rooshvforum.network is a fully functional forum: you can search, register, post new threads etc...
Old accounts are inaccessible: register a new one, or recover it when possible. x


Bachelor Nation: 70% of Men Aged 20-34 Are Not Married

Bachelor Nation: 70% of Men Aged 20-34 Are Not Married

Quote: (03-12-2015 11:21 PM)WestIndianArchie Wrote:  

This explains why non-player men don't have jobs.

But how does this affect working women?

WIA

Quote: (03-12-2015 08:36 PM)Dismal Operator Wrote:  

....

Women are affected because they're almost forced to enter the workforce permanently, for both economic and cultural reasons. The economic reasons are largely what I was talking about before - women aren't spared from rising costs of living, taxes and increasing debt burdens. To the extent they want, or have to be breadwinners, these issues affect them the same way they do men.

I suppose I should step back for a sec and state the obvious: the feminist ideal of 'having it all' is complete fiction. Even so, the fact that women are encouraged to head down that same American Dream track means they won't find that out until it's too late. Just like with men, the first hurdle of getting a degree requires taking on a debt burden.

The difference is that men have always worked under the assumption that at some point they were going to have to take on the responsibility of providing. Even if you fully understand that you aren't entering into an ideal scenario in taking on loads of debt to get a degree, you can still do the mental gymnastics to convince yourself that this is what must be done to fulfill my role as a man.

When college was affordable, a woman could get a degree with basically no debt, marry a college boyfriend at 22 (who also had no debt) and call it a day. Today that same 22 year old has $50k in student loans, which means that even if she wants to be a traditional stay at home mom, she can't unless she finds a well off man who can absorb her debt.

Women who don't go to college don't have that economic baggage, but given the issues the average man is looking at, even a debt free 22 year old woman who gets married may have to work to make ends meet. All of that reduces the quality of family life when kids come into the picture, as a woman's mental and physical resources must be allocated between her employer and her family, whereas in prior generations it all went towards the family.

Everyone gets a raw deal. Men work to achieve sub-optimal family conditions, women are led to deviate from their natural proclivities which leads to their discontent (as evidenced by the fact we have record numbers of women on prescription meds for mental issues), and children don't get the ideal environment in which to grow.
Reply

Bachelor Nation: 70% of Men Aged 20-34 Are Not Married

Quote: (03-12-2015 05:31 PM)DrewP Wrote:  

Everyone mentions divorce law as the ultimate marriage deterrent, but that can be negated by a prenup.

I can think of a much better deterrent: fatpocalypse. I notice that few girls under 30 are actually obese--the ones who are tend to be cartoonishly delusional and fucked in the head--but very, very few are thin and fit either. Most younger girls I see are just a tad on the chubby side; that is, they do just enough to get by without completely fucking up their prospects.

What do you think will happen to these "just enough to get by" girls when they have the lower metabolism associated with aging, and the comfort/complacency associated with marriage?
[Image: long-blonde-hair.jpg]

I would estimate that 80-90% current young women will be too fat to be attractive once they get well into their 30's. Can you imagine anything more depressing than being a fit, hard-working man in the prime of his life tethered to someone like the woman pictured above? THAT is why I'm scared of marriage.
This broad must've eaten Willy Wonka's experimental gum with the cherry pie dessert.
Reply

Bachelor Nation: 70% of Men Aged 20-34 Are Not Married

Quote: (03-13-2015 05:06 AM)It_is_my_time Wrote:  

Quote: (03-13-2015 04:59 AM)Akula Wrote:  

Quote: (03-13-2015 12:56 AM)Phoenix Wrote:  

Lol I just read the comments section of the original article. Absolute gold. Brutal onslaught of anti-feminist excoriation.

Guys with greater online clout should try and spread the link, maybe make an ROK article too. At the very least we should take a copy of the comments unless they are taken down.

I'll 2nd that! Comments are pure gold. I don't see any of us in there commenting so many of 'em seem to be from your "average guy" who's seen and had enough.

The comments are excellent and it appears almost all of them are 100% supportive of our views here.

