[Vitriol]

There has definitely been a massive, organized media campaign planned as a response to this decision.



Source

Kind of ridiculous we had the tranny thing celebrated a few weeks ago and now this. I didn't even have too strong of an opinion about either issue, but the media barrage is an attempt to make it clear that there's only one acceptable opinion about each. This is how they're attempting to control the public.

[Il Bersagliere]

As long as someone doesn't try and bring a pistol through San Fran, I'm ok.

[Truth Teller]

A few comments:

1. Saying that "if God existed, the Bible should be taken literally" is childish, fundamentalist thinking. The early Church fathers didn't believe that, and biblical literalism essentially came into existence with Martin Luther.

2. Scalia's dissent is right on. He's correctly saying that this country is still (technically) a democratic republic. The people should be empowered, not nine appointed judges.

3. This decision, while unfortunate, was what we all reasonably expected. The Supreme Court wasn't likely to rule another way.

4. Maybe widespread "gay marriage" will wake people up to the idea that this isn't such a good idea. Just maybe people need to see how dark it gets before they wake up from their slumber.

5. We have a populace that uncritically swallows whatever the media tells it, and sadly, that's also true around here. People who declare themselves "free thinkers" often swallow whatever they want to be true. This is the greatest danger to any democracy. If you keep repeating a lie (wage gap, college rape, "gay marriage," etc.), then people will believe it to be true. They won't actually investigate things.

6. This is another element in a very disturbing trend. Somehow, the courts have acquired the ability to legislate and enforce morality. Whenever right-wing elements try to do it, God forbid. For example, eliminating abortion is seen by many as "evil" and "not allowing a woman to do what she wants with her body." But if the Supreme Court forces all states to accept "gay marriage," then it's a victory for equality and justice.

[BlurredSevens]

(06-26-2015 02:47 PM)speakeasy Wrote:  

It's like all these millennials and SJWs vie with each other to prove how much they approve homosexuality.

If there's anything SJW's like more than faux tolerance, body acceptance, and consumerism; it's ice cream.

Now they can have all four!

[Gordax]

(06-26-2015 11:55 AM)The Moonlight Patriot Wrote:  

(06-26-2015 11:40 AM)Slim Shady Wrote:  

On the other hand, I'm waiting for my right to sit in my tent with my 8 wives.

I would stop at three wives. I don't want every weekend in my month ruined.

When you got two or more of them living in the same house their periods sync up, so your weekends are fine.

[Remington]

I'm going to celebrate the legalization of gay marriage by cooking chili dogs for dinner.

[Onto]

Always wondered how they divy-up the assets later in divorce court. Does the judge say, "Ok, who was the bottom-boy in the relationship?, You will get to divorce-rape the other guy"

[Rang off the Pipe]

When you say all Western Countries, would you also be including Latin American and Caribbean countries?


I doubt somewhere like Jamaica will be jumping on the gay marriage bandwagon anytime soon. The same can be said for many countries in that region.

[TigerMandingo]

Check out these words from Richard Cohen, head of the SPLC:



"We still have a lot of work to do, particularly in the Deep South"

The fuckin' balls on these pricks!

[kaotic]

South isn't going to take this sitting down, just like with the flag.

Texas is already saying fuck you to the SCOTUS also.

It's going to be interesting what happens when states or leaders refuse to abide by the SCOTUS ruling.

[TheWastelander]

(06-26-2015 05:26 PM)kaotic Wrote:  

South isn't going to take this sitting down, just like with the flag.

Texas is already saying fuck you to the SCOTUS also.

It's going to be interesting what happens when states or leaders refuse to abide by the SCOTUS ruling.

The SJWs will call for the military to be sent down there to force them to marry homos. You watch.

[Saga]

(06-26-2015 05:21 PM)TigerMandingo Wrote:  

"We still have a lot of work to do, particularly in the Deep South"

Notice that they're now focusing on "attitudes", which means they're going to be full-time thought police. No more of that quaint (and false) "oh we just want legal equality" line: now anyone who doesn't show enthusiastic support for their agenda will be tarred and slandered into silence. How enlightened.

[MdWanderer]

(06-26-2015 05:21 PM)TigerMandingo Wrote:  

Check out these words from Richard Cohen, head of the SPLC:



"We still have a lot of work to do, particularly in the Deep South"

The fuckin' balls on these pricks!

I noticed the subtle hint at the South too:

"Ya'll means ALL"

[kaotic]

(06-26-2015 05:28 PM)TheWastelander Wrote:  

(06-26-2015 05:26 PM)kaotic Wrote:  

South isn't going to take this sitting down, just like with the flag.

Texas is already saying fuck you to the SCOTUS also.

It's going to be interesting what happens when states or leaders refuse to abide by the SCOTUS ruling.

The SJWs will call for the military to be sent down there to force them to marry homos. You watch.

Don't you remember Texas is "observing" military maneuvers aka Jade Helm ?

It's a practice run for the real thing when Texas secedes

[TheWastelander]

Have a good look at this perfectly normal couple.

