How PUAs, Including Roosh, are Further Exacerbating the Masculization of Women
09-02-2012, 09:50 AM
How PUAs, Including Roosh, are Further Exacerbating the Masculization of Women
While she's getting her pussy "demolished" by a strange man she'll never see again, the excitement and thrill of it might flood her with a rush of endorphins. But after he leaves, and doesn't see her again, those endorphins quickly change into remorse and regret, and these last a lot longer and have a far bigger impact on the girl's life from that day forward, than the hour or two of thrill. She learns that she cannot trust men - and even worse, that she cannot trust HERSELF. Every halfway decent looking, masculine man she sees now, she's going to have to be more guarded. She knows that if she lets her guard down for even a minute, she could find herself getting swept up and "demolished" again, so she learns to wear a thicker skin, act more curt, and even be rudely unresponsive in public towards single men.
And most importantly, being "on guard" is THE most destructive energy toward femininity. No longer can she sit in a coffee shop or walk down the street in comfort, unguarded, free - she has to bring her own, internal, masculine guard with her wherever she goes. And gradually, this becomes incorporated into her habit and demeanor. And since energy affects the body, her body masculizes as well: skin, voice, and gait all lose softness. Voila: a masculized girl. Thanks to the PUA.
"But wait a minute", you say. "Girls WANT to have sex. A man like Roosh is giving her what she WANTS. Sex is a normal, natural, vital part of being human."
A girl wants to have sex - with a man who LOVES her. (And for all the die-hard evolutionary psych fans, just read that as a man who will stick around to care for the baby she would have had were it not for the darwinistically irrelevant condom). Girls - especially Latin and Eastern European feminine girls who haven't been corrupted by feminism yet - want to have sex with a man in a *love relationship.* This desire is intimately intertwined with the feminine energy we enjoy in girls from these traditional countries. She wants to fuck, of COURSE - but the difference between her, and a masculized feminist who fucks like a man, is she wants to save her fucking for only situations in which her and her partner are in love. These two conditions - femininity (which we all want), and the saving of sex for love, are intertwined and inseperable.
The fun of the fuck wears off. The day after the PUA stops seeing her - or fucks another girl - or travels to another country - the emotions start kicking in, trying to make sense of what happened. How could she let a guy just fuck her like that? He's not devoted to her, he doesn't love her, he won't care for the baby. The emotions she has to deal with now are despair, remorse, and regret.
And she has to put her guard up from that day forward, to ensure she doesn't fall into such a trap again. Say hello to the bitch shield, say hello to the cockblock, say hello to curt, logical women
who walk, talk and think a little more like men.
So while alpha dogs like Roosh are having a blast harvesting all the first time crops, they're leaving the fields fallow for the rest of us. They suck the nutrients out of the soil, and then justify it by teaching other men how to drill it just as effectively. "See, I'm sharing the wealth!" he says. But that just speeds the process up even more, accelerating the spread of female masculization to traditional countries, even as he decries it here. Imagine the following argument from a logging company that clearcuts massive tracts of virgin forest for profit: "What we're doing is ok because we're sharing our superior logging technology with other companies, so they can get in on the action as well."
Yes Roosh, I expect you to care about future generations who will be here after you're gone.
The remedy for the situation is to focus less on conquest, and more on love. If you want to reverse the masculization of chicks, and allow them to rediscover femininity, this is how.
While she's getting her pussy "demolished" by a strange man she'll never see again, the excitement and thrill of it might flood her with a rush of endorphins. But after he leaves, and doesn't see her again, those endorphins quickly change into remorse and regret, and these last a lot longer and have a far bigger impact on the girl's life from that day forward, than the hour or two of thrill. She learns that she cannot trust men - and even worse, that she cannot trust HERSELF. Every halfway decent looking, masculine man she sees now, she's going to have to be more guarded. She knows that if she lets her guard down for even a minute, she could find herself getting swept up and "demolished" again, so she learns to wear a thicker skin, act more curt, and even be rudely unresponsive in public towards single men.
And most importantly, being "on guard" is THE most destructive energy toward femininity. No longer can she sit in a coffee shop or walk down the street in comfort, unguarded, free - she has to bring her own, internal, masculine guard with her wherever she goes. And gradually, this becomes incorporated into her habit and demeanor. And since energy affects the body, her body masculizes as well: skin, voice, and gait all lose softness. Voila: a masculized girl. Thanks to the PUA.
"But wait a minute", you say. "Girls WANT to have sex. A man like Roosh is giving her what she WANTS. Sex is a normal, natural, vital part of being human."
A girl wants to have sex - with a man who LOVES her. (And for all the die-hard evolutionary psych fans, just read that as a man who will stick around to care for the baby she would have had were it not for the darwinistically irrelevant condom). Girls - especially Latin and Eastern European feminine girls who haven't been corrupted by feminism yet - want to have sex with a man in a *love relationship.* This desire is intimately intertwined with the feminine energy we enjoy in girls from these traditional countries. She wants to fuck, of COURSE - but the difference between her, and a masculized feminist who fucks like a man, is she wants to save her fucking for only situations in which her and her partner are in love. These two conditions - femininity (which we all want), and the saving of sex for love, are intertwined and inseperable.
The fun of the fuck wears off. The day after the PUA stops seeing her - or fucks another girl - or travels to another country - the emotions start kicking in, trying to make sense of what happened. How could she let a guy just fuck her like that? He's not devoted to her, he doesn't love her, he won't care for the baby. The emotions she has to deal with now are despair, remorse, and regret.
And she has to put her guard up from that day forward, to ensure she doesn't fall into such a trap again. Say hello to the bitch shield, say hello to the cockblock, say hello to curt, logical women
who walk, talk and think a little more like men.
So while alpha dogs like Roosh are having a blast harvesting all the first time crops, they're leaving the fields fallow for the rest of us. They suck the nutrients out of the soil, and then justify it by teaching other men how to drill it just as effectively. "See, I'm sharing the wealth!" he says. But that just speeds the process up even more, accelerating the spread of female masculization to traditional countries, even as he decries it here. Imagine the following argument from a logging company that clearcuts massive tracts of virgin forest for profit: "What we're doing is ok because we're sharing our superior logging technology with other companies, so they can get in on the action as well."
Yes Roosh, I expect you to care about future generations who will be here after you're gone.
The remedy for the situation is to focus less on conquest, and more on love. If you want to reverse the masculization of chicks, and allow them to rediscover femininity, this is how.