[Wool Suit]

I know it's reddit, but if you were looking for ammo that being raised by women only makes feminine, emasculated men, look no further. Seems two make it even worse:

http://www.reddit.com/r/IAmA/comments/13...by_my_two/

Identifies as pansexual (how many different terms for this are there)? Check.
Wore high heels and painted his nails? Check.
Talks at length about the role of "gender" and society? Check.
Has an awful relationship with his father? Check.
Reddit once again proves it's the world's largest beta factory? Double check.

Also, everyone thinks his "mom on the left" is "hot". Christ, reddit.

[Handsome Creepy Eel]

Still, statistically speaking, I think having two mothers or two fathers gives the kid better odds than just a single mother or father. One gender is already missing no matter how you look at it so you can't do any worse, and two parents means double the resources and care. But this is an interesting case, although I wouldn't yet judge from it.

p.s. someone who has a Reddit account ask him what his love life looks like. I'm interested in how Beta/Omega he is with those views, but I could be mistaken.

[Samseau]

Here's another account of Lesbo's fucking up a guy: http://www.thepublicdiscourse.com/2012/08/6065/

Quote:

I had no male figure at all to follow, and my mother and her partner were both unlike traditional fathers or traditional mothers. As a result, I had very few recognizable social cues to offer potential male or female friends, since I was neither confident nor sensitive to others. Thus I befriended people rarely and alienated others easily. Gay people who grew up in straight parents’ households may have struggled with their sexual orientation; but when it came to the vast social universe of adaptations not dealing with sexuality—how to act, how to speak, how to behave—they had the advantage of learning at home. Many gays don’t realize what a blessing it was to be reared in a traditional home.

Quote:

In terms of sexuality, gays who grew up in traditional households benefited from at least seeing some kind of functional courtship rituals around them. I had no clue how to make myself attractive to girls. When I stepped outside of my mothers’ trailer, I was immediately tagged as an outcast because of my girlish mannerisms, funny clothes, lisp, and outlandishness. Not surprisingly, I left high school as a virgin, never having had a girlfriend, instead having gone to four proms as a wisecracking sidekick to girls who just wanted someone to chip in for a limousine.

When I got to college, I set off everyone’s “gaydar” and the campus LGBT group quickly descended upon me to tell me it was 100-percent certain I must be a homosexual. When I came out as bisexual, they told everyone I was lying and just wasn’t ready to come out of the closet as gay yet. Frightened and traumatized by my mother’s death, I dropped out of college in 1990 and fell in with what can only be called the gay underworld. Terrible things happened to me there.

Quote:

It was not until I was twenty-eight that I suddenly found myself in a relationship with a woman, through coincidences that shocked everyone who knew me and surprised even myself. I call myself bisexual because it would take several novels to explain how I ended up “straight” after almost thirty years as a gay man. I don’t feel like dealing with gay activists skewering me the way they go on search-and-destroy missions against ex-gays, “closet cases,” or “homocons.”

A perfect example of how gay behavior can be learned.

[painter]

That is just so bizarre. What is this cisgender, pansexual shit? Invented by people who have the time to complicate everything and have never heard of Occam's Razor. When the power eventually goes out it will be refreshing to see the natural order of things come roaring back with a vengeance and those GLBT textbooks will be useful for making a fire and keeping warm.

I'm not a hater, live and let live, do whatever you want but don't shove it in my face and especially don't try and knock me down because you need to justify how you want to live. The quotes Samseau put up really explain how far these whackos will go to fulfill their agenda at any cost.

[Alpha Hunter Zero]

Poor bastard never stood a chance. He might as well get a sex chance and be done with it.

[Menace]

This whole cis-gendered thing is a term they borrowed from chemistry actually. In certain chemical compounds, if two substituents are on the same side of the compound gets a cis- designation, and if they are on opposite sides (of a bond typically) they get a trans-designation. So I think cisgendered means you identify inside with your outside gender.

It's funny that the acronym GLBT gets bandied about by them and makes it seem like it's all one big happy family, but in reality I think there is a lot of animosity between the various groups (i.e. the "B" get no respect, followed by the "T"s).

There are a lot of other crazy ideas people have, like multiples. I get the distinct impression that you don't get the more extreme sorts of craziness in less Western societies.

[RobP]

Some non-Western societies are pretty crazy. I went to New Caledonia and it was full of trannies.

[jammer]

http://www.time.com/time/health/article/...80,00.html

[Wayout]

(11-23-2012 03:48 PM)RobP Wrote:  

Some non-Western societies are pretty crazy. I went to New Caledonia and it was full of trannies.

Worse than Thailand?

[Samseau]

(11-23-2012 03:58 PM)jammer Wrote:  

http://www.time.com/time/health/article/...80,00.html

Nice feminist propaganda piece by the TIMES there.

