[General Mayhem]

The level of narcissism here is off the charts.

She is automatically assuming that guys want to bang her.

We should probably stop validating these chicks by telling them, "Sorry, you aren't even rapeable."

[LINUX]

You're on a roll this week Roosh.

[Pacesetter20]

Would bang.

Would not hire for any sort of task that requires reading comprehension.

[Rutting Elephant]

"Search every man who ever responded 'WB' in all threads."

[Simeon_Strangelight]

(02-25-2015 10:52 AM)Rutting Elephant Wrote:  

The most important duty of a secretary.

[Dusty]

Roosh , I would try to force her employer to force her to retract the false tape threat and apologize for slandering you.

[BlurredSevens]

This girl might actually be insane.










From her website:

"My hope is to bring a Christian leftist perspective to public discourse that is sensitive to the shape of modern American politics while remaining faithful to Christian doctrine."

"I have one cat, a blue-point Siamese named Baby."

[The Beast1]

Someone should tweet her the Warner Brothers logo.

[Marmite]

Delete.

[2Wycked]

(02-25-2015 12:08 PM)Marmite Wrote:  

(02-25-2015 10:33 AM)General Mayhem Wrote:  

We should probably stop validating these chicks by telling them, "Sorry, you aren't even rapeable."

That should be a Twitter hash tag. #NotEvenRapeable or #NotRapeWorthy

This a terrible idea idea, for many reasons.

[vinman]

(02-25-2015 09:51 AM)Aphex Wrote:  

She's going to start carrying the mattress around you virtually "punished" her on.

[kosko]

So she is a Christian Commie? I assumed almost all were Atheist, this is likely how she pretends to stand out from the crowd. She will ramble on about inequity and the dangers of capitalist enterprise all while on her Macbook in a Starbucks.

[mikado]

(02-25-2015 12:13 PM)2Wycked Wrote:  

(02-25-2015 12:08 PM)Marmite Wrote:  

(02-25-2015 10:33 AM)General Mayhem Wrote:  

We should probably stop validating these chicks by telling them, "Sorry, you aren't even rapeable."

That should be a Twitter hash tag. #NotEvenRapeable or #NotRapeWorthy

This a terrible idea idea, for many reasons.

Something akin to "NotevenLastCallworthy" would maybe be better.

[TheWastelander]

(02-25-2015 12:25 PM)kosko Wrote:  

So she is a Christian Commie? I assumed almost all were Atheist, this is likely how she pretends to stand out from the crowd. She will ramble on about inequity and the dangers of capitalist enterprise all while on her Macbook in a Starbucks.

Christian insofar as she goes to church once in a while to calm the hamster when she's feeling like a gigantic slut for banging some dude she's supposed to hate for all his inherent "privileges."

[Dusty]

She has a busted grill. Tuth unearthed a photo of her smiling and exposing her teeth and it's a train wreck. 5/10.

[Atlanta Man]

(02-25-2015 08:24 AM)Roosh Wrote:  

Three weeks after Liz Bruenig wrote about me, she mentions me again in a new article.

It was safe to assume that she may like me, so I simply asked "Would you bang?"


https://twitter.com/rooshv/status/570416807972098051

Then somehow she is stating it's some kind of rape threat:


https://twitter.com/ebruenig/status/570419471946551297



Now she's getting massive support. This one got 227 retweets: https://twitter.com/ebruenig/status/570433811705683968

Note that I did not say I wanted to have sex with her--I just asked my readers if they would. So somehow she has reconstrued that into me wanting her body. Wishful thinking?

Anyway, if you run into this girl and get her into bed, record everything because as Tuth mentioned this is a prime candidate for a false rape accusation.

I would bang the shit out of her and make her want to leave her husband.

[JJ Roberts]

(02-25-2015 09:24 AM)PrimeTime32 Wrote:  

2/10 WNB. Can't read.

She can read.