And one comment that is the most correct is that there is no way to fix this without removing women's rights to vote. Because even if we do fix the issues, the women will vote the same shit back into place.

That's why we've got to repeal the 19th Amendment before we go forward.
Reply

Bachelor Nation: 70% of Men Aged 20-34 Are Not Married

Dismal Operator or someone else can probably explain this better than I can, but back in the 70's during a poor economy and as manufacturing jobs went overseas, fewer men could support a family on one income. Women started to enter the workplace out of necessity. This of course, de-stabilized families and the masculine-feminine polarity.
With women working, families now needed a second car, two car garage, clothes for the workplace...
Around this time, people started to amass debt (credit card) as they struggled to keep up with a stagnating income.

At the end of the day it's a win for consumerism.

Men and women are left holding the bag.
Reply

Bachelor Nation: 70% of Men Aged 20-34 Are Not Married

Oh, this is rich!
It could be used as a base for an ROK article.
Reply

Bachelor Nation: 70% of Men Aged 20-34 Are Not Married

Quote: (03-13-2015 10:17 AM)The_CEO Wrote:  

Dismal Operator or someone else can probably explain this better than I can, but back in the 70's during a poor economy and as manufacturing jobs went overseas, fewer men could support a family on one income. Women started to enter the workplace out of necessity. This of course, de-stabilized families and the masculine-feminine polarity.
With women working, families now needed a second car, two car garage, clothes for the workplace...
Around this time, people started to amass debt (credit card) as they struggled to keep up with a stagnating income.

At the end of the day it's a win for consumerism.

Men and women are left holding the bag.

I think high home prices led to working women being a necessity. Interest rates were so high too during the 70s. The more people had access to credit, the more money they had to bid up prices. The government securing these loans through Freddie/Fannie allowed prices to rise above the fundamentals. I think the same forces are responsible for the escalation of education debt.

Here's a question though. How many women would opt to be housewives if it wasn't a necessity for them to work? I'm pretty sure virtually all non-western women would rather stay home. But Western women even if they had the option to be home and raise kids I'm sure would prefer work due to the culture of feminism.
Reply

Bachelor Nation: 70% of Men Aged 20-34 Are Not Married

Quote: (03-13-2015 07:26 AM)It_is_my_time Wrote:  

Quote: (03-13-2015 07:23 AM)DarkTriad Wrote:  

Quote: (03-12-2015 11:07 AM)RIslander Wrote:  

This will lead to an effort to destroy the bachelor.

Bachelor taxes
Implementation of 'common law' spouses
Bachelor shaming

The government will be forced by the future feminist agenda to pressure bachelors into marriage. The other option is to make marriage attractive again and a worthwhile investment. Which path do you think will be chosen?



Actually, what will happen is what already happened in one Province of Canada...they'll start drafting people. Thousands woke one morning to discover that they had been married overnight against their will by an act of court.

Married to whom?

A live in partner?
A long time girl friend that doesn't live with them?
A once in a while hook up?
A long past hook up?
Just a random single woman they don't even know?

Just wondering how far the govt. is trying to push this.

Cohabitating partners. But if men stop cohabitating (to protect themselves from marriage-rape) I can see them going further. Scary, scary world.
Reply

Bachelor Nation: 70% of Men Aged 20-34 Are Not Married

Quote: (03-13-2015 02:24 PM)speakeasy Wrote:  

Quote: (03-13-2015 10:17 AM)The_CEO Wrote:  

Dismal Operator or someone else can probably explain this better than I can, but back in the 70's during a poor economy and as manufacturing jobs went overseas, fewer men could support a family on one income. Women started to enter the workplace out of necessity. This of course, de-stabilized families and the masculine-feminine polarity.
With women working, families now needed a second car, two car garage, clothes for the workplace...
Around this time, people started to amass debt (credit card) as they struggled to keep up with a stagnating income.

At the end of the day it's a win for consumerism.

Men and women are left holding the bag.

