[Brother Abdul Majeed]

One factor in this that gets overlooked is the ever increasing urbanization of our society. More and more single women live by themselves in urban centres where they gravitate towards one another. Girls that I knew from my relatively small hometown would go to the big cities for university and never come back. 5 years later they'd come home for a visit with their hair cut short looking like a typical SJW. The bigger cities always seem to be hotbeds like this.
Even mid size cities are not immune to this. Where ever there's a university or college, there's a glowing spot of cancer on the map, radiating out and sucking the happiness away from women.

[questor70]

(10-26-2018 07:22 AM)Glaucon Wrote:  

I am not sure if being diagnosed and medicated makes anything better for that 25%

Nope. It treats the symptoms, not the root problems.

People are most happy, regardless of how much money they have, when they have a very strong sense of purpose in their lives. They know what they're here on this earth to do and they strive to do it well. They feel important and valued in society. A big part of the drive towards politics (aka SJW) is it gives women that sense of greater purpose that they've lost by not having kids or feeling part of a close-knit community. This is also why SJWs must manufacturer ever more trivial things to be outraged about, because the moment they feel they've "won" they will have nothing left to contribute to (in their mind) the betterment of society.

Again, and I've said this before, but the biggest problem, feminism aside, is that modern life has destroyed society as we know it in favor of hyper-individualism. Nobody relies on anybody else. Humans are social animals. We desperately want to be USEFUL to the collective. If there's no collective anymore, then it opens up a terrible spiritual void. A lack of belonging, a lack of value.

Also, as society becomes ever more diverse, it's harder to be in a situation of like-minded souls. The only place we find tribes is online which is why conflict primarily plays out online. Even on Youtube with bobbleheading editorialists, they spend more time dictating articles that triggered them (which in itself are editorials where the author's been triggered).

It's not politically correct to say this, but homogeneity, like the mythical 1950s ideal, is an extremely attractive proposition, if you at least are in sync with such a group's way of life. In a world where everyone's a special snowflake it can feel like you have nothing in common with anyone else.

[MrLemon]

There is a simple way to stop the creeping trend towards women's mental illness and Feminism (they are one and the same).

Get young women pregnant. Having a child is a mental, moral, and developmental necessity for human females. If they don't bear a child, their bodies torture them for the rest of their lives, and it drives them nuts.

When you meed a 40 year old woman, for a job interview or to hire as a real estate agent, the first thing you need to know is whether she had kids.

No kids? She's a nut.

So here in America, we need to get 20 something girls to focus on getting married and having kids. That's it. The rest will work itself out fine.

In Japan, Denmark and other Euro nations they are doing this to reverse demographic collapse, and it works. A few advertising jingles is all it takes.

Here in the US we'd also need to purge Hollywood's gay leadership and make family and pregnancy-focused TV shows.

[RawGod]

(10-26-2018 09:44 AM)MrLemon Wrote:  

In Japan, Denmark and other Euro nations they are doing this to reverse demographic collapse, and it works. A few advertising jingles is all it takes.

Here in the US we'd also need to purge Hollywood's gay leadership and make family and pregnancy-focused TV shows.

Previously I would have agreed with the common wisdom that low birthrates are due to a complicated mix of wealth, availability of contraception, consumerism, etc. But I think you're right. You could change it within 5 years simply by hijacking the minds of a dozen Hollyweird decision-makers to promote having babies.

[Trumps Intern]

In Poland the government incentivized child birth heavily and abortion is illegal. It was the only way to avoid mass immigration into their country. They are doing a great job.

[torridon747]

Not surprised. They've been sold a dream, see themselves as freedom fighters for their kind and ignore their biological imperative.

Life is actually very simple at it's base. Find something you like to do, find a mate that can love you, have kids. Recipe for happiness

[John Michael Kane]

(10-26-2018 09:44 AM)MrLemon Wrote:  

There is a simple way to stop the creeping trend towards women's mental illness and Feminism (they are one and the same).

Get young women pregnant. Having a child is a mental, moral, and developmental necessity for human females. If they don't bear a child, their bodies torture them for the rest of their lives, and it drives them nuts.

When you meed a 40 year old woman, for a job interview or to hire as a real estate agent, the first thing you need to know is whether she had kids.

No kids? She's a nut.

So here in America, we need to get 20 something girls to focus on getting married and having kids. That's it. The rest will work itself out fine.

In Japan, Denmark and other Euro nations they are doing this to reverse demographic collapse, and it works. A few advertising jingles is all it takes.

Here in the US we'd also need to purge Hollywood's gay leadership and make family and pregnancy-focused TV shows.

