Quote: (12-03-2014 01:59 PM)The_e_man Wrote:
The true red-pill to swallow is that of biological truths of our nature.
This post is absolute gold!
If we look at things from an evolutionary biological and anthropological standpoint... we realize a couple of different things about sexual selection.
First is that in the very distant past we likely lived more like primates, but this would be over 100,000 years ago. In those times children would be kind of considered tribal and sex was perhaps orgy style. Probably 75 to 80% of all offspring didn't reach age 2.
Once we became farmers and gave up the hunter gatherer lifestyle some massive changes likely occured. I believe at this point women no longer became the primary chooser of their mates. Instead families chose for them, and many were also taken as captives of war and made concubines. This situation likely fits the last 20,000 years of human evolution.
It is my personal belief that women are biologically engineered from a psychological perspective to choose men based on 100,000 year old needs. This is why they are focused on low intelligence lazy fuckers that act like tribal big men. They simply are not equipped for modern mate selection. Most cultures built in control mechanisms to mitigate female mate choice stupidity, however liberalism and technology have destroyed those things.
So, we are actually left with a reverse natural selection issue... where the stupidest, laziest, least able to survive outbreed the hard working intelligent folks.
