[TheCaptainPower]

I know we have a couple lawyers on here..

Pretty much this overweight beta started a site where he comments on so called "red pill" sites....

I believe in freedom of speech, and freedom of the press, but this A-hole COPIES verbatim some "red pill" blog posts and then he has the nerve to ask for monetary donations...

He just copied a Heartiste post recently Heartiste
and he recently used a post of mine also...

Is this a legal case? Or am I just being a bitch?

I was going to warn him over Twitter about copying my work without asking...

[DLZ]

Probably falls under fair use, sorry bub.

I think looking like this is punishment enough:

[Wadsworth]

Beta? If ever there was an omega, it's him. Just ignore him. In my opinion, he's helping the growth of the manosphere, not hindering it.

[Roosh]

Nope, fair use.

[Architekt]

He's using it in a critique, so I assume it would be considered a fair reproduction. But yeah, my life would have been slightly more pleasant without having been exposed to that pic. DLZ...

Interesting that some no name fuckwit that would never be let near a vagina is criticising someone who, he himself acknowledges, gets more pussy per week than he will in his entire life

[TheCaptainPower]

He calls himself a "male feminist" or something like that. His comments look suspect to me, 500+ comments but I didn't get any traffic??

[Walderschmidt]

(07-15-2013 07:33 PM)TheCaptainPower Wrote:  

He calls himself a "male feminist" or something like that. His comments look suspect to me, 500+ comments but I didn't get any traffic??

I believe he makes up a significant portion of his "commenter base".

[Generation21stCentury]

What you resist, persists - Buddhist proverb.

This guy is a true champion of the manosphere, and his dedication to providing exposure of new demographics to sites like Heartiste is ceaseless. I applaud him.

If he really wanted to make a difference, he could just ignore us. But it's a lose-lose, because the most resistant parasite is the truth.

[germanico]

Just because your dick fell off doesnt makes you a feminist.

I dont get it. A fat guy makes a site called manboobs? Did he named it after himself?

[Mage]

This guy secretly but evidently has a phantasy to be a bold and manly player just like us but he cannot because his feminist mommy would kick him out of his basement then. So he approaches the subject in a way he is permitted and gets pleasure from feeling guilty for secretly admiring manosphere.

[Samseau]

I really hate this fat fuck. He's written a number of attack articles on my RoK posts. If I met the dude I'd eviscerate his ego.

[Architekt]

(07-15-2013 10:07 PM)Samseau Wrote:  

I really hate this fat fuck. He's written a number of attack articles on my RoK posts. If I met the dude I'd eviscerate his ego.

You'd probably have a hard time catching him away from his computer

[username]

I bet the Manboobz guy is trying to get pussy by being a feminist. Hahah It will never happen.

[Ingocnito]

Ahh the dregs of society will strike with drones. Just plain laughing at this...

[Hades]

No guy who gets laid on the regular opens a site proclaiming himself as a male feminist. If you pulled any notches since Easter you're miles ahead of this shitheel. Basically the best revenge here is a good life.

[Matt Forney]

(07-15-2013 07:33 PM)TheCaptainPower Wrote:  

He calls himself a "male feminist" or something like that. His comments look suspect to me, 500+ comments but I didn't get any traffic??

Nah, they're real. The thing you have to remember about Manboobz is:

1) His commenters are mostly women, hence they're more inclined to use blogs as a coffee klatch then men. Even red pill women-run blogs get way more comments (albeit from a smaller readership) than man-run blogs because all the girls want to do is blab on and on and on...

2) The site attracts feminists who want to experience "the dark side" (those evil, evil misogynists) safely and without being "triggered." Think of Christian conservatives like Ben Shapiro who offer up creepy, overly-detailed dissections of the different varieties of Internet porn in the name of "public morality." It's self-gratification disguised as a moral denunciation.

[Katatonic]

Is that Michael Moore?

[2Wycked]

(07-16-2013 06:46 PM)Katatonic Wrote:  

Is that Michael Moore?

No, it's actually Rush Limbaugh.

[TheCaptainPower]

Actually I can always technically sue him, the only question is if I win any $$....doubtful since he most likely doesn't have any.

It's like they say, "sometimes you have to shank somebody in the yard to get respect from the cholos"

[Katatonic]

(07-16-2013 07:20 PM)2Wycked Wrote:  

(07-16-2013 06:46 PM)Katatonic Wrote:  

Is that Michael Moore?

No, it's actually Rush Limbaugh.

Rush Limbaugh has more of a kempt swine look, whereas Michael Moore looks as if he has just finished a one month Dungeons & Dragons bender.

I do have to ask. Is there a reason why you said he looked like Rush Limbaugh when he obviously bears a striking resemblance to Michael Moore? The only thing Limbaugh and that guy above have in common from a physical standpoint, is that they are both fatasses. Was it an emotional response because you like Moore and figure if anyone is jesting him, they must be a shill for a fat piece of shit like Limbaugh?

[Vaun]

traffic is traffic, right? at least he links to it. monetize it with ads and there you go, more traffic more $$. He looks like the producer of jackass, rick kosick, but obviously not as cool.

[Architekt]

(07-16-2013 07:34 PM)TheCaptainPower Wrote:  

Actually I can always technically sue him, the only question is if I win any $$....doubtful since he most likely doesn't have any.

It's like they say, "sometimes you have to shank somebody in the yard to get respect from the cholos"

I guess you could try for defamation or something, but I presume his reach and your brand are probably not large enough to warrant covering legal fees associated with the proceedings...