http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/a...along.html
Of course, what happened is that the study concluded is that men are the superior parkers.
However, the hamster fights on. The article points out that men took more risks, so don't believe that men are the superior drivers. What is funny is the explanations of why women aren't as good. They concede that men have better hand-eye coordination and superior depth perception - however, the hamster refuses to believe this is the reason.
Check this out:
Here are some amusing comments:
"You can make anything fit the statistics. A load of rubbish. I can reverse park with no problem at all, whatever car I have driven and I've driven loads. Now ask my husband to do the same ................. that's quite another story. In fact he admitted the other day that I reversed parked far better than he did........... It's all about maths, apparently & sorting out the angles & equations in your subconscious. Anyway, I'm female & I can REVERSE PARK as good as any chauvanist male ......................................... so there!!"
Wow, you the "exception" that disproves the rule. Congrats.
"To make a true comparison, the women should be the same height as the men because the higher your head is,the greater your area of visibility when reversing."
Just can't accept that fact men are better drivers overall?
"if the women had come out on top the femminists would have been shouting from the rooftops but in the real world what chance of that"
He gets it on some level - if this had come out the either way, we men would have not have heard the end of it, blah blah blah a bunch of mindless chest-beating about how important and crucial female drivers are to the advancement of society.
Quote:Quote:
Dr Claudia Wolf, who co-wrote the study, said she was prompted to investigate the subject after getting fed up with chauvinistic jokes about female drivers.
Of course, what happened is that the study concluded is that men are the superior parkers.
However, the hamster fights on. The article points out that men took more risks, so don't believe that men are the superior drivers. What is funny is the explanations of why women aren't as good. They concede that men have better hand-eye coordination and superior depth perception - however, the hamster refuses to believe this is the reason.
Check this out:
Quote:Quote:
‘I can believe that men were proven to have a very insignificant advantage in spatial awareness when it comes to parking.
'My mum parked appallingly, but that’s because my father did not let her drive very often and she was frightened in the car.
You must remember that women also have bosoms which makes it very difficult to turn around.
Here are some amusing comments:
"You can make anything fit the statistics. A load of rubbish. I can reverse park with no problem at all, whatever car I have driven and I've driven loads. Now ask my husband to do the same ................. that's quite another story. In fact he admitted the other day that I reversed parked far better than he did........... It's all about maths, apparently & sorting out the angles & equations in your subconscious. Anyway, I'm female & I can REVERSE PARK as good as any chauvanist male ......................................... so there!!"
Wow, you the "exception" that disproves the rule. Congrats.
"To make a true comparison, the women should be the same height as the men because the higher your head is,the greater your area of visibility when reversing."
Just can't accept that fact men are better drivers overall?
"if the women had come out on top the femminists would have been shouting from the rooftops but in the real world what chance of that"
He gets it on some level - if this had come out the either way, we men would have not have heard the end of it, blah blah blah a bunch of mindless chest-beating about how important and crucial female drivers are to the advancement of society.