[greensteelhead]

Simple fix:

1. Putin
2. Snowden
3. Tuth

Lifetime Achievement: Woods - Old as fuck but banging the fuck out of young, tight hotties

Problem solved. Let's move along, shall we?

[tpiddy]

How about Elon Musk? Just shot a rocket to space, Tesla sales and stock have been on rocketship as well.

Last year in 2012 he divorced his second wife and said he wants a girlfriend but only wants to spend 10 hours a week with her.

[nek]

Can't remember his name of the top of my head, but who was the Guardian reporter who broke the Snowden story? I think he lives in Brazil now, but if you've seen some of his interviews while in exile, the dude completely clowns mainstream media personalities and basically exposes them as public relations people for the government.

[draguer]

(12-05-2013 01:01 AM)nek Wrote:  

Can't remember his name of the top of my head, but who was the Guardian reporter who broke the Snowden story? I think he lives in Brazil now, but if you've seen some of his interviews while in exile, the dude completely clowns mainstream media personalities and basically exposes them as public relations people for the government.

Glenn Greenwald.

Watch him destroy this old trout.

]

[WanderingSoul]

All year, every year.

[Handsome Creepy Eel]

I also say Edward Snowden. I don't know much about his seduction skills, but they're not shabby by the looks of the girlfriend he left behind, and he did a great service to the entire world (USA citizens included). Make it happen!

[Blaster]

(12-04-2013 11:30 PM)Enigma Wrote:  

You think she's higher than a 6? She just looks like a 20 year old with long hair to me. Nothing special or particularly attractive about her at all.

Yes. I would put her solidly 7 at the least. To break it down in words rather than numbers (just for fun, with links to pictures for Walderschmidt):

She is slender with good skin and her face has no major flaws (mug shot). It's not a gorgeously feminine face, mostly because of the chin and jawline, but from certain angles it's undeniably cute. Her lips are a little above average-- nothing crazy but they look soft and very feminine. Her waist-hip ratio is uninspiring. Her legs are long but otherwise average (basis). No data on ass but my guess is that it's about average as well. Her hands look a little big maybe.

In other words: she is well above the bangability threshold for the vast majority of men. Taken as a whole, her looks are undeniably above average. To push her into "eight" range, all you would need to do is smooth out her lower-body curves a bit, increase her breasts by about one cup size and feminize her chin and jawline. Maybe her nose a bit, too. Those are fairly subtle changes. A singularly great ass, pair of tits, or face could do it, too.

Meanwhile sixes tend to either have critical flaws with a redeeming trait or two (eg thick-boned butterface with decent ass) or a girl that is excessively plain with virtually nothing particularly attractive but nothing actively repulsive either. Woods' girlfriend's nice skin, cute face, long legs, slenderness, and lack of any major flaws sets her apart from the average and into the "Would Bang" category for a majority of men, assuming no superior options are currently available.

[The Lizard of Oz]

Blaster, awesome breakdown above. She's definitely being underrated. You've got to know how to read the pics -- shit would look very tasty naked and spread out, and there is a naughtiness in her mug that adds a good half-point all by itself.

You know, I was thinking about this and it just strikes me all over again that Snowden and Putin are both such dull and obvious choices. Plenty of other places will be making one of these choices for this or that political reason and either way it would drown in a chorus of banality. Whereas this should be a time for ROK to keep rolling and making waves.

But I feel more and more that the James Woods idea would have real legs and would continue to make a name for ROK not being afraid to go against the grain and do things that drive feminist hags up the wall.

If ROK puts this image up and makes it viral it will be a fucking mitzvah, I'm dead serious.



Not enough feminist hags and mangina allies have seen this image and have been made to realize what it means. Let's do them a favor and correct this reality.

And finally, if it were up to me I wouldn't call it "Man of the Year". Fuck Time Magazine. Call it "Big Swinging Dick of the Year".

[Sawyer]

She looks like Sasha Grey. Woods done good.

I agree we can do better than "Man of the Year". Keeping it simple, how about King of the Year?

[runsonmagic]

Edward Snowden. Changed the world.

[soup]

Nelson Mandela beats Snowden and Putin.

[Handsome Creepy Eel]

(12-06-2013 03:30 AM)soup Wrote:  

Nelson Mandela beats Snowden and Putin.

No. I have great respect for him, but if anyone wanted to celebrate him they could have done so while he was alive. To jump on the bandwagon in the wake of his passing seems morbid/opportunistic, and the fact that magazines all around the world are doing it doesn't change that fact.

[KorbenDallas]

Snowden is the obvious choice, but I don't think Return of Kings should do a Man of the Year. It's the exact same as Time's 'Man of the Year'.