Would rep again if I could. Women need babies to stay sane, unless they chose to dedicate their lives to becoming nuns and serving others. Everything else will leave them unhappy and wanting. More programming that glorifies motherhood is needed.

[infowarrior1]

(10-26-2018 09:44 AM)MrLemon Wrote:  

There is a simple way to stop the creeping trend towards women's mental illness and Feminism (they are one and the same).

Get young women pregnant. Having a child is a mental, moral, and developmental necessity for human females. If they don't bear a child, their bodies torture them for the rest of their lives, and it drives them nuts.

When you meed a 40 year old woman, for a job interview or to hire as a real estate agent, the first thing you need to know is whether she had kids.

No kids? She's a nut.

So here in America, we need to get 20 something girls to focus on getting married and having kids. That's it. The rest will work itself out fine.

In Japan, Denmark and other Euro nations they are doing this to reverse demographic collapse, and it works. A few advertising jingles is all it takes.

Here in the US we'd also need to purge Hollywood's gay leadership and make family and pregnancy-focused TV shows.

Women don't stop being feminist just because they are a mom.

Otherwise this wouldn't exist:

Quote:

On September 14, The Washington Post published what can only be described as a public display of child abuse. In an article entitled “My teen boys are blind to rape culture,” feminist writer Jody Allard chastises her sons for questioning the propaganda she feeds them.

“They’ve been listening to me talk about consent, misogyny and rape culture since they were tweens. They listened to me then, but they are 16 and 18 now, and they roll their eyes and argue when talk to them about sexism and misogyny.”

That Allard’s boys won’t take up their mother’s fight makes them “part of the problem,” writes Allard. They’ve “dipped their toes into toxic masculinity,” she adds. Toxic masculinity is a favorite feminist term. It means the more masculine a man is, the more vile he is. Nice, huh?

https://dailycaller.com/2016/09/20/femin...the-media/

[infowarrior1]

There are plenty of examples you can dig up and find out all those moms who remained feminists in spite of motherhood.

[torridon747]

There's a difference between being a mother first and a feminist first.

Clearly there's some amount of self selection for either. But this much is clear - women that are mothers first are happier, healthy, more productive members of culture and society

[Sgt Donger]

25% of American women have a mental illness...rubbish, it's a lot higher than 25%

Here's a quote from Psychology Today:

Quote:

One in three Americans struggles with a mental illness, but the rate is much higher in women.

The reasons cited for the mental illnesses include

Quote:

Discrimination, Trauma, and Stressful Life Experiences

and

Quote:

Hormonal Issues

So it's probably more likely that 50% of American women have mental health issues.

[MrLemon]

(10-26-2018 09:34 PM)infowarrior1 Wrote:  

There are plenty of examples you can dig up and find out all those moms who remained feminists in spite of motherhood.

True. But I'm thinking about averages. If we want to make women mentally healthier on average, get them pregnant younger.

[infowarrior1]

(10-26-2018 11:30 PM)MrLemon Wrote:  

(10-26-2018 09:34 PM)infowarrior1 Wrote:  

There are plenty of examples you can dig up and find out all those moms who remained feminists in spite of motherhood.

True. But I'm thinking about averages. If we want to make women mentally healthier on average, get them pregnant younger.

Definitely. But in regards to ideology I doubt it makes much difference.

[John Michael Kane]

It isn't completely fair to hold women up against popular ideology, because women are naturally more conformist by nauture. It is up to men to try and influence culture through patriarchy. Most men in America are weak, but Trump and others are showing it is okay to have balls. In a few generations, we can right this ship.

[Trumps Intern]

Yes, the reason women are more conformist is because social death meant physical death, since they required male assistance for survival, at least evolutionarily.

Interestingly, you see this biologically as well. Women’s higher oxytocin and estrogen lead both to group think, hostility towards outsiders, PTSD and anxiety, and so on. My theory is that in the face of an external threat, women are quick to “rally” males for their support in thwarting said threat and offering protection.

Anyways this is off topic. But it’s true what was stated above. The truth is that it is males, particularly beta males, who further this culture by consenting to it and encouraging it. It will always be the male who has responsibility in steering the cultural values. We have become a much more feminized culture for whatever reason.

[MrLemon]

(10-27-2018 12:11 AM)infowarrior1 Wrote:  

(10-26-2018 11:30 PM)MrLemon Wrote:  

(10-26-2018 09:34 PM)infowarrior1 Wrote:  

There are plenty of examples you can dig up and find out all those moms who remained feminists in spite of motherhood.

True. But I'm thinking about averages. If we want to make women mentally healthier on average, get them pregnant younger.

