rooshvforum.network is a fully functional forum: you can search, register, post new threads etc...
Old accounts are inaccessible: register a new one, or recover it when possible. x


Oregon college shooting

Oregon college shooting

Quote: (10-02-2015 12:06 PM)captndonk Wrote:  

I disagree. Yes, people killed people but its much harder to do this with your fists than with firearms. Elliott Rodger, you really think he could have killed several people without a gun?
Or the kids from columbine high school or Breivik?

You're reaching for straws now.

Elliot ? He killed small CHILDREN. So yes he could've killed several children without a gun.

The kids from Columbine had pipe bombs also, could've manufacture larger cluster of them and killed many.

Breivik - kids were stranded on an island with no escape, he could've killed several people with a knife, he was on a MISSION to murder as many as he could.

All these mass shooters intended to inflict as much pain and death as they can, guns don't matter.

Don't you get it, these guys pick soft targets that are easy to ensure mass death. You don't see mass shooters going to a police station and shooting it up, why ?

BECAUSE THEY CAN DEFEND THEMSELVES WITH WEAPONS.

You can ban all the guns in the world, people will still find a way to kill people.

If a person (mass shooter) knows that anyone could be carrying a concealed weapon, he's less likely to shoot, and would deter him.

You can rationalize all you want, but this world isn't singing peace on earth, some humans aren't the greatest people in the world.

Pray for the best, prepare for the worst.
Reply

Oregon college shooting

Quote: (10-02-2015 11:38 AM)captndonk Wrote:  

I know that you can't go back in time. But I think it is more preferable that no one has a gun than that everybody has one. Because if someone freaks out he simply won't do so much damage.

Quote: (10-02-2015 12:06 PM)captndonk Wrote:  

I disagree. Yes, people killed people but its much harder to do this with your fists than with firearms. Elliott Rodger, you really think he could have killed several people without a gun?
Or the kids from columbine high school or Breivik?

A good 80% of the time guns are used defensively, it's basically brandished to get your assailant to fuck off. The estimates vary wildly as to how many times guns are used defensively, but it is at least 100,000 cases a year and upwards of 1 to 2 million a year, depending on who you ask. You ever notice how almost all of these shootings happen in a gun free zone?

Get rid of guns and you'll see a lot more violence, like how you're twice as likely to get stabbed in the UK as you are to get shot in the US once you account for population, even though we have like 35% of the world's guns.

No, these people shouldn't be going psycho in the first place. There are a number of factors at play; the end result is that our society is completely fucked in the head. The US has so many gun related suicides it is unreal. Most of the victims are white males, the peak is at mid 20's and it tapers off from there. The majority of gun related homicides are black men shooting other black men.

“I have a very simple rule when it comes to management: hire the best people from your competitors, pay them more than they were earning, and give them bonuses and incentives based on their performance. That’s how you build a first-class operation.”
― Donald J. Trump

If you want some PDF's on bodyweight exercise with little to no equipment, send me a PM and I'll get back to you as soon as possible.
Reply

Oregon college shooting

Quote: (10-02-2015 12:31 PM)kaotic Wrote:  

You can ban all the guns in the world, people will still find a way to kill people.

If a person (mass shooter) knows that anyone could be carrying a concealed weapon, he's less likely to shoot, and would deter him.

I think all the 'ban guns' ideas are just so simplistic its laughable though. Its not something we should accept as a premise. We've seen government efforts to ban drugs. So no-one is taking drugs now?

I'd much rather live in a country with an infrequent school shooting, than live in one with persistent burglaries, rapes and robberies, or in one which can't overthrow its evil government. Government is one of the most dangerous things in the world, up there as a leading cause of death with heart disease and malnutrition. School shootings are nothing compared to the hundred of millions of bodies governments have piled up over the years. The most dangerous thing you can do is disarm the population but leave the government armed.

