[cardguy]

Sex is a weakness.

Why get two people to do a job that you can do on your own?

To me cumming is like shitting. Get it over and done - and then get on with the rest of the day.

Fuck fucking around with biches. Open up the laptop. Surf through a million different options. In any variety you want. And be done with your business for the day.

They never get fat. They get old. They never get tired. My little porn friends.

Waiting for me everytime I open the laptop.

You are brainwashed by society if you value 'the real thing' over porn. I would rather masterbate over a '10' than fuck a '7'. Maybe I am sick - but I would rather look at perfection than look at second best. I don't compromise in any of my other interests. And I am certainly not going to compromise when it comes to looking at hot chicks.

If you fucking '10s', '9s' or '8s' - fair enough. None of this applies to you. But if you are slumming around with '7s' and below then you are wasting a good wank on some ugly skank. It isn't worth it.

And the sad thing is you are doing so because you have the Blue Pill notion that any hole is a goal. And than any sex beats porn. Everytime.

To me that is bullshit.

Anyway - no hate intended to anyone. Just wanted to put forward some a different point of view here!

[Every10GivesMeA10]

Nothing good comes from watching porn.

[cardguy]

My brother is happily engaged.

I remember when his girlfriend went away for a couple of weeks.

Not a problem.

I remember when his laptop broke down for a couple of days.

I have never seen a guy looked so stressed out.

The truth is that porn is looked at just as much by guys in relationships as by those not in relationships.

[SpecialEd]

I still prefer the real thing...even if it means lower quality. But I have never considered porn to be the WMD that some people on the manosphere say it is. Porn and fapping actually makes me want to chase women more. If it is sapping your game, then maybe you need to inject yourself with a big vial of testosterone.

[cardguy]

I prefer the real thing as well.

But to me - porn > chicks who are not an 8 or above.

And I think to deny that means you are still stuck in the mode of over-valuing pussy. That is a scarcity mindset right there.

I am not trying to upset anyone. I don't give a fuck what people want to do with their lives. Instead I just want to throw a different point of view out there for the sake of balance.

I admire anyone who has the dedication and character to make a real change in their lives.

[Collide]

I harness my fap energy to meet the needs of every day. If I need the courage to ask out or make the moves on a girl, I won't fap for a week prior. Any longer than that i risk ending up in the paper the next day.

That being said I'm not an everyday fap advocate, or completely abstaining from it advocate. Moderation is fine and if you really need to hone in your confidence on certain occasions go twice as long without it.

[Handsome Creepy Eel]

1. There is a point at which the reward from chasing women becomes inferior to porn, either because the women are too low of value or because it becomes too difficult or demanding. But there is also a point at which porn becomes inferior to other ways of getting happiness. It shouldn't be compared against just sex with real women.

2. Watching porn has the potential to make you physically incapable of sex with real women, but never the opposite.

3. Real women can bring other benefits to your life other than just sex (was this Beta?). Porn will never provide you with love or other emotional experience, cook for you, bear you children or provide you with any benefit other than a strictly physical one.

4. Getting good at getting sex from real women is a skill that is rewarding both in itself and through improving other areas of life (maintaining good health, earning money, developing social skills and courage, etc.)

I have absolutely nothing against guys who have given up on women and fulfill all their needs through porn. It's an admirable choice. However, to me it seems that this thread is needlessly inflammatory and laden with

[cardguy]

Quote:

Porn will never provide you with love or other emotional experience, cook for you, bear you children or provide you with any benefit other than a strictly physical one.

I don't believe in love.

I don't want children.

I get emotional experiences from friends, books, movies, music and reading Teedub's posts.

I have always cooked for myself. It would be great if a chick could cook for me. But I prefer to cook for myself and get it done 100% the way I want it. Rather than have somebody else do it and slightly fuck it up. I also like eating out alot.

----------------------

That is just my take on things. But I freely admit I am a bit of weirdo. Even as a kid I preferred to take care of myself than have other people do stuff for me.

[Basil Ransom]

Why are you here?

[Christian McQueen]

Epic 'troll' post.

[Bolthouse]

Man I love reading cardguy's posts.

