[dragnet]

Woman tingles for alpha asshole...and decides to write an article about it. The man in question? JFK:

http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/arch...irls/9000/

Quote:

"JFK was a man whose sexual life remained a central fact of his existence, who did not allow it to be diminished by anything—not his political ambitions, not issues of national security, not his Catholicism, not loyalty to his friends and his male relatives, not physical limitation or pain, not the risk of infecting any of his partners with the venereal disease that regularly plagued him, not fear of impregnating someone, not the potential for personal embarrassment, and certainly, certainly, not his marriage.

John Kennedy, that ravishing creature, could spend a morning riding unbroken horses, bareback, in the Newport sunshine with a very young Jacqueline Bouvier, and he could maneuver a 19-year-old Wheaton sophomore into bed within minutes of encountering her at a cocktail party, could groom her so completely to his liking that she could be goaded into giving a blow job to his friend while he stood and watched. We’re not supposed to like men like that; the ones who put in a boorish performance at it, we loathe. But the ones who can pull it off—God help us."

The rationalization hamster is running full tilt in this one. Shit, you can almost smell the juice dripping from her snatch as she pens this.

[Roosh]

I'm starting to recognize these reporter names.

She also wrote this article:

"How girls reluctantly endure the hookup culture"

Poor poor girls, with men calling the shots and them forced to do our sexual bidding.

[Samseau]

Here's the author:



Would anyone bone her?

[SpiderKing]

(07-15-2012 02:12 PM)Samseau Wrote:  

Here's the author:



Would anyone bone her?

She resembles Clint Howard.

[Caligula]

The writer has drawn feminist ire repeatedly by speaking up against some of their excesses. She's argued that many women would be better off being traditional housewives than climbing the career ladder. She's almost red pill.

Here's one article responding to a book that argues boys are better off without fathers - http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/arch...boys/4317/

Quote:

The ramifications of this new attitude are going to be grave. Belittle men's responsibilities to their families, raise boys to believe that fatherhood is not a worthy aspiration, and the people who will suffer are women and children. For the past forty years women have been insisting that they be able to enjoy the same sexual freedoms as men (You go, girl!), and to become single mothers by choice (ditto!). Surprise, surprise: men have been more than happy to comply. Someday American women may realize that the great achievement of civilization wasn't Erica Jong's zipless fuck of yesteryear. It was convincing men that they had an obligation to contain their sexual energies within marriage and to support—economically and emotionally—the children they created in that marriage. You go, June Cleaver!