Quote: (08-02-2012 01:07 AM)Dan Wrote:
I've read through this thread in its entirety and was really impressed.
The only thing I'm unsure about is your ratings of the girls. I remember at one point you referred to a 6 as above average. This confused me because my scale's lowest number is 6... anyone lower doesn't even deserve a rating. But I'm willing to accept that everyone does it slightly differently and I think I've caught on.
It's going to be hard to reach that 100 approaches at this point, but you still have banged a decent number of chicks.
I'd like to know more about your style to improve my own.
Quote:Quote:
Posted by Hotwheels - 08-02-2012 07:56 AM
Oh geezus... Let's not get into another rating "discussion"....
I would usually agree that rating discussions are pointless and annoying, but in this case i think it's fair to ask about my rating system, since a girls ranking has a lot to do with how I game her and my likelihood of success.
I view female attractiveness as basically a bell curve, although bulging on the left side in the US due to the obesity epidemic. This means that most women will be 4s, 5s and 6s who fall in the middle of the curve. Here's how I would verbally describe the rankings
1- repulsively ugly-you are grossed out by even looking at her. Relatively rare
2-Really ugly
3-Standard ugly
4-Plain. Not ugly,but below average. I have banged a few 4s in my life, mostly when i was drunk and horny, but never gone below a 4. I doubt a 4 would pass my Boner Test today
5-This seems to be the most controversial ranking, with guys having widely different conceptions of what a 5 is. I think of a 5 as average- she's wouldn't be described as pretty but she is certainly not ugly either. My reactions to 5s vary a lot depending on their particular look and personality. Some 5s I will definitely bang, others not. Guys who describe 5s as ugly obviously have a different rating system than I do.
6-Cute-the classic cute girl. I would give her a second look but not think she was a knockout or be intimidated by her.
7-Pretty- 7s are noticeably good looking and get a lot of attention from guys. There is no question as to their attractiveness which is why i am mystified when some guys describe 7s as OK looking, which again makes me think we are using a different ratings conception.
8- Beautiful- A girl who turns heads and most guys and girls would describe as "hot". Unusually good looking. Maybe 4% or less of female population under 35 (at most) would be 8 or above.
9-Very beautiful- An almost flawless beauty that you have a hard time pulling your eyes away from. Maybe 1%.
10- Rare beauty-Has the looks of the 9 with something more- some special charisma or eroticism to her look. Maybe 1 in 500 at most.
I have read quite few girl rating threads on the web over the years, and talked to many guys in person about girl rankings, and I have concluded that my ranking system is a bit stricter than most guys, by perhaps .75 to 1 point. Meaning that what a lot of guys would describe as a 6 I would describe as a 5.3, what others might call an 8.5 I would call a 7.5 ,etc. At the same time I don't have the ridiculous e-standards claimed by guys who haven't been laid in years and judge women by models and porn stars they see on the web.
I think that my ranking system is a reasonable one. Although tastes vary of course, I feel that the great majority of members here would bang almost any girl I rank as 6 or above, and a lot would bang a girls I rank in the 5 range.