[Slam]

(05-25-2013 03:33 PM)Therapsid Wrote:  

A lot of white nationalism on the boards lately. That's fine with me, but at some point the imperative to travel the world scoring foreign pussy and the desire to defend your race are going to collide.

Bumping this old thread because it seems very relevant nowadays. Interesting it was started 4+ years ago.

The quote above is especially pertinent... Does anyone feel the tension described here? i.e. wanting to defend / cultivate / benefit your own race and people (a perfectly natural sort of thing), but knowing that foreign girls seem to be a much better deal?

[Easy_C]

"The White Man"?

Honestly, this "white man" bullshit is stupid.

What matters is CULTURE. There's plenty examples of prosperous multi-racial, culturally homogenous countries. There are very few ones that are culturally diverse that last.

The thing we need to be defending is the judeo-Christian ethical system and accompanying culture norms/values that go along with that.

[Dan Woolf]

(08-16-2017 08:42 PM)Easy_C Wrote:  

There's plenty examples of prosperous multi-racial, culturally homogenous countries.

[John Michael Kane]

(08-16-2017 06:57 PM)Slam Wrote:  

(05-25-2013 03:33 PM)Therapsid Wrote:  

A lot of white nationalism on the boards lately. That's fine with me, but at some point the imperative to travel the world scoring foreign pussy and the desire to defend your race are going to collide.

Bumping this old thread because it seems very relevant nowadays. Interesting it was started 4+ years ago.

The quote above is especially pertinent... Does anyone feel the tension described here? i.e. wanting to defend / cultivate / benefit your own race and people (a perfectly natural sort of thing), but knowing that foreign girls seem to be a much better deal?

Solid point. I'm torn at times to go to Poland and find a white girl to marry, but I also know that some Asian girls make fantastic wives. Western European women, and North American women are a sad joke, with a few exceptions in fly over country.

[Chris Brown]

Those who will not fight dont deserve to live.

[Leonard D Neubache]

(08-16-2017 08:42 PM)Easy_C Wrote:  

"The White Man"?

Honestly, this "white man" bullshit is stupid.

What matters is CULTURE. There's plenty examples of prosperous multi-racial, culturally homogenous countries. There are very few ones that are culturally diverse that last.

The thing we need to be *defending is the judeo-Christian ethical system and accompanying culture norms/values that go along with that.

*Considering the mess we're in, define the lengths you're willing to go to.

[YoungBlade]

(08-16-2017 08:42 PM)Easy_C Wrote:  

"The White Man"?

Honestly, this "white man" bullshit is stupid.

What matters is CULTURE. There's plenty examples of prosperous multi-racial, culturally homogenous countries. There are very few ones that are culturally diverse that last.

The thing we need to be defending is the judeo-Christian ethical system and accompanying culture norms/values that go along with that.

The reason we're in this mess in the first place.

[Samseau]

(08-16-2017 09:04 PM)Dan Woolf Wrote:  

(08-16-2017 08:42 PM)Easy_C Wrote:  

There's plenty examples of prosperous multi-racial, culturally homogenous countries.

One easy example: Byzantine Empire, lasted 1000 years. Composed of Asians, Whites, and a few Blacks (Blacks didn't make it far past the Sahara desert until Muslims started bringing them out en masse after 750 AD).

Still the backbone was Greek White, but being centrally located in Europe and one of the richest empires in the world meant all races went there.

They were united around Christ. No freedom of religion there.

---

Now, a country that is both multi-racial and multireligious... let's just say this is an experiment with a horrible track record

[H1N1]

Ottomans too would be a good example. Look at the Janissaries. Indoctrination into customs and culture are what count.

[Easy_C]

(08-17-2017 08:42 AM)YoungBlade Wrote:  

(08-16-2017 08:42 PM)Easy_C Wrote:  

"The White Man"?

Honestly, this "white man" bullshit is stupid.

What matters is CULTURE. There's plenty examples of prosperous multi-racial, culturally homogenous countries. There are very few ones that are culturally diverse that last.

The thing we need to be defending is the judeo-Christian ethical system and accompanying culture norms/values that go along with that.

The reason we're in this mess in the first place.

No. Post-Renaissance "Christianity" bears very little resemblence to the old-world Catholicism that built post-Roman European civilization to begin with.

The single biggest difference is the rejection of the concept of absolute moral truth that was preached by Catholicism. Martin Luther introduced the idea that there is no universal moral truth by introducing the "Conscience first" concept: that whatever you feel is wrong, is what's wrong. Only YOU define right and wrong based on your feelings and the church doesn't get to do that.

The connection between that idea and modern liberal thought should be fairly obvious. Most progressive schools of thought trace back to Martin Luther, Calvin, and other "reformers", whereas most conservative thought tends to trace back to Medieval Catholic scholars.

[Samseau]

(08-17-2017 12:11 PM)Easy_C Wrote:  

(08-17-2017 08:42 AM)YoungBlade Wrote:  

(08-16-2017 08:42 PM)Easy_C Wrote:  

"The White Man"?

Honestly, this "white man" bullshit is stupid.

What matters is CULTURE. There's plenty examples of prosperous multi-racial, culturally homogenous countries. There are very few ones that are culturally diverse that last.

The thing we need to be defending is the judeo-Christian ethical system and accompanying culture norms/values that go along with that.

The reason we're in this mess in the first place.

No. Post-Renaissance "Christianity" bears very little resemblence to the old-world Catholicism that built post-Roman European civilization to begin with.

The single biggest difference is the rejection of the concept of absolute moral truth that was preached by Catholicism. Martin Luther introduced the idea that there is no universal moral truth by introducing the "Conscience first" concept: that whatever you feel is wrong, is what's wrong. Only YOU define right and wrong based on your feelings and the church doesn't get to do that.

The connection between that idea and modern liberal thought should be fairly obvious. Most progressive schools of thought trace back to Martin Luther, Calvin, and other "reformers", whereas most conservative thought tends to trace back to Medieval Catholic scholars.

My Orthodox Priest holds Catholicism in a MUCH higher regard than Protestantism, despite my objections that American Protestants are far more salt of the earth types than European Catholic countries.

He really does not like the doctrine of Luther, thinks it is all deceptions and lies

[debeguiled]

That's funny. Catholics are still pissed about Luther too, seeing him as a grubby and dishonest little man.

Your priest probably just has a really long memory.

[YoungBlade]

(08-17-2017 12:11 PM)Easy_C Wrote:  

(08-17-2017 08:42 AM)YoungBlade Wrote:  

(08-16-2017 08:42 PM)Easy_C Wrote:  

"The White Man"?

Honestly, this "white man" bullshit is stupid.

What matters is CULTURE. There's plenty examples of prosperous multi-racial, culturally homogenous countries. There are very few ones that are culturally diverse that last.

The thing we need to be defending is the judeo-Christian ethical system and accompanying culture norms/values that go along with that.

The reason we're in this mess in the first place.

No. Post-Renaissance "Christianity" bears very little resemblence to the old-world Catholicism that built post-Roman European civilization to begin with.

The single biggest difference is the rejection of the concept of absolute moral truth that was preached by Catholicism. Martin Luther introduced the idea that there is no universal moral truth by introducing the "Conscience first" concept: that whatever you feel is wrong, is what's wrong. Only YOU define right and wrong based on your feelings and the church doesn't get to do that.

The connection between that idea and modern liberal thought should be fairly obvious. Most progressive schools of thought trace back to Martin Luther, Calvin, and other "reformers", whereas most conservative thought tends to trace back to Medieval Catholic scholars.

Universality is what led to this mess. A universal god for everyone is the problem. Unless you think Judeo-Christ only loves white people, in which case good luck, as Africa has the most Christians in the world right now.