Austin has already started issuing licenses for them.

https://www.texastribune.org/2015/06/26/...ge-ruling/

[Gimlet]

(06-26-2015 02:35 PM)VolandoVengoVolandoVoy Wrote:  

I am completely unconvinced that this has any effect whatsoever on you unless you plan on getting married to someone of the same sex.

Who the fuck cares what two consenting adults do in their private lives?

And if those two adults pay taxes and follow the law, they are entitled to equal protection. Marriage is just a stupid legal contract. Chivalry died a long time ago, if it even ever existed.

"Love wins" means society loses. Why? Marriage is not about love. That marriage is about love is a relatively new idea, one which led to the explosion of divorce. Marriage - and almost every religion across a variety of civilizations has a form of marriage by some name or another - is about moving society forward. It is about producing successful, legitimate heirs to your knowledge, property and genes. It is about having a familial stake in your society which in turn moves it forward. A marriage about love is dangerous. Why? Love is all about the Self.

Love can only be defined by ones Self. Love is also very fleeting and so it is inevitable that it will fade and in turn a marriage based upon love will expire. The only way for a marriage to survive is to have a stake in it, in believing that it is a fundamental part of raising children to your most successful ability. Without the belief that marriage is something worth sacrificing for - that once the shiny love feeling wears off it is fair game to leave - it is useless in terms of what it does for society. Instead it is simply a selfish, vanity endeavor which is what homosexual marriage really is about... not unlike modern, secular heterosexual marriages. The Eat, Pray Love crowd is quick to leave once they get bored because they have been told for the last 20 years that love is all that matter, that pursuit of personal happiness trumps all, that "my children would rather see me be happy". In other words, the Self is all that matters, that is what everyone has been told. This is why this erosion of marriage is so destructive.

I am an atheist. I always believed I was an atheist because I am smarter than my Catholic upbringing. I pride myself on my intelligence. But the truth is, I am an atheist because I have been told to be an atheist. And I was told to be an atheist because in turn it makes me celebrate my Self. Atheism is just as destructive against society as the erosion of marriage, which is the whole point. There is a reason why Catholicism referred to marriage as a Sacrament - because that is what is best for society. But again the religion itself does not matter, so long as there is one which makes you act in a way that benefits the greater good instead of based upon your Self's feelings and desires. Ego.

That is what we are seeing today, the rise in feeling, the triumph of Self. Now you can be "poly" or fuck the whole football team without getting shamed, so long as it feels good and feeds your ego. And when you put your Self above society, society fails.

Upthread someone posted the Yuri Bezmenov video. Everyone who thinks that none of this is a big deal should watch it. Make no mistake, we in western society are being fucked with intentionally.

Here is a 1926 article from The Atlantic The Russian Effort to Abolish Marriage in which you will find quoted many of the very things I am herding today:

Argument pro destruction of marriage:

Quote:

Free love is the ultimate aim of a socialist State; in that State marriage will be free from any kind of obligation, including economic, and will turn into an absolutely free union of two beings. Meanwhile, though our aim is the free union, we must recognize that marriage involves certain economic responsibilities, and that's why the law takes upon itself the defense of the weaker partner, from the economic standpoint.

And check out the argument against... it seems like it was written last week.

Quote:

The proposed law seems to favor women, but it will really work out to their disadvantage, because even now husbands run away from their wives and wives run vainly after their husbands and their alimony. Women enter into temporary connections because they think the law will protect them. We must tell them that only registered marriage can involve economic obligations; then they will be more careful. You say we can put alimony defaulters in prison, but if we tried to do this we shouldn't have enough prisons to hold the guilty. Women will defend themselves better if they know that they can't rely on our laws for defense.'

Again, this article is from 1926. The playbook was already established and all you have to do is look around and see the effects. We now have a nation of free love and single moms being supported by The State. This is intentional.

I posted this on another thread but will do so again here. This Russian born (hmmm...) writer for The Guardian, Salon, HuffPo etc says straight up that she wants marriage to be destroyed and that children should be raised communally.

Of course, none of it matters as it is too late. We already know that Russian comes out of top and we will see a massive shift in wealth from the West to Russia and China. We will also be in a serous fight for resources.

If Russia trading oil with China in Yuan instead of US dollars didn't scare you it should. I am pretty sure that in 10 years we will see who really won the Cold War and that it didn't end when we thought it did. Good thing our law enforcement is already prepared for Martial Law across the country.

But anyway, who cares, Love Wins!

[Downtown]

Can someone please explain to me just how your individual lives will be affected by this?

I know two guys who will get married because of this.

How does this change my life with my girlfriends and my kids?

Is it because you think people will be less likely to get married and have kids?

Is it because you think your own children will be swayed into being gay now?

[blacknwhitespade]

(06-26-2015 05:34 PM)kaotic Wrote:  

(06-26-2015 05:28 PM)TheWastelander Wrote:  

(06-26-2015 05:26 PM)kaotic Wrote:  

South isn't going to take this sitting down, just like with the flag.

Texas is already saying fuck you to the SCOTUS also.

It's going to be interesting what happens when states or leaders refuse to abide by the SCOTUS ruling.

