[Sp5]

I'm tempted to send this to my ex-wife, but, nahhhh. She's finding it out for herself.

[J DOE]

These people whining and complaining remind me of when I was a freshman in high school and me and my buddies were playing videos games on Friday/Saturday nights because all the girls in my grade were off with juniors and seniors who had cars, good weed and later curfews. Based on that I can somewhat understand why women don't like hearing these sorts of things.

But ultimately it doesn't matter what they say/complain about, it matters what they respond to which is older, confident, established men. However, the men who are acting so alarmed and disgusted by this are pathetic fags. It's obvious they are polluting the well and repeating what women want to hear to gain their approval and support.

[Celtic]

It's basic biology.Younger women are more fertile so men are naturally more attracted to them. You would think the left's love of science would make them more attuned to this, but somehow even science gets pushed aside when it runs into the sacred doctrine of feminism.

What's ironic about this is just a couple weeks ago, the feminists and manginas were shrieking about male "entitlement" in the wake of the Elliot Rodger shooting. "How dare these entitled men complain about not getting sex? How dare these so called nice guys question women's preferences? If some men aren't having sex, they shouldn't complain, they shouldn't try to better their situation with game, just accept sexlessness and stop being entitled"

Well, I ask why these feminists are so ENTITLED as to think they automatically deserve a man their own age? Do they think of men as objects that they just deserve to have, even if the men would rather date someone younger and hotter? Why are they so entitled to think that if they spend their best years whoring around, that they should still get a man their same age when there are much younger women they have to compete with?

Feminists, and their sniveling male allies who sacrifice their integrity for the hopes of dried up feminist pussy, complain about men all day. But they jump up and down screaming about entitlement and misogyny at anything which even hints at criticizing women.

[Espresso]

If they're so shocked and appalled, and like older women so much, I have the perfect solution.

They can date the older women, and we'll date the 20 years olds. Everybody wins.

[Dusty]

So men find women in their early 20s attractive:

[The PerSev]

Manufactured outrage is what it is. Even these limpdicks have brains, vestigial though they may be. Even they know the truth. But they have to be disingenuous, that's how their bread is buttered.

Notice that they'll huff and puff and piss on hydrants, but they'll never actually address the fact in a meaningful way. The truth can be denounced, but seldom disputed.

[Parlay44]

The fact that women are bothered by this only goes to show that their self worth is directly tied to their attractiveness despite what they say about anything else like career.

[placer]

Andrew's answer to the biology argument is that only men are making that argument.



Class, today we will discuss basic biology and touch on logical fallacies.

The reason why men are interested in young women in because they are more healthy and, therefore, better able to make children. This is because, when men evolved, the men who dated young attractive women had more children, so the genetic code of men who dated young women became more common.

Ad hominem is a type of fallacy where someone tries to invalidate a well-made argument "is rejected on the basis of some irrelevant fact about the author of or the person presenting the claim or argument" (that comes from the Wikipedia), such as the person's gender.

[Dusty]

(06-08-2014 11:14 AM)placer Wrote:  

Andrew's answer to the biology argument is that only men are making that argument.



Class, today we will discuss basic biology and touch on logical fallacies.

The reason why men are interested in young women in because they are more healthy and, therefore, better able to make children. This is because, when men evolved, the men who dated young attractive women had more children, so the genetic code of men who dated young women became more common.

Ad hominem is a type of fallacy where someone tries to invalidate a well-made argument "is rejected on the basis of some irrelevant fact about the author of or the person presenting the claim or argument" (that comes from the Wikipedia), such as the person's gender.

Science and logic are sexists.

[agentaika]

(06-08-2014 07:28 AM)CrashBangWallop Wrote:  

what the fuck is going on???

I suspect two things are going on: 1) Click bait. Or, in this instance, ally bait. Feminism is a hot topic right now, and this kind of shit draws attention. And 2) Hillary Clinton. I think there's a lot going on behind the scenes that we aren't seeing. I don't want to sound like a conspiracy theorist, but the sudden influx of feminism seems very strategic. Something bigger than the universities is fueling and funding this beast. And what better way to get a woman in the White House than to create an environment where men look like freaks, and women can't be criticized.

[TheFinalEpic]

In other news.... the sky is blue!

I guess that little quip about women "aging like a fine wine" couldn't be further from the truth.

[Beyond Borders]

(06-08-2014 11:26 AM)agentaika Wrote:  

2) Hillary Clinton. I think there's a lot going on behind the scenes that we aren't seeing. I don't want to sound like a conspiracy theorist, but the sudden influx of feminism seems very strategic. Something bigger than the universities is fueling and funding this beast. And what better way to get a woman in the White House than to create an environment where men look like freaks, and women can't be criticized.

Interesting thought.

(06-08-2014 11:56 AM)TheFinalEpic Wrote:  

In other news.... the sky is blue!

I guess that little quip about women "aging like a fine wine" couldn't be further from the truth.

Yep, that's men.

[Collide]

"Homosexual relations are fine, you can't change who you love!"

"You love a 20-year old? You sick FUCK!"

[Dusty]

(06-08-2014 11:26 AM)agentaika Wrote:  

2) Hillary Clinton. I think there's a lot going on behind the scenes that we aren't seeing.

