[Blackhawk]

Paula Broadwell not only carried on an affair with Petraeus, but is also his biographer and co-author of "All In: The Education of General David Petraeus".

It appears Paula Broadwell is just a star fucker.



I like the comment, "The book is nothing more than a school girl valentine."

There are now allegations the affair had started when she went to Afghanistan to write about him, was already well known to have been going on during his military service, and that they attempted to end it in 2011 as part of him being leaving the military and being appointed CIA Director.

The claims that he now had to step down because he might be blackmailed by her are ludicrous.
What was she going to do, write more biographies about him?



Meanwhile, her own biography appears to put her in her 50s:

Paula Broadwell has more than a decade of military service and nearly two decades of work in counterterrorism and counterinsurgency. She is a PhD candidate at the University of London. Broadwell received an MPA degree from Harvard. She graduated with honors from the United States Military Academy. She lives with her husband and their two children in North Carolina.

[iknowexactly]

(11-10-2012 09:59 PM)joehoya Wrote:  

.... Just have a foreign intelligence officer approach her and threaten to destroy her family, career and her REPUTATION (the only thing she really cares about) and they could flip her with ease. Then get her to access the general's emails, or ....

..And we have a winner for the best sounding reason they outed them. Now no one can blackmail either of them.

[Nineteen84]

(11-10-2012 09:02 PM)iknowexactly Wrote:  

(11-10-2012 01:26 PM)Nineteen84 Wrote:  

(11-10-2012 01:21 PM)basilransom Wrote:  

(11-10-2012 01:16 PM)Nineteen84 Wrote:  

that guy does look like a pussy though. Just saying...

Yeah, reminds me of that site 'men who look like old lesbians' - menwholooklikeoldlesbians.blogspot.com

oh no! thats great

Lucky there's some "pussies" around who know medicine for when "cool" guys get sick. You'll be crying for his help "like a little bitch" when you need him.

I'm a doctor too

[Nineteen84]

Now Hillary bails on Benghazi as well
http://washingtonexaminer.com/house-asks...le/2513151

[Divorco]

I was originally indignant that Petraus was forced to resign for having a mistress. But after she dumped him, he sent her thousands of e-mails. He deserves to lose his job for being beta!

[Steven Lurkel]

The latest:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/nati...s_carousel

Women be shoppin', baby!

[Vicious]

I think it's frightening that so many people her don't see a security risk in a CIA director having a secret mistress. When you're elevated to these offices you are agreeing to put your balls in the freezer for the duration of the time you hold office. A piece of ass is not supposed to trump your commitment to national security.

[Humanist]

This story just keeps getting funnier and confirming all of our initial impressions of this ambitious, sociopathic, slut-tastic cuckolding cock-monster Paula Broadwell. The Washington Post has added some details to its story about her. (I think the story has been linked in this thread already but material has been added.)

(1) Her lack of modesty of attire shocked Petraeus' staff (and Petraeus himself) when she toured the Middle East with him:

Quote:

There were other controversies as well. Former aides say Broadwell’s attire — usually tight shirts and pants — prompted complaints in Afghanistan, where Western-style attire can offend local sensibilities. Her form-fitting clothes made a lasting impression on longtime Afghan hands, and Petraeus once admonished her, through a staffer, to “dress down,” a former aide recalled.

“She was seemingly immune to the notion of modesty in this part of the world,” said a general who served in Afghanistan while Petraeus was commander there.

(2) Despite her sterling credentials, she could not help giggling and bragging about herself on Facebook to her gaggle of friends back home:

Quote:

Officers close to Petraeus grew concerned about her posts on Facebook, which they believed sometimes divulged sensitive operational details. The posts, intended for friends back home, were often playfully written and aimed at showing off her adventures in the war zone.

Some senior officers thought Broadwell, who held a security clearance and had served as an Army intelligence officer, should have known better.

Once again, Paula Broadwell serves as a case study in how no matter how educated, accomplished, cerebral, and in-control a woman is, she can be reduced to a crazed, irrational puddle of pussy juice once the vagina starts tingling. Wow.

[Nineteen84]

she sounds like she'd be great in bed

[RobP]

LOL-catfight between two women provoked the FBI investigation:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnew...ified.html

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-...dwell.html

3rd woman also married to a physician, 3 kids.

[jerome]

general P...got game bitches....

[Kona]

Why didn't he just have her killed?

Aloha!

[iknowexactly]

(11-11-2012 07:38 AM)Nineteen84 Wrote:  

(11-10-2012 09:02 PM)iknowexactly Wrote:  

(11-10-2012 01:26 PM)Nineteen84 Wrote:  

(11-10-2012 01:21 PM)basilransom Wrote:  

(11-10-2012 01:16 PM)Nineteen84 Wrote:  

that guy does look like a pussy though. Just saying...

