http://www.c-span.org/video/?c4578575/cl...owa-caucus
Explanation link:
https://www.reddit.com/r/SandersForPresi...ied_about/
Quote:Quote:
This was for #43 (I believe) in Des Moines, IA held at Roosevelt High School. It was broadcast live on C-SPAN2.
Final delegate count was Clinton 5, Sanders 4. It was very close. Here is the breakdown:
FIRST VOTE:
215 Sanders
210 Clinton
26 O'Malley
8 Undecided
459 TOTAL
After this, the groups realign and another count was conducted.
Sanders's group leads performed a FULL recount of all the supporters in
his group. The Clinton team only added the new supporters gained to her
original number from the first round of voting. I did not see another
recount of the Clinton supporters taking place. It would have been very
hard to miss that activity.
SECOND ROUND:
232 Clinton
224 Sanders
456 Total
It was assumed by the chair, Drew Gentsch, that the voter difference
was due to a few people that left the building before the second round
began. The question is whether there were really 456 total people
present for the second round of voting. That was not clear, as Clinton's
team did not perform a recount of ALL of the Hillary supporters during
the second round of voting. We don't know how many Hillary supporters
were in the room. Some of them may have also left the building between
rounds.
The Clinton precinct chair, Liz Buck, lied about whether she
recounted all of the Clinton supporters during the second count. At
9:44pm ET she stated to the Chair that she only counted the newly gained
supporters and added that to her first-round count to arrive at the new
232 total. A minute later, after the second round votes were being
discussed openly, with Hillary then taking a 5-4 delegate lead, the
Sanders supporters directly asked Liz if she recounted ALL of the
Clinton supporters during the second round. Liz Buck answered yes to
that question at 9:45pm ET stating that she DID count them all. It's all
on tape. The Sanders supports were unsuccessful at getting a recount conducted, even though several of them protested vigorously.
Those supporters knew exactly what happened, but instead of the Chair
asking Liz to perform a count of all Clinton supports, he said that the
results had to be protested formally, leading to a majority vote, that
the Sanders supporters lost. It should be noted that, before the recount
vote was conducted, the Chair told the crowd that the results of the
recount would not have an effect on the outcome.
Quote:Quote:
Clinton voter fraud in the Polk Country Iowa Caucus. At first, the vote count was 215 Sanders, 210 Hillary, 26 Omalley, 8 undecided. Sanders was leading. Since Omalley's 26 votes was less than 15% of the total, those votes had to go to Sanders or Hillary. Most of them said they were going to Sanders. But after the switches were made, it was 224 sanders and 232 Hillary. Hillary gained 22, but Sanders only gained 9. How is this possible? On live TV the Omalley group said that the majority of them were going to the Sander's group. Even if it ended up splitting 50/50, Sanders would still be leading. There is no way that 71% of the Omalley supporters decided to switch to Clinton, especially since most of them said they were going to switch to Sanders. This is outright fraud - and the Chair person tried to cover it up by saying that a recount would not have swayed the delegate total - pretty much securing a "no" vote for the recount. This was a lie. The truth is that a few less votes would have caused Hillary to lose one Delegate. Many in the room believed him, but he was wrong. That absolutely swayed the vote to do a recount
![[Image: laugh5.gif]](https://rooshvforum.network/images/smilies/new/laugh5.gif)
![[Image: tard.gif]](https://rooshvforum.network/images/smilies/new/tard.gif)