A government 'ban' on guns is not a "magical disappearance of all the guns". The attitude that the government is magic, as opposed to merely a group of power hungry dickheads, is a testament to the power of propaganda.
Reply

Oregon college shooting

Quote: (10-02-2015 12:44 PM)Phoenix Wrote:  

I think all the 'ban guns' ideas are just so simplistic its laughable though. Its not something we should accept as a premise. We've seen government efforts to ban drugs. So no-one is taking drugs now?

I was being sarcastic and using a term your regular SJW would say.

Of course banning all guns wouldn't work, it's a joke.

This is what captndonk probably thinks, "I wish there were no guns"

Yeah well, we don't live in a dreamworld, we have to deal with evil.
Reply

Oregon college shooting

Rodgers killed six persons. They were 19,19,20,20,20 and 22 years old. I can't imagine him doing this with his fists or a stick.
He also injured 13 more. Breivik shot 69 persons.
It is simply way more difficult if not impossible to do this without a gun.

I know that a ban on gun would not make the situation safer but I think if there were no guns it would be safer.
Reply

Oregon college shooting

Without guns we'd still be serfs getting our shit ruined by our liege lord's knights whenever we get too uppity.

"Men willingly believe what they wish." - Julius Caesar, De Bello Gallico, Book III, Ch. 18
Reply

Oregon college shooting

Quote: (10-02-2015 01:08 PM)captndonk Wrote:  

Rodgers killed six persons. They were 19,19,20,20,20 and 22 years old. I can't imagine him doing this with his fists or a stick.
He also injured 13 more. Breivik shot 69 persons.
It is simply way more difficult if not impossible to do this without a gun.

I know that a ban on gun would not make the situation safer but I think if there were no guns it would be safer.

Nothing ever is impossible when you want to inflict mass damage.

We don't live in a world with no guns, better get over that fact.

We live in a world with guns, this isn't a thought exercise, this is real life.

Leave soft targets vulnerable (read: gun free zones) - and this will continue to happen.
Reply

Oregon college shooting

@captndonk
Look up stabbing sprees, plenty of guys have taken out five people with a knife.

Quote:Quote:

Despite heavily favoring the UK for determining the per capita statistics, I think you’ll find the results illuminating:

In or about 2006, there were about 60 million (actually closer to 58M, but we’ll use the rounded-up number to be kind to hopolophobes) people in the UK as a whole, including Scotland.

In England and Wales alone — discounting Scotland — there were over 163 thousand knife crimes.

By the end of 2006, there were more than 300 million people in the US as a whole.

In the US as a whole, there were fewer than 400 thousand gun crimes.

In the UK, based on these numbers, there was one knife crime commited for every 374 people (rounded down).

In the US, based on these numbers, there was one gun crime committed for every 750 people — less than half a gun crime per 374 people (about 0.4987 gun crimes per 374 people, actually).

That means that, based on these statistics, you are more than twice as likely to be a victim of knife crime in the UK as you are to be a victim of gun crime in the US.

http://sob.apotheon.org/?p=1323

You also have to take into account, suicides with a gun count as a gun crime and gun suicides way outnumber gun homicides.

So take out gun suicides (which is the number one method of suicide, number 2 for men is hanging and number 2 for women is drug overdose) and you'll find that there's more knife violence in a gun free society than there is gun violence in a gun common society.

“I have a very simple rule when it comes to management: hire the best people from your competitors, pay them more than they were earning, and give them bonuses and incentives based on their performance. That’s how you build a first-class operation.”
― Donald J. Trump

If you want some PDF's on bodyweight exercise with little to no equipment, send me a PM and I'll get back to you as soon as possible.
Reply

Oregon college shooting

[Image: CQVSPi0UsAAkLL2.jpg]

The usual suspects at it again.

"Men willingly believe what they wish." - Julius Caesar, De Bello Gallico, Book III, Ch. 18
Reply

Oregon college shooting

Our Red Pill Homo, Milo, wrote something related: How To Stop Mass Shootings.