Definitely. But in regards to ideology I doubt it makes much difference.

Oh yeah. Ideology is going to do whatever it wants to do. Women's ideology is all fluff and junk.

But my thinking is...

If you get a lot of 20-something girls married and pregnant, first, even if they CALL themselves feminists, that word will start to change (again) to something less diseased. Women who have sons usually won't stand by and let their sons get fucked by haters. We do see parents suing the crap out of the universities.

If you get enough moms with sons to join in the fight, they will start swaying other women back towards a healthier mindset. If you ever get involved in local politics, you know that a group of angry mothers is the strongest force in politics. No judge, policeman, mayor, or governor in the US will stand in their way. Strong men, even Trump, fold like tissue paper in the face of a group of angry moms fighting for the safety of their kids. Instinct.

So get more women out of catherding and into bearing sons, and you right the ship.

That's my theory, obviously it can be total shit!

[infowarrior1]

(10-27-2018 10:12 AM)John Michael Kane Wrote:  

It isn't completely fair to hold women up against popular ideology, because women are naturally more conformist by nauture. It is up to men to try and influence culture through patriarchy. Most men in America are weak, but Trump and others are showing it is okay to have balls. In a few generations, we can right this ship.

True for the average woman. Although interesting information exists in regards to feminist activist. Their masculinity is what drives their feminist views.

Quote:

The feminist movement purports to improve conditions for women, and yet only a minority of women in modern societies self-identify as feminists. This is known as the feminist paradox. It has been suggested that feminists exhibit both physiological and psychological characteristics associated with heightened masculinization, which may predispose women for heightened competitiveness, sex-atypical behaviors, and belief in the interchangeability of sex roles. If feminist activists, i.e., those that manufacture the public image of feminism, are indeed masculinized relative to women in general, this might explain why the views and preferences of these two groups are at variance with each other. We measured the 2D:4D digit ratios (collected from both hands) and a personality trait known as dominance (measured with the Directiveness scale) in a sample of women attending a feminist conference. The sample exhibited significantly more masculine 2D:4D and higher dominance ratings than comparison samples representative of women in general, and these variables were furthermore positively correlated for both hands. The feminist paradox might thus to some extent be explained by biological differences between women in general and the activist women who formulate the feminist agenda.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4158978/

[66Scorpio]

What about that witch's coven otherwise known as the Democrat representatives of the Senate Judiciary Committee? Or Feinstein, Harris, Waters, Warren etc.?

[Laner]

(10-26-2018 09:27 PM)infowarrior1 Wrote:  

(10-26-2018 09:44 AM)MrLemon Wrote:  

There is a simple way to stop the creeping trend towards women's mental illness and Feminism (they are one and the same).

Get young women pregnant. Having a child is a mental, moral, and developmental necessity for human females. If they don't bear a child, their bodies torture them for the rest of their lives, and it drives them nuts.

When you meed a 40 year old woman, for a job interview or to hire as a real estate agent, the first thing you need to know is whether she had kids.

No kids? She's a nut.

So here in America, we need to get 20 something girls to focus on getting married and having kids. That's it. The rest will work itself out fine.

In Japan, Denmark and other Euro nations they are doing this to reverse demographic collapse, and it works. A few advertising jingles is all it takes.

Here in the US we'd also need to purge Hollywood's gay leadership and make family and pregnancy-focused TV shows.

Women don't stop being feminist just because they are a mom.

Otherwise this wouldn't exist:

Quote:

On September 14, The Washington Post published what can only be described as a public display of child abuse. In an article entitled “My teen boys are blind to rape culture,” feminist writer Jody Allard chastises her sons for questioning the propaganda she feeds them.

“They’ve been listening to me talk about consent, misogyny and rape culture since they were tweens. They listened to me then, but they are 16 and 18 now, and they roll their eyes and argue when talk to them about sexism and misogyny.”

That Allard’s boys won’t take up their mother’s fight makes them “part of the problem,” writes Allard. They’ve “dipped their toes into toxic masculinity,” she adds. Toxic masculinity is a favorite feminist term. It means the more masculine a man is, the more vile he is. Nice, huh?

https://dailycaller.com/2016/09/20/femin...the-media/

There is a difference between being a mother and being an active part of the kids lives, or being a mother and having a nanny and the state raise the kids.

An affluent mother in 2018 has a career and a family, but the family takes a distance for most in the struggle of 60 hour work weeks. A nanny is a cheap way to have kids but not have to do the heavy lifting.

On the other end, is mothers who are very active in the raising of their kids, but are damaged in other ways. They have a bunch of kids with different fathers and are fighting a losing battle every day by way of giving kids manners and skills.