Quote:

"We simply expected to find no difference in psychological adjustment between adolescents reared in lesbian families and the normative sample of age-matched controls," says Gartrell.

Researchers completely biased? Check.

Quote:

Not surprisingly, the researchers found that 41% of children reported having endured some teasing, ostracism or discrimination related to their being raised by same-sex parents. But Gartrell and Bos could find no differences on psychological adjustment tests between the children and those in a group of matched controls.

Ignoring contrary data? Check.


Would love to know what these "psychological adjustment tests" consisted of. I bet you serial killers probably would score well on these tests too.

[Basil Ransom]

God, Reddit is a nightmare. Every time I see a thread, the topic alone is cringeworthy. Then I see the weird internet nerd omega male humor, and I start to think that the entire world is like that. And then I leave Reddit, and see the world is not like that, and 'relief washes over me in an awesome wave.'

Relevant: A Danish study on environmental factors linked to a higher incidence of homosexuality. Among them - absent father, death of mother during child adolescence, divorce, urban dwelling. Link: http://wthrockmorton.com/2006/10/18/envi...ish-study/

Another study found being raised by lesbians increased the incidence of homosexuality among male offspring. And that lesbian relationships were more unstable, and thus more likely to lead to broken homes. Link: http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstth...omosexual/

[oldnemesis]

(11-23-2012 01:03 PM)Samseau Wrote:  

I had no male figure at all to follow, and my mother and her partner were both unlike traditional fathers or traditional mothers. As a result, I had very few recognizable social cues to offer potential male or female friends, since I was neither confident nor sensitive to others.

The parents influence is only part of what the kid sees. There are friends, there are books, movies, peers and so on. Unless he lived locked in this trailer for 18 years surrounded only by females, there is no way he couldn't see those social cues.

To me this looks like a classic American "I've became fat because my parents didn't love me enough".

[Roosh]

The "studies" coming out of American universities that don't concern the hard sciences are bordering on fraudulent.

They have their end goal in mind (abortions are great, gays are great, multiculturialism is great, feminism is great, etc.) and then go on designing a flimsy survey study that "proves" it. The irony is that millenials are being enslaved by student loans which go to the departments that put out this tripe. They're getting bent over twice.

[christpuncher]

(11-24-2012 12:39 AM)oldnemesis Wrote:  

The parents influence is only part of what the kid sees. There are friends, there are books, movies, peers and so on. Unless he lived locked in this trailer for 18 years surrounded only by females, there is no way he couldn't see those social cues.

What if they have no friends? and all their peers do is mock them? and the only books they read are assigned homework and gender neutral children's books from their lesbian mothers? and they never go out and watch any movies because they have no friends?

[ColSpanker]

I hope this man has tenure where he teaches because teh gey retribution will be massive.

[oldnemesis]

(11-24-2012 08:45 AM)christpuncher Wrote:  

What if they have no friends? and all their peers do is mock them? and the only books they read are assigned homework and gender neutral children's books from their lesbian mothers? and they never go out and watch any movies because they have no friends?

There are libraries in the school and in the city. There are movies on TV. And they let you into the cinema even if you don't have friends with you. And I haven't seen anyone in my life who'd have NO friends, even the most retarded/weird people have friends - sure, they're weird too, but they do have them.

What you described would only be possible if he was homeschooled, but in this case he'd be fucked up anyway.

[oldnemesis]

(11-24-2012 07:51 AM)Roosh Wrote:  

The "studies" coming out of American universities that don't concern the hard sciences are bordering on fraudulent.

They have their end goal in mind (abortions are great, gays are great, multiculturialism is great, feminism is great, etc.) and then go on designing a flimsy survey study that "proves" it. The irony is that millenials are being enslaved by student loans which go to the departments that put out this tripe. They're getting bent over twice.

This is not true. America isn't Scandinavia, here we have a strong religious lobby, which is also VERY rich. There is a bunch Christian universities. Even if there weren't, the studies aren't that expensive, and if organizations like NOM can spend millions on anti-gay-marriage political ads, they could definitely afford $50K for a study. And they know they need those studies, as they played the vital role in several landmark court cases. So the opposition is definitely here, and it is definitely not underrepresented. But where are their studies?

Even if they didn't, those studies were published in peer-reviewed journals. Unless you believe ALL scientists are following the same political agenda, if the studies were rigged, other scientists would be quick to point the failures out. The scientific community is pretty good in self-moderating.

I have only one answer to that - they have done the studies (after all, they aren't idiots, they hire experienced political consultants for god's sake), and the studies showed the same result as the published studies. So they threw them away and never acknowledged them. And this is why they do not dispute the published studies.

Not to mention it doesn't really apply here, as no study said EVERY child who grew up with same-sex parents would do great. Some same-sex parents would be shitty parents, but this ain't different from the opposite-sex parents, some of whom would also be shitty parents.