Quote:Quote:

I might be a raging homo, but I still innately understand the male need to conquer, crush and win. Men need to express that dark, powerful part of themselves, or it can abruptly overflow. If it is suppressed, derided and ridiculed, it can show up without warning and with horrible consequences.

That’s why I’m so distressed that heterosexual men are being told, constantly, by the media and even in schools, that what they are is bad. This, I submit, is at least in part what’s driving the recent spate of shootings.

The media trash-talks everything men love: guns, booze, boisterousness, drugs, sex and video games. Economic pressures are relentlessly stripping away male spaces like the traditional pub, where blokes can drink and bond. Social pressures are opening up male-only golf and social clubs to women, destroying what made them precious and essential.

The breakdown of the nuclear family is a euphemistic phrase used to describe a more troubling picture: there are more absent fathers now and vanishingly few positive male role models for young men to admire and emulate. This is often fuelled, or at least endorsed, by wrongheaded progressives who want to tear down supposedly patriarchal institutions.

But it is those patriarchal institutions, if you like, that for centuries provided the sort of structure, order and role models that young men need.

Masculinity isn’t fragile, as a spiteful, sociopathic feminist Twitter hashtag recently claimed. But — and here’s where some man-hating feminists almost get it right — it is powerful, and exciting, and it does have a flip-side if not properly respected. At its best, male competitiveness is the driving force behind most of society’s progress. We would be nowhere without the patriarchy, from the internet and space travel to the road under your feet and the roof on your house. The same thing that drives mass shooters inspires courage, too.

That doesn’t mean masculinity is “toxic.” What’s toxic is society’s attitudes towards men. Masculinity only becomes “toxic” when it is beaten down and suppressed and when men are told that what and who they are is defective. It becomes toxic when young boys are drugged in school because they don’t conform to feminine standards of behaviour.

What’s worse is that the media ridicules, criticises, punishes and demonises masculinity, then uses the product of its own hatred to justify more man-hating, in a Kafkaesque cycle of progressive insanity that has only one, inevitable consequence: more innocent dead people.

Progressives don’t see the irony in going after “straight white men.” But they are hypocritical bigots, hounding people for gender, skin colour and sexuality and saying that essential male characteristics are wrong. Men must be allowed to compete. To fight. To shoot things. Today’s man-punishing, feminised culture is creating killers by suppressing these urges. We have to stop it.

The confusion and alienation that so many young men feel today drives some to drop out of society completely and to retreat into pornography and video games. But others — the less stable, less supported, less able to cope with their natures — become progressively more angry until they explode in rage and pain.

In a sense, what happened yesterday was also a suicide. A spectacularly melodramatic suicide from a man in pain who wanted to hurt the world that had hurt him. Society has got to start treating boys better if it wants to avoid more of this in the future.

Progressives are forever banging on about how mental health facilities are no good in Europe and the US. They’re right, but we rarely hear them acknowledge the primary victims of that shortfall: men. It’s men who are in trouble today; men who are killing themselves — and others — at horrifying rates; men who are retreating from society and giving up on women and careers.

Some macho types will say: let’s not defend pussies. These shooters are pathetic loners. They should be condemned as crazies. Those men are wrong. Basic decency, human compassion and evolution tell us that the strong should protect the weak. That includes more emotionally fragile men, too. If you want to stop the killings, learn to celebrate men like only gay men still do.

Denying essential human nature — that men can be powerful and dangerous and this should be harnessed for good — is a recipe for tragedy. This is why some of us rail against feminism so much. We don’t hate women. We don’t care about “manspreading.” We care about this.

Underemployed, disrespected and frustrated men drive terrorism, mass shootings, gang warfare, you name it. But railing against guys for “toxic masculinity” clearly hasn’t worked. So why not try something new? Why not celebrate what makes men unique instead of trying to turn boys into girls? Why not harness that power and set men back to work? To make America great again, we need to rescue our lost generation of young males.

