Posts: 1,723
Threads: 0
Joined: Mar 2012
Reputation:
14
Federal Judge Bones Pennsylvania
05-21-2014, 01:53 PM
Hating on gay marriage is gay
Posts: 324
Threads: 0
Joined: Jul 2013
Reputation:
3
Federal Judge Bones Pennsylvania
05-21-2014, 02:00 PM
Who is hating? Any disagreement with the leftist agenda is automatically classified as hate. One judge overturning a legislature or voter ballot initiatives on marriage is disgusting.
Posts: 163
Threads: 0
Joined: Apr 2014
Federal Judge Bones Pennsylvania
05-21-2014, 02:06 PM
Overturn No Fault divorce (essentially making infidelity a punishable offense) and then see how many homos want to get married.
They want to get married for the perks. Don't for a second think that most of them aren't buttfucking tons of other dudes throughout their marriages. It's a farce. But so is marriage in general when someone can divorce anyone for any reason. Especially women, because most men are stuck in marriages for fear of getting raped in divorce court.
Posts: 481
Threads: 0
Joined: Mar 2013
Reputation:
5
Federal Judge Bones Pennsylvania
05-21-2014, 02:31 PM
I don't understand people who are against gay marriage. Why do you care? How does it affect you? Because it doesn't. If two grown ups want to sign a legal contract to get married why not let them. Personally I'm against all forms of marriage but to say gay people ruined or are ruining marriage is stupid they didn't heterosexuals have already made marriage a complete joke.
Posts: 5,822
Threads: 0
Joined: Oct 2011
Reputation:
72
Federal Judge Bones Pennsylvania
05-21-2014, 02:49 PM
I don't see the problem. I don't support gay marriage but its not like the legislation is forcing me to marry a man, or forcing my church to marry gay people. There are a whole lot of other sins which are currently legal so its not like that foundation is crumbling.
As long as there is religious freedom I think the separation of church and state is a great thing, its not my place to impose punishment on people for doing things that I disagree with, especially when they don't damage me, my family or my property.
I am actually somewhat hopeful for progression on the treatment of marriage through the eventual divorce of homosexual couples. Parental custody, alimony and child support will all have to be truly gender neutral in these cases and will hopefully set some good precedents as they make their way through the system.
All of that being said though, Uzi posts an excellent point, the most disappointing part is the feds stepping in to change something that the majority of people voted for.
Why do the heathen rage and the people imagine a vain thing? Psalm 2:1 KJV
Posts: 1,812
Threads: 0
Joined: Dec 2013
Reputation:
15
Federal Judge Bones Pennsylvania
05-21-2014, 03:03 PM
It's such a non-issue that it's pathetic. However, I agree with Uzi and Dr. Howard, the government shouldn't be stepping in to eliminate something that the majority of voters supported.
If you're not fucking her, someone else is.
Posts: 324
Threads: 0
Joined: Jul 2013
Reputation:
3
Federal Judge Bones Pennsylvania
05-21-2014, 07:42 PM
I don't care if gays get "married" it happens all the time and nobody is stopping them. But they don't have the right to a social endorsement from the rest of us. Nobody can force us to recognize something that we the majority sees as harmful to society. There are plenty of threads that cover why we see it as harmful. Get "married" and kindly leave the rest of us alone about it. We're sick of you.
Posts: 1,363
Threads: 0
Joined: Oct 2011
Reputation:
5
Federal Judge Bones Pennsylvania
05-21-2014, 07:54 PM
The exact point I was making.
I could care less if Bruce married David. Or if Shelia married Joyce. But te Gey demands acceptance. It's not enough to be allowed to do whatever you want without interference from the outside. What the federal judge has done was destroy the illusion we live in any kind of democracy. If this is such a burning issue, let the monosexualists put it on the ballot.
Because there is no way you can get rid of one man one woman without destroying the whole modern concept of marriage. How can you possibly advocate for SSM without agreeing to polygamy? Polygamy was the standard for years in much of the world. I know several Muslim men who have had to leave their extra wives back in the old country. Are you now going to tell them they have to accept Hashem and Abdul swearing their vows of eternal love in the local mosque?
Posts: 1,723
Threads: 0
Joined: Jul 2010
Federal Judge Bones Pennsylvania
05-21-2014, 07:56 PM
I don't care about gay marriage and never will. But why should government have a say in my permanent relations anyway?