Return of Kings should puts it's own unique spin on an award(s). Call it 'King of the Year' like someone else said or 'Patriarch of the Year' or man who caused most feminist tears award or something. Make it a fun, light-hearted award where you can poke fun at feminists. I love James Woods as a pick. You could do a separate thing for legitimate man of the year where you say if you agree with Time's decision or would have picked someone else.

Snowden, even though lots of people will also be acknowledging him, deserves Man of the Year. Just because someone is getting a lot of recognition doesn't mean its not deserved. This isn't Kim Kardashian. This is a man who risked his life to help the citizens of America and the world in a major way. This is a man that faced down the Empire and won. He not only won in that he's still alive-he also won in the court of public opinion! This is going up against the propaganda machine of the entire Anglo-sphere. Snowden is a hero. Just because others are recognizing him doesn't mean ROK can't too.

[JohnKreese]

(12-04-2013 08:00 PM)The Lizard of Oz Wrote:  

The guy is 66, he's fucking a very doable 20 yr old after having just broken up with a 26 year old. He is also an excellent and underrated actor, a ballsy guy who doesn't give a shit about what others think, and a good man.

I can think of no one better for RoK to get behind, and no one who would piss the feminists off more.

The thing to consider is that Woods, for at least the next decade, will be the gift that keeps on giving. Give him two or three years and he'll be trading her in for the next college sophomore.

[The Beast1]

Vote for Snowden, here's his girlfriend:




WB and then eat the cupcakes. Girl is surprisingly fit for dating a system's administrator.

[birdrussell]

I've been seeing thises and that's about the internet of Charels Manson planing on getting his old ass married in prison to what appers to be at least a 6. Hell for a crazy ass cult leader whos been in jail since the 70's I'd say he's cleaning up. Plus that dude had compleat mind control over a score of women. Some still to this day. Just a point of interest that I hadn't seen expressed here yet. I also like Tom Ford. That guy just really doesn't give a fuck and his approval rating is better than Obama and Congress put together last I checked.

[j r]

I don't get the love for Putin. I always hear peoole talking about how alpha he is or whatever because he's riding bears with no short on or swimming through glaciers catching wish with his teeth. All those photos are staged. They're purposefully done for publicity.

As for his politics, I get that some like his was, but the dude is at too authoritarian for my taste. Call me old fashioned, but I think that people should be able to criticize the government withou being arrested on trumped up charges or whacked KGB style.

[Vicious]

(12-08-2013 09:24 AM)j r Wrote:  

As for his politics, I get that some like his was, but the dude is at too authoritarian for my taste. Call me old fashioned, but I think that people should be able to criticize the government withou being arrested on trumped up charges or whacked KGB style.

I second this. No one here would truly want Putin in the US. Teh approval for him in the western world represent misplaced frustration with the current state of things.

Snowden is my choice.

[Emmanuel Goldstein]

(12-06-2013 06:21 AM)KorbenDallas Wrote:  

Snowden is the obvious choice, but I don't think Return of Kings should do a Man of the Year. It's the exact same as Time's 'Man of the Year'.

Return of Kings should puts it's own unique spin on an award(s). Call it 'King of the Year' like someone else said or 'Patriarch of the Year' or man who caused most feminist tears award or something. Make it a fun, light-hearted award where you can poke fun at feminists. I love James Woods as a pick. You could do a separate thing for legitimate man of the year where you say if you agree with Time's decision or would have picked someone else.

Snowden, even though lots of people will also be acknowledging him, deserves Man of the Year. Just because someone is getting a lot of recognition doesn't mean its not deserved. This isn't Kim Kardashian. This is a man who risked his life to help the citizens of America and the world in a major way. This is a man that faced down the Empire and won. He not only won in that he's still alive-he also won in the court of public opinion! This is going up against the propaganda machine of the entire Anglo-sphere. Snowden is a hero. Just because others are recognizing him doesn't mean ROK can't too.

I asked Roosh about an alternate title more tailored to ROK, including King of The Year, but it all sounded corny, and he agreed, saying Man of the Year was fine. Time Magazine does NOT do Man of the Year - they do Person of the Year. And of the last ten or so people they picked in the past decade or so, I'm sure that ROK would only have picked at most *one* of those (Vladimir Putin). So while this year if we picked Snowden, we might match Time's choice. But 90%+ of the time, if history is any guide, we will have a completely different choice than Time.

Also, the award's conditions haven't really been set. But the way I pitched it to Roosh was as a man who embodies what ROK stands for - Time's award is for whoever it deems most influential or world changing. They selected Adolf Hitler after all in 1938.