Ignore the gender warriors. To me, what shootings like this should tell us is that men need to be celebrated more, not less. Men should be honoured. There is no progress, no civilisation without the healthy application of masculinity. Let’s get started.
Reply

Oregon college shooting

LeBron calls for more gun control:

Quote:Quote:

With the country reeling from a mass-shooting in Oregon, LeBron James focused on the death of a 5-month-old girl, Aavielle Wakefield, who was shot in the chest on Thursday during a drive-by shooting in Cleveland as another example of gun violence run amok.

James was asked about what prompted him to take to Twitter to bring light to Wakefield's story and speak out against the societal pitfalls behind her death after Cavs practice Friday.

"It's the quickest way to get my voice out there, first of all, social media. Obviously it's not the first time that it's happened, but it's been happening a little bit too much recently," James said. "I think it happened like in the last four weeks, four kids under the age of five or six years old have been shot and killed or very badly injured or whatever. It's just, there's no room for that."

Wakefield was the third child in the Cleveland area gunned down in a drive-by shooting since early September, according to Cleveland.com. Five-year-old Ramon Burnett and three-year-old Major Howard also lost their lives.

James showed a similar social consciousness last season, commenting on the deaths of Mike Brown in Ferguson, Missouri and Tamir Rice in Cleveland, while also donning an "I can't breathe" T-shirt before playing a game in Brooklyn to show solidarity with supporters of Eric Garner, another African-American man who was killed during a confrontation with the police.

While James' messages last season were mostly centered on peace, part of his words on Friday were aimed at public policy. Specifically, James called for greater gun control laws in the U.S.

"I know what I see. I know how I feel," James said. "Obviously you're not going to be able to take every gun out, I don't know how you can do that. There's so many around now, today. But if there's some stipulations behind it or some penalties, some big-time penalties or rules or regulations about carrying firearms, legal or illegal, people will second-guess themselves."

James said he did not see President Obama's gun control-themed speech following the tragedy at Umpqua Community College in Roseburg, Oregon on Thursday when a lone gunman killed nine people and wounded nine others before dying in gun battle with local police.

"There's no room for guns, first of all, but then for violence towards kids or anybody," James said. "But, having kids of your own, I see the news go across my phone and I'm sitting there in front of my three kids, so it automatically just hit me. Just getting my voice out there and letting a lot of people know, it's not just in Cleveland. If you seen my message I also hash-tagged '#TheNation' as well, so it's also the whole nation that goes through this as well. We all hurt from it."

He was then asked if he would develop a program through his LeBron James Family Foundation to specifically address gun violence in the Northeast Ohio community.

"Maybe," James said. "I'm using my voice through social media and that's what I always do when something goes on that I feel like it's important. I will speak upon it.

"My foundation is doing some (good work). We're kind of focused on something right now, don't want to veer off on that, obviously you guys know the education program we're going through right now. Part of the education program we're doing is keeping those kids off the street and keeping their situations that (are) maybe bad and turning them into good."

James explained that his foundation is focusing on preventative measures -- providing a positive influence to children and teaching them life skills to grow into successful adults -- rather than reactionary efforts after a tragedy has occurred.

"I think what we're doing is controlling some of the violence," James said. "Some of these kids might be in violent situations, violent areas or violent homes and we're trying to keep them away from that by having that program that I've set up through my foundation, through the University of Akron, through the Akron Public School system and so on and so on. I feel like if we can do our part, through my foundation and what we do, then maybe it can possibly bring the number of percentages (of at-risk youth) down from, I don't know, 20 percent to 15 to 10. Hopefully we'll continue to do that."

http://espn.go.com/nba/story/_/id/137942...-room-that
Reply

Oregon college shooting

Quote: (10-02-2015 01:47 AM)AnonymousBosch Wrote:  

Quote: (10-02-2015 12:24 AM)Quintus Curtius Wrote:  

I think our society is breeding these people, for the reasons that I've given above. Unless we make big changes in our whole worldview, this is going to continue.