I think high home prices led to working women being a necessity. Interest rates were so high too during the 70s. The more people had access to credit, the more money they had to bid up prices. The government securing these loans through Freddie/Fannie allowed prices to rise above the fundamentals. I think the same forces are responsible for the escalation of education debt.

Here's a question though. How many women would opt to be housewives if it wasn't a necessity for them to work? I'm pretty sure virtually all non-western women would rather stay home. But Western women even if they had the option to be home and raise kids I'm sure would prefer work due to the culture of feminism.

If I had to guess, most American women would like the benefits of both sides.

They may eventually get their way and get shorter work weeks than men, but get just as much money. I think if most women had a choice they would work 20 to 30 hours a week in a low stress environment, but still one that mad them feel important. Then the rest of the time they could mess around or go be mommy.
Reply

Bachelor Nation: 70% of Men Aged 20-34 Are Not Married

Quote: (03-13-2015 02:24 PM)speakeasy Wrote:  

I think high home prices led to working women being a necessity. Interest rates were so high too during the 70s. The more people had access to credit, the more money they had to bid up prices. The government securing these loans through Freddie/Fannie allowed prices to rise above the fundamentals. I think the same forces are responsible for the escalation of education debt.

Elizabeth Warren wrote a book titled "The Two Income Trap"

Basically, if I remember right, parents in the 70s realized education was important and started focusing on homes in the right school districts. So the wives started to work to help cover the mortgage. The issue was before, if the husband lost his job, the wife could work plus unemployment and they could weather the storm. It also allowed for someone to be home to care for kids and elderly.

With both parents working, if only one of the lost his or her job the family could be in trouble, where in the past (as mentioned above) they could survive.

Her solution was that education needed to get better for everyone and that might might the pressure off.

This is all from memory, I could be off.

Fate whispers to the warrior, "You cannot withstand the storm." And the warrior whispers back, "I am the storm."

Women and children can be careless, but not men - Don Corleone

Great RVF Comments | Where Evil Resides | How to upload, etc. | New Members Read This 1 | New Members Read This 2
Reply

Bachelor Nation: 70% of Men Aged 20-34 Are Not Married

SJWs twisting themselves into knots trying to explain why men don't get married:




Reply

Bachelor Nation: 70% of Men Aged 20-34 Are Not Married

Amazing how ignorant and out of touch with reality SJW/TYT are.
Reply

Bachelor Nation: 70% of Men Aged 20-34 Are Not Married

Holy hell. Is that what passes as news now? Is that on TV? Talk about an echo chamber.

"It's not true that guys aren't marrying because girls are slutting it up"
Prove it, bitch.

And the guy talking about fucking his wife's brains out. Gamma as hell. "lol I'm better than you because I've got a wife and we fucked for 10 years lololol send me money"

Talentless hacks
Reply

Bachelor Nation: 70% of Men Aged 20-34 Are Not Married

Quote: (03-13-2015 04:30 PM)Tex Pro Wrote:  

SJWs twisting themselves into knots trying to explain why men don't get married:




Ana Kasparian, would you bang?

"The point is, marriage is stupid. Every year there are a million hot, new 22-year olds going into bars, and call me glass-half-full, but I think they're getting dumber." -Barney Stinson
Reply

Bachelor Nation: 70% of Men Aged 20-34 Are Not Married

Quote: (03-13-2015 05:23 PM)Medic42 Wrote:  

Quote: (03-13-2015 04:30 PM)Tex Pro Wrote:  

SJWs twisting themselves into knots trying to explain why men don't get married:




Ana Kasparian, would you bang?

I would rather bang Tantaros.
Reply

Bachelor Nation: 70% of Men Aged 20-34 Are Not Married

^ I despise those 3 men. Men that laugh at their own jokes and smile like they have cracked the best joke ever imagined and there is only pity laughter and they keep going. Hate them.

A rule of male humor is you can only laugh maybe 1/4 as much as your audience is at your joke. Better if barely at all, ever. It is try hard and attention whoring. Womanly.