Get them the fuck out of marriage and then it all becomes legal anyway.
Wald
Posts: 6,550
Threads: 0
Joined: Aug 2011
Reputation:
66
Federal Judge Bones Pennsylvania
05-21-2014, 08:02 PM
Supporting gay marriage is like validating that gay sex is about love. Sorry but anytime a cock goes in an asshole it's not about love. Homo, hetero, beastiality or otherwise.
Gays usually congregate in the cities where nobody cares. The cities must be getting full so they want to expand their rainbow empire into the suburbs.
Team Nachos
Posts: 123
Threads: 0
Joined: Jan 2012
Reputation:
1
Federal Judge Bones Pennsylvania
05-21-2014, 08:48 PM
Gay marriage is great for straight guys in the long run, because now that women have to start taking their girl-on-girl relationships seriously, guys will look like a great option. Until very recently, women almost exclusively looked to each other for casual, care-free flings. The divorce and domestic violence rates for same-sex-female marriages are sky high relative to intersex and male-male marriages.
Posts: 1,723
Threads: 0
Joined: Jul 2010
Federal Judge Bones Pennsylvania
05-21-2014, 09:24 PM
Quote: (05-21-2014 07:59 PM)Goldin Boy Wrote:
Something similar happened in Virginia. A federal judge overturned an amendment to the state's constitution that the people voted for.
But...but...democracy?
Wald
Posts: 1,723
Threads: 0
Joined: Jul 2010
Federal Judge Bones Pennsylvania
05-21-2014, 11:49 PM
Quote: (05-21-2014 11:39 PM)Katatonic Wrote:
Quote: (05-21-2014 09:24 PM)Walderschmidt Wrote:
Quote: (05-21-2014 07:59 PM)Goldin Boy Wrote:
Something similar happened in Virginia. A federal judge overturned an amendment to the state's constitution that the people voted for.
But...but...democracy?
Wald
Thank God we don't live in a democracy in the US. I'll take a constitutional republic any day over a democracy where peoples rights can be voted away by an ignorant populace. I support gay marriage not because I have a soft spot for buggery. I support it because nobody has the right to stop consenting adults from being awarded the same recognition that others have.
I'm being sarcastic. The US is not a democracy; was never supposed to be. Still, students in the US are taught that the US is a democracy and that democracy is the best form of a government. Hell, part of the "justification" for the war in Iraq was for making the world safer for democracy.
Speaking of going against the will of the people, they also overturned the people's will by going ahead with the bank bailouts.
I know you don't support buggery - but do you support people who bugger one another harassing a company that refuses to shoot photos for wedding just because they're gay?
Do you believe in freedom of association?
Why not just vote for no government involvement in marriage instead of making it "legal" for gays to be married?
Wald
Posts: 3,214
Threads: 0
Joined: Aug 2011
Reputation:
42
Federal Judge Bones Pennsylvania
05-22-2014, 12:26 AM
When two gay men divorce, who gets divorce raped?
Posts: 324
Threads: 0
Joined: Jul 2013
Reputation:
3
Federal Judge Bones Pennsylvania
05-22-2014, 01:46 AM
Katatonic, respectfully, nobody has a right to anyone else's "recognition" for anything they do. Be it a behavior or body of work. Gays have the right to be gay, but they don't have the right to force society to "recognize" their behavior as productive and beneficial to society.
Posts: 494
Threads: 0
Joined: Nov 2012
Reputation:
8
Federal Judge Bones Pennsylvania
05-22-2014, 08:25 AM
The admonishment of a judge overturning a law seems hollow here. If it were the reverse situation we would be commending him for being brave in the face of MSM.
Remember "the voting people" nowadays includes women, illegal immigrants, hipster college and grad students, and a multitude of people who pay no income tax yet expect a say and services provided.
Just because 1 in 20 bills voted in are something your average freedom-loving man would agree with doesn't mean the other 19 aren't society wreaking, feminist bullshit!
In general I would trust the decisions of a wise old man more than the current populous eligible to vote...I expect this will only get worse with time, and the only way a man will receive fair consideration in a courtroom is if a judge with a backbone is willing to overturn or overlook all the unjust laws we have currently, and the ones which are no doubt coming...