Quote: (01-18-2014 06:06 PM)Tail Gunner Wrote:
Your original post had nothing to do with "respect" in regard to foreign policy?
Quote:Quote:
Presidents are more important for the macro domestic challenges and for international leadership. On the global stage, Democratic US Presidents are far more respected and embraced than Republican ones.
Having confirmed that you are a sociopath, I'll just move on.
That's fine by me. I don't know why you want to have a discussion anyway. You've already made your point. I can only make my points and cite a credible source to support them. You simply try to bombard someone with your opinion yet don't cite any support to make it persuasive.
Imagine if one day I'm having the same discussion with someone else and they rationally cite credible support for an opposing viewpoint. Am I'm supposed to say, you know, I had this same discussion in the past and some guy on the Roosh Forum named Tail Gunner said...(?)
If all you have is an opinion and the insistence that it's right, then just make your point once and let's agree to disagree. I don't find you on your own credible enough to go against world opinion verified by polling and my own experiences abroad.
But even in the foreign policy arena, I think most of the world's people (forget about pundits and elites) respect Democratic Party Presidents more than Republicans. Bill Clinton is arguably more popular abroad post-presidency than he was during president. He commands enormously high fees on the lecture circuit and is invited to all kinds of international organizations, think thanks, etc. He gets mobbed wherever he goes.
FDR was going to win a fourth consecutive election (the only
President to serve more than two terms). His leadership during WWII was legendary.
Every American President has had foreign policy blunders, and that alone could take easily take up another thread. Hell, GWB's presidency on its own could. Let's not go into that. Let's just agree to disagree.
As Nelson Mandela wisely said once, "Only armchair politicians are immune from committing mistakes. Errors are inherent in political action. Those who are in the centre of political struggle, who have to deal with practical and pressing problems, are afforded little time for reflection and no precedents to guide them and are bound to slip up many times."
For future reference, here's a flow chart to guide you on what constitutes a "rational" discussion. Cheers.