Cardguy, I couldn't disagree with you more on this, and many of your other takes, but you are an incredibly clever and cunning writer. Some of your takes are just so out there, yet it's all backed up my reasoned thought that makes them incredibly compelling.

Any other guy who would say things like "porn is better than sex" or "travel is the most overrated hobby" on this forum would get an immediate troll ban. But your ability to formulate arguments is outstanding, which ostensibly derives from your constant reading.

You might be the most redpill one of us all.

[runsonmagic]

So, this thread is gonna devolve into us all posting our favorite porn links, right?

[WesternCancer]

(12-14-2013 04:53 PM)cardguy Wrote:  

My brother is happily engaged.

I remember when his girlfriend went away for a couple of weeks.

Not a problem.

I remember when his laptop broke down for a couple of days.

I have never seen a guy looked so stressed out.

The truth is that porn is looked at just as much by guys in relationships as by those not in relationships.

The way I see it is that activities which decrease personal freedom are bad.

If your buddy stresses over a few days without porn isn't he dependent on porn, and isn't his dependence a limiter of his personal freedom?

With porn you may have the 'freedom' to chose who/what you want to jerk it to for sexual release, but take porn away (ie. no internet connection) and you're left with a deficit of this freedom, you can no longer choose to jerk it to porn. Whereas if you jerk it to mental images or fuck real women you're only limited by the amount of effort you put into the task.

[pitt]

With all due respect, you are really trolling us.

This shit (fapping) has been harmful for many of us that were on that thread, you come up with this thread it's like you are indirectly attacking us. Not cool.

[cardguy]

I am not attacking anyone. I just thought it would be funny to co-opt the name of that thread for this thread.

I don't want to start any drama - I have made my point. That is good enough for me.

As always - I admire those who want to improve their lives.

[iknowexactly]

(12-14-2013 07:31 PM)cardguy Wrote:  

I am not attacking anyone. I just thought it would be funny to co-opt the name of that thread for this thread.

I don't want to start any drama - I have made my point. That is good enough for me.

As always - I admire those who want to improve their lives.

I agree with the inflammatory post, but with caveats. It's my dick and I have the right to do exactly what I want with it.

I owe women nothing unless they have earned it by doing a FUCK OF A LOT MORE than they are doing now.

I agree that managing fapping can help you be more aggressive with women, but by no stretch of the imagination do I have any obligation whatsoever to be more aggressive with women who would dump me for someone .01% more alpha in .01 of a second.

It's also good for my prostate to masturbate, keeps everything flowing through there.

[Valhalla]

Guys it's satire

[cardguy]

Not satire.

But I don't like being mistaken for a troll. None of my 2,284 posts on here have being anything but the honest truth as to how I feel.

I won't say much more because I don't want people to think I'm trolling. And I don't want to upset anybody that disagrees with what I wrote.

I am a bit nutty - so I can see why people have trouble understanding that. I have a weird thing. If I come up with a logical reason for doing (or not doing) something then 99.99% of the time I have to obey that logic.

[Veloce]

It's important that the Manosphere have some core values, some sort of belief system and identity. Otherwise we become like feminism which "isn't an philosophy, but a discussion" and all that bullshit. We have to stand for something.

I think it's important that porn NOT be a part of that, or at least in very very small amounts. I watch porn and occasionally masturbate to it, but I see the immense value in not doing it. To me it's last-resort maintenance so I don't jizz in my sheets while I'm sleeping.

As a movement that is centered in self-improvement and positive change, I think it's important that our stance on porn should be a mostly negative one. Porn does nothing to improve a man's life, and the negatives are plenty.

If you're a MGTOWer, that's fine, but you too can benefit from no porn. Your imagination is the best porn.

All that said, Cardguy definitely isn't trolling anyone. He's got a history as a solid poster that offers a lot of counter-current opinions that challenge the establishment, which is largely what red-pill is all about.

[cardguy]

You make a good point. I forgot there are core values underpinning a forum such as this. I think of this place as like a bar to hang out and discuss shit.

Yet - for alot of people they are here because they have an earnest desire for self-improvement in their lives.

I should probably respect that spirit a little more in my posts.