Of course it is. This is Cultural Marxism in action: atomised individuals with no support structures wanting to lash out at society enough to destabilise it.

Whether it's a Conspiracy Theory or not is irrelevant- every Radical Feminist I went to university with believed in the process of infiltrating and subverting patriarchal institutions with the destruction of the family, the church and capitalist society itself as the end goals.

As I've said before, expect more of it. This is why I keep saying, find your tribe. There's an odd feeling in the air even normal people around me are sensing and commenting on: a feeling that it's time to choose sides. I think it's coming from the vast gulf between the morals the media trumpets, and what average people actually believe.

Isolate people, gently float a balloon and see how they respond. When they do, let them know they're not alone. Not with online communication - face to face. You will see the relief of realisation on their faces - it's not just me.

Doing this yesterday is how I now know my Doctor is anti-gay marriage, anti-abortion and doesn't believe Bruce Jenner is a woman.


THe "finding your tribe" part is difficult. Even if you can find someone that agrees with you, the moment a pretty girl walks around they seem willing to throw it all away.

Civilize the mind but make savage the body.
Reply

Oregon college shooting

Quote: (10-02-2015 05:40 AM)AFS Wrote:  

My take on all the shootings recently:

They are the result of our rapidly unraveling social fabric. Before you accuse me of hyperbole, let me explain. For millions of years humans and our ancestors have lived in small, close-knit tribes and communities. We were forced to live with our families, or close to them, and were always accountable to someone or supported by someone.

Now we are completely disconnected and live in complete anonymity. Unless you live in a small town of a couple of thousand people, you are basically alone unless you make those tribal connections yourself. The internet has only increased the problem, because people have a release to go to and get their social fix to a degree. However it is not a natural release and the results are eventually the same. This is just like how pornography can never replace sex with a real person.

I was wondering yesterday why these shootings seem to only happen in these developed first-world countries where people don't have to fight tooth and nail for the necessities to survive another day, Even in societies that are overall more violent then ours we don't really see people wigging out and going on these shooting sprees against strangers. A lot more people are getting blown up and shot in Afghanistan but at least insurgents/terrorists are fighting for a cause of some sort, not looking to cause havoc just for the sake of causing havoc like we see with spree killers here. Your analysis makes a lot of sense.
Reply

Oregon college shooting

Quote: (10-02-2015 12:06 PM)captndonk Wrote:  

I disagree. Yes, people killed people but its much harder to do this with your fists than with firearms. Elliott Rodger, you really think he could have killed several people without a gun?
Or the kids from columbine high school or Breivik?

Like I already pointed out on the "Vester Flanagan" (similar) thread : even without guns, any crazy person can do a lot of damage: using their cars as weapons!

Example: In France last Winter we had several cases of people (terrorists or would-be terrorists) plowing into crowds, at "Christmas Markets", with cars.
Also, a few months ago a Bosnian drove his car into a crowd in Austria, killing several...

So, banning guns would only mean that crazy people would start using their cars, or maybe incendiary devices (or acid), to do damage to us...

Guns are for honest people to quickly defend themselves. Bad people will always find ways to hurt honest, disarmed people.

Back to this case, I heard that his 10 victims are all young, White women... and the shooter is Black ("half-African-American")... So would the media please explain how it is not a case of anti-White racism? [Image: dodgy.gif]
Reply

Oregon college shooting

Quote: (10-02-2015 01:08 PM)captndonk Wrote:  

Rodgers killed six persons. They were 19,19,20,20,20 and 22 years old. I can't imagine him doing this with his fists or a stick.
He also injured 13 more. Breivik shot 69 persons.
It is simply way more difficult if not impossible to do this without a gun.

I know that a ban on gun would not make the situation safer but I think if there were no guns it would be safer.

I think the world be safer if there was no starvation and everyone got free bacon sandwiches for life.

I think men would be happier if we didn't have to game and every man was given twenty girls of 10 quality upon reaching the age of 18.