Her narcissism however insists that it has be about her.

So she made it that way in her head.

[Quintus Curtius]

An insignificant little twit.

[AnonymousBosch]

(02-25-2015 09:44 AM)Zelcorpion Wrote:  

The advent of tyranny comes in cute, innocent looking faces like these - propaganda has been really improved in the last decades:

Cute face, but those are the Crazy Eyes of a Dead Soul, which is why you get the cognitive-dissonance of two competing ideologies in the one body: Christianity and Marxist-Based Social Justice. Learn to recognise this look. It's how you know a girl's Inner Light has died.

Reading the thread on that Harry Potter girl the other day, I noted to myself that you can see the point in her growth where the light goes out in her eyes, never to return. Specifically, when she starts deliberate self-uglification via a Pixie Cut, and the playful celebration of her sexuality in studio shots hardens, never to fully-return.



I've noted in the past that Gamergate's Anita Sarkeesian sports the same deadness.



Heh, I've just noticed just how much she looks like a Bouncer Mate of mine in Monty Python drag. It's uncanny.

Guys might call it 'the 1000-cock stare', but I think is more about women possessing knowledge that they can't handle the psychological reality of, (most commonly that their sexual power doesn't translate to into being valued for relationships), but you also see it in rape and abuse victims, and girls who proselytize Marxist ideologies.

I have to wonder if this if this dying of the inner light is the root for the myth of Eve biting into the Apple.

I never, ever fuck these women.

Now, examine this Typist's thinking:

Quote:

"My hope is to bring a Christian leftist perspective to public discourse that is sensitive to the shape of modern American politics while remaining faithful to Christian doctrine."

In other words: "My faith isn't about respecting dogma, and quiet consideration of scripture, but whatever I cherry-pick to suit my personal whims." This is why women make such lousy priests.

This isn't how it works. I know Catholicism considers Marxism evil, and I'm not even religious. Here's a beautiful summation of why Marxism is considered sinful, and this Female Typist is an idiotic hypocrite without any reading comprehension skills whatsoever:

Quote:

Marxism is a doctrine based on atheism, on systematic hate and on the satanic sentence that the end justifies the means. This would be enough for any Christian to keep away with horror from Marxism.

Quote:

[The Bishop's conference of Columbia wrote a paper entitled] “Christian identity in the action for justice”, which denounces, referring to the theological conception of some followers of Marxism, that there is no other sin than social sin, such as the sin of economical exploitation and that the rest of sins are not important at all....

... [This is inconsistent thinking] for sin has its roots in the attitude of one’s heart. The withdrawal from the love of God and to the neighbor in any sphere, sin, in all its gloomy manifestations, prepares the ground for corruption, exploitation and injustice.

Quote:

[Contrary to Marxism] every true conversion [to Christ] means an improvement of [societal] justice

Quote:

Pope Paul VI said: “even the most idealized systems become inhuman very soon, if man’s inhuman inclinations are not corrected, if there isn’t a conversion of mind and heart of those who live under such structures or direct them”.

Quote:

...theologians supporting Marxism tend to convert the change of the economic system into a talisman, an idol to which they sacrifice everything, hoping in vain that such a change will solve all the troubles of man and of society, as if the mere change of economical structures would automatically bring the change in the heart of men.

Quote:

“[Marxism] doesn’t try to solve the injustices through the conversion of unjust people, but through the violent destruction of the adversary; with a Manichean attitude it looks at him as an absolute and irremediable evil. Therefore, it replaces an injustice with another injustice and Christian charity, which commands to love even our enemies, with systematic hate”.

And here is this idiotic girl summed up in a nutshell:

Quote:

“In order to sustain their theories, they misread the Holy Scripture and try to back the basic features of their ideology on it. “They pretend to find there a political, revolutionary and subversive Christ as the only possible interpretation of the person and the work of Jesus. According to this point of view (….), they are also determined to change the vision of the Church, redefining it and changing it into a valid tool for revolution. They also fabricate a different Church whose mere temporary option forces her to compromise with Marxist socialism”.