SENS Foundation - help stop age-related diseases

Quote: (05-19-2016 12:01 PM)Giovonny Wrote:  
If I talk to 100 19 year old girls, at least one of them is getting fucked!
Quote:WestIndianArchie Wrote:
Am I reacting to her? No pussy, all problems
Or
Is she reacting to me? All pussy, no problems
Reply

Bachelor Nation: 70% of Men Aged 20-34 Are Not Married

Quote: (03-13-2015 05:05 AM)CrashBangWallop Wrote:  

I keep saying this here but the answer is staring every one of us in the face:

Do everything in your power to be in the 1%.

Nothing else matters in the world as we know it.

Aren't the 1%'s the ones getting raked over the coals?

I mean we recently had one whose wife demanded 24k a year just for stationery.

Money doesn't make one immune to getting a greedy bitch, if anything, that's exactly what it attracts, more often than not.

Once simps allow women to get used to the "good life", they're not going back to the "common life", they'll do anything, lie, cheat, steal, kill, degrade themselves, etc. to see that they don't.
Reply

Bachelor Nation: 70% of Men Aged 20-34 Are Not Married

Quote: (03-13-2015 05:54 PM)Tex Pro Wrote:  

I would rather bang Tantaros.

Agreed.

"The point is, marriage is stupid. Every year there are a million hot, new 22-year olds going into bars, and call me glass-half-full, but I think they're getting dumber." -Barney Stinson
Reply

Bachelor Nation: 70% of Men Aged 20-34 Are Not Married

Great post! And here's something I put together for the DC forums a couple years back:

What’s the Point?

I’ve been doing a lot of thinking about this lately. esp. with my wing also picking up/closing hot, young girls but feeling the pressure to settle down with someone “more suitable” (i.e. significantly older) for marriage/kids etc. Mocked by friends and family, who are perhaps small-minded and possibly motivated by their own jealousy and/or mediocrity/misery, this is the reality we face.

Yes, images of the perfect happy family abound. And we constantly hear the phrase “growing old together”. But that’s completely unacceptable in my view. Why take oneself out of the game for something that’s going to occur thirty to forty years into the future?

Marriage is generally for unattractive people who lead boring, unfulfilling lives, with limited options. People who don’t bother working out, eating right and taking care of themselves tend to look their ages and find it necessary to ‘lock down” before it’s too late. Guided by false media images, organized religion and societal pressures, there’s a certain stability or comfort that comes from marriage. And some actually do welcome the “metal focus”.

It’s viewed as one of life’s milestones to be checked off the list as one pursues career success and “raising a family”, unencumbered by chasing after women. To a certain degree this all makes sense for those with limited options. Back in the day, most social connections were limited to friends of friends, co-workers etc. There was a greater sense of commitment, perhaps as a result, and people took their vows much more seriously. It was a slower-paced world of less instant-gratification. Airline travel wasn’t quite as inexpensive/widespread, and there was no Internet, online dating/social media, bringing us closer together...AND further apart.

Through marriage, one is staking a claim to another human being. So in our consumerist society, a spouse is merely another possession to be accumulated. Taken another way, one is just committing to a form of voluntary slavery. And while extra-marital affairs seem to be somewhat more socially-acceptable these days, for both men and women, they’re still widely shunned in the U.S. Other cultures have been much more open-minded, however.

So I would argue that barring a mutually agreed upon “open marriage” or a situation when one or both spouses are able to keep friends on the side without too much internal guilt or discovery by the other, marriage these days is a huge hoax. Our government encourages family units as it leads to greater economic productivity vs. having its business leaders and wage-earners running around every night in the hope of screwing each other. Larger, single family homes also drive the housing market. And let’s not forget about the multi-billion dollar “wedding industry” among others.

Let’s pause to consider two different images. There’s the sweet older couple holding hands on their front porch. Everyone looks at them and smiles. That’s the ideal we’re conditioned to seek from an early age. Now contrast that with the 65 or 70 year old bachelor playboy, still in decent shape, getting into his sportscar and messing around with women young enough to be his grand daughters. Most are appalled by such “inappropriate behavior” as it threatens the social order. If more people were like him, there would be fewer children and families, or certainly more single mothers. Not to mention, all the women in their 30’s/40’s perpetually abandoned and alone.