This is why the middle class devastation has been so profound in the west. A stay at home mother, surrounded by her kids and other mothers from the neighborhood have been the happiest segment of women in the history of the world. It was short lived, but the experiment was conclusive. Women need other women to be healthy and happy. The gossip needs to be uplifting and fun, rather than sophist and doom.

Women in cities, without kids, flocking together and following each demented trend together is going to damage to any woman who spends time in this crowd. Women are rejecting men, and men of value are rejecting most women. Men of no value are putting women of any value on a pedestal, in turn driving their madness.

My radar is highly tuned to those who respond in positive ways to kids, and even more so to those women who respond in negative ways to kids. With this demographic surge of women in their early 40's who will never have kids, parents should be vigilant of drugged up, single and bitter women.

[Truth Tiger]

I appreciate what Trump is doing very greatly, but unless he spend his second term fixing Divorce Corp America, only an idiot would get married or have non-surrogate children in America. Men have all the responsibilities and none of the rights, and women are going insane from unearned freedom the know in their hearts they don't deserve. The masculine men they crave in their loins are only as safe as the daily degree of insanity American women indulge in.

Pumping babies into young women will only be sane when the government stops incentivizing women to divorce rape men and the courts to reward them for it via alimony, outrageous child support, and incarceration of men who fall behind in those outrageous support payments, plus subsequent prevention of their ability to hold a job to take care of their children. No wonder so many alienated fathers are desperate - I've known more than a few that ate a bullet.

Until the 19th is appealed and family courts destroyed for the un-Constitutional monstrosities that they are, any sane man will only have children in a country with saner marriage laws. Poland seems a better choice than most, perhaps then Hungary.

[Bienvenuto]

[quote='Sgt Donger' pid='1876024' dateline='1540608727']
25% of American women have a mental illness...rubbish, it's a lot higher than 25%

Here's a quote from Psychology Today:

[quote]One in three Americans struggles with a mental illness, but the rate is much higher in women.

The reasons cited for the mental illnesses include Discrimination, Trauma, and Stressful Life Experiences and Hormonal Issues

So it's probably more likely that 50% of American women have mental health issues.
[/quote]

Ha ha ha ha ha ..

How much bad discrimination have these women actually faced in Modern America?
Compare the traumas men suffer with what women put forward as significant traumas, 'stressful life experiences' (what like Divorce Ra--? no, wait..)
Bottom line is they have it easier in every marker apart from being exposed to delusional ideas about how life should actually treat them.

Even then, it isn't that hard to see through BS and not let it overtake one's life.
Women continue to cry about how weak and helpless they are and at the same time that they are not being feted for how wonderful and powerful they are.

They want to be a Mayan priesthood treading in the blood of sacrificial slaves and spared from the indignity of having to live with small inconveniences like the rest of the world.

They want a new caste system..

No wonder they are going mad.

[redpillage]

(10-28-2018 12:33 AM)Truth Tiger Wrote:  

Men have all the responsibilities and none of the rights, and women are going insane from unearned freedom the know in their hearts they don't deserve. The masculine men they crave in their loins are only as safe as the daily degree of insanity American women indulge in.

Dude, it's not a bug, it's a feature. They know exactly what they have done and it's just another part of the agenda, and we all know what that is: Prevent industrious high IQ white males from reproducing.

[911]

(10-27-2018 12:11 AM)infowarrior1 Wrote:  

(10-26-2018 11:30 PM)MrLemon Wrote:  

(10-26-2018 09:34 PM)infowarrior1 Wrote:  

There are plenty of examples you can dig up and find out all those moms who remained feminists in spite of motherhood.

True. But I'm thinking about averages. If we want to make women mentally healthier on average, get them pregnant younger.

Definitely. But in regards to ideology I doubt it makes much difference.

You're wrong about this, warrior. Married women have very distinct political views and voting patterns from unmarried/childless women. Here's a snapshot from a recent election:

Quote:

64 percent of unmarried women said they would vote for Obama over Mitt Romney, the presumptive Republican nominee, according to a Democracy Corps survey analyzed by Democratic pollsters. Only 31 percent picked the GOP candidate. The gap — 33 points — was 10 points bigger than in it was in January.

Now look at what married women say: 56 percent said they would vote for Romney, and only 37 percent of married women are for Obama

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/OTUS/put...d=16057761

As well, unmarried women are more driven by identity politics and are easier to manipulate. Married women on the other hand are focused on the well-being of their families and their childrens' future. They want lower taxes, higher wages for their husbands and a better economy.

Single moms are a category of their own, they lack the mental stability of being in a stable family structure.

