Has the White Man gone soft today? Take it from a Comanche. Yes.
The United States military prides itself on its adherence to the Geneva Conventions of 1949. Comprising reactions to the atrocities of World War II, the Geneva Convention is the Allied declaration new standards of conduct in war.
![[Image: 090812150136_geneva_conventions_icrc_466.jpg]](http://www.bbc.co.uk/worldservice/assets/images/2009/08/12/090812150136_geneva_conventions_icrc_466.jpg)
From the Geneva Convention, 1949. It professed to be about protecting civilians from the ravages of war. It turned out to
be more of a globalist downsizing of national power.
It is a wonderful thing, to reflect on human behavior, and to raise the standards as high as possible. But, when the enemy is a demon, you might have to become Satan himself to defeat him. It’s been done. Dracul (“the dragon) did it, in the 15th century. Holy Roman Emperor Sigismond of Saxony created the Order of the Dragon to fight against the invading Muslim Turks. Dracula (“son of Dracul,” or Vlad Ţepeş) was renown for unknown cruelty in Eastern Europe, but he drove the Muslims back to Istanbul.
But what about the United States? In the history of the country’s corporate armed efforts, has the Order of the Dragon ever loomed in the ranks?
The answer is yes. Many people do not know it, but, during the 19th century, 1823 to be exact, the state of Texas created such a sinister force. Stephen F. Austin called them “The Texas Rangers.” It was strong law enforcement agency, and later became as ruthless as any “savage” they faced. Indeed, the reason they were formed was to fight against the Comanche–the most feared and dreaded human force on the southern plains.
Evidently the Rangers were not so heartless in the beginning, when they faced a variety of outlaw opponents. But, when they later had to concentrate on the Comanche, they became more ferocious than any other legal enforcement agency in the history of the country.
![[Image: texasrangers-500.jpg]](http://www.richardbealblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/texasrangers-500.jpg)
Old Texas Rangers: They weren’t afraid of Comanches. They learned to fight like them. Today, American enforcement is commanded by law to fear Muslims. The Muslims take full advantage.
Essentially, they learned Comanche tactics (guerrilla warfare) and used them against the Comanche. Prior to this development, the U.S. military had enjoyed a finer reputation as dignified professionals (be that reputation justified or not). Fighting the Comanche destroyed all that fantasy, gentile image of law enforcement. Of course, the Texas Rangers were an elite Texas enforcement group, and not really part of the U.S. military. They were a state agency.
But the point is, they came to use the war tactics of them whom they despised. Yea, they became worse than the enemy, to defeat the enemy.
This can’t happen today?
Globalism tends to crush such aggressive defense. As in all “world treaties,” compromise and humanitarian standards tend to eliminate sufficient defense. The true aggressor is left with an open door, while his victims are chained to a liberal morality.
The lying Muslims always cry for “morality” when any of them are killed by Western forces, or by their own; yet their terror tactics are the most immoral of any ever known to humanity.
Muslims have learned to use Western morality against Westerners. The West, particularly America, cowers before moral accusation, worse than the Republican Party.
![[Image: TimberBluff3.jpg]](http://www.badeagle.com/badeagle/TimberBluff3.jpg)
Timber Bluff, Comanche warrior.
Instead, the whole West needs to become like the Texas Rangers. If you want to defeat the enemy, you must annihilate him! Mercy is for the leftovers, not for the instigators. American enforcement never hesitated to encounter the Comanche. At least the Comanche knew when we were defeated. But why should the Muslims accept defeat, when they are allowed a free hand to destroy Americans? So why now whimper and whine about the terrible Muslims?
You insult me America. Every time. It is your lethal liberalism.
The white man has forgotten to be strong, but is quick to be weak–as some liberal tactic of political goodness. The white man must be “good.” Preoccupied with theories of goodness, the white man is handing the victory to bad beasts. To very bad, immoral “animals.” The white man’s goodness is becoming the foundation of evil in the world.