Yes, marriage clearly favors women. While men typically appreciate in value into their forties and fifties, achieving greater earning potential, female beauty is a depreciating asset. So that’s why we see successful, reasonably fit guys attracting hot, younger girls throughout the majority of their lives. Meanwhile, with many women putting on significant weight and sustaining sun-related premature aging of the skin, often they’re physically “used up” by their early thirties or mid-late twenties even.

Just think about it for a second. The typical woman has dating value for just ten years of her life, from 18-28. Quite a sobering thought. Whereas guys can expect to pull for at least thirty years. Given their vastly shorter “shelf life”, it’s no wonder that women are pushing hard for marriage. Unfortunately, for every guy that resists, there are several chumps ready to take his place. Societal pressures become too overwhelming at times, and we’re forced to either capitulate or to just walk away, exploring other options. “Growing old together” clearly favors the fairer sex, however. And let’s just pity the hard-driving career type females who delay their prospects, facing rapidly decreasing options.

Next, we’re “directed” to start having children. Oftentimes, this serves as the “glue” keeping a rapidly fading marriage together, after both parties and esp. the male realizes that it’s not at consistent with their expectations. But again, what’s really the point? It carries on the family line. Of course, there’s a certain vanity, and perhaps, some pride/satisfaction to be had in molding another human being and seeing a junior version of oneself. Parental responsibility could provide a sense of purpose in life for some. Also, there’s the hope of one’s child becoming el Presidente or more and taking care of his/her parents as they reach the “golden years”.

Much more likely, however, these offspring fail to achieve such lofty heights. Instead, for twenty to thirty years or more, they’re just creating further stress on the marriage and for those who sired them. All the while, they’re sucking up financial resources to the tune of at least a quarter million dollars each. Often showing little gratitude in return.

With HALF of all marriages statistically doomed to fail, financially, it’s a losing proposition any way you look at it. Even without children, the pressures are immense. And despite the increased earning power of women, antiquated laws over-protect them to the severe detriment of their soon to be ex-husbands. Factoring in alimony, perhaps, child support and the prospect of financial ruin, could this be yet another social construct designed to preserve this “sacred institution”? Voluntary slavery, indeed!

Nevertheless, societal pressures are hard to overcome for many. And people, usually men, are unaware of their options. So lured by feelings of love and lust, media messages, stability, the promise of regular sex, and possibly unplanned parenthood, they decide to settle down. However, those who “play by the rules” and remain faithful suffer the most. Sex usually becomes far less regular and much less exciting/fulfilling as familiarity leads to discontent. Both parties tend to stop caring as much about staying fit and maintaining their appearance. After all, they’re already “hitched”. And as they begin their gradual descent into mediocrity, the normalcy of this sad fate is just reinforced by co-workers, neighbors and their new family-centered social circle.

In looking around my own suburban neighborhood, nobody seems all that happy or loving. Instead, there’s just a general feeling of duty and resignation as people are merely going about their lives. Meanwhile, there seems to be a general sense of disapproval over the playboy lifestyle I’ve chosen to pursue. Far less judgmental and more accepting are friends and family who have a vicarious fascination, and good-natured jealousy, always interested in seeing pictures and hearing my tales.

But this all just further reinforces the notion of marriage as an elaborate trap. Lacking better judgment and life experiences, I had bought into the social programming and did it too. While there were some fun times, especially the beginning and it was nice to share a commitment with the woman I loved, in some ways our voluntary union prior to marriage felt even better.

Although we both made good money and enjoyed a fairly comfortable lifestyle, we gradually lost sight of what really mattered, becoming trapped by the materialism. It was comforting having that “safety net” and a life partner. But at the same time, there was a certain loss of independence and being able to think for oneself. And ours was a VERY independent marriage as compared to many others. Despite the shared incomes, there were even more financial pressures and demands as she was always striving for bigger and better. Meanwhile, she was always asking for favors, or “nagging”, as you will. Which again, is to be expected in a marriage. For better or worse, I remained faithful to the core and just accepted my chosen fate.