[911]

(10-26-2018 09:19 AM)Brother Abdul Majeed Wrote:  

One factor in this that gets overlooked is the ever increasing urbanization of our society. More and more single women live by themselves in urban centres where they gravitate towards one another. Girls that I knew from my relatively small hometown would go to the big cities for university and never come back. 5 years later they'd come home for a visit with their hair cut short looking like a typical SJW. The bigger cities always seem to be hotbeds like this.
Even mid size cities are not immune to this. Where ever there's a university or college, there's a glowing spot of cancer on the map, radiating out and sucking the happiness away from women.

Good post Majeed.

In most American cities, things weren't always this way, urban settings used to be far healthier. Their cultural environment was broken down and degraded in the 1960s/70s through urban policies promoted by social engineers. E. Michael Jones has done a great job documenting the deliberate degradation of White ethnic neighborhoods (and a parallel degradation of Black society led by figures like MLK, see my post here) in his book "The Slaughter of Cities: Urban Renewal as Ethnic Cleansing". Here's an episode fo Tim Kelly's podcast that covered it:

E. Michael Jones is the most brilliant, most righteous American alive. He provides very deep and unconventional analyses of the social engineering we've been subjected to. He's had a great breadth of personal experience and a tremendous sense of perspective.

Here's a synopsis of Jones' Slaughter of Cities:

Quote:

By now, it should be obvious that the government-sponsored initiative to renew this country’s large cities which began in the 1930s and continued largely unabated in the East and Midwest through the 1960s and beyond has been a profound and devastating failure. More homes were destroyed than were ever built; once-great metropolises like Detroit lay in ruins; once-thriving neighborhoods were overwhelmed with drugs and crime; buildings that were built to last centuries fell to the wrecking ball mere decades after they were built; an entire generation of young people, both those who came to the cities and those who were driven from the cities into the suburbs, have grown up rootless, in a Hobbsian state in which man's life was “solitary, poor, nasty, brutish and short.”

The traditional explanation, the one which no one believes anymore, is that all this was done to eliminate “blight.” A more recent explanation, only slightly less implausible, is that it all came about because of faulty design, as if a nation of 260 million people, one which had already produced the Columbian Exhibition of 1893, couldn't come up with anything more inspiring that the average strip mall. The real story, it turns out, is different from both previous explanations. What began as the World War II intelligence community’s attempt to solve America's “nationalities problem” and provide workers for the nation's war industries degenerated by the early post-war period into full-blown ethnic cleansing.

E. Michael Jones has followed the advice of Christopher Wrenn. Looking around, he saw monuments, but monuments to the folly and malice of social engineering and a government that had declared war on large segments of its own people. In his meticulously documented book, he proves that urban renewal had more to do with ethnicity than it ever had to do with design or hygiene or blight. Urban renewal was the last gasp attempt of the WASP ruling class to take control of a country that was slipping out of its grasp for demographic reasons. The largely Catholic ethnics were to be driven out of their neighborhoods into the suburbs, where they were to be “Americanized” according to WASP principles. The neighborhoods they left behind were to be turned over to the sharecroppers from the South or turned into futuristic Bauhaus enclaves for the new government elites. Using political tactics like eminent domain and “integration,” the planners made sure that the ethnic neighborhood got transformed into something more congenial to their dreams of social engineering than the actual communites of people they saw as a threat to their control.

The Slaughter of Cities proposes a new take on familiar territory, e.g., to give just one example, the civil rights movement. Does anyone, for example, really know why Martin Luther King abandoned his southern strategy and came to Chicago during the summer of 1966? Does anyone really know who brought him there? Does anyone know who told him which ethnic neighborhoods he would march through? Hint: it was a religious denomination usually associated with Philadelphia that had been at work trying to “integrate” Chicago's neighborhoods since 1951.

Jones concentrates on four cities – Boston, Philadelphia, Detroit, and Chicago – in a book whose conclusions will be shocking and controversial. The destruction of the ethnic neighborhoods that made up the human, residential heart of these cities was not an unfortunate by-product of a well-intentioned plan that somehow went awry; it was part of the plan itself.

[911]

(10-26-2018 09:52 PM)Sgt Donger Wrote:  

25% of American women have a mental illness...rubbish, it's a lot higher than 25%

Here's a quote from Psychology Today:

Quote:

One in three Americans struggles with a mental illness, but the rate is much higher in women.

The reasons cited for the mental illnesses include

Quote:

Discrimination, Trauma, and Stressful Life Experiences

and

Quote:

Hormonal Issues

So it's probably more likely that 50% of American women have mental health issues.

Of course the percentage is a lot higher than this, depending on the time of the month.