WNB, but would ex-communicate.

[MMX2010]

(02-25-2015 08:30 AM)samsamsam Wrote:  

Haha great a journalist who doesn't having any reading comprehension. You needed to write something in SJW slang and not English Roosh.

AnonymousBosch posted two wonderful essays on Puritanism http://www.rooshvforum.network/thread-45396-...#pid965666 and http://www.rooshvforum.network/thread-45...#pid965675

If I remember correctly, it was Puritanism which first stated, "If you have a sinful thought, but don't act upon it, then the sinful thought is equally sinful as the sinful action." So to a Puritan mind, "Would You Bang?" is equally sinful as actually banging.

[AnonymousBosch]

(02-25-2015 01:21 PM)MMX2010 Wrote:  

(02-25-2015 08:30 AM)samsamsam Wrote:  

Haha great a journalist who doesn't having any reading comprehension. You needed to write something in SJW slang and not English Roosh.

AnonymousBosch posted two wonderful essays on Puritanism http://www.rooshvforum.network/thread-45396-...#pid965666 and http://www.rooshvforum.network/thread-45...#pid965675

If I remember correctly, it was Puritanism which first stated, "If you have a sinful thought, but don't act upon it, then the sinful thought is equally sinful as the sinful action." So to a Puritan mind, "Would You Bang?" is equally sinful as actually banging.

^
Great observation. This is where the Call to Check Your Privilege comes from, and why thoughts have to be monitored and apologised for, even if not translated into action. This is where observing a racial difference would become racism, observing sexual difference would become sexism, etc.

I can't remember if I clarified that we're not dealing with Traditional Puritanism, but a bastardisation of Purtianism and Cultural Marxism. The puritan mindset, thought process and translation into action remains, just the nature of the allowable sins has changed*.

The final quote in my post above describes the bastardisation process of Catholicism.

* For now. I expect sexual repression to play a larger and larger part in this movement, if it persists. It's possible this could cause a potential schism with the queers and genderfluids down the track, but it's just occurred to me, a Puritan Sexual Repression could be behind the whole Gender Indentity craze of the Marxists.

If you were deeply-uncomfortable with the sex act, and unconsciously wanted to avoid it, wouldn't it make sense to identify as such a unique, specific gender as to be the only one in it, and therefore never be faced with the expectation that you might be sexually-compatible with someone? If a potential partner can't tell what you are, how can they be turned on by you?

You will never face sexual pressure.

Dismissive-avoidance again.

[godfather dust]

(02-25-2015 12:25 PM)kosko Wrote:  

So she is a Christian Commie? I assumed almost all were Atheist, this is likely how she pretends to stand out from the crowd. She will ramble on about inequity and the dangers of capitalist enterprise all while on her Macbook in a Starbucks.

You can't be Christian and pro-trangender. Those creatures are an abomination and God did not make us men and women just for us to go around cutting dicks off and shit.

[kaotic]

(02-25-2015 12:23 PM)vinman Wrote:  

(02-25-2015 09:51 AM)Aphex Wrote:  

She's going to start carrying the mattress around you virtually "punished" her on.

Instead of an Air Mattress she'll carry a MacBook Air in protest.

Talk about attention whoring, she's pulling the same shit that Zoe Quinn did by saying she was getting "threats".

[Lizard King]

(02-25-2015 12:25 PM)kosko Wrote:  

So she is a Christian Commie? I assumed almost all were Atheist, this is likely how she pretends to stand out from the crowd. She will ramble on about inequity and the dangers of capitalist enterprise all while on her Macbook in a Starbucks.

As we could all probably guess, she does have a macbook.

https://twitter.com/ebruenig/status/530939707694526464

[samsamsam]

How about #ImADentistImHeretoHelp

#NeedBetaDentist