As is typical, the sex went from semi-decent and somewhat frequent to almost non-existent. Fortunately, however, no kids were involved. Or that would have made everything much worse for everyone. Although she was just eighteen when we started dating, over our fourteen years together, there was definitely a physical decline. Meanwhile, I managed to stay in shape, and actually improved over the years. While being out on my own did require some mental adjustment at first, overall, it’s quite liberating and now approaching the five year anniversary of the divorce I’m grateful that I escaped before it was too late.

Interestingly-enough, coming out of a long-term relationship and driven by decades of such social programming, I spent the first few years looking to replace just that. Again, like most, I simply didn’t know any better. Discovering PUA, however, I’ve since come to realize that life is full of options. So why settle for years of boredom and mediocrity with just one person? There are tons of young, hot women to be loved. And many of them harbor “daddy complexes” due to their parents’ own broken marriages. Now there’s a whole world of possibilities available to me with new friendships and connections just waiting to be made.

Perhaps one day I will settle down again. But now I’ve realized that time is definitely on my side, and there’s certainly no need to rush into anything. Not to mention, having sampled A LOT over the past few years, these days, I’m not too easily impressed. Maybe when I’m reaching my late fifties/early sixties, if the available options begin dwindling, and I feel the need to essentially give up on life to start growing old with someone, I’ll commit once again.

Until then, unless I’m meeting someone who’s absolutely perfect in every way and a “reach” in terms of physical beauty, making it worthwhile to “take myself off the market”, I’ll instead, gladly remain a “free agent” for the foreseeable future.

Instead, it makes a lot more sense to keep one’s options open, play the field, enjoy the variety and then trade them in for a younger upgrade every few years. And to all those younger PUAs searching for “the One”, please be VERY careful what you wish for. Unless, of course, you’re the type who craves stability, has limited options and/or wants kids. Under those circumstances monogamy could make some sense.
Reply

Bachelor Nation: 70% of Men Aged 20-34 Are Not Married

Quote: (03-13-2015 04:30 PM)Tex Pro Wrote:  

SJWs twisting themselves into knots trying to explain why men don't get married:




Good God. Kasperian must be a truly miserable woman when she goes home at night and looks at herself in the mirror. She has to ask herself if there is a problem with young people not marrying, who is it that has the power of choice to commit and marry. Sure women have the sexual power, but it's us men who hold the key to marriage. If we are collectively not marrying, that's an obvious symptom and reflection of the women we are putting up with. And that reflection isn't positive. It is not that hard to understand. Unless you're a Marxist idealogical crusader like The Young Turks.

Dreams are like horses; they run wild on the earth. Catch one and ride it. Throw a leg over and ride it for all its worth.
Psalm 25:7
https://youtu.be/vHVoMCH10Wk
Reply

Bachelor Nation: 70% of Men Aged 20-34 Are Not Married

From the article's comments section.

Just wow.

Quote:The Daily USA Patriot john smith • 2 days ago Wrote:

You have no idea how incredibly accurate you are with this comment. Its 100% right on target. I know exactly what you are talking about, ive seen it with my own eyes. I know a lot of people in my area, hundreds of people. And this is exactly whats going on.

Guess what i started doing? All the girls with the bad boys for boyfriends? I started f*cking them. After being cheated on by every single girl ive been with, i decided to try to find out how hard it is to f*ck a girl with a boyfriend. I did it like 3 times in a 1 month by just barely trying. Then i stopped, because I just wanted to prove a point, i didnt actually want to keep doing this.

A more brutal ride from young romanticist to a mature realist. If you take a look at the comments page, the young romantic man wanting to get married to realist journey is very common.
Reply

Bachelor Nation: 70% of Men Aged 20-34 Are Not Married

Quote: (03-13-2015 08:07 AM)scorpion Wrote:  

Quote: (03-13-2015 05:05 AM)CrashBangWallop Wrote:  

I keep saying this here but the answer is staring every one of us in the face:

Do everything in your power to be in the 1%.