At the end of the day, it's not clear that Putin stands for anything but the increase of his own power and wealth. If you think the hustle at any cost is the highest virtue, the be all and end all of a good moral life, Putin is your hero. But if you value anything beyond just the hustle, he's not the best choice. Honestly, if you valorize the hustle, there's no reason not to honor various successful rapists, murderers, thieves, and frauds - because your metric is 'success' not virtue - so don't let moral considerations influence your choice.

I'm pretty amoral in my own life, but I don't bullshit myself into thinking that it makes me a better person than say, a good Samaritan - it doesn't.

[mikeraw]

I say Snowden should not even be considered. We're talking MAN of the year. The guy is an effiminate wuss that started whining after he didn't like some aspects of the job he signed on for. True, the surveillance apparatus he blew the whistle on is reproachable, but what most people don't seem to realize is that the US is still the freest place on earth.

Try taking precious metals into any Central American nation: detention, questioning, and maybe confiscation.

Try overstaying your visa in any African country: incarceration.

Try carrying a gun in Singapore: Execution.

So surveillance: bad. Snowden: self important pasty wuss.

Hot ex-GF though.

My vote is for Tut

[Handsome Creepy Eel]

Speaking of Snowden, I found this incredible quote by the 1960' defectors William Hamilton Martin and Bernon F. Mitchell. Reposting it here just because I don't want to open a separate thread about either Snowden or these two:

Quote:

On June 25, 1960, Mitchell and Martin left the U.S. for Mexico. They traveled from there to Havana and then sailed on a Russian freighter to the Soviet Union. On August 5, the Pentagon announced that they had not returned from vacation and said "there is a likelihood that they have gone behind the Iron Curtain."[11] On September 6, 1960, they appeared at a joint news conference at the House of Journalists in Moscow and announced they had requested asylum and Soviet citizenship.

The New York Times described them as "long-time bachelor friends" and reported they smiled at each other only when they described the social advantages they anticipated in the Soviet Union, where, their prepared statement said, "The talents of women are encouraged and utilized to a much greater extent in the Soviet Union than in the United States. We feel that this enriches Soviet society and makes Soviet women more desirable as mates."

During the conference, the defectors made public for the first time the mission and activities of the NSA in a prepared statement written, they said, "without consulting the Government of the Soviet Union". It said that "the United States Government is as unscrupulous as it has accused the Soviet Government of being". They also said:

Our main dissatisfaction concerned some of the practices the United States uses in gathering intelligence information ... deliberately violating the airspace of other nations ... intercepting and deciphering the secret communications of its own allies ...

Perhaps United States hostility towards Communism arises out of a feeling of insecurity engendered by Communist achievements in science, culture and industry.

As we know from our previous experience working at N.S.A., the United States successfully reads the secure communications of more than forty nations, including its own allies.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martin_and_..._defection

Interestingly enough, it seems that at least Martin later became disillusioned with Soviet Union as well, regretted his defection and tried to return to the USA several times. He also married and divorced a Russian woman.

[Emmanuel Goldstein]

(12-08-2013 12:14 PM)mikeraw Wrote:  

what most people don't seem to realize is that the US is still the freest place on earth.

Hey, maybe you were an average student and graduated at the top of your class in Special Ed. Math and you're very proud, I'm happy for you.

Let's assume this is true. Who gives a fuck what other countries are up to? Being the least bad option is not an achievement, it's just a declaration of how shitty everyone else is. The fact that say Pakistan has a much worse record on human rights than the US doesn't mean shit to a small time farmer in Oklahoma. It's not any different in the realm of self-improvement - you don't compare to others, but to your own potential.

Also, by saying Snowden should not even be considered when numerous others here think he should be the winner, and when the founder of the site you're on responded favorably to his nomination, you come across as a supremely arrogant dickhead, with all of eleven posts and zero rep points to your name.

I like to think of Snowden as The Great Clarifier - where someone stands on Snowden is the quickest, clearest window into their other beliefs. The chasm between his advocates and his opponents is much bigger than that between right and left, and far less likely to be bridged.

[Vicious]

(12-08-2013 12:14 PM)mikeraw Wrote:  

what most people don't seem to realize is that the US is still the freest place on earth.

You're adorable.

http://en.rsf.org/press-freedom-index-2013,1054.html
http://www.heritage.org/index/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_in_the_World
https://www.eiu.com/public/topical_repor...acyIndex12

[Intl_Rasta]

Mike Rowe. is my vote.

Mike Trade activism campaign speaks more to what most the men on the forum are actually about. I think most men on here can related and actually hang out with Mike Rowe.

The work might Rowe is doing has a better impact on MEN as a whole than than Putin, Sowden, James woods.

If Rowe succeed in his mission you will see a whole new class of men in the younger generation, men with a skill and no college debt.