Quote:Quote:
"It is an insult to women. Why not call them womenholes?" he said.
Please let's call them womenholes!
Quote:Quote:
"It is an insult to women. Why not call them womenholes?" he said.
Quote: (07-23-2015 07:59 AM)Zelcorpion Wrote:
Quote: (07-23-2015 07:35 AM)Phoenix Wrote:
^ That'd be alright actually, I'd marry an entire city and benefit from the zero taxes. How come only the fuckups should benefit for marriage-is-anything-ism.
Actually sometimes articles come up in the media which prove that married couples pay more taxes than if they would be just living together and having children.
Quote: (07-23-2015 11:38 AM)Renzy Wrote:
You can see an infographic of the results of the study (Outcomes for Children) where they display the results for children who were asked to respond to questions such as:
- Were ever touched sexually by a parent or other adult (23% LM vs 2% IBF)
- Were ever forced to have sex against their will (31% LM vs 8% IBF)
- Ever had a sexually transmitted infection (STI) (25% GF vs 8% IBF)
- Had an affair while married or cohabitating (40% LM vs 13% IBF)
- Identify as entirely heterosexual (straight) (61% LM vs 90% IBF)
- Are currently unemployed (28% LM vs 8% IBF)
- Are currently on public assistance (38% LM vs 10% IBF)
- Have thought recently about suicide (24% GF vs 5% IBF)
LM = Lesbian Mothers
GF = Gay Fathers
IBF = Intact Bio Family (ie, Hetero Dad & Mom, not divorced)