Nothing else matters in the world as we know it.

This is the game equivalent of saying, "Do everything in your power to be 6'5", with an 8 inch dick and good looks, and born into a wealthy family with connections."

Not everyone can be in the 1%, so the advice is useless from a societal perspective, especially considering we're discussing something as fundamental as marriage and children here. If only the top 1% of men can expect to have secure marriages with attractive, supportive women, then society is completely and utterly fucked. It's not like the average man is asking for a lot - most would be satisfied with an average-looking woman who won't get fat, has a pleasant personality and who won't divorce rape him in the courts and take his children away. If something so fundamental to society and historically normal as marriage is suddenly out of reach for the common man, we're in serious trouble.

Of course, you're right.

However being 6'5 etc is something you can't change.

I'm of the belief that every single man on this forum has the potential to get close to the 1%.

Society is fucked, for sure but as individuals you have to just do what's best for you.

Nothing is going to change, as I see it; hell it's probably going to get a whole load worse.

As a realist, I see protecting myself as number one priority,
Reply

Bachelor Nation: 70% of Men Aged 20-34 Are Not Married

Quote: (03-13-2015 06:11 PM)jariel Wrote:  

Quote: (03-13-2015 05:05 AM)CrashBangWallop Wrote:  

I keep saying this here but the answer is staring every one of us in the face:

Do everything in your power to be in the 1%.

Nothing else matters in the world as we know it.

Aren't the 1%'s the ones getting raked over the coals?

I mean we recently had one whose wife demanded 24k a year just for stationery.

Money doesn't make one immune to getting a greedy bitch, if anything, that's exactly what it attracts, more often than not.

Once simps allow women to get used to the "good life", they're not going back to the "common life", they'll do anything, lie, cheat, steal, kill, degrade themselves, etc. to see that they don't.

I really mean in the context of this forum.

Us guys know the score. We know how to protect ourselves better than the average dude out there.
Reply

Bachelor Nation: 70% of Men Aged 20-34 Are Not Married

Basically, why buy the cow when you can get the milk for free?
Reply

Bachelor Nation: 70% of Men Aged 20-34 Are Not Married

Quote: (03-13-2015 02:24 PM)speakeasy Wrote:  

Quote: (03-13-2015 10:17 AM)The_CEO Wrote:  

With women working, families now needed a second car, two car garage, clothes for the workplace...
Around this time, people started to amass debt (credit card) as they struggled to keep up with a stagnating income.

At the end of the day it's a win for consumerism.

Men and women are left holding the bag.

I think high home prices led to working women being a necessity. Interest rates were so high too during the 70s. The more people had access to credit, the more money they had to bid up prices.

Here's a question though. How many women would opt to be housewives if it wasn't a necessity for them to work? I'm pretty sure virtually all non-western women would rather stay home. But Western women even if they had the option to be home and raise kids I'm sure would prefer work due to the culture of feminism.

I don't think this is correct but I don't have facts-- I read once somewhere 80% of women wish they could not work.

What high school college girls fantasize about is not what 95% of them see in the workplace-- it's not glamorous; you are kissing ass in an inane bureaucracy if you work for the government ( but at least you get a pension) or getting squeezed every day for maximum productivity to make someone else rich ( the private sector.)

In few cases do they get the hero-appeal glamour they fantasize about. That goes to Senator-level people in the public sector and the very rich in the private.

We are almost all working for those sets of elite people unless we have our own businesses. Some jobs you get to learn something great from superior colleagues but not that much of the time.
Reply

Bachelor Nation: 70% of Men Aged 20-34 Are Not Married

I was impressed at how narcissistic she was "We all have to take a look at right now..." (the issue of the marriage strike).

I think SHE in her mid 40's (or looks like it) and sagging from 7.5 to 6 , is projecting her own desperation and presuming we all share it, or are obligated to.

Also really weird her low budget set and chorus of three betas agreeing with her. Eeew.

She doesn't grasp what's a problem for HER (the marriage strike) is a (partial) SOLUTION for men in the current legal climate-- for divorce rape.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)