I think our lives would be happier if we could all get 6 pack abs while subsisting on a diet of Pringles and Coca Cola.
Reply

Oregon college shooting

Quote: (10-01-2015 11:53 PM)TheWastelander Wrote:  

Quote:Quote:

During an evening press conference on the attack, Douglas County Sheriff John Hanlin asked media not to use the gunman’s name–not to give him the celebrity he may have been seeking via the attack.

Sheriff Hanlin has the right idea. I personally make an effort NOT to remember any of these guy's names. The UCSB killer? I'd have to think about his name, but it'd take a minute to recall. Aurora Theater killer? Can't remember. Honestly, I'd have to go back to Columbine to easily recall.

My FB is lit up over gun control yet again, but not a single person is calling for better mental health care, or changing the laws regarding declaring a person insane. One reason this didn't happen in the 50's is that back then, it was much easier to institutionalize someone. Nowadays, it's impossible... until that person does something heinous. Look at the news stories - everybody is saying they knew there was something wrong with that guy. Just like the UCSB guy. Just like the Aurora guy. Just like the Newtown, CT guy. Just like Columbine. Everybody knows, but nobody does anything. And then the guy goes and legally buys a half dozen or more weapons, PLUS body armor. I mean, he followed the Brady bill, all the local laws, it was all by the book. In fact, as best I recall, none of these guys (except maybe Columbine because they were underage), none of them obtained weapons illegally. So we're going to have more laws and psychos will still buy guns legally because if psychos are good at anything, it's flying under the radar. The only law that's going to do anything is an outright ban. I'm sure a lot of people on my Facebook would go there, but that's basically it. Make gun ownership a crime and throw a bunch of people in prison. Because we don't have a large enough incarcerated population already.

Aurora guy was turned down for membership at a local gun club because he set off the owner's creep alarm. There was a dude who was thinking.

I might raise a shitstorm here, but here's a suggestion: I'm WAY more suspicious of a guy buying body armor than a guy buying a gun. Not saying buying body armor makes you a psycho killer, but let's run the profile here: under age 30, owns a bunch of weapons, a bulletproof vest, never been in a stable relationship, and all the neighbors think he's a weirdo. You think, just maybe, he's a risk?
Reply

Oregon college shooting

Quote: (10-02-2015 02:29 PM)Game_Started Wrote:  

Our Red Pill Homo, Milo,

[Image: laugh3.gif]

Anyhow it seems he left a letter and a manifesto, stating he had no life and no girlfriend.
Quote:Quote:

'Welcomed in Hell and embraced by the devil': Details of twisted letter left behind by Oregon college gunman as it's revealed he had Asperger's and was kicked out of the Army in 2008

Chris Harper-Mercer, 26, left the twisted letter behind before the massacre
Officials who have seen the note say he wrote that he 'had no life'
Also complained about not having girlfriend and felt world was against him

He had Asperger's Syndrome, according to online posts by his mother
Shooter attended Switzer Center - a high school for special needs students
People in his class say he had obsession with drawing skulls and coffins
Earlier it emerged Mercer was discharged from the U.S. Army after 5 weeks


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-...z3nRgfEej1
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
Reply

Oregon college shooting

Quote: (10-02-2015 01:08 PM)captndonk Wrote:  

Rodgers killed six persons. They were 19,19,20,20,20 and 22 years old. I can't imagine him doing this with his fists or a stick.
He also injured 13 more. Breivik shot 69 persons.
It is simply way more difficult if not impossible to do this without a gun.

I know that a ban on gun would not make the situation safer but I think if there were no guns it would be safer.

True, this Norwegian shot people, but he also used a bomb, to kill some government people in the capital. So, "without guns", he would just have used... more bombs (and actually do more damage, without getting caught). So, your example backfires: guns or no guns, huge damage can be done.

Edit:
"Earlier it emerged Mercer was discharged from the U.S. Army after 5 weeks"

You mean the US Army hired, took in, such an obvious nutcase during 5 long weeks? [Image: confused.gif] ... and needed 5 weeks to discover he was a racially-insecure, withdrawn, time-bomb virgin?