I say rather, Protect what’s yours. Don’t give away what you took from me. Fight for what’s yours. Make my day. Be brutal. Be ruthless. Be the victor.
Has the White Man Gone Soft?
The United States military prides itself on its adherence to the Geneva Conventions of 1949. Comprising reactions to the atrocities of World War II, the Geneva Convention is the Allied declaration new standards of conduct in war.
From the Geneva Convention, 1949. It professed to be about protecting civilians from the ravages of war. It turned out to
be more of a globalist downsizing of national power.
It is a wonderful thing, to reflect on human behavior, and to raise the standards as high as possible. But, when the enemy is a demon, you might have to become Satan himself to defeat him. It’s been done. Dracul (“the dragon) did it, in the 15th century. Holy Roman Emperor Sigismond of Saxony created the Order of the Dragon to fight against the invading Muslim Turks. Dracula (“son of Dracul,” or Vlad Ţepeş) was renown for unknown cruelty in Eastern Europe, but he drove the Muslims back to Istanbul.
But what about the United States? In the history of the country’s corporate armed efforts, has the Order of the Dragon ever loomed in the ranks?
The answer is yes. Many people do not know it, but, during the 19th century, 1823 to be exact, the state of Texas created such a sinister force. Stephen F. Austin called them “The Texas Rangers.” It was strong law enforcement agency, and later became as ruthless as any “savage” they faced. Indeed, the reason they were formed was to fight against the Comanche–the most feared and dreaded human force on the southern plains.
Evidently the Rangers were not so heartless in the beginning, when they faced a variety of outlaw opponents. But, when they later had to concentrate on the Comanche, they became more ferocious than any other legal enforcement agency in the history of the country.
Old Texas Rangers: They weren’t afraid of Comanches. They learned to fight like them. Today, American enforcement is commanded by law to fear Muslims. The Muslims take full advantage.
Essentially, they learned Comanche tactics (guerrilla warfare) and used them against the Comanche. Prior to this development, the U.S. military had enjoyed a finer reputation as dignified professionals (be that reputation justified or not). Fighting the Comanche destroyed all that fantasy, gentile image of law enforcement. Of course, the Texas Rangers were an elite Texas enforcement group, and not really part of the U.S. military. They were a state agency.
But the point is, they came to use the war tactics of them whom they despised. Yea, they became worse than the enemy, to defeat the enemy.
This can’t happen today?
Globalism tends to crush such aggressive defense. As in all “world treaties,” compromise and humanitarian standards tend to eliminate sufficient defense. The true aggressor is left with an open door, while his victims are chained to a liberal morality.
The lying Muslims always cry for “morality” when any of them are killed by Western forces, or by their own; yet their terror tactics are the most immoral of any ever known to humanity.
Muslims have learned to use Western morality against Westerners. The West, particularly America, cowers before moral accusation, worse than the Republican Party.
Timber Bluff, Comanche warrior.
Instead, the whole West needs to become like the Texas Rangers. If you want to defeat the enemy, you must annihilate him! Mercy is for the leftovers, not for the instigators. American enforcement never hesitated to encounter the Comanche. At least the Comanche knew when we were defeated. But why should the Muslims accept defeat, when they are allowed a free hand to destroy Americans? So why now whimper and whine about the terrible Muslims?
You insult me America. Every time. It is your lethal liberalism.
The white man has forgotten to be strong, but is quick to be weak–as some liberal tactic of political goodness. The white man must be “good.” Preoccupied with theories of goodness, the white man is handing the victory to bad beasts. To very bad, immoral “animals.” The white man’s goodness is becoming the foundation of evil in the world.
I say rather, Protect what’s yours. Don’t give away what you took from me. Fight for what’s yours. Make my day. Be brutal. Be ruthless. Be the victor.
Has the White Man Gone Soft?
![[Image: wtf.jpg]](https://rooshvforum.network/images/smilies/wtf.jpg)
![[Image: image.png]](http://s21.postimg.org/taiyk8bwn/image.png)