Yeah, reminds me of that site 'men who look like old lesbians' - menwholooklikeoldlesbians.blogspot.com

oh no! thats great

Lucky there's some "pussies" around who know medicine for when "cool" guys get sick. You'll be crying for his help "like a little bitch" when you need him.

I'm a doctor too

Then you know how much work he's done and if polite you would be respectful of that.

[Timoteo]

(11-11-2012 09:44 AM)Vicious Wrote:  

I think it's frightening that so many people her don't see a security risk in a CIA director having a secret mistress. When you're elevated to these offices you are agreeing to put your balls in the freezer for the duration of the time you hold office. A piece of ass is not supposed to trump your commitment to national security.

Yeah. Sometimes we want so much to find some kind of elaborate conspiracy that we refuse to see the most simple reasons that are sitting right there on the surface. He became a security risk, plain and simple. A man in his position simply can't have this kind of sordid episode unfold around him, and his particular position comes with a totally different standard of behavior than it would for other men. He isn't the first great man of responsibility to fall because of a woman.

[BurnFirst]

There is no way to blackmail you over something you don't give a fuck about and is not illegal.
What's next, blackmailing someone for secretly listening to Lady Gaga? Definitely there is more to this story we aren't privy to.

[Timoteo]

It really isn't so much about the blackmail aspect, or whether or not it's legal or illegal to fuck around. Some bitch he was banging had access to his computer and email account, and was using it to engage in a catfight with another bitch. That alone is enough to cost him his job. He was sloppy and exhibited extremely poor judgment. The director of the CIA simply can't have something like this happen to him. It gives the APPEARANCE that he could be compromised or that he is careless. For this position, that's enough. The same goes for those Secret Service agents that stiffed those hookers in Colombia. It doesn't matter that they didn't have the ultimate responsibility of protecting the President, or that they were an advance team looking to kill time. You have to be smarter and more discreet than they were. If something like that makes it into the papers, you have to lose your job. You've reached a certain level where exceptional behavior is required. Whether or not certain behavior is technically against the law is beside the point. There are certain other standards that have to be adhered to.

[iknowexactly]

(11-11-2012 06:45 PM)BurnFirst Wrote:  

There is no way to blackmail you over something you don't give a fuck about and is not illegal.
What's next, blackmailing someone for secretly listening to Lady Gaga? Definitely there is more to this story we aren't privy to.

There's always more in Intelligence, I mean you don't WANT the president's CIA meetings to be broadcast on Youtube, right?

But as I put in my post, if you were Obama/ or the other guy who's above Petraeus and reports to Obama, I imagine it's your duty to POSITIVELY eliminate any possibility of them being blackmailed. Which basically means making it all public so the blackmailer has no additional information. This is the most likely scenario I see.

If you just let him retire with the public story it's "to spend more time with his family" you will never know when someone contacts them and threatens to out them.

[BurnFirst]

Yeah but it could be put out in public without him resigning.

On the other hand, if he really did give some bitch access to his email that's fucked and he should probably be brought up on charges. I thought that was media speculation though, is that confirmed?

[Timoteo]

If something like this comes out about a high-ranking official, he's been weakened. It's almost impossible to remain in that position any longer. You almost always have to be concerned with leaks also (look at what the Bush administration did to Valerie Plame because they were pissed at her husband for telling them there were no WMDs?). You could sell the whole "he's retiring to spend more time with his family" rap, but it might not die there. The media and others will refuse to buy it. It's virtually impossible in this day and age for someone that is either involved with, or with knowledge something like this to keep quiet. The best way to deal with it is to get out in front and put it out there.

[theIVth]

Gen Patreaus was very successful and accomplished. A 4 star general and all that. I've read up on him and was very impressed. But when I saw his wife for the first time, I knew he had to have been cheating on her left and right.

What has been reaffirmed for me in this is: don't marry an ugly ass woman. The temptation to cheat will always be there and could potentially fuck your life up.

Don't mess around with ugly ass women

[kosko]

Its odd people are not considering the fact either that Peatraus is a Military man. The CIA is its own world just like the Army with its own hierarchy and realms of privilege. Pretreaus literately drove over from the Pentagon to Langley and thought he could start calling the shots. There were rumblings of the CIA begin unhappy with his leadership and to think that the CIA could not help and aid his removal is laughable. I am sure that the threats she received were from the CIA to push her hand into making these things public. They did not want Paetraus calling the shots any more and did a typical smear job to get rid of him. I can't give this broad that much credit. I can't. She was just a Alpha-hungry female with a long resume.. nothing more.