I speculated that that was what "Ban Bossy" was all about. Hillary.

She has a revolting overbearing demeanor about her that turns people off (BHO condescendingly:"you're likable enough Hillary") so they are trying to censor anyone pointing out this glaring personality flaw of hers (which is common in female 'leaders").

[ManAbout]

(06-08-2014 11:26 AM)agentaika Wrote:  

I suspect two things are going on: And 2) Hillary Clinton.

Women claim to be attracted to men their own age on a dating site because of Hillary Clinton?

[Mekorig]

(06-08-2014 10:43 AM)Sp5 Wrote:  

I'm tempted to send this to my ex-wife, but, nahhhh. She's finding it out for herself.

I like your way of thinking.

[dog]

(06-08-2014 11:26 AM)agentaika Wrote:  

(06-08-2014 07:28 AM)CrashBangWallop Wrote:  

what the fuck is going on???

I suspect two things are going on: 1) Click bait. Or, in this instance, ally bait. Feminism is a hot topic right now, and this kind of shit draws attention. And 2) Hillary Clinton. I think there's a lot going on behind the scenes that we aren't seeing. I don't want to sound like a conspiracy theorist, but the sudden influx of feminism seems very strategic. Something bigger than the universities is fueling and funding this beast. And what better way to get a woman in the White House than to create an environment where men look like freaks, and women can't be criticized.

Barring some absolutely enormous colossal fuckup, Hillary will be the next president. So I agree that the discourse is getting more shrill with the next election cycle on the horizon, but not for the purpose of putting her into office. Her winning the election is a given at this point; she could personally drone-bomb an orphanage full of gay babies without fazing her core supporters. The reason why there has been a gigantic push for the feminist LGTBQ progressive anti-male agenda (whatever the term is for The Agenda of The Movement) on all fronts is because it sets the tone and discourse for potential legislation.

Look at what is occupying the intellectual zeitgeist:
- the "1-in-5 women are raped" myth
- "Rape culture" on campus in particular and society in general
- "Institutional misogyny" in academia, the workplace, etc
- Men as bizarre and scary creatures. Men are attracted to young women... DEEPLY DISTURBING!
- The removal of any and all standards when it comes to women, the notion that women are entitled to a life free of any questioning or accusations of wrongdoing
- etc etc etc

I don't think it's out of the question that we will see some really bizarre legislation or regulation passed to "fix" these perceived problems. In fact, I would bet on it. The witch-hunts are just getting started.

I'm not conspiratorially minded, so I don't think there is some dark room where people make these decisions. And that's what makes it scarier. The culture has been so thoroughly corrupted that the puppets dance to the music without anyone pulling the strings.

[Quintus Curtius]

The comments in the Twitter feed on this are worth reading.

I now always lie about my age online, and luckily I can get away with posing as 15 years younger than my age. And it works.

American women are the only women in the world who have this bullshit social programming that it's "creepy" for a younger woman to be with an older man.

In reality, that social rule (that younger women shouldn't be with older men) was created to shame men, and empower cougars, spinsters, and fatties.

[Tuthmosis]

This is all part of the general trend of applying the "pedophile" or pervert label on all men through insinuation. Men's sexuality is routinely pathologized and stigmatized. Contrary to what feminists would have you believe, it's women who feel threatened by male sexuality, not the other way around. I tweeted about this documentary "Are All Men Pedophiles?" a few days ago that very closely addresses the issue of men being attracted to women in their prime by nature. In it, they talk about odd choice of 18 as the age of consent in the West (the age of maturity for men, not girls) and about how men, for their entire lives, stay attracted to girls at the beginning of girl's sexual maturity (about 16).

Watch these two trailers. The whole documentary is on Netflix and on Youtube. Apart from a the odd voiceover work, it's quite good.

[Days of Broken Arrows]

Is anyone giving this guy a hard time on Twitter? If so, be sure to Tweet him this:

Link here: http://i191.photobucket.com/albums/z244/...emotiv.jpg

[CRR]

The chart exemplifies the flawed thinking of feminism and their white knight supporters, and this has been discussed repeatedly here, which is that what men want directly correlates to what women want.

The woman's side should have income instead of age, then I think we'd see similar results.

[Hedonist94]

(06-08-2014 01:23 PM)Days of Broken Arrows Wrote:  

Is anyone giving this guy a hard time on Twitter? If so, be sure to Tweet him this:

Link here: http://i191.photobucket.com/albums/z244/...emotiv.jpg

To be fair, Edward Cullen(The Twilight guy) is over 100 years old.

I suppose this satisfies women's dual fantasies of a man who's much older than themselves but still looks to be in his physical prime.

[Private Man]

Logic and reason are tools of the patriarchy.

[Vacancier Permanent]

Come on Sp5, be a gentleman and send it to her for either her birthday or Christmas. Whichever comes first.

And if you want to be extra sweet, include a pic of you on a tropical beach with two or three hot, slim and feminine women in your arms with the following caption:

"Things are sweet here. How about you? "

She'll be quiet touched!

(06-08-2014 10:43 AM)Sp5 Wrote:  

I'm tempted to send this to my ex-wife, but, nahhhh. She's finding it out for herself.

[Chemical O]

those are some creepy mid thirties women who think they deserve a man the same age