Thanks for the heads up!

[Shotgun Styles]

Crunch, straight jackin'!

[FretDancer]

Keep fapping to porn, and when you get to land a real 8 (if), we'll see if you are really up for the job.

[MrXY]

Is there any member here who created more threads in 2013 than Cardguy, and is there any member who is less congruent than Cardguy with the mindset and lifestyles we are trying to develop, share and promote here?

He's said that his only interest in women is porn and prostitutes and apparently has no interest in approaching or having a relationship with a woman

He's said in this thread that he prefers to masturbate over having actual sex and that we are "brainwashed" by society if we value real sex over porn.

He's admitted that he's fat and has no interest in losing the weight

He's said he doesn't care how he looks or dresses

He has said he has a menial job and has no ambition

According to Bolthouse in this thread he's also attacked travel. Guess I missed that post.

Most of his threads are either based on articles you can read at general interest or science news websites, conspiracy crap-"Andy Kaufman faked his own death","JFK assasination-Umbrella Man, Vietnam POWs-Giant Coverup","Is this Adolph Hitler's son?" or just absolute junk threads such as "What the hell happened to Mike Myers?", "You have roommates at US colleges?","Anyone know this TV show?" "Looking for name of another show-sorry" ,"Were the hot girls always the cheerleaders?", "Guinness Crisps", "Mike Tyson entrance music"

I don't expect all threads posted here to be 5 stars-of course not. Mine aren't. And Cardguy has posted some good threads such as the Cool Hand Luke thread which I thought was interesting. But that essay would have been better posted at a film geek forum of which there are plenty. Mostly he appears to use this forum as a dumping ground for his random thoughts and musings and passive aggressive attention seeking without really contributing much of anything.

Is he a troll? I don't know, although this thread is certainly trollish. Perhaps he's been subtly mocking us for the last year in that dry British style by presenting himself as the diametrical opposite of the sort of man we aspire to be and seeing how much he could draw us into arguments or distractions.

Or perhaps he is in truth "weird" and "nutty" as he describes himself. Either way, I don't see that he contributes much of substance compared to the amount of posting he does here.

This forum has members with a wide variety of views on politics, economics, social issues, and game and who are different ethnicities, nationalities, personalities, ages and socio-economic groups and certainly there is no ideology enforced here other than expecting members to be generally on the side of men and opposed to feminism, and an expectation that they are here because they want to make themselves and their lives better.

But someone with this posting history and especially with this thread which really goes over the line in saying there is something wrong with men who prefer sex with a woman instead of rubbing themselves while staring at dots on an electronic screen, raises the question of whether another place on the web might be a more congenial home for him

Regardless, I believe that each of us is ever-changing and that who we associate with and what thoughts we allow into our minds have a huge effect on who we will become in the future and thus I am giving Cardguy the honor of being the first and only RVF member I have ever put on Ignore

[cardguy]

Yikes! I'm gonna' take a time out for a bit.

[The Lizard of Oz]

To anyone who thinks that cardguy is a "troll" you need to look at this page:

http://www.rooshvforum.network/reputation.php?uid=12034

Some excerpts:

Quote:

delicioustacos (38) - Last updated 11-11-2013, 02:16 AM

Positive (+1): Always interesting.

Samseau (106) - Last updated 08-14-2013, 02:04 AM

Positive (+1): Cardguy lives the life of the mind. From one philosopher to another, +1. http://www.rooshvforum.network/thread-26713-...#pid507267

MSW2007 (15) - Last updated 07-27-2013, 03:49 PM

Positive (+1): How the hell have I not repped this guy yet? Easily one of my favorite posters.

WestIndianArchie (80) - Last updated 06-24-2013, 12:14 AM

Positive (+1): killing it in the philosophy thread. http://www.rooshvforum.network/thread-25063-...#pid474169

thedude3737 (75) - Last updated 03-21-2013, 01:46 PM

Positive (+1): we don't see eye to eye on everything but we don't have to. The red pill is strong in this one.

I could give about 35 more.

This thread was needlessly inflammatory, and the OP has acknowledged this in a couple of subsequent posts. That's all.