[not-a-pua]

Rose McGowan attacks LGBT community for failing to campaign for feminism: 'Gay men are more misogynistic than straight men'

Story is here

Oh god, I hope this will turn into a war of feminists vs gays.

[SteveMcMahon]

(11-06-2014 08:24 AM)not-a-pua Wrote:  

'Gay men are more misogynistic than straight men'

Well, duh. The leading cause of white knighitis is the mistaken belief that pandering to women will get you pussy.

Gay men don't want or like pussy, so they've got no reason to care about the precious feelings of feminists.

[kbell]

What did she do to her hair? Short hair boy cut.

Also her face is signalling the wall.

[Candlejack]

So someone says something about gay people and it is in a national newspaper. Another case of the media telling us what to believe.

[Veloce]

delete

[perverted sage]

HOLY Fuck they have a lecture on this thing

[bojangles]

Another contender for the victim olympics here.

[Days of Broken Arrows]

Roosh and several others predicted the left would collapse when its various special interest groups started fighting with each other over who is the biggest victim.

That's now coming to pass.

Beyond that, the idea that gay men should put aside their own concerns to fight for women is beyond narcissistic. Women should realize the only reason straight men do it is for the possibility of sex. Gay men have a lot less incentive.

The funny thing is that the very idea of altruism and fighting for the downtrodden comes from the bible. The left trashes religion, then expects the rest of us to behave like Good Samaritans. More power to guys to don't fall into the phony trap.

They want old-fashioned altruism and chivalry, but certainly aren't behaving like the women in the '50s who received that...

[Canopus]

First thing that went through my head:

[HeyPete]

First, Rose looks like shit. Tits are still nice, though.

Second, maybe this fight with the butt-busters will teach these bitches a thing or two. Most likely not though.

I wonder if/when they lose the gays, will they continue to block and shame male sexuality? Will they squelch it at every turn or will they realize - if it wasn't for the strong male sex drive - most of them would be dead.

Deemed useless, because of obesity, age and stinky snatches.

I say let the gays loose. They get knocked around by men who don't want to buy what they are selling and see how they feel.

I have no doubts gay dudes will function just fine w/o feminist interruption.

[kerouac]

No Shit. Gay guys only use women to convince straight beta males to play along on their issues.

Gay guys live in a male-only world. The only time you seem them associating with women is when their job requires it (hair dresser, costume designer, make up artists, etc.). Otherwise, you rarely see them associating with women, unless they're fag-hags, and they only hang out with fag-hags because they are self-deprecating and probably add some entertainment for them.

[Renzy]

I didn't even recognize her from the picture. She chopped all of her hair off:



What she used to look like:

[Dusty]

Would any of us want anything to do with women if we didn't like pussy?

[Sonsowey]

Every time leftists fight does not mean leftism is about to implode.

[Veloce]

Also, when was the last time you heard Rose McGowan's name in the media?

I smell a washed up attention-whore.

[AnonymousBosch]

(11-06-2014 01:52 PM)Dusty Wrote:  

Would any of us want anything to do with women if we didn't like pussy?

I genuinely-enjoy the company of feminine women on a certain level. I just don't expect them to be interested in complex thought unless they're obsessed with appearing deep, intelligent and complex - usually girls of moderate to lesser beauty from privileged backgrounds - it's the rote learning kind they've applied no personal critical thought to, so you listen without needing to listen to what they're saying because it's all academia buzzwords, and they can't tell the difference anyway. There's still no point offering them your own complex thought because their minds were trained to ape ideas for the reward of praise, not to weigh up competing opinions.

Girls love feminism because it functions as a dictated religion that requires nothing but a regular show of faith.

[Truth Teller]

What was the last time Rose McGowan was culturally relevant?

Also, no shit. I have several gay friends, and most of them are willing to admit that the gay community is one of the most intolerant places around.

[Veloce]

(11-06-2014 02:59 PM)AnonymousBosch Wrote:  

There's still no point offering them [girls] your own complex thought because their minds were trained to ape ideas for the reward of praise, not to weigh up competing opinions.

This is pure gold. Shit like this belongs in a handbook to give out to young men, "Understanding Women, a Primer."

[kerouac]

(11-06-2014 01:52 PM)Renzy Wrote:  

What she used to look like:

Damn, she used to look really damn good. It goes to show, HIT IT AND QUIT IT!

AMIRITE?!!?

[General Stalin]

Let the in-fighting begin. Divide and conquer. Divide and conquer.

Also what the fuck happened to Rose McGowan? She used to be one hell of a piece. Crazy how much short hair can ruin a girl's aesthetic appeal.

[YossariansRight]

(11-06-2014 02:55 PM)Veloce Wrote:  

Also, when was the last time you heard Rose McGowan's name in the media?

I smell a washed up attention-whore.

Yep: https://www.nowness.com/story/wild-rose

[Grange]

(11-06-2014 04:45 PM)YossariansRight Wrote:  

(11-06-2014 02:55 PM)Veloce Wrote:  

Also, when was the last time you heard Rose McGowan's name in the media?

I smell a washed up attention-whore.

Yep: https://www.nowness.com/story/wild-rose

What the fuck is that? Is it supposed to be artsy? That ought to make the handbook on attention whoring.

[ChrisPitts]

(11-06-2014 01:52 PM)Renzy Wrote:  

I didn't even recognize her from the picture. She chopped all of her hair off:



What she used to look like:

Wow. Just like the carousel waits for no man, the wall waits for no woman. This is fairly disappointing. She used to give me the strongest of boners.

[samsamsam]

Who?

[AnonymousBosch]

Part of her original statement was telling:

Quote:

"I see now basically people who've fought for the right to stand on top of a float wearing an orange speedo and take molly (MDMA)," McGowan said. "And I see no help, and I see no paying it forward, and I have a huge problem with that. ... There are so many things to help and do, and I see no extending of a hand outside of the gay community to another community, and that's a problem for me."

This is the 'We Own You because You Owe Us' mentality I spoke about in the Gamergate thread that I recognised from 20+ years of dealing with Leftist Crusaders around me.

http://www.rooshvforum.network/thread-39616-...#pid866804

Now she's being forced to apologise, but it's a non-apology.

Quote:

"I made a dumb generalization, and for that I apologize," she said in her opinion piece. "For everything else I said, no, I will not."

"Where does it say that because of a man's sexual preference, I don't get to point out character defects?" McGowan continued.

Dear irrelevant actress: we're playing by your rules. If pointing out a female's character defects = misogyny, then pointing out a gay man's character defects = homophobia.

I actually agree with her points, but it's good to see her have to live in the world she made.