[Sourcecode]

Im so confused.
What was the point of this video?
A girl that he wasnt interested try to talk to him..he wasnt interested.
A girl he was interested in tried to talk to him...he wanted to talk to her.

This video will go viral soon..and people will have millions of reasons to hate on the guy.

[soup]

Maybe his girlfriend texted him that she's not coming?

Ha this is so stupid.

[LEMONed IScream]

Oh god why. Yeah, the first one was awkward and the hijab(?) is not exactly very attractive. The second one.....erm.... hot but shitty attitude.

[MHaes]

Wow this shit was so blatantly fake.

His reasoning "Oh she had this thing on her head." - clearly scripted to get some views via Internet Rage about "social injustice".

--------

But about the script itself, so what if he lies about having a girlfriend?

Girls lie and say they have a boyfriend all the time. I bet there would be just as much of an internet outrage if he (the actor) told the truth and said, "Yeah sorry I just don't find you sexually attractive."

[It_is_my_time]

First girl talks to him, he isn't interested and is very nice to say he has a girl friend to make sure to not hurt her feelings.

Second girl talks to him, and he is interested, so he offers to help her when she asks for help.

And this is supposed to be bad? Men are not supposed to be allowed to choose what strangers we associate with?

[Collide]

"She had this.... thing on her head"

Do Americans really say this? Seems fake.

[quino_16]

This looks like UCLA, right?

And the guy should have told the second girl that the first girl was creepy. haha

[AntiTrace]

How ironic.

Females are going to start hating on a guy for using a fake girlfriend as an excuse to end a conversation.

[username]

So fake and that guy is a bad actor. This is just a fake video used to generate views and subscribers.

[Emancipator]

At least Vitaly has talent.

The hamster is strong with the second one "thirsty ass", if he was so thirsty he would have gone for the first one too.

A ploy to get views and attention of the SJWs

[Samseau]

This is a bad experiment. If they really wanted to produce any sort of scientific validity, they should have used the same lines for both girls.

So if the first one opened with "Hey, do I know you?" then the second one should have too. Instead, there is plausible deniability that he really was a bit creeped out by the first girl, and to be totally honest I don't blame him. She seemed a bit weird.

[Teedub]

(11-19-2013 04:27 PM)Emancipator Wrote:  

At least Vitaly has talent.

The hamster is strong with the second one "thirsty ass", if he was so thirsty he would have gone for the first one too.

A ploy to get views and attention of the SJWs

I don't think he possesses any 'talent' - he just has supreme confidence and a drive to be famous.

[canucktraveller]

(11-19-2013 05:54 PM)Teedub Wrote:  

I don't think he possesses any 'talent' - he just has supreme confidence and a drive to be famous.

Is confidence not a talent?

[Teedub]

(11-19-2013 09:02 PM)canucktraveller Wrote:  

(11-19-2013 05:54 PM)Teedub Wrote:  

I don't think he possesses any 'talent' - he just has supreme confidence and a drive to be famous.

Is confidence not a talent?

No, it's a quality, an attribute.

[draguer]

If this is real, 'thirsty ass' because he's willing to spend time with a potential pump'n'dump who's just approached him.

[Gopher]

Bitches be crazy.

[demolition]

This video provides a really good example of emotionalized thinking feminists/women use. This video is in no way analogous to the Vitaly video it's supposed to be mimicking, since in the Vitaly video we clearly see a woman's response to a single man change dramatically based on revelation of a perceived status symbol. (FWIW: Vitaly's video is probably staged too.)

An analogous situation here might be if the girl in the headscarf removed it to reveal long, flowing luxuriant hair that instantly gave the guy a hard on. Instead we get this nonsensical setup with two different women sending very different signals and a guy responding differently based on those. We cap it off with a brief, "You go grrrl! You TOLD him" sort of twist that actually makes no logical sense but appeals to and validates the underlying emotional narrative that a feminist viewer brings to the video.

[poutsara]

(11-19-2013 01:57 PM)quino_16 Wrote:  

This looks like UCLA, right?

It's been a while but I recognize that place. Yeah it's UCLA outside Kerckhoff next to the coffee place. It's clearly staged.

Not a bad place to day game if you have the time.

[funkyzeit]

Lol. A woman covered in hijab must not approach unknown man for talk or even look him in the eyes.

Fake as fuck and just shows the ignorance and incompetence of authors to make men bad in legit way.

[Quintus Curtius]

I watched this video, and it really pissed me off. Why?
Because the message embedded in it is a clear form of social conditioning.
It's a "shaming" video, in reality.

The video tries to foist on us the politically correct message that "all girls are equally beautiful, even ugly ones, and they all are OWED the time and attentions of a man." That's the message here, not so subtly conveyed.

As men, we're supposed to "apologize" for not wanting to spend time with ugly women. Look how that snarky, uptalking wanna-be hot chick tries to grill this guy over why he turned down the ugly chick. Get the fuck outta my face, bitch. Please.

This guy, instead of standing there stammering like a helpless dolt, should have simply said, "I didnt' want to go to coffee with her." Period. He doesn't owe anyone any explanation.

[augen sehen]

(12-12-2013 08:21 PM)Quintus Curtius Wrote:  

This guy, instead of standing there stammering like a helpless dolt, should have simply said, "I didnt' want to go to coffee with her." Period. He doesn't owe anyone any explanation.

+1. Agreed with your entire post. After saying the above sentence, he should have added: "... and now, I'm not sure I want to go out to a coffee with you either."