[John_Galt]

I've only had 3 LTRs in my life. All 3 of them were with girls who had flip-phones. The first was in 09, the most recent ended a few months ago. I never consciously screened for this trait, but I know for a fact it's not coincidence.

The best way to screen for an LTR prospect, outside of virginity (which you have to fuck her to verify) is her phone. IMHO, any girl you see carrying around a non-smart phone (in the US) is worthy of consideration. If I'm at a mall and I see a girl pull out a flip-phone, I'm chatting her up (assuming she's cute and not with a guy, obviously).

[YoungAngel1]

Match.com has ALOT of good quality women. Although, I must say it seems like a majority of them had their fun in college, and are looking to settle down with a provider/beta type. Not necessarily a bad thing if that's what you want.

[John_Galt]

(10-07-2016 12:32 AM)YoungAngel1 Wrote:  

Match.com has ALOT of good quality women. Although, I must say it seems like a majority of them had their fun in college, and are looking to settle down with a provider/beta type. Not necessarily a bad thing if that's what you want.

Please define "good quality". Because it sounds like they rode the carousel and now that alpha fucked, they want a beta to buck. That's not "quality" to me.

[Rhyme or Reason]

All this bullshit about phones is nonsense. So because a bitch can go 10 minutes without checking her phone, she's "quality"?

What the fuck kind of standard is that?

It just goes to show that men are willing to overlook all kinds of horrible character traits a woman has and will look for anything...anything at all to indicate she's not utter garbage, even though she is. So much so that when a girl doesn't look at her phone for a few minutes we have supposedly red pill men lauding her virtues as a potential mother to their kids. Give me a break.

And women can't even meet the very, very low bar that has been set for them by our bitch-made society.