The SJWs will call for the military to be sent down there to force them to marry homos. You watch.

Don't you remember Texas is "observing" military maneuvers aka Jade Helm ?

It's a practice run for the real thing when Texas secedes

Seriously, I think federally-imposed gay marriage could be the spark that leads to secession, or probably more accurately a gradual fragmentation of the United States. I don't see conservative Christians (Protestant/Evangelicals and Catholics) backing down to this, and there are millions of them. Anti-Big Government types of all stripes, religious and secular, are not going away. Between this and the recently stoked racial tensions, Liberals may have really kicked the hornet's nest here. May take a while to ride down that slope and see the fallout, but from where I'm standing it looks inevitable.

[Truth Teller]

Part of me is convinced that all this LGBT bullshit is just a way to distract the masses from the real problems of the world.

Ukraine's still in the grip of war, Argentina's bankrupt, Putin continues to rattle the saber, Iran creeps ever closer to a bomb, who cares? None of that matters to most Americans. American infrastructure is falling apart, but it doesn't matter. What matters to these idiots is that nine unelected officials decided to radically redefine what marriage actually is.

If Americans got their heads out of their asses about all these "social justice" things, the government would have to actually be competent. But the American people are largely stupid and only care about social issues. That's how Obama won in 2012. He had the right position on social (i.e. unimportant) issues. His economic policies were a disaster. Romney's social positions were unpopular, and while his economic plan was a mess, it arguably made a little more sense than Obama's.

Marriage has been redefined. How much longer until a fundamental right (speech, press, assembly, etc.) gets redefined?

[Aenigmarius]

Quote:

Can someone please explain to me just how your individual?

People keep taking this tact, asking "how does gay marriage affect me?"

Read the thread. It's been explained multiple times. It's bigger than two guys getting married, or whether two guys getting married affects you on a personal level.

If you can't understand that it's bigger than the sounds bites being spoon fed to you, then nothing any of us can say is gonna open your eyes. It's about much more than Adam and Steve getting married and whether it fucks up your white picket fence and shits on your Volvo.

[kaotic]

Truth Teller - speaking of that.

Noone talked about the following on my news feed today:

-ISIS advances
-The Terrorist Attacks
-TPP

[blacknwhitespade]

(06-26-2015 02:47 PM)speakeasy Wrote:  

I open up Spotify, and right on top is a fresh new playlist called # love wins. The Google main search page has a pro gay message today. It's like all these millennials and SJWs vie with each other to prove how much they approve homosexuality. It's literally like a symbol of status amongst them to prove their tolerance.

It's clannish/cult like behavior inspired by the new social values and magnified by social media. These droids couldn't get much more conformist. All these #bansomething and twitter mafias, I was pondering on it this week and realizing that we're living in a brave new world, this is how modern totalitarianism spreads. I just thank God we have websites like this one where clearly a calculable minority of young guys are waking up and resisting this shit.

[kaotic]

The media advertising, blogs being rolled out, logos, etc. was all apart of Big Gay. They knew this was coming and had a trigger finger ready to go.

This was to be expected, well at least I knew this was coming.

[Dr. Howard]

(06-26-2015 05:51 PM)Aenigmarius Wrote:  

Quote:

Can someone please explain to me just how your individual?

People keep taking this tact, asking "how does gay marriage affect me?"

Read the thread. It's been explained multiple times. It's bigger than two guys getting married, or whether two guys getting married affects you on a personal level.

If you can't understand that it's bigger than the sounds bites being spoon fed to you, then nothing any of us can say is gonna open your eyes. It's about much more than Adam and Steve getting married and whether it fucks up your white picket fence and shits on your Volvo.

I completely agree. To me, this vote isn't about two guys being able to wear metal bands on their fingers while they fuck each others asses. This is about steamrollering states rights...same fucking shit the civil war and the confederate flag was about.

Buttfucking or not, many states had referendums on gay marriage where individual people cast their votes to say yay or nay to allow gay marriage in their state. Guess what MOST of those states said yes but 13 voted...I repeat VOTED no. Instead of respecting the will of the people some butthurt (pun intended) individuals appealed to 9, un-elected individuals that in an instant overruled the votes of millions of individuals in those 13 states.

Today the supreme court said "The voice of state citizens doesn't mean shit, we do" Thats why Scalia wrote what the wrote. Thats why states like Texas are pissed off.

This is a decree by an unelected body, overruling legitimate votes, thats the problem, not gay marriage. As Bill burr says "If you can't do the math on that, then I can't help ya"

[robreke]

(06-26-2015 05:56 PM)kaotic Wrote:  

Truth Teller - speaking of that.

Noone talked about the following on my news feed today:

-ISIS advances
-The Terrorist Attacks
-TPP

^To be sure.



Today is a Huge news day;

* A notable beheading complete with an Islamic scripted head stuffed on a fence.

* Tunisian terror attacks.

* One of those escaped convicts shot dead (finally)

* The Supreme Court goes Full Rainbow.

......and oh yeah , Bob Beckel got fired by Fox News.