1
Must-not read books
04-19-2017, 06:44 AM
Fat Tuesday by Sandra Brown. Same goes for most bubble gum fiction.
All you gotta do is ask them questions and listen to what they have to say and shit.
Posts: 11
Threads: 0
Joined: Feb 2017
Must-not read books
04-21-2017, 04:12 AM
I never read such book that no one should read.
Posts: 582
Threads: 0
Joined: Feb 2015
Reputation:
15
Must-not read books
04-21-2017, 10:34 PM
"Myths of the Norsemen" by Helene Guerber.
Picked it up at B&N cheap - it's one of those reprints they do of public-domain works.
The structure of it is quite strange. You get one or two paragraphs of text punctuated by a snippet of poorly-translated poetry from one of the source materials or (more often than not) ultra-cheesy verse from English poets of the Victorian/English Romantic/Medievalist period of the mid-1800s (whatever the term is - the William Morris and Matthew Arnold types). The text is little better. Each chapter focuses on a particular god or goddess or mythological entity/concept (like Yggdrasil, Fenris, or Ragnarok), and gives a cursory description of its subject before swerving off into seemingly random anecdotes that shed little if any light. The breezy and shallow tone of her writing makes the mythology seem utterly absurd and twee, without (I'm assuming) intending to do so - imagine if instead of mockery, South Park's Scientology episode had been the result of innocently and sincerely presenting the material even-handedly to a popular audience.
It's impossible to read this work and comprehend how anyone could have taken any of it seriously. The only good element of it is that she does explain some of the mythological symbolism - but even there it sucks because every god and goddess seems to be a symbol or allegory for the same changing seasons. There's no depth to the analysis, leaving most of the anecdotes and descriptions only half-comprehensible at best, e.g.: "Odin wanted wisdom, but he had to trade something to get it, so he gave up his eye", or "the gods decided the wolf Fenris was dangerous for some reason, so they cruelly bound him in chains and shoved a sword in his mouth and walked away". It's like someone explaining Christianity as "Jesus did some miracles and then the Romans killed him. But only for three days."
It's plainly the work of an amateur, or something that would have been written for the women's-interest magazines of the time. As irritating as I find scholarly works from that same period (especially translations of classical literature that slavishly hew to the grammar of the original), I can't see one of those Greek/Latin-fetishizing scholars producing such a half-assed work as this.
Posts: 3,028
Threads: 0
Joined: Jul 2015
Reputation:
67
Must-not read books
07-30-2017, 04:16 PM
I recently came across this book which I somehow acquired many many years ago. I don't know what I was thinking at the time- it is garbage to the core.
Americans are dreamers too
Posts: 253
Threads: 0
Joined: Jan 2016
Reputation:
5
Must-not read books
08-01-2017, 08:02 PM
American Nations by Colin Woodward.
The first 2/3 or so of the book is pretty interesting. Woodward's hypothesis has some flaws but it's an engaging interpretation of American history. But in the last third, he brushes over most of the 20th century, ignores huge impact of immigration on the American Nations, and writes from a blatantly biased leftist Yankee perspective while demonizing and dismissing virtually everyone south of the Mason-Dixon Line by characterizing the interests of the antebellum oligarchist slave-owners as representative of all modern-day southerners. He skims over the western states and mischaracterizes them, and generally does a lousy job of applying his hypothesis post-Civil War. Read Albion's Seed (a much better and less-biased book with a similar theme) instead.
Posts: 31
Threads: 0
Joined: Jun 2015
Reputation:
0
Must-not read books
10-18-2017, 05:35 PM
The Crash of 2016 by Thom Hartmann
Terrible analysis of America's financial problems by a socialist.
Posts: 1,285
Threads: 0
Joined: Oct 2017
Must-not read books
11-27-2017, 01:14 PM
"What Happened" by Hillary Clinton. I don't know why some publisher paid her millions to write this book. She blames everyone but herself for her loss.