Quote: (07-12-2013 07:08 PM)The Texas Prophet Wrote:
Quote: (07-12-2013 07:06 PM)samsamsam Wrote:
Quote: (07-12-2013 06:50 PM)MidniteSpecial Wrote:
He's not a white knight? He visited the blonde witnesses house twenty fucking times to interview her about a break in that happened at her house. Twenty times.
28 year old men should be getting money and fucking bitches. In that order. Not getting beat up by 16 year olds for being a snitch.
I think he was trying to shag the blonde. He was playing neighborhood watch game. To Protect and To Service Vagina. ![[Image: smile.gif]](https://rooshvforum.network/images/smilies/smile.gif)
Doesn't matter if he is convicted or not, Zimmerman is gonna be fucked the rest of his life anyway. He may be hailed as a hero by some and a villain by others. But he will always be tainted. And I don't feel bad for him in that regard, even if he is let free. Putting aside all the legal stuff, he went sniffing for trouble. There are no victims in life, everyone plays a 100% role in what he or she gets in life.
Does this include Trayvon?
Yes, he was 100% responsible.
If you read my previous posts. I think all my posts end with I wish the two idiots never met. And I "try" to stay even about it. Though I wish Z would have just called the cops and stayed in the car. And having a gun gave him courage that he wouldn't have normally. So I guess I am 55% for M and 45% for Z.
Trayvon did plenty of things to make this happen, but so did Zimmerman. It wasn't a solo it was a duet. Both are 100% accountable. Trayvon paid his price with his life. Everyone wants to say people are victims, but they are not.
When I am caught in traffic and running late, you know whose fault it is? Mine. I could have fucking left earlier. When I hit the gym today and both squat racks were taken, you know whose fault it was mine - I stayed in the car too long listening to ESPN radio once I parked. But it is much more fun to blame someone or something else.
There are no victims - it just sounds nice. No one can say that it surprised them to hear that there was a conflict between Z and M based on the series of events leading up to it. And once you hear some prior history - it seemed inevitable. Are any of you of you that shocked? Seriously? Should it have happened? Totally an opinion on that, depends on how you see the world. The sad thing is, I guarantee some people were happy to hear a black kid got shot. Just the way it is. No one should be surprised. I think it is pretty tough to lose a kid - but our society doesn't care about a lot these days other than material possessions.
Generally, only when someone is personally impacted by loss does it change our attitudes. Or you are white knighter and it makes you feel good about yourself like all those Kony video watching mother fuckers. Unless you get some sort of payoff, you don't care - it is the way it is. Yes, I went off on a tangent.
But to answer your question again Trayvon is 100% responsible. Responsibility isn't a thing you pick up and put down (that expression "take responsibility" is annoying). Being responsible is a full time gig. So it is mathematically possible that Z was 100% responsible and M was 100% responsible. Either of them could have made the one key decision to keep it from going haywire.
Fate whispers to the warrior, "You cannot withstand the storm." And the warrior whispers back, "I am the storm."
Women and children can be careless, but not men - Don Corleone
Great RVF Comments |
Where Evil Resides |
How to upload, etc. |
New Members Read This 1 |
New Members Read This 2