Look at whom the CIA props up: George Bush was largely seen as a one-term dud but he was an entrenched CIA career man whom rode the ladder to the top ranks of that Organization. Nothing.. not a peep has come out about ol' George Bush the elder. They love that man and have protected him and his character through and through.

[Nineteen84]

not too bad:

[Basil Ransom]

(11-11-2012 08:43 PM)theIVth Wrote:  

Gen Patreaus was very successful and accomplished. A 4 star general and all that. I've read up on him and was very impressed. But when I saw his wife for the first time, I knew he had to have been cheating on her left and right.

Since we're on the topic...

Imagine if some guy viciously murders your son. You know it was him, and you manage to extract revenge and kill him. And this is within the letter of the law. But now you must pay 'family support' - you must provide for his brothers, sisters, cousins, children, grandparents and the family's pet iguana. Does this sound like a reasonable, fair outcome?

That's what happened in Afghanistan. We said, 'The Taliban fucked with us, time to bomb them to smithereens.' Fair enough. But then the neoconservative right and the internationalist left combined to create this clusterfuck of an idea that we are responsible for the dysfunction of Afghanistan, and are obligated to 'restore' it to improved conditions it had never actually had. Bush was in power, and the American right is like a bitch who changes her hobbies every time she gets a new alpha boyfriend - regardless of their stated principles, they bought what Bush was selling, they only apply cold skepticism to Democratic/left wing politicians. The left, meanwhile, felt bad about just striking back, and wanted to 'save the children' or something. Both the mainstream right and the mainstream left believed, and continue to believe, that everyone on Earth secretly wants to be an American, more or less.

Petraeus is another modern American general, perfect for our current establishment. He is only too willing to adopt and enforce an anti-American policy that puts the lives of Afghans before those of our soldiers. He may be technically proficient - I myself aren't qualified to say. But he, like almost all the rest of the flag level military establishment, is complicit in an anti-American policy that puts the lives of foreigners ahead of our own men, with ultimately little in the way of results or reduced risk to America to show for it.

[Kona]

(11-11-2012 09:13 PM)basilransom Wrote:  

(11-11-2012 08:43 PM)theIVth Wrote:  

Gen Patreaus was very successful and accomplished. A 4 star general and all that. I've read up on him and was very impressed. But when I saw his wife for the first time, I knew he had to have been cheating on her left and right.

Since we're on the topic...

Imagine if some guy viciously murders your son. You know it was him, and you manage to extract revenge and kill him. And this is within the letter of the law. But now you must pay 'family support' - you must provide for his brothers, sisters, cousins, children, grandparents and the family's pet iguana. Does this sound like a reasonable, fair outcome?

That's what happened in Afghanistan. We said, 'The Taliban fucked with us, time to bomb them to smithereens.' Fair enough. But then the neoconservative right and the internationalist left combined to create this clusterfuck of an idea that we are responsible for the dysfunction of Afghanistan, and are obligated to 'restore' it to improved conditions it had never actually had. Bush was in power, and the American right is like a bitch who changes her hobbies every time she gets a new alpha boyfriend - regardless of their stated principles, they bought what Bush was selling, they only apply cold skepticism to Democratic/left wing politicians. The left, meanwhile, felt bad about just striking back, and wanted to 'save the children' or something. Both the mainstream right and the mainstream left believed, and continue to believe, that everyone on Earth secretly wants to be an American, more or less.

Petraeus is another modern American general, perfect for our current establishment. He is only too willing to adopt and enforce an anti-American policy that puts the lives of Afghans before those of our soldiers. He may be technically proficient - I myself aren't qualified to say. But he, like almost all the rest of the flag level military establishment, is complicit in an anti-American policy that puts the lives of foreigners ahead of our own men, with ultimately little in the way of results or reduced risk to America to show for it.

Basilransom,

In one way or another I served under Petraeus.

Its the same thing we did to Germany, Japan, Panama and whoever else.

I know you want a well written response from a smart guy, but think about it like this:

When the mafia has to fuck somebody up and stick their head in the sauce, they still toss them a grand to get the burns taken care of. Just on a larger scale.

Happy Veterans Day.

Aloha!

[kdolo]

This doesn't disgust me. It just seems normal female behaviour now. She got hot for the powerful man in charge over the omega looking husband. I can't even look down on it. Is that bad?
[/quote]

Normally no - its not 'bad'.

But, the problem here is that she is married with 2 children.

She had an oath and obligation to be faithful to that man and her family and she jeopardizes all of it for some alpha cock.

In many places in the world she'd be shot or stoned to the death.

Her behavior is reprehensible. That husband needs to do DNA immediately on his children - one or two of them may not be his,