In my country's army, such a nutcase, especially a virgin... well, his fellow soldiers would have discovered (in under 48 hours) that he was crazy, unstable, and virgin, and he would have been expelled, right away...

I mean, anyone who has been in the army know that soldiers quickly discover which one of them is a dangerous, weak-minded, virgin no-life, and certainly get rid of such losers in less than a week...

So, it amazes me that this crazy unstable no-life killer, could fool his fellow comrades, soldiers, during 4 or 5 weeks...
Reply

Oregon college shooting






CNN using terms like Beta Male and Alpha Male.
Reply

Oregon college shooting

EDIT:

I mistakenly said Elliot killed children.

I meant to say Adam Lanza killed those children.

Also:

Quote: (10-02-2015 12:07 PM)8ball Wrote:  

Good luck defending yourself when they evict you to make room for young middle eastern men pretending to be 13 year olds.

Seriously, have fun in Syr...uh I mean Germany.

[Image: laugh3.gif]
Reply

Oregon college shooting

I'm English and I think anti-gun laws are bullshit. I find it fascinating where humans can obsess over wanting to bomb the fuck out of some far away land and yet want gun laws in their own backyard.

Have permits, have wait lists, have background checks but don't ban them.
Reply

Oregon college shooting

Quote: (10-02-2015 04:16 PM)Foolsgo1d Wrote:  

I'm English and I think anti-gun laws are bullshit. I find it fascinating where humans can obsess over wanting to bomb the fuck out of some far away land and yet want gun laws in their own backyard.

Have permits, have wait lists, have background checks but don't ban them.

Or they hate guns yet rely on men with guns to protect them, thereby enslaving themselves to the whims of the ruling authorities completely. The whole thing is a sort of bizarre, masochistic, unnatural behavior on display that mostly, I think, stems from the feminization of society and the fecklessness of the urban man.

Can you think of any other time in history when a man would even be allowed by his clan to be afraid of or eschew weaponry? In ancient times, if some boy was afraid of wielding and holding a spear then I imagine he would be ridiculed relentlessly for it until either he got over whatever his hang-up was or lost all social standing altogether.

"Men willingly believe what they wish." - Julius Caesar, De Bello Gallico, Book III, Ch. 18
Reply

Oregon college shooting

Few years ago a man went about the Lake District here in England shooting random people and those he knew point blank by sticking his gun out of the window. Killed more than a dozen people.

No conceal/open carry or strict gun laws can stop that sort of thing. These guys are close to the lone wolf terrorists in behaviour but they should have picked up on his social media postings.
Reply

Oregon college shooting

Quote: (10-02-2015 01:08 PM)captndonk Wrote:  

Rodgers killed six persons. They were 19,19,20,20,20 and 22 years old. I can't imagine him doing this with his fists or a stick.
He also injured 13 more. Breivik shot 69 persons.
It is simply way more difficult if not impossible to do this without a gun.

I know that a ban on gun would not make the situation safer but I think if there were no guns it would be safer.

Tell me more about how you would enforce a gun ban when you have countless firearms flooding into America via Mexico.
Reply

Oregon college shooting

Quote: (10-02-2015 12:06 PM)captndonk Wrote:  

I disagree. Yes, people killed people but its much harder to do this with your fists than with firearms. Elliott Rodger, you really think he could have killed several people without a gun?
Or the kids from columbine high school or Breivik?

You're the typical Eurotard I wrote about earlier in this thread ... and from Germany of all places! Hello Germanwings pilot? Name one incident in the last 10 years with a gun that took out 100+ people within a couple of minutes.

Also, could someone who's anti-guns please explain to my why no one gets shot at gun conventions where they are everywhere and almost everyone is packing heat (at least in the South where they can)? If guns are so dangerous, we should have mass shootings all the time at gun shows.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)