[Sombro]

http://thefeministwire.com/2013/09/dont-call-me-dude/

Quote:

Please don’t call me “man” or “dude” any longer. I will not join you in friendship or partnership on a male-supremacist, patriarchal project. I will not condone the view that women are born to provide you with sexual gratification, and to do care work for you.

And in the comments:

Quote:

There’s something about this post that seems inauthentic and poorly thought out. This looks more like climbing on a white horse and waving a feminism banner–”don’t worry ladies! I don’t say ‘dude’ anymore! All is right in the world, now!”–and points heavily outward without showing much sign of actual personal reflection.

Feel his pain:

[Teedub]

I hope he's being satirical! The guy could look pretty cool if he grew his beard out and got rid of the stupid scarf.

[2Wycked]

Pretty funny comments.

As usual, feminists fail to realize they are what they claim to hate.

[scorpion]

People respect displays of strength, even if they disagree with your message.

People disdain displays of weakness, even if they support your message.

This chode basically throws himself on the ground and starts licking the feminist boot. Weak. No respect from anyone, not even the feminists themselves.

Sorry, "dude", better luck next time. Should have bookmarked the RVF instead of Jezebel.

[Excelsior]

[Samseau]

(09-04-2013 01:50 PM)scorpion Wrote:  

People respect displays of strength, even if they disagree with your message.

People disdain displays of weakness, even if they support your message.

This chode basically throws himself on the ground and starts licking the feminist boot. Weak. No respect from anyone, not even the feminists themselves.

Sorry, "dude", better luck next time. Should have bookmarked the RVF instead of Jezebel.

You couldn't be more right. Check out this comment:

Quote:

This is really cheap, unevolved feminism looking for cookies. You’re right, men should learn how to clean and feed themselves, and you’re not getting a prize for figuring that out. Where’s the self reflection in this, the nuance, the intersectional view point? It is as though this author is so ashamed of his cis male privilege that he won’t even directly speak to it, choosing to hide behind this shaky manifesto and the appropriation of non-binary gender pronouns (“they”). This is substandard writing for TFW.

Even the most left-wing feminists are disappointed when us white men don't live up to our evil oppressor image. Us white men must learn not to disappoint.

[Days of Broken Arrows]

This is either satire, poorly thought out or a deliberate Trojan Horse to lure feminists in and hit them with the Red Pill. He goes from shaming bros to talking to females (note the use of the word "beautiful") and repeating Roosh's talking points. Here is paragraph #3:

Please learn to love and care for yourself. You are incredibly beautiful, and I want you to be cared for. Learn to cook, clean, sew, and care for yourself, your body, and your personal space. If you do not know how to care for yourself and are seeking a romantic partnership on the basis of finding somebody to do that work for you, then I will remain skeptical of your capacity to love and care for others.

Seriously, who gets on a feminist Web site and tells them to learn to cook, clean and sew? Unless he's calling men "beautiful" and asking men to cook, clean and sew?!?! Something is up.

[TheSlayer]

I still don't understand words like cis male privilege or cis gender mean. Who the fuck invented those terms and what is the feminists' obsessions with the word privilege? I bet he's the kind of guy who wants to get fucked in the ass by his gf. Him and Hugo must be best friends.

[Sombro]

He's almost too good looking to have to resort to kissing feminist ass to get laid, so there is a high possibility he's trolling.

On the other hand, he might just be an honest-to-goodness social retard.

[Veloce]

(09-04-2013 02:40 PM)Sombro Wrote:  

He's almost too good looking to have to resort to kissing feminist ass to get laid, so there is a high possibility he's trolling.

On the other hand, he might just be an honest-to-goodness social retard.

I'd stick to the latter.

[Wadsworth]

This guy is a fucking mangina who isn't even philosophically aligned with his own views. He's opposed to any expression that imposes an expectation on women (fine, sure I agree, everyone should be free to choose who they wanna be), but his entire worldview is centered on an imposition on masculine identity.

He talks about love and our infinite possibilities but is fundamentally incapable of showing love for his own identity or that of other men. Calling each other "man" or "dude" is part of a "patriarchal project" to this limp wrist, and he won't "ease or comfort" you if you want to pick up girls. Such is the profound depth of love the enlightened like him can embody.

[placer]

(09-04-2013 01:54 PM)Athlone McGinnis Wrote:  

As a chess player, I find it rather appropriate that this picture of a white knight breaks the rules of chess [1], just as being a white knight breaks the rules of PUA and what a man has to do to get laid.

[1] On a chessboard, the lower right square from both players' POV is white, not black. Ignoring that, it would take four moves to move the white knight to that square (